scholarly journals PEDIA: Prioritization of Exome Data by Image Analysis

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tzung-Chien Hsieh ◽  
Martin Atta Mensah ◽  
Jean Tori Pantel ◽  
Krawitz Peter ◽  
Dione Aguilar ◽  
...  

AbstractPhenotype information is crucial for the interpretation of genomic variants. So far it has only been accessible for bioinformatics workflows after encoding into clinical terms by expert dysmorphologists. Here, we introduce an approach, driven by artificial intelligence that uses portrait photographs for the interpretation of clinical exome data. We measured the value added by computer-assisted image analysis to the diagnostic yield on a cohort consisting of 679 individuals with 105 different monogenic disorders. For each case in the cohort we compiled frontal photos, clinical features and the disease-causing mutations and simulated multiple exomes of different ethnic backgrounds. With the additional use of similarity scores from computer-assisted analysis of frontal photos, we were able to achieve a top-10-accuracy rate for the disease-causing gene of 99 %. As this performance is significantly higher than without the information from facial pattern recognition, we make gestalt scores available for prioritization via an API.

2000 ◽  
Vol 192 (4) ◽  
pp. 545-548 ◽  
Author(s):  
Friedrich Jesenik ◽  
David R. Springall ◽  
Anthony E. Redington ◽  
Caroline J. Dor� ◽  
Don-Carlos Abrams ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 44 (3) ◽  
pp. 179-185 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Balercia ◽  
A. Sbarbati ◽  
F. Franceschini ◽  
A. Bravo-Cuellar ◽  
A. Osculati ◽  
...  

1985 ◽  
Vol 77 (3) ◽  
pp. 722-730 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mordecai J. Jaffe ◽  
Andrew H. Wakefield ◽  
Frank Telewski ◽  
Edward Gulley ◽  
Ronald Biro

LWT ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 67 ◽  
pp. 37-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Piotr Zapotoczny ◽  
Piotr M. Szczypiński ◽  
Tomasz Daszkiewicz

2001 ◽  
Vol 49 (10) ◽  
pp. 1285-1291 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert A. Underwood ◽  
Nicole S. Gibran ◽  
Lara A. Muffley ◽  
Marcia L. Usui ◽  
John E. Olerud

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) is a valuable tool for labeling structures in tissue samples. Quantification of immunolabeled structures using traditional approaches has proved to be difficult. Manual counts of IHC-stained structures are inherently biased, require multiple observers, and generate qualitative data. Stereological methods provide accurate quantification but are complex and labor-intensive when staining must be compared among large numbers of samples. In an effort to quickly, objectively, and reproducibly quantify cutaneous innervation in a large number of counterstained tissue sections, we developed a color subtractive–computer-assisted image analysis (CS–CAIA) system. To develop and test the CS–CAIA method, tissue sections of diabetic (db/db) mouse skin and their wild-type (db/–) littermates were stained by IHC for the neural marker PGP 9.5. The brown-red PGP 9.5 peroxidase stain was colorimetrically isolated through a scripted process of color background removal. The remaining stain was thresholded and binarized for computer determination of nerve profile counts (number of stained regions), area fraction (total area of nerve profiles per unit area of tissue), and area density (total number of nerve profiles per unit area of tissue). Using CS–CAIA, epidermal nerve profile counts, area fraction, and area density were significantly lower in db/db compared to db/– mice.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document