scholarly journals Evaluation of S1PR1/pSTAT3 and S1PR2/FOXP1 Expression in Aggressive, Mature B Cell Lymphomas

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mustafa Al-Kawaaz ◽  
Teresa Sanchez ◽  
Michael J Kluk

AbstractAggressive, mature B-cell lymphomas represent a heterogeneous group of diseases including Burkitt Lymphoma (BL), High Grade B Cell Lymphomas (HGBL) (eg, Double-Hit B cell lymphomas (HGBL-DH: HGBL with MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 translocations)), HGBL, Not Otherwise Specified (HGBL, NOS) and Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma. The overlapping morphologic and immunohistochemical features of these lymphomas may pose diagnostic challenges in some cases, and a better understanding of potential diagnostic biomarkers and possible therapeutic targets is needed. Sphingosine 1 Phosphate Receptors (S1PR1-5) represent a family of G-protein coupled receptors that bind the sphingolipid (S1P) and influence migration and survival pathways in a variety of cell types, including lymphocytes. S1PRs are emerging as biomarkers in B cell biology and interaction between S1PR pathways and STAT3 or FOXP1 has been reported, especially in DLBCL. Our aim was to extend the understanding of the S1PR1, STAT3 and S1PR2, FOXP1 expression beyond DLBCL, into additional aggressive, mature B cell lymphomas such as BL, HGBL-DH and HGBL,NOS.Herein, we report that S1PR1 and S1PR2 showed different patterns of expression in mantle zones and follicle centers in reactive lymphoid tissue and, among the lymphomas in this study, Burkitt lymphomas showed a unique pattern of expression compared to HGBL and DLBCL. Additionally, we found that S1PR1 and S1PR2 expression was typically mutually exclusive and were expressed in a low proportion of cases (predominantly HGBL involving extranodal sites). Lastly, FOXP1 was expressed in a high proportion of the various case types and pSTAT3 was detected in a significant proportion of HGBL and DLBCL cases. Taken together, these findings provide further evidence that S1PR1, pSTAT3, S1PR2 and FOXP1 play a role in a subset of aggressive mature B cell lymphomas.

2009 ◽  
Vol 133 (8) ◽  
pp. 1233-1237 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kirtee Raparia ◽  
Chung-Che(Jeff) Chang ◽  
Patricia Chévez-Barrios

AbstractContext.—Diagnosis and classification of primary intraocular lymphoma can be challenging because of the sparse cellularity of the vitreous specimens.Objective.—To classify and clinically correlate intraocular lymphoma according to the World Health Organization (WHO) classification by using vitrectomy specimens.Design.—Clinical history, cytologic preparations, flow cytometry reports, and outcome of 16 patients diagnosed with intraocular lymphoma were reviewed.Results.—The study group included 10 women and 6 men. The mean age of the patients was 63 years (range, 19–79 years). Eleven patients had central nervous system involvement and 6 patients had systemic involvement. All cases were adequately diagnosed and classified according to the WHO classification by using combination of cytologic preparations and 4-color flow cytometry with a limited panel of antibodies to CD19, CD20, CD5, CD10, and κ and λ light chains. The cases included 9 primary diffuse large B-cell lymphomas of the CNS type; 2 diffuse large B-cell lymphomas, not otherwise specified; 1 extranodal, low-grade, marginal zone lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT); 1 precursor B-lymphoblastic lymphoma; and 3 peripheral T-cell lymphomas, not otherwise specified. Of note, all 11 cases of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma were CD10−. All the patients received systemic chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Only 4 patients were free of disease at last follow-up (range, 18 months to 8 years), with severe visual loss.Conclusions.—Intraocular lymphoma cases can be adequately classified according to the WHO classification. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, CD10− and most likely of non–germinal center B-cell–like subgroup, is the most common subtype of non-Hodgkin lymphoma in this site, in contrast to ocular adnexal lymphoma for which MALT lymphoma is the most common subtype.


Hematology ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 (1) ◽  
pp. 90-99 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven H. Swerdlow

Abstract Identification of large B-cell lymphomas that are “extra-aggressive” and may require therapy other than that used for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified (DLBCL, NOS), is of great interest. Large B-cell lymphomas with MYC plus BCL2 and/or BCL6 rearrangements, so-called ‘double hit’ (DHL) or ‘triple hit’ (THL) lymphomas, are one such group of cases often recognized using cytogenetic FISH studies. Whether features such as morphologic classification, BCL2 expression, or type of MYC translocation partner may mitigate the very adverse prognosis of DHL/THL is controversial. Classification of the DHL/THL is also controversial, with most either dividing them up between the DLBCL, NOS and B-cell lymphoma, unclassifiable, with features intermediate between DLBCL and Burkitt lymphoma (BCLU) categories or classifying at least the majority as BCLU. The BCLU category itself has many features that overlap those of DHL/THL. Currently, there is growing interest in the use of MYC and other immunohistochemistry either to help screen for DHL/THL or to identify “double-expressor” (DE) large B-cell lymphomas, defined in most studies as having ≥40% MYC+ and ≥50%-70% BCL2+ cells. DE large B-cell lymphomas are generally aggressive, although not as aggressive as DHL/THL, are more common than DHL/THL, and are more likely to have a nongerminal center phenotype. Whether single MYC rearrangements or MYC expression alone is of clinical importance is controversial. The field of the DHL/THL and DE large B-cell lymphomas is becoming more complex, with many issues left to resolve; however, great interest remains in identifying these cases while more is learned about them.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (19) ◽  
pp. 8803
Author(s):  
Andrea Brody ◽  
Csaba Dobo-Nagy ◽  
Karoly Mensch ◽  
Zsuzsanna Oltyan ◽  
Judit Csomor ◽  
...  

High-grade B-cell lymphoma not otherwise specified is listed as a new group in the WHO 2017 statement as a subtype of aggressive, mature B-cell lymphomas with a poor prognosis. To our knowledge, no description of this genetic type of maxillary lymphoma has appeared in the literature until now; thus, our case provides valuable data on its symptoms, clinical behavior, response to treatment and survival rate. The present report describes the early diagnosis and treatment of an extremely rare histological subtype of B-cell lymphoma, a case of high-grade B-cell lymphoma not otherwise specified, localized in the maxillary sinus and mimicking signs and symptoms of periapical inflammation. After chemotherapy, the presented patient showed complete remission without relapse and systemic spread. As far as we know, this is the first reported case of this rare type of lymphoma associated with the maxillary sinus. Considering that high-grade B-cell lymphomas are aggressive tumors with rapid growth and poor prognosis, which are often misdiagnosed in the early stages as inflammatory disease, it is relevant to highlight the importance of a detailed evaluation of clinical signs and radiological findings during diagnosis, especially if they contradict each other.


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 2867-2867
Author(s):  
Christopher Melani ◽  
Rahul Lakhotia ◽  
Stefania Pittaluga ◽  
Milos D. Miljkovic ◽  
Jagan R. Muppidi ◽  
...  

Introduction: Aggressive B-cell lymphomas can be cured with chemo-immunotherapy; however, those who fail primary therapy and those with indolent lymphomas are rarely curable with such therapy. Novel targeted therapies can disrupt key survival pathways in lymphoma such as regulation of apoptosis (BCL2: venetoclax), B-cell receptor signaling (BTK: ibrutinib), and NFκB survival pathways (IRF4/SPIB: lenalidomide). These agents are active as monotherapy but fail to induce deep responses and require continuous therapy. Also, genetically defined subtypes of lymphoma that best respond to these targeted therapies are undefined. We hypothesized that combining agents that target unique survival pathways in a synergistic fashion will leverage efficacy and time-limited, cyclic dosing will limit toxicities. Methods: Relapsed/refractory B-cell lymphoma pts, excluding MCL and CLL/SLL, with adequate organ function were eligible. A 3+3 design was used to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of 4 dose-levels (DLs) of dose-escalated venetoclax (200 mg, 400 mg, 600 mg, and 800 mg) PO D2-14 (starts cycle 2 for DL1) in combination with fixed-dose ibrutinib 560 mg PO D1-14, prednisone 100 mg PO D1-7, obinutuzumab 1000 mg IV D1-2, and lenalidomide 15 mg PO D1-14. Aggressive and indolent expansion cohorts were included at the MTD. Maximum 6 cycles of ViPOR q21 days was given unless PD or unacceptable AE. TLS prophylaxis with IV fluids and allopurinol was given to all pts and VTE prophylaxis and G-CSF use was per investigator discretion. Pre-treatment biopsies were obtained and analyzed for whole-exome sequencing, RNA-sequencing, and copy-number alterations. Baseline CT, PET and BM was performed with CT scans after cycles 1, 2, 4, and 6 and PET after cycle 6 or at time of suspected CR. Results: 27 pts have been enrolled; 17 in the dose-escalation and 10 in the dose-expansion cohorts. Histologic subtypes include DLBCL (13), FL (8), HGBCL (4), and MZL (2). Median (range) age was 58 yrs (34-77) with stage III/IV disease in 23 (85%), elevated LDH in 20 (74%), and >2 EN sites in 15 (56%) pts. Median (range) of prior therapies was 3 (1-8) and 19 (70%) pts were refractory to last therapy. A single dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of G3 intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) occurred at DL1 with concomitant use of enoxaparin and ASA. No other DLTs occurred and venetoclax 800 mg was used in expansion. Heme AEs were most common with >G3 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia in 50%, 38%, and 15% of pts and 27%, 16%, and 3% of cycles, respectively. G-CSF was given in 85% of pts in 80% of cycles and no treatment-related febrile neutropenia occurred. Non-heme AEs were mainly G1-2 with rare G3 and no G4-5 events. G3 non-heme AEs included diarrhea (12%), hypophosphatemia and UTI (8% each), and hypokalemia, edema, fever, hypotension, increased AST/ALT/AlkP, a.fib, and ICH (4% each). Dose reductions and delays occurred in 11% and 37% of pts and 5% and 15% of cycles, respectively. Of 21 pts now off-therapy (14 completed 6C, 4 PD, 3 AE), 20 are evaluable for response with an ORR of 70% (14/20) and 40% (8/20) CR, which occurred across all DLs and NHL subtypes. In 26 evaluable pts overall (6 on active treatment), 85% (22/26) experienced tumor reduction (Fig.1A) with an ORR of 77% (20/26) and 38% (10/26) CR. ORR and CR rate was 69% (11/16) and 25% (4/16) in aggressive and 90% (9/10) and 60% (6/10) in indolent NHL subtypes, respectively. Median TTR and DOR was 1.35 m and not reached, respectively, with 17 (85%) of 20 responses on-going, from 0.16-15.9 m after date of first response (Fig.1B). XRT was given in 1 DLBCL pt with PR to ViPOR who achieved CR and another FL patient with PR and histologic transformation post-therapy as a bridge to CAR-T. One non-GCB DLBCL pt with concurrent sarcoidosis had residual uptake on post-treatment PET and was considered a PR but was MRD negative by ctDNA analysis. With a median potential f/u of 8.5 m, 6-mo PFS and OS was 77% and 87%, respectively. Conclusions: Combination targeted therapy with ViPOR is safe without TLS or unexpected toxicities observed. Heme AEs, mainly neutropenia, were most common and manageable with G-CSF and no neutropenic fever or severe infections occurred. Early signs of clinical activity, including CRs in refractory pts, are observed with ViPOR and further development plans include phase 1 testing in MCL and phase 2 testing in DLBCL and FL. Updated response durability and molecular correlates of response will be presented at the meeting. Disclosures Portell: AbbVie: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy; BeiGene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kite: Consultancy, Research Funding; Acerta/AstraZeneca: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Xencor: Research Funding; Roche/Genentech: Research Funding; Infinity: Research Funding. Staudt:Nanostring: Patents & Royalties. OffLabel Disclosure: venetoclax, ibrutinib, prednisone, obinutuzumab, and lenalidomide off-label use for relapsed/refractory B-cell lymphomas


2014 ◽  
Vol 38 (8) ◽  
pp. 1138-1146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shoko Nakayama ◽  
Taiji Yokote ◽  
Motomu Tsuji ◽  
Toshikazu Akioka ◽  
Takuji Miyoshi ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miguel A Galindo-Campos ◽  
Nura Lutfi ◽  
Sarah Bonnin ◽  
Carlos Martínez ◽  
Talia Velasco-Hernandez ◽  
...  

Dysregulation of the c-Myc oncogene occurs in a wide variety of haematologic malignancies and its overexpression has been linked with aggressive tumour progression. Here, we show that Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP)-1 and PARP-2 exert opposing influences on progression of c-Myc-driven B-cell lymphomas. PARP-1 and PARP-2 catalyse the synthesis and transfer of ADP-ribose units onto amino acid residues of acceptor proteins in response to DNA-strand breaks, playing a central role in the response to DNA damage. Accordingly, PARP inhibitors have emerged as promising new cancer therapeutics. However, the inhibitors currently available for clinical use are not able to discriminate between individual PARP proteins. We found that genetic deletion of PARP-2 prevents c-Myc-driven B-cell lymphomas, while PARP-1-deficiency accelerates lymphomagenesis in the Em-Myc mouse model of aggressive B-cell lymphoma. Loss of PARP-2 aggravates replication stress in pre-leukemic Em-Myc B cells resulting in accumulation of DNA damage and concomitant cell death that restricts the c-Myc-driven expansion of B cells, thereby providing protection against B-cell lymphoma. In contrast, PARP-1-deficiency induces a proinflammatory response, and an increase in regulatory T cells likely contributing to immune escape of B-cell lymphomas, resulting in an acceleration of lymphomagenesis. These findings pinpoint specific functions for PARP-1 and PARP-2 in c-Myc-driven lymphomagenesis with antagonistic consequences that may help inform the design of new PARP-centred therapeutic strategies with selective PARP-2 inhibition potentially representing a new therapeutic approach for the treatment of c-Myc-driven tumours.


Hematology ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 (1) ◽  
pp. 406-413 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle Fanale

AbstractNodular lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin lymphoma (NLPHL) is a unique diagnostic entity, with only ∼ 500 new cases in the United States per year with a similar infrequent incidence worldwide. NLPHL also has distinctive pathobiology and clinical characteristics compared with the more common classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL), including CD20 positivity of the pathognomic lymphocytic and histiocytic cells and an overall more indolent course with a higher likelihood of delayed relapses. Given the limited numbers of prospective NLPHL-focused trials, management algorithms historically have typically been centered on retrospective data with guidelines often adopted from cHL and indolent B-cell lymphoma treatment approaches. Key recent publications have delineated that NLPHL has a higher level of pathological overlap with cHL and the aggressive B-cell lymphomas than with indolent B-cell lymphomas. Over the past decade, there has been a series of NLPHL publications that evaluated the role of rituximab in the frontline and relapsed setting, described the relative incidence of transformation to aggressive B-cell lymphomas, weighed the benefit of addition of chemotherapy to radiation treatment for patients with early-stage disease, considered what should be the preferred chemotherapy regimen for advanced-stage disease, and even assessed the potential role of autologous stem cell transplantation for the management of relapsed disease. General themes within the consensus guidelines include the role for radiation treatment as a monotherapy for early-stage disease, the value of large B-cell lymphoma–directed regimens for transformed disease, the utility of rituximab for treatment of relapsed disease, and, in the pediatric setting, the role of surgical management alone for patients with early-stage disease.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document