scholarly journals Rapid embryonic cell cycles defer the establishment of heterochromatin by Eggless/SetDB1 inDrosophila

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles A. Seller ◽  
Chun-Yi Cho ◽  
Patrick H. O’Farrell
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Drosophila Melanogaster ◽  
Repetitive Dna ◽  
Constitutive Heterochromatin ◽  
Experimental Manipulation ◽  
Embryonic Cell ◽  
Chromatin Modifications ◽  
Cell Cycles ◽  
Heterochromatin Formation ◽  
Cycle Times

Acquisition of chromatin modifications during embryogenesis distinguishes different regions of an initially naïve genome. In many organisms, repetitive DNA is packaged into constitutive heterochromatin that is marked by di/tri methylation of histone H3K9 and the associated protein HP1a. These modifications enforce the unique epigenetic properties of heterochromatin. However, in the earlyDrosophila melanogasterembryo the heterochromatin lacks these modifications which only appear later when rapid embryonic cell cycles slow down at the Mid-Blastula Transition or MBT. Here we focus on the initial steps restoring heterochromatic modifications in the embryo. We describe the JabbaTrap, a technique for inactivating maternally provided proteins in embryos. Using the JabbaTrap we reveal a major requirement for the methyltransferase Eggless/SetDB1 in the establishment of heterochromatin. In contrast, other methyltransferases contribute minimally. Live-imaging reveals that endogenous Eggless gradually accumulates on chromatin in interphase, but then dissociates in mitosis and its accumulation must restart in the next cell cycle. Cell cycle slowing as the embryo approaches the MBT permits increasing accumulation and action of Eggless at its targets. Experimental manipulation of interphase duration shows that cell cycle speed regulates Eggless. We propose that developmental slowing of the cell cycle times embryonic heterochromatin formation.

Zygotic expression of the pebble locus is required for cytokinesis during the postblastoderm mitoses of Drosophila

Development ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 114 (1) ◽  
pp. 165-171 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Hime ◽  
R. Saint
Keyword(s):  
Drosophila Melanogaster ◽  
Developmental Regulation ◽  
Single Cells ◽  
Embryonic Cell ◽  
Cell Cycles ◽  
Drosophila Embryogenesis ◽  
Zygotic Transcription ◽  
Homozygous Mutant ◽  
Mitotic Figures

Mutations at the pebble locus of Drosophila melanogaster result in embryonic lethality. Examination of homozygous mutant embryos at the end of embryogenesis revealed the presence of fewer and larger cells which contained enlarged nuclei. Characterization of the embryonic cell cycles using DAPI, propidium iodide, anti-tubulin and anti-spectrin staining showed that the first thirteen rapid syncytial nuclear divisions proceeded normally in pebble mutant embryos. Following cellularization, the postblastoderm nuclear divisions occurred (mitoses 14, 15 and 16), but cytokinesis was never observed. Multinucleate cells and duplicate mitotic figures were seen within single cells at the time of the cycle 15 mitoses. We conclude that zygotic expression of the pebble gene is required for cytokinesis following cellularization during Drosophila embryogenesis. We postulate that developmental regulation of zygotic transcription of the pebble gene is a consequence of the transition from syncytial to cellular mitoses during cycle 14 of embryogenesis.

Cell cycle progression and cell division are sensitive to hypoxia in Drosophila melanogaster embryos

2001 ◽  
Vol 280 (5) ◽  
pp. R1555-R1563 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert M. Douglas ◽  
Tian Xu ◽  
Gabriel G. Haddad
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Drosophila Melanogaster ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Fluorescent Protein ◽  
Immunoblot Analysis ◽  
Embryonic Cell ◽  
Cell Cycle Checkpoints ◽  
Cycle Phase ◽  
Embryonic Cells

We and others recently demonstrated that Drosophila melanogaster embryos arrest development and embryonic cells cease dividing when they are deprived of O2. To further characterize the behavior of these embryos in response to O2 deprivation and to define the O2-sensitive checkpoints in the cell cycle, embryos undergoing nuclear cycles 3–13 were subjected to O2deprivation and examined by confocal microscopy under control, hypoxic, and reoxygenation conditions. In vivo, real-time analysis of embryos carrying green fluorescent protein-kinesin demonstrated that cells arrest at two major points of the cell cycle, either at the interphase (before DNA duplication) or at metaphase, depending on the cell cycle phase at which O2 deprivation was induced. Immunoblot analysis of embryos whose cell divisions are synchronized by inducible String (cdc25 homolog) demonstrated that cyclin B was degraded during low O2 conditions in interphase-arrested embryos but not in those arrested in metaphase. Embryos resumed cell cycle activity within ∼20 min of reoxygenation, with very little apparent change in cell cycle kinetics. We conclude that there are specific points during the embryonic cell cycle that are sensitive to the O2 level in D. melanogaster. Given the fact that O2deprivation also influences the growth and development of other species, we suggest that similar hypoxia-sensitive cell cycle checkpoints may also exist in mammalian cells.

scholarly journals Chromosome Association of Minichromosome Maintenance Proteins in Drosophila Mitotic Cycles

1997 ◽  
Vol 139 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tin Tin Su ◽  
Patrick H. O'Farrell
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cyclin E ◽  
Embryonic Cell ◽  
Cyclin B ◽  
Chromatin Interaction ◽  
G1 Phase ◽  
Minichromosome Maintenance ◽  
Cell Cycles ◽  
Mcm Proteins ◽  
Replication Factors

Minichromosome maintenance (MCM) proteins are essential DNA replication factors conserved among eukaryotes. MCMs cycle between chromatin bound and dissociated states during each cell cycle. Their absence on chromatin is thought to contribute to the inability of a G2 nucleus to replicate DNA. Passage through mitosis restores the ability of MCMs to bind chromatin and the ability to replicate DNA. In Drosophila early embryonic cell cycles, which lack a G1 phase, MCMs reassociate with condensed chromosomes toward the end of mitosis. To explore the coupling between mitosis and MCM–chromatin interaction, we tested whether this reassociation requires mitotic degradation of cyclins. Arrest of mitosis by induced expression of nondegradable forms of cyclins A and/or B showed that reassociation of MCMs to chromatin requires cyclin A destruction but not cyclin B destruction. In contrast to the earlier mitoses, mitosis 16 (M16) is followed by G1, and MCMs do not reassociate with chromatin at the end of M16. dacapo mutant embryos lack an inhibitor of cyclin E, do not enter G1 quiescence after M16, and show mitotic reassociation of MCM proteins. We propose that cyclin E, inhibited by Dacapo in M16, promotes chromosome binding of MCMs. We suggest that cyclins have both positive and negative roles in controlling MCM–chromatin association.

scholarly journals Excess histone H3 is a Chk1 inhibitor that controls embryonic cell cycle progression

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuki Shindo ◽  
Amanda A. Amodeo
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Histone H3 ◽  
Embryonic Cell ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Cell Cycles ◽  
Embryonic Cell Cycle

AbstractThe early embryos of many species undergo a switch from rapid, reductive cleavage divisions to slower, cell fate-specific division patterns at the Mid-Blastula Transition (MBT). The maternally loaded histone pool is used to measure the increasing ratio of nuclei to cytoplasm (N/C ratio) to control MBT onset, but the molecular mechanism of how histones regulate the cell cycle has remained elusive. Here, we show that excess histone H3 inhibits the DNA damage checkpoint kinase Chk1 to promote cell cycle progression in the Drosophila embryo. We find that excess H3-tail that cannot be incorporated into chromatin is sufficient to shorten the embryonic cell cycle and reduce the activity of Chk1 in vitro and in vivo. Removal of the Chk1 phosphosite in H3 abolishes its ability to regulate the cell cycle. Mathematical modeling quantitatively supports a mechanism where changes in H3 nuclear concentrations over the final cell cycles leading up to the MBT regulate Chk1-dependent cell cycle slowing. We provide a novel mechanism for Chk1 regulation by H3, which is crucial for proper cell cycle remodeling during early embryogenesis.

scholarly journals Aurora Kinase Inhibitor ZM447439 Blocks Chromosome-induced Spindle Assembly, the Completion of Chromosome Condensation, and the Establishment of the Spindle Integrity Checkpoint inXenopusEgg Extracts

2005 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 1305-1318 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bedrick B. Gadea ◽  
Joan V. Ruderman
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Mitotic Spindle ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Spindle Assembly ◽  
Aurora Kinase ◽  
Chromosome Morphology ◽  
Chromosome Condensation ◽  
Embryonic Cell ◽  
Cell Cycle Regulators ◽  
Cell Cycles

The Aurora family kinases contribute to accurate progression through several mitotic events. ZM447439 (“ZM”), the first Aurora family kinase inhibitor to be developed and characterized, was previously found to interfere with the mitotic spindle integrity checkpoint and chromosome segregation. Here, we have used extracts of Xenopus eggs, which normally proceed through the early embryonic cell cycles in the absence of functional checkpoints, to distinguish between ZM's effects on the basic cell cycle machinery and its effects on checkpoints. ZM clearly had no effect on either the kinetics or amplitude in the oscillations of activity of several key cell cycle regulators. It did, however, have striking effects on chromosome morphology. In the presence of ZM, chromosome condensation began on schedule but then failed to progress properly; instead, the chromosomes underwent premature decondensation during mid-mitosis. ZM strongly interfered with mitotic spindle assembly by inhibiting the formation of microtubules that are nucleated/stabilized by chromatin. By contrast, ZM had little effect on the assembly of microtubules by centrosomes at the spindle poles. Finally, under conditions where the spindle integrity checkpoint was experimentally induced, ZM blocked the establishment, but not the maintenance, of the checkpoint, at a point upstream of the checkpoint protein Mad2. These results show that Aurora kinase activity is required to ensure the maintenance of condensed chromosomes, the generation of chromosome-induced spindle microtubules, and activation of the spindle integrity checkpoint.

scholarly journals Cell cycle control during early embryogenesis

Development ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 148 (13) ◽  
Author(s):  
Susanna E. Brantley ◽  
Stefano Di Talia
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Quantitative Imaging ◽  
Cell Cycle Control ◽  
Embryonic Cell ◽  
Early Embryogenesis ◽  
Model Systems ◽  
Drosophila Embryo ◽  
Cell Cycles ◽  
Physical Mechanisms ◽  
Species Specific

ABSTRACT Understanding the mechanisms of embryonic cell cycles is a central goal of developmental biology, as the regulation of the cell cycle must be closely coordinated with other events during early embryogenesis. Quantitative imaging approaches have recently begun to reveal how the cell cycle oscillator is controlled in space and time, and how it is integrated with mechanical signals to drive morphogenesis. Here, we discuss how the Drosophila embryo has served as an excellent model for addressing the molecular and physical mechanisms of embryonic cell cycles, with comparisons to other model systems to highlight conserved and species-specific mechanisms. We describe how the rapid cleavage divisions characteristic of most metazoan embryos require chemical waves and cytoplasmic flows to coordinate morphogenesis across the large expanse of the embryo. We also outline how, in the late cleavage divisions, the cell cycle is inter-regulated with the activation of gene expression to ensure a reliable maternal-to-zygotic transition. Finally, we discuss how precise transcriptional regulation of the timing of mitosis ensures that tissue morphogenesis and cell proliferation are tightly controlled during gastrulation.

Analysis of the early embryonic cell cycles of Xenopus; regulation of cell cycle length by Xe-wee1 and Mos

Development ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 125 (2) ◽  
pp. 237-248 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.S. Murakami ◽  
G.F. Vande Woude
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Tyrosine Phosphorylation ◽  
Cycle Length ◽  
Calcium Ionophore ◽  
Embryonic Cell ◽  
Dominant Negative ◽  
Cell Cycles ◽  
Dominant Negative Form ◽  
Regulation Of Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Length

In Xenopus, cdc2 tyrosine phosphorylation is detected in the first 60–75 minute cell cycle but not in the next eleven cell cycles (cycles 2–12) which are only 30 minutes long. Here we report that the wee1/cdc25 ratio increases before the first mitotic interphase. We show that the Xe-wee1 protein is absent in stage VI oocytes and is expressed from meiosis II until gastrulation. A dominant negative form of Xe-wee1 (KM wee1) reduced the level cdc2 tyrosine phosphorylation and length of the first cycle. However, the ratio of wee1/cdc25 did not decrease after the first cycle and therefore did not explain the lack of cdc2 tyrosine phosphorylation in, nor the rapidity of, cycles 2–12. Furthermore, there was no evidence for a wee1/myt1 inhibitor in cycles 2–12. We examined the role of Mos in the first cycle because it is present during the first 20 minutes of this cycle. We arrested the rapid embryonic cell cycle (cycle 2 or 3) with Mos and restarted the cell cycle with calcium ionophore; the 30 minute cycle was converted into a 60 minute cycle, with cdc2 tyrosine phosphorylation. In addition, the injection of a non-degradable Mos (MBP-Mos) into the first cycle resulted in a dramatic elongation of this cycle (to 140 minutes). MBP-Mos did not delay DNA replication or the translation of cyclins A or B; it did, however, result in the marked accumulation of tyrosine phosphorylated cdc2. Thus, while the wee1/cdc25 ratio changes during development, these changes may not be responsible for the variety of cell cycles observed during early Xenopus embryogenesis. Our experiments indicate that Mos/MAPK can also contribute to cell cycle length.

scholarly journals Dissection of the XChk1 Signaling Pathway in Xenopus laevis Embryos

2000 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. 3101-3108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas C. Kappas ◽  
Pamela Savage ◽  
Katherine C. Chen ◽  
Allan T. Walls ◽  
Jill C. Sible
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Xenopus Laevis ◽  
Signaling Pathway ◽  
Embryonic Cell ◽  
Midblastula Transition ◽  
Cell Cycles ◽  
Cyclin Dependent Kinases ◽  
Xenopus Embryos ◽  
Egg Extracts ◽  
Sperm Nuclei

Checkpoint pathways inhibit cyclin-dependent kinases (Cdks) to arrest cell cycles when DNA is damaged or unreplicated. Early embryonic cell cycles of Xenopus laevis lack these checkpoints. Completion of 12 divisions marks the midblastula transition (MBT), when the cell cycle lengthens, acquiring gap phases and checkpoints of a somatic cell cycle. Although Xenopus embryos lack checkpoints prior to the MBT, checkpoints are observed in cell-free egg extracts supplemented with sperm nuclei. These checkpoints depend upon the Xenopus Chk1 (XChk1)-signaling pathway. To understand why Xenopus embryos lack checkpoints,xchk1 was cloned, and its expression was examined and manipulated in Xenopus embryos. Although XChk1 mRNA is degraded at the MBT, XChk1 protein persists throughout development, including pre-MBT cell cycles that lack checkpoints. However, when DNA replication is blocked, XChk1 is activated only after stage 7, two cell cycles prior to the MBT. Likewise, DNA damage activates XChk1 only after the MBT. Furthermore, overexpression of XChk1 inXenopus embryos creates a checkpoint in which cell division arrests, and both Cdc2 and Cdk2 are phosphorylated on tyrosine 15 and inhibited in catalytic activity. These data indicate that XChk1 signaling is intact but blocked upstream of XChk1 until the MBT.

scholarly journals Different cyclin types collaborate to reverse the S-phase checkpoint and permit prompt mitosis

2012 ◽  
Vol 198 (6) ◽  
pp. 973-980 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kai Yuan ◽  
Jeffrey A. Farrell ◽  
Patrick H. O’Farrell
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Embryonic Cell ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Midblastula Transition ◽  
Cell Cycles ◽  
Mitotic Entry ◽  
G2 Phase ◽  
Embryonic Morphogenesis ◽  
Do So ◽  
S Phase Checkpoint

Precise timing coordinates cell proliferation with embryonic morphogenesis. As Drosophila melanogaster embryos approach cell cycle 14 and the midblastula transition, rapid embryonic cell cycles slow because S phase lengthens, which delays mitosis via the S-phase checkpoint. We probed the contributions of each of the three mitotic cyclins to this timing of interphase duration. Each pairwise RNA interference knockdown of two cyclins lengthened interphase 13 by introducing a G2 phase of a distinct duration. In contrast, pairwise cyclin knockdowns failed to introduce a G2 in embryos that lacked an S-phase checkpoint. Thus, the single remaining cyclin is sufficient to induce early mitotic entry, but reversal of the S-phase checkpoint is compromised by pairwise cyclin knockdown. Manipulating cyclin levels revealed that the diversity of cyclin types rather than cyclin level influenced checkpoint reversal. We conclude that different cyclin types have distinct abilities to reverse the checkpoint but that they collaborate to do so rapidly.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document