scholarly journals Selective advantages favour high genomic AT-contents in intracellular elements

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne-Kathrin Dietel ◽  
Holger Merker ◽  
Martin Kaltenpoth ◽  
Christian Kost

AbstractExtrachromosomal genetic elements generally exhibit increased AT-contents relative to their hosts’ DNA. The AT-bias of endosymbiotic genomes is commonly explained by neutral evolutionary processes. Here we show experimentally that an increased AT-content of host-dependent elements can be selectively favoured on the host level. Manipulating the nucleotide composition of bacterial cells by introducing A+T-or G+C-rich plasmids, we demonstrate that cells containing GC-rich plasmids are less fit than cells containing AT-rich plasmids. Moreover, the cost of GC-rich elements could be compensated by providing G+C-, but not A+T-precursors, thus linking the observed fitness effects to the cytoplasmic availability of nucleotides. Our work identifies selection as a strong evolutionary force that drives the genomes of intracellular genetic elements toward higher A+T contents.Author SummaryGenomes of endosymbiotic bacteria are commonly more AT-rich than the ones of their free-living relatives. Interestingly, genomes of other intracellular elements like plasmids or bacteriophages also tend to be richer in AT than the genomes of their hosts. The AT-bias of endosymbiotic genomes is commonly explained by neutral evolutionary processes. However, since A+T nucleotides are both more abundant and energetically less expensive than G+C nucleotides, an alternative explanation is that selective advantages drive the nucleotide composition of intracellular elements. Here we provide strong experimental evidence that intracellular elements, whose genome is more AT-rich than the genome of the host, are selectively favored on the host level. Thus, our results emphasize the importance of selection for shaping the DNA base composition of extrachromosomal genetic elements.

1971 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 91-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. F. Gause ◽  
A. V. Laiko ◽  
M. V. Bibikova ◽  
L. I. Kusovkova ◽  
T. I. Selesneva ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 11 (04) ◽  
pp. 341-350 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. R. Forsdyke

Sometimes a cross between two individuals that appear to belong to the same species produces a sterile offspring (i.e., their hybrid is sterile). Thus, the two individuals appear reproductively isolated from each other. If each could find a compatible mate, then new species might emerge. At issue is whether the form of hybrid sterility that precedes sympatric differentiation into species is, in the general case, of genic or non-genic origin. Several recent papers lend the authority of William Bateson to the genic hypothesis, referring to the "Bateson–Dobzhansky–Muller hypothesis". All these papers cite a 1996 paper that, in turn, cites a 1909 paper of Bateson. However, from 1902 until 1926 the latter espoused a non-genic hypothesis that today would be classified as "chromosomal". Analysis of Bateson's 1909 text reveals no recantation. Bateson's non-genic view was similar to that advanced by Richard Goldschmidt in the 1940s. However, Bateson proposed a contribution from parents of abstract factors that, together in their hybrids, complement to bring about a negative effect (hybrid sterility). In contrast, Goldschmidt proposed that normally parents contribute complementary factors making parental chromosomes compatible at meiosis in their hybrids, which hence are fertile (i.e., the parental factors work together to produce a positive effect). When the factors are not sufficiently complementary the parental chromosomes are incompatible in their hybrids, which hence are sterile. The non-genic Batesonian–Goldschmidtian abstractions are now being fleshed-out chemically in terms of DNA base-composition differences.


1983 ◽  
Vol 18 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 131-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew David Collins ◽  
Sara Feresu ◽  
Dorothy Jones

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document