scholarly journals Identification of a simple and novel cut-point based CSF and MRI signature for predicting Alzheimer’s disease progression that reinforces the 2018 NIA-AA research framework

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Priya Devanarayan ◽  
Viswanath Devanarayan ◽  
Daniel A. Llano ◽  

AbstractThe 2018 NIA-AA research framework proposes a classification system with beta-Amyloid deposition, pathologic Tau, and neurodegeneration (ATN) for the diagnosis and staging of Alzheimer’s Disease (AD). Data from the ADNI (AD neuroimaging initiative) database can be utilized to identify diagnostic signatures for predicting AD progression, and to determine the utility of this NIA-AA research framework. Profiles of 320 peptides from baseline cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples of 287 normal, mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and AD subjects followed over a 3-10 year period were measured via multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mass spectrometry. CSF Aβ42, total-Tau (tTau), phosphorylated-Tau (pTau-181) and hippocampal volume were also measured. From these candidate markers, optimal diagnostic signatures with decision thresholds to separate AD and normal subjects were first identified via unbiased regression and tree-based algorithms. The best performing signature determined via cross-validation was then tested in an independent group of MCI subjects to predict future progression. This multivariate analysis yielded a simple diagnostic signature comprising CSF pTau-181 to Aβ42 ratio, MRI hippocampal volume and a novel PTPRN peptide, with a decision threshold on each marker. When applied to a separate MCI group at baseline, subjects meeting this signature criteria experience 4.3-fold faster progression to AD compared to a 2.2-fold faster progression using only conventional markers. This novel 4-marker signature represents an advance over the current diagnostics based on widely used marker, and is much easier to use in practice than recently published complex signatures. In addition, this signature reinforces the ATN construct from the 2018 NIA-AA research framework.DisclosuresViswanath Devanarayan is an employee of Charles River Laboratories, and as such owns equity in, receives salary and other compensation from Charles River Laboratories.Data collection and sharing for this project was funded by the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) (National Institutes of Health Grant U01 AG024904) and DOD ADNI (Department of Defense award number W81XWH-12-2-0012). ADNI is funded by the National Institute on Aging, the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, and through generous contributions from the following: AbbVie, Alzheimer’s Association; Alzheimer’s Drug Discovery Foundation; Araclon Biotech; BioClinica, Inc.;Biogen; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company; CereSpir, Inc.; Eisai Inc.; Elan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Eli Lilly and Company; EuroImmun; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd and its affiliated company Genentech, Inc.; Fujirebio; GE Healthcare; IXICO Ltd.; Janssen Alzheimer Immunotherapy Research & Development, LLC.; Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development LLC.; Lumosity; Lundbeck; Merck & Co., Inc.; Meso Scale Diagnostics, LLC.; NeuroRx Research; Neurotrack Technologies; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation; Pfizer Inc.; Piramal Imaging; Servier; Takeda Pharmaceutical Company; and Transition Therapeutics. The Canadian Institutes of Health Research is providing funds to support ADNI clinical sites in Canada. Private sector contributions are facilitated by the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (www.fnih.org). The grantee organization is the Northern California Institute for Research and Education, and the study is coordinated by the Alzheimer’s Disease Cooperative Study at the University of California, San Diego. ADNI data are disseminated by the Laboratory for Neuro Imaging at the University of Southern California.

2006 ◽  
Vol 14 (7S_Part_20) ◽  
pp. P1076-P1076
Author(s):  
Daniela J. Conrado ◽  
Timothy Nicholas ◽  
Jackson Burton ◽  
Stephen P. Arnerić ◽  
Danny Chen ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lana Fani ◽  
Marios K. Georgakis ◽  
M. Arfan Ikram ◽  
M. Kamran Ikram ◽  
Rainer Malik ◽  
...  

AbstractThe aim of this study was to explore the association between genetically predicted circulating levels of immunity and inflammation, and the risk of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and hippocampal volume, by conducting a two-sample Mendelian Randomization Study. We identified 12 markers of immune cells and derived ratios (platelet count, eosinophil count, neutrophil count, basophil count, monocyte count, lymphocyte count, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio, CD4 count, CD8 count, CD4-to-CD8 ratio, and CD56) and 5 signaling molecules (IL-6, fibrinogen, CRP, and Lp-PLA2 activity and mass) as primary exposures of interest. Other genetically available immune biomarkers with a weaker a priori link to AD were considered secondary exposures. Associations with AD were evaluated in The International Genomics of Alzheimer’s Project (IGAP) GWAS dataset (21,982 cases; 41,944 controls of European ancestry). For hippocampal volume, we extracted data from a GWAS meta-analysis on 33,536 participants of European ancestry. None of the primary or secondary exposures showed statistically significant associations with AD or with hippocampal volume following P-value correction for multiple comparisons using false discovery rate < 5% (Q-value < 0.05). CD4 count showed the strongest suggestive association with AD (odds ratio 1.32, P < 0.01, Q > 0.05). There was evidence for heterogeneity in the MR inverse variance-weighted meta-analyses as measured by Cochran Q, and weighted median and weighted mode for multiple exposures. Further cluster analyses did not reveal clusters of variants that could influence the risk factor in distinct ways. This study suggests that genetically predicted circulating biomarkers of immunity and inflammation are not associated with AD risk or hippocampal volume. Future studies should assess competing risk, explore in more depth the role of adaptive immunity in AD, in particular T cells and the CD4 subtype, and confirm these findings in other ethnicities.


2009 ◽  
Vol 16 (10) ◽  
pp. 1283-1286 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chi-Wei Huang ◽  
Chun-Chung Lui ◽  
Weng-Neng Chang ◽  
Cheng-Hsien Lu ◽  
Ya-Ling Wang ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 43 (03) ◽  
pp. 585-587
Author(s):  
Bradley C. Canon

Malcolm “Mac” Jewell was a mainstay of the Political Science Department at the University of Kentucky (UK) for 36 years. For that same period and even longer, he was one of the profession's leading researchers in explaining legislative behavior (particularly in the states) and how state political parties worked. Mac retired from UK in 1994 but continued being active in our profession. Around 2004, he began suffering from Alzheimer's disease. He died on February 24, 2010, in Fairfield, Connecticut.


1994 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
pp. S10
Author(s):  
C.E. Rosenberg ◽  
J. Lee ◽  
D. Rowland ◽  
P.J. Whitehouse

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel A. Llano ◽  
Susanna S. Kwok ◽  
Viswanath Devanarayan ◽  

Multiple epidemiological studies have revealed an association between presbycusis and Alzheimer’s Disease (AD). Unfortunately, the neurobiological underpinnings of this relationship are not clear. It is possible that the two disorders share a common, as yet unidentified, risk factor, or that hearing loss may independently accelerate AD pathology. Here, we examined the relationship between reported hearing loss and brain volumes in normal, mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and AD subjects using a publicly available database. We found that among subjects with AD, individuals that reported hearing loss had smaller brainstem and cerebellar volumes in both hemispheres than individuals without hearing loss. In addition, we found that these brain volumes diminish in size more rapidly among normal subjects with reported hearing loss and that there was a significant interaction between cognitive diagnosis and the relationship between reported hearing loss and these brain volumes. These data suggest that hearing loss is linked to brainstem and cerebellar pathology, but only in the context of the pathological state of AD. We hypothesize that the presence of AD-related pathology in both the brainstem and cerebellum creates vulnerabilities in these brain regions to auditory deafferentation-related atrophy. These data have implications for our understanding of the potential neural substrates for interactions between hearing loss and AD.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document