scholarly journals Division of labour between different PP2A-B56 complexes during mitosis

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giulia Vallardi ◽  
Lindsey A Allan ◽  
Lisa Crozier ◽  
Adrian T Saurin
Keyword(s):  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Critical Region ◽  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ◽  
Specific Interaction ◽  
Division Of Labour ◽  
Specific Interactions ◽  
Microtubule Attachment ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Terminal Loop ◽  
Selective Interactions

PP2A-B56 is a serine/threonine phosphatase complex that regulates several major mitotic processes, including sister chromatid cohesion, kinetochore-microtubule attachment and the spindle assembly checkpoint. We show here that these key functions are divided between B56 isoforms that localise differentially to either the centromere or kinetochore. The centromeric B56 isoforms rely on a specific interaction with Sgo2, whereas the kinetochore isoforms bind preferentially to BubR1 and other proteins containing an LxxIxE motif. In addition to these selective interactions, Sgo1 also contributes to both localisations by collaborating with BubR1 to maintain B56 isoforms at the kinetochore and helping to anchor the Sgo2/B56 complex at the centromere. A series of chimaeras were used to map the critical region in B56 to a small C-terminal loop that specifies which interactions are favoured and therefore defines where B56 isoforms localise during prometaphase. Together, this study describes how different PP2A-B56 complexes utilise isoform-specific interactions to control distinct processes during mitosis.

scholarly journals Division of labour between PP2A-B56 isoforms at the centromere and kinetochore

eLife ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giulia Vallardi ◽  
Lindsey A Allan ◽  
Lisa Crozier ◽  
Adrian T Saurin
Keyword(s):  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Critical Region ◽  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ◽  
Specific Interaction ◽  
Division Of Labour ◽  
Specific Interactions ◽  
Microtubule Attachment ◽  
Binding Partners ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Terminal Loop

PP2A-B56 is a serine/threonine phosphatase complex that regulates several major mitotic processes, including sister chromatid cohesion, kinetochore-microtubule attachment and the spindle assembly checkpoint. We show here that these key functions are divided between different B56 isoforms that localise to either the centromere or kinetochore. The centromeric isoforms rely on a specific interaction with Sgo2, whereas the kinetochore isoforms bind preferentially to BubR1 and other proteins containing an LxxIxE motif. In addition to these selective binding partners, Sgo1 helps to anchor PP2A-B56 at both locations: it collaborates with BubR1 to maintain B56 at the kinetochore and it helps to preserve the Sgo2/B56 complex at the centromere. A series of chimaeras were generated to map the critical region in B56 down to a small C-terminal loop that regulates the key interactions and defines B56 localisation. Together, this study describes how different PP2A-B56 complexes utilise isoform-specific interactions to control distinct processes during mitosis.

scholarly journals Absence of the Spindle Assembly Checkpoint restores mitotic fidelity upon loss of sister chromatid cohesion

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rui D. Silva ◽  
Mihailo Mirkovic ◽  
Leonardo G. Guilgur ◽  
Om S. Rathore ◽  
Rui Gonçalo Martinho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Survival ◽  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ◽  
Genome Shuffling ◽  
Spindle Assembly ◽  
Sister Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Abnormal Development ◽  
Wing Development ◽  
Cohesin Complex ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion

AbstractSister chromatid cohesion is essential for faithful mitosis, as premature cohesion loss leads to random chromosome segregation and aneuploidy, resulting in abnormal development. To identify specific conditions capable of restoring defects associated with cohesion loss, we screened for genes whose depletion modulates Drosophila wing development when sister chromatid cohesion is impaired. Cohesion deficiency was induced by knock-down of the acetyltransferase Separation anxiety (San)/Naa50, a cohesin complex stabilizer. Several genes whose function impacts wing development upon cohesion loss were identified. Surprisingly, knockdown of key Spindle Assembly Checkpoint (SAC) proteins, Mad2 and Mps1, suppressed developmental defects associated with San depletion. SAC impairment upon cohesin removal, triggered by San depletion or artificial removal of the cohesin complex, prevented extensive genome shuffling, reduced segregation defects and restored cell survival. This counterintuitive phenotypic suppression was caused by an intrinsic bias for efficient chromosome bi-orientation at mitotic entry, coupled with slow engagement of error-correction reactions. We conclude that mitotic timing determines the severity of defects associated with cohesion deficiency. Therefore, although divisions are still error-prone, SAC inactivation enhances cell survival and tissue homeostasis upon cohesion loss.

scholarly journals ConnectingGCN5’s centromeric SAGA to the mitotic tension-sensing checkpoint

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (18) ◽  
pp. 2201-2212 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily L. Petty ◽  
Masha Evpak ◽  
Lorraine Pillus
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ◽  
Binding Function ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Histone H3 Variant ◽  
Spindle Microtubules ◽  
Low Tension ◽  
Centromere Histone H3 ◽  
Segregation Of Chromosomes

Multiple interdependent mechanisms ensure faithful segregation of chromosomes during cell division. Among these, the spindle assembly checkpoint monitors attachment of spindle microtubules to the centromere of each chromosome, whereas the tension-sensing checkpoint monitors the opposing forces between sister chromatid centromeres for proper biorientation. We report here a new function for the deeply conserved Gcn5 acetyltransferase in the centromeric localization of Rts1, a key player in the tension-sensing checkpoint. Rts1 is a regulatory component of protein phopshatase 2A, a near universal phosphatase complex, which is recruited to centromeres by the Shugoshin (Sgo) checkpoint component under low-tension conditions to maintain sister chromatid cohesion. We report that loss of Gcn5 disrupts centromeric localization of Rts1. Increased RTS1 dosage robustly suppresses gcn5∆ cell cycle and chromosome segregation defects, including restoration of Rts1 to centromeres. Sgo1’s Rts1-binding function also plays a key role in RTS1 dosage suppression of gcn5∆ phenotypes. Notably, we have identified residues of the centromere histone H3 variant Cse4 that function in these chromosome segregation-related roles of RTS1. Together, these findings expand the understanding of the mechanistic roles of Gcn5 and Cse4 in chromosome segregation.

scholarly journals Saccharomyces cerevisiae CTF18 and CTF4 Are Required for Sister Chromatid Cohesion

2001 ◽  
Vol 21 (9) ◽  
pp. 3144-3158 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph S. Hanna ◽  
Evgueny S. Kroll ◽  
Victoria Lundblad ◽  
Forrest A. Spencer
Keyword(s):  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Replication Fork ◽  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Sister Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Nuclear Antigen ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Core Components ◽  
Proliferating Cell

ABSTRACT CTF4 and CTF18 are required for high-fidelity chromosome segregation. Both exhibit genetic and physical ties to replication fork constituents. We find that absence of eitherCTF4 or CTF18 causes sister chromatid cohesion failure and leads to a preanaphase accumulation of cells that depends on the spindle assembly checkpoint. The physical and genetic interactions between CTF4, CTF18, and core components of replication fork complexes observed in this study and others suggest that both gene products act in association with the replication fork to facilitate sister chromatid cohesion. We find that Ctf18p, anRFC1-like protein, directly interacts with Rfc2p, Rfc3p, Rfc4p, and Rfc5p. However, Ctf18p is not a component of biochemically purified proliferating cell nuclear antigen loading RF-C, suggesting the presence of a discrete complex containing Ctf18p, Rfc2p, Rfc3p, Rfc4p, and Rfc5p. Recent identification and characterization of the budding yeast polymerase κ, encoded by TRF4, strongly supports a hypothesis that the DNA replication machinery is required for proper sister chromatid cohesion. Analogous to the polymerase switching role of the bacterial and human RF-C complexes, we propose that budding yeast RF-CCTF18 may be involved in a polymerase switch event that facilities sister chromatid cohesion. The requirement for CTF4 and CTF18 in robust cohesion identifies novel roles for replication accessory proteins in this process.

scholarly journals Bub1 is essential for assembly of the functional inner centromere

2007 ◽  
Vol 176 (7) ◽  
pp. 919-928 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yekaterina Boyarchuk ◽  
Adrian Salic ◽  
Mary Dasso ◽  
Alexei Arnaoutov
Keyword(s):  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Kinase Activity ◽  
Centromeric Region ◽  
Protein Complexes ◽  
Multiple Points ◽  
Biochemical Pathways ◽  
Microtubule Attachment ◽  
Egg Extract ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Chromosomal Passenger

During mitosis, the inner centromeric region (ICR) recruits protein complexes that regulate sister chromatid cohesion, monitor tension, and modulate microtubule attachment. Biochemical pathways that govern formation of the inner centromere remain elusive. The kinetochore protein Bub1 was shown to promote assembly of the outer kinetochore components, such as BubR1 and CENP-F, on centromeres. Bub1 was also implicated in targeting of Shugoshin (Sgo) to the ICR. We show that Bub1 works as a master organizer of the ICR. Depletion of Bub1 from Xenopus laevis egg extract or from HeLa cells resulted in both destabilization and displacement of chromosomal passenger complex (CPC) from the ICR. Moreover, soluble Bub1 controls the binding of Sgo to chromatin, whereas the CPC restricts loading of Sgo specifically onto centromeres. We further provide evidence that Bub1 kinase activity is pivotal for recruitment of all of these components. Together, our findings demonstrate that Bub1 acts at multiple points to assure the correct kinetochore formation.

scholarly journals Spindle checkpoint–independent inhibition of mitotic chromosome segregation byDrosophilaMps1

2012 ◽  
Vol 23 (12) ◽  
pp. 2275-2291 ◽  
Author(s):  
Friederike Althoff ◽  
Roger E. Karess ◽  
Christian F. Lehner
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ◽  
Mitotic Chromosome ◽  
Independent Manner ◽  
Spindle Poles ◽  
Anaphase Onset ◽  
Chromosome Congression ◽  
Monopolar Spindle ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion

Monopolar spindle 1 (Mps1) is essential for the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC), which prevents anaphase onset in the presence of misaligned chromosomes. Moreover, Mps1 kinase contributes in a SAC-independent manner to the correction of erroneous initial attachments of chromosomes to the spindle. Our characterization of the Drosophila homologue reveals yet another SAC-independent role. As in yeast, modest overexpression of Drosophila Mps1 is sufficient to delay progression through mitosis during metaphase, even though chromosome congression and metaphase alignment do not appear to be affected. This delay in metaphase depends on the SAC component Mad2. Although Mps1 overexpression in mad2 mutants no longer causes a metaphase delay, it perturbs anaphase. Sister kinetochores barely move apart toward spindle poles. However, kinetochore movements can be restored experimentally by separase-independent resolution of sister chromatid cohesion. We propose therefore that Mps1 inhibits sister chromatid separation in a SAC-independent manner. Moreover, we report unexpected results concerning the requirement of Mps1 dimerization and kinase activity for its kinetochore localization in Drosophila. These findings further expand Mps1's significance for faithful mitotic chromosome segregation and emphasize the importance of its careful regulation.

scholarly journals Absence of the Spindle Assembly Checkpoint Restores Mitotic Fidelity upon Loss of Sister Chromatid Cohesion

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (17) ◽  
pp. 2837-2844.e3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rui D. Silva ◽  
Mihailo Mirkovic ◽  
Leonardo G. Guilgur ◽  
Om S. Rathore ◽  
Rui Gonçalo Martinho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ◽  
Spindle Assembly ◽  
Sister Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion

scholarly journals Securin and Separase Phosphorylation Act Redundantly to Maintain Sister Chromatid Cohesion in Mammalian Cells

2005 ◽  
Vol 16 (10) ◽  
pp. 4725-4732 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xingxu Huang ◽  
Rashieda Hatcher ◽  
J. Philippe York ◽  
Pumin Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Genome Stability ◽  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Embryonic Stem ◽  
Spindle Assembly ◽  
Sister Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Spindle Microtubules

The spindle assembly checkpoint monitors the integrity of the spindle microtubules, which attach to sister chromatids at kinetochores and play a vital role in preserving genome stability by preventing missegregation. A key target of the spindle assembly checkpoint is securin, the separase inhibitor. In budding yeast, loss of securin results in precocious sister chromatid separation when the microtubule spindle is disrupted. However, in contrast to budding yeast, mammalian securin is not required for spindle checkpoint, suggesting that there are redundant mechanisms controlling the dissolution of sister chromatid cohesion in the absence of securin. One candidate mechanism is the inhibitory phosphorylation of separase. We generated a nonphosphorylable point mutant (S1121A) separase allele in securin-/- mouse embryonic stem cells. Securin-/-separase+/S1121A cells are viable but fail to maintain sister chromatid cohesion in response to the disruption of spindle microtubules, show enhanced sensitivity to nocodazole, and cannot recover from prometaphase arrest.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document