scholarly journals HSP-4/BiP expression in secretory cells is regulated by a lineage-dependent differentiation program and not by the unfolded protein response

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ji Zha ◽  
Jasmine Alexander-Floyd ◽  
Tali Gidalevitz
Keyword(s):  
Unfolded Protein Response ◽  
Secretory Cells ◽  
C Elegans ◽  
Unfolded Protein ◽  
Daughter Cells ◽  
Developmental Program ◽  
The Unfolded Protein Response ◽  
Stress Dependent ◽  
Protein Response ◽  
Anticipatory Activation

AbstractDifferentiation of secretory cells leads to sharp increases in protein synthesis, challenging ER proteostasis. Anticipatory activation of the unfolded protein response (UPR) prepares cells for the onset of secretory function by expanding the ER size and folding capacity. How cells ensure that the repertoire of induced chaperones matches their post-differentiation folding needs is not well understood. We find that during differentiation of stem-like seam cells, a typical UPR target, the C. elegans BiP homologue HSP-4, is selectively induced in alae-secreting daughter cells, but is repressed in hypodermal daughter cells. Surprisingly, this lineage-dependent induction bypasses the requirement for UPR signaling, and instead is controlled by a specific developmental program. The repression of HSP-4 in hypodermal-fated cells requires a transcriptional regulator BLMP-1/BLIMP1, involved in differentiation of mammalian secretory cells. The HSP-4 induction is anticipatory, and is required for the integrity of secreted alae. Thus, differentiation programs can directly control a broad-specificity chaperone that is normally stress-dependent, to ensure the integrity of secreted proteins.

scholarly journals Stressed: The Unfolded Protein Response in T Cell Development, Activation, and Function

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (7) ◽  
pp. 1792 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyeorda Kemp ◽  
Cody Poe
Keyword(s):  
Endoplasmic Reticulum ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Unfolded Protein Response ◽  
T Cell Development ◽  
Cell Development ◽  
Secretory Cells ◽  
Unfolded Protein ◽  
The Unfolded Protein Response ◽  
And Function ◽  
Protein Response

The unfolded protein response (UPR) is a highly conserved pathway that allows cells to respond to stress in the endoplasmic reticulum caused by an accumulation of misfolded and unfolded protein. This is of great importance to secretory cells because, in order for proteins to traffic from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), they need to be folded appropriately. While a wealth of literature has implicated UPR in immune responses, less attention has been given to the role of UPR in T cell development and function. This review discusses the importance of UPR in T cell development, homeostasis, activation, and effector functions. We also speculate about how UPR may be manipulated in T cells to ameliorate pathologies.

ER stress and the unfolded protein response in intestinal inflammation

2010 ◽  
Vol 298 (6) ◽  
pp. G820-G832 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael A. McGuckin ◽  
Rajaraman D. Eri ◽  
Indrajit Das ◽  
Rohan Lourie ◽  
Timothy H. Florin
Keyword(s):  
Er Stress ◽  
Unfolded Protein Response ◽  
Protein Misfolding ◽  
Intestinal Inflammation ◽  
Secretory Cells ◽  
Unfolded Protein ◽  
Bowel Diseases ◽  
Stressed Cells ◽  
The Unfolded Protein Response ◽  
Protein Response

Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress is a phenomenon that occurs when excessive protein misfolding occurs during biosynthesis. ER stress triggers a series of signaling and transcriptional events known as the unfolded protein response (UPR). The UPR attempts to restore homeostasis in the ER but if unsuccessful can trigger apoptosis in the stressed cells and local inflammation. Intestinal secretory cells are susceptible to ER stress because they produce large amounts of complex proteins for secretion, most of which are involved in mucosal defense. This review focuses on ER stress in intestinal secretory cells and describes how increased protein misfolding could occur in these cells, the process of degradation of misfolded proteins, the major molecular elements of the UPR pathway, and links between the UPR and inflammation. Evidence is reviewed from mouse models and human inflammatory bowel diseases that ties ER stress and activation of the UPR with intestinal inflammation, and possible therapeutic approaches to ameliorate ER stress are discussed.

scholarly journals Hypoxia-induced SETX links replication stress with the unfolded protein response

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shaliny Ramachandran ◽  
Tiffany Ma ◽  
Natalie Ng ◽  
Iosifina P. Foskolou ◽  
Ming-Shih Hwang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Unfolded Protein Response ◽  
Cellular Response ◽  
Biological Response ◽  
Transcriptional Response ◽  
Replication Stress ◽  
Unfolded Protein ◽  
The Unfolded Protein Response ◽  
Stress Dependent ◽  
Protein Response

ABSTRACTThe levels of hypoxia associated with resistance to radiotherapy significantly impact cancer patient prognosis. These levels of hypoxia initiate a unique transcriptional response with the rapid activation of numerous transcription factors in a background of global repression of transcription. Here, we show that the biological response to radiobiological hypoxia includes the induction of the DNA/RNA helicase SETX. In the absence of hypoxia-induced SETX, R-loop levels increase, DNA damage accumulates, and DNA replication rates decrease. SETX plays a key role in protecting cells from DNA damage induced during transcription in hypoxia. Importantly, we show that the mechanism of SETX induction is reliant on the PERK/ATF4 arm of the unfolded protein response. These data not only highlight the unique cellular response to radiobiological hypoxia, which includes both a replication stress dependent DNA damage response and an unfolded protein response but uncover a novel link between these two distinct pathways.

scholarly journals Feedback Inhibition of the Unfolded Protein Response by GADD34-Mediated Dephosphorylation of eIF2α

2001 ◽  
Vol 153 (5) ◽  
pp. 1011-1022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabel Novoa ◽  
Huiqing Zeng ◽  
Heather P. Harding ◽  
David Ron
Keyword(s):  
Unfolded Protein Response ◽  
Feedback Inhibition ◽  
Translation Initiation Factor ◽  
Initiation Factor ◽  
Α Subunit ◽  
Unfolded Protein ◽  
New Genes ◽  
The Unfolded Protein Response ◽  
Stress Dependent ◽  
Protein Response

Phosphorylation of the α subunit of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 (eIF2α) on serine 51 integrates general translation repression with activation of stress-inducible genes such as ATF4, CHOP, and BiP in the unfolded protein response. We sought to identify new genes active in this phospho-eIF2α–dependent signaling pathway by screening a library of recombinant retroviruses for clones that inhibit the expression of a CHOP::GFP reporter. A retrovirus encoding the COOH terminus of growth arrest and DNA damage gene (GADD)34, also known as MYD116 (Fornace, A.J., D.W. Neibert, M.C. Hollander, J.D. Luethy, M. Papathanasiou, J. Fragoli, and N.J. Holbrook. 1989. Mol. Cell. Biol. 9:4196–4203; Lord K.A., B. Hoffman-Lieberman, and D.A. Lieberman. 1990. Nucleic Acid Res. 18:2823), was isolated and found to attenuate CHOP (also known as GADD153) activation by both protein malfolding in the endoplasmic reticulum, and amino acid deprivation. Despite normal activity of the cognate stress-inducible eIF2α kinases PERK (also known as PEK) and GCN2, phospho-eIF2α levels were markedly diminished in GADD34-overexpressing cells. GADD34 formed a complex with the catalytic subunit of protein phosphatase 1 (PP1c) that specifically promoted the dephosphorylation of eIF2α in vitro. Mutations that interfered with the interaction with PP1c prevented the dephosphorylation of eIF2α and blocked attenuation of CHOP by GADD34. Expression of GADD34 is stress dependent, and was absent in PERK−/− and GCN2−/− cells. These findings implicate GADD34-mediated dephosphorylation of eIF2α in a negative feedback loop that inhibits stress-induced gene expression, and that might promote recovery from translational inhibition in the unfolded protein response.

scholarly journals Complementary Signaling Pathways Regulate the Unfolded Protein Response and Are Required for C. elegans Development

Cell ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 107 (7) ◽  
pp. 893-903 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaohua Shen ◽  
Ronald E. Ellis ◽  
Kyungho Lee ◽  
Chuan-Yin Liu ◽  
Kun Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Unfolded Protein Response ◽  
Signaling Pathways ◽  
C Elegans ◽  
Unfolded Protein ◽  
The Unfolded Protein Response ◽  
Protein Response

scholarly journals Depletion of the C. elegans NAC Engages the Unfolded Protein Response, Resulting in Increased Chaperone Expression and Apoptosis

PLoS ONE ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 7 (9) ◽  
pp. e44038 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul T. Arsenovic ◽  
Anthony T. Maldonado ◽  
Vaughn D. Colleluori ◽  
Tim A. Bloss
Keyword(s):  
Unfolded Protein Response ◽  
C Elegans ◽  
Unfolded Protein ◽  
The Unfolded Protein Response ◽  
Protein Response

scholarly journals Heat Shock Protein 90 Modulates the Unfolded Protein Response by Stabilizing IRE1α

2002 ◽  
Vol 22 (24) ◽  
pp. 8506-8513 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monica G. Marcu ◽  
Melissa Doyle ◽  
Anne Bertolotti ◽  
David Ron ◽  
Linda Hendershot ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Er Stress ◽  
Unfolded Protein Response ◽  
Specific Inhibitor ◽  
Transcriptional Response ◽  
Heat Shock Protein 90 ◽  
Unfolded Protein ◽  
The Unfolded Protein Response ◽  
Stress Dependent ◽  
And Function ◽  
Protein Response

ABSTRACT The molecular chaperone HSP90 regulates stability and function of multiple protein kinases. The HSP90-binding drug geldanamycin interferes with this activity and promotes proteasome-dependent degradation of most HSP90 client proteins. Geldanamycin also binds to GRP94, the HSP90 paralog located in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). Because two of three ER stress sensors are transmembrane kinases, namely IRE1α and PERK, we investigated whether HSP90 is necessary for the stability and function of these proteins. We found that HSP90 associates with the cytoplasmic domains of both kinases. Both geldanamycin and the HSP90-specific inhibitor, 514, led to the dissociation of HSP90 from the kinases and a concomitant turnover of newly synthesized and existing pools of these proteins, demonstrating that the continued association of HSP90 with the kinases was required to maintain their stability. Further, the previously reported ability of geldanamycin to stimulate ER stress-dependent transcription apparently depends on its interaction with GRP94, not HSP90, since geldanamycin but not 514 led to up-regulation of BiP. However, this effect is eventually superseded by HSP90-dependent destabilization of unfolded protein response signaling. These data establish a role for HSP90 in the cellular transcriptional response to ER stress and demonstrate that chaperone systems on both sides of the ER membrane serve to integrate this signal transduction cascade.

Cellular Mechanisms of Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Signaling in Health and Disease. 3. Orchestrating the unfolded protein response in oncogenesis: an update

2014 ◽  
Vol 307 (10) ◽  
pp. C901-C907 ◽  
Author(s):  
Serge N. Manié ◽  
Justine Lebeau ◽  
Eric Chevet
Keyword(s):  
Endoplasmic Reticulum ◽  
Unfolded Protein Response ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Cellular Mechanisms ◽  
Unfolded Protein ◽  
Stress Sensors ◽  
Plasma Membrane Receptor ◽  
The Unfolded Protein Response ◽  
Stress Dependent ◽  
Protein Response

The endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-induced unfolded protein response (UPR) is an adaptive mechanism that is activated upon accumulation of misfolded proteins in the ER and aims at restoring ER homeostasis. In the past 10 years, the UPR has emerged as an important actor in the different phases of tumor growth. The UPR is transduced by three major ER resident stress sensors, which are protein kinase RNA-like ER kinase (PERK), activating transcription factor 6 (ATF6), and inositol-requiring enzyme-1 (IRE1). The signaling pathways elicited by those stress sensors have connections with metabolic pathways and with other plasma membrane receptor signaling networks. As such, the ER has an essential position as a signal integrator in the cell and is instrumental in the different phases of tumor progression. Herein, we describe and discuss the characteristics of an integrated signaling network that might condition the UPR biological outputs in a tissue- or stress-dependent manner. We discuss these issues in the context of the pathophysiological roles of UPR signaling in cancers.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document