scholarly journals Structure of a hibernating 100S ribosome reveals an inactive conformation of the ribosomal protein S1

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
ertrand Beckert ◽  
Martin Turk ◽  
Andreas Czech ◽  
Otto Berninghausen ◽  
Roland Beckmann ◽  
...  

To survive under conditions of stress, such as nutrient deprivation, bacterial 70S ribosomes dimerize to form hibernating 100S particles1. In γ-proteobacteria, such as Escherichia coli, 100S formation requires the ribosome modulation factor (RMF) and the hibernation promoting factor (HPF)2-4. Although structures of E. coli 100S particles have been reported5,6, the low resolution (18-38 Å) prevented the mechanism of ribosome inactivation and dimerization to be fully elucidated. Here we present single particle cryo-electron microscopy structures of hibernating 70S and 100S particles isolated from stationary phase E. coli cells at 3.0-7.9 Å resolution, respectively. Preferred orientation bias for the complete 100S particle was overcome using tilting during data collection. The structures reveal the binding sites for HPF and RMF as well as the unexpected presence of deacylated E-site tRNA and ribosomal protein S1 in the 100S particle. HPF interacts with the anticodon-stem-loop of the E-tRNA and occludes the binding site for the mRNA as well as A- and P-site tRNAs. RMF stabilizes a compact conformation of S1, which together sequester the anti-Shine-Dalgarno (SD) sequence of the 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA), thereby inhibiting translation initiation. At the dimerization interface, S1 and S2 form intersubunit bridges with S3 and S4 and the C-terminus of S2 probes the mRNA entrance channel of the symmetry related particle, thus suggesting that only translationally inactive ribosomes are prone to dimerization. The back-to-back 100S dimerization mediated by HPF and RMF is distinct from that observed previously in Gram-positive bacteria7-10 and reveals a unique function for S1 in ribosome dimerization and inactivation, rather than its canonical role in facilitating translation initiation.

PLoS Biology ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. e1001731 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mélodie Duval ◽  
Alexey Korepanov ◽  
Olivier Fuchsbauer ◽  
Pierre Fechter ◽  
Andrea Haller ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 116 (32) ◽  
pp. 15901-15906 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cédric Romilly ◽  
Sebastian Deindl ◽  
E. Gerhart H. Wagner

In bacteria, stable RNA structures that sequester ribosome-binding sites (RBS) impair translation initiation, and thus protein output. In some cases, ribosome standby can overcome inhibition by structure: 30S subunits bind sequence-nonspecifically to a single-stranded region and, on breathing of the inhibitory structure, relocate to the RBS for initiation. Standby can occur over long distances, as in the active, +42 tisB mRNA, encoding a toxin. This mRNA is translationally silenced by an antitoxin sRNA, IstR-1, that base pairs to the standby site. In tisB and other cases, a direct interaction between 30S subunits and a standby site has remained elusive. Based on fluorescence anisotropy experiments, ribosome toeprinting results, in vitro translation assays, and cross-linking–immunoprecipitation (CLIP) in vitro, carried out on standby-proficient and standby-deficient tisB mRNAs, we provide a thorough characterization of the tisB standby site. 30S subunits and ribosomal protein S1 alone display high-affinity binding to standby-competent fluorescein-labeled +42 mRNA, but not to mRNAs that lack functional standby sites. Ribosomal protein S1 is essential for standby, as 30∆S1 subunits do not support standby-dependent toeprints and TisB translation in vitro. S1 alone- and 30S-CLIP followed by RNA-seq mapping shows that the functional tisB standby site consists of the expected single-stranded region, but surprisingly, also a 5′-end stem-loop structure. Removal of the latter by 5′-truncations, or disruption of the stem, abolishes 30S binding and standby activity. Based on the CLIP-read mapping, the long-distance standby effect in +42 tisB mRNA (∼100 nt) is tentatively explained by S1-dependent directional unfolding toward the downstream RBS.


1979 ◽  
Vol 86 (6) ◽  
pp. 1739-1745 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takashi YOKOTA ◽  
Ken-ichi ARAI ◽  
Yoshito KAZIRO

1979 ◽  
Vol 86 (6) ◽  
pp. 1725-1737 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takashi YOKOTA ◽  
Ken-ichi ARAI ◽  
Yoshito KAZIRO

FEBS Letters ◽  
1974 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 323-326 ◽  
Author(s):  
P.H. Van Knippenberg ◽  
P.J.J. Hooykaas ◽  
J. Van Duin

2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 107-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre Giraud ◽  
Jean-Bernard Créchet ◽  
Marc Uzan ◽  
François Bontems ◽  
Christina Sizun

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nusrat Shahin Qureshi ◽  
Jasleen Kaur Bains ◽  
Sridhar Sreeramulu ◽  
Harald Schwalbe ◽  
Boris Fürtig

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document