scholarly journals How symbiosis and ecological context influence the variable expression of transgenerational wing induction upon fungal infection of aphids

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wen-Hao Tan ◽  
Miguel L. Reyes ◽  
Kim L. Hoang ◽  
Tarik Acevedo ◽  
Fredrick Leon ◽  
...  

AbstractAphids, like most animals, mount a diverse set of defenses against pathogens. For aphids, two of the best studied defenses are symbiont-conferred protection and transgenerational wing induction. Aphids can harbor bacterial symbionts that provide protection against pathogens, parasitoids and predators, as well as against other environmental stressors. In response to signals of danger, aphids also protect not themselves but their offspring by producing more winged than unwinged offspring as a way to ensure that their progeny may be able to escape deteriorating conditions. Such transgenerational wing induction has been studied most commonly as a response to overcrowding of host plants and presence of predators, but recent evidence suggests that pea aphids (Acyrthosiphon pisum) may also begin to produce a greater proportion of winged offspring when infected with fungal pathogens. Here, we explore this phenomenon further by asking how protective symbionts, pathogen dosage and environmental conditions influence this response. Overall, while we find some evidence that protective symbionts can modulate transgenerational wing induction in response to fungal pathogens, we observe that transgenerational wing induction in response to fungal infection is highly variable. That variability cannot be explained entirely by symbiont association, by pathogen load or by environmental stress, leaving the possibility that a complex interplay of genotypic and environmental factors may together influence this trait.

Insects ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 161 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ning Lv ◽  
Lei Wang ◽  
Wen Sang ◽  
Chang-Zhong Liu ◽  
Bao-Li Qiu

Pea aphid (Acyrthosiphon pisum) is a worldwide pest that feeds exclusively on the phloem sap of numerous host plants. It harbours a well-known primary endosymbiont Buchnera aphidicola that helps to overcome the nutritional deficiency of a plant-based diet. However, how the Buchnera contributes to the nutritional and energy metabolism of its aphid host is unclear to date. In the current study, the function of Buchnera in relation to nutritional synthesis of pea aphid was investigated by disrupting the primary endosymbiont with an antibiotic rifampicin. Our findings revealed that the disruption of Buchnera led to infertility and higher loss in body mass of aphid hosts. Body length and width were also decreased significantly compared to healthy aphids. The detection of nutrition indicated that the quantity of proteins, soluble sugars, and glycogen in aposymbiotic pea aphids increased slowly with the growth of the aphid host. In comparison, the quantities of all the nutritional factors were significantly lower than those of symbiotic pea aphids, while the quantity of total lipid and neutral fat in aposymbiotic pea aphids were distinctly higher than those of symbiotic ones. Thus, we concluded that the significant reduction of the total amount of proteins, soluble sugars, and glycogen and the significant increase of neutral fats in aposymbiotic pea aphids were due to the disruption of Buchnera, which confirmed that the function of Buchnera is irreplaceable in the pea aphid.


Insects ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. 614
Author(s):  
Martin John Martin ◽  
Yueming Li ◽  
Li Ma ◽  
Yi Feng ◽  
Zhiqiang Lu

Non-immunological responses are important alternative strategies for animals to deal with pathogens. It has long been recognized that fecundity compensation and production of winged offspring are two common non-immunological responses used by aphids when confronted with predators or pathogens. However, the effects of host plant on these responses have received little attention. This study investigated the effects of host plant on non-immunological defense in the pea aphids, Acyrthosiphon pisum, after bacterial and fungal infections. The aphids were raised in two groups, with one group being raised on broad beans and the other group being raised on alfalfa. The secondary symbiont background was examined, and the aphids were then infected with bacteria and fungus to assess fecundity and winged offspring production. We found that aphids that had been fed alfalfa had fewer offspring than those fed broad beans. Alfalfa-fed aphids produced more winged offspring in response to S. aureus and B. bassiana infections. Our findings suggest that the host plant plays a key role in fecundity and winged offspring production in pea aphid colony.


2015 ◽  
Vol 282 (1811) ◽  
pp. 20150977 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ailsa H. C. McLean ◽  
H. Charles J. Godfray

Many insects harbour facultative symbiotic bacteria, some of which have been shown to provide resistance against natural enemies. One of the best-known protective symbionts is Hamiltonella defensa , which in pea aphid ( Acyrthosiphon pisum ) confers resistance against attack by parasitoid wasps in the genus Aphidius (Braconidae). We asked (i) whether this symbiont also confers protection against a phylogenetically distant group of parasitoids (Aphelinidae) and (ii) whether there are consistent differences in the effects of bacteria found in pea aphid biotypes adapted to different host plants. We found that some H. defensa strains do provide protection against an aphelinid parasitoid Aphelinus abdominalis. Hamiltonella defensa from the Lotus biotype provided high resistance to A. abdominalis and moderate to low resistance to Aphidius ervi , while the reverse was seen from Medicago biotype isolates. Aphids from Ononis showed no evidence of symbiont-mediated protection against either wasp species and were relatively vulnerable to both. Our results may reflect the different selection pressures exerted by the parasitoid community on aphids feeding on different host plants, and could help explain the maintenance of genetic diversity in bacterial symbionts.


2013 ◽  
Vol 103 (5) ◽  
pp. 578-583 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adalbert Balog

AbstractThe interplay between the host plant of an insect herbivore and an insect predator (here two-spot ladybird beetles; Adalia bipunctata (L).; Coleoptera: Coccinellidae), feeding upon such a herbivore was examined in the laboratory as factors possibly determining the differential abundance and success of green and red host races of pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum Harris. The experiment comprised three treatments: two host plants (bean and clover), two treatment levels (control and predation) and three colour morph levels (green alone, red alone and green and red in mixture). Green morphs had higher fitness on the general host plant, bean Vicia faba, than on the derived host, clover (Trifolium pratense), in the absence of predation. Although green morph fitness was reduced by predation when infesting bean together with reds, there was no observable net fitness loss due to predation on clover in mixed colonies with red morphs. Red morphs exhibited fitness loss alone on both bean and clover, while clover plants seemingly prevented fitness loss in the presence of predation when red morphs were mixed with green ones. According to this scenario, when colour morphs existed as a mixed colony, the net fitness of either pea aphid morph was not influenced by predation on clover. Predators had significant effects only on red morphs on broad bean either when alone or were mixed together with green morphs. Thus, only red morphs experienced the benefits of switching from the general to the derived host red clover in the presence of predation. For green morphs, there was no apparent cost of switching host plants when they faced predation. Hence, the co-existence of green-red colour polymorphism of pea aphids on single host plants appears to be maintained by the morph gaining fitness on the derived host due to a host plant– and predation–reduction effect. These findings have important implications for understanding the ecology and evolution of host switching by different colour-plant host adapted races of pea aphids.


2010 ◽  
Vol 278 (1706) ◽  
pp. 760-766 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. H. C. McLean ◽  
M. van Asch ◽  
J. Ferrari ◽  
H. C. J. Godfray

Aphids possess several facultative bacterial symbionts that have important effects on their hosts' biology. These have been most closely studied in the pea aphid ( Acyrthosiphon pisum ), a species that feeds on multiple host plants. Whether secondary symbionts influence host plant utilization is unclear. We report the fitness consequences of introducing different strains of the symbiont Hamiltonella defensa into three aphid clones collected on Lathyrus pratensis that naturally lack symbionts, and of removing symbionts from 20 natural aphid–bacterial associations. Infection decreased fitness on Lathyrus but not on Vicia faba , a plant on which most pea aphids readily feed. This may explain the unusually low prevalence of symbionts in aphids collected on Lathyrus . There was no effect of presence of symbiont on performance of the aphids on the host plants of the clones from which the H. defensa strains were isolated. Removing the symbiont from natural aphid–bacterial associations led to an average approximate 20 per cent reduction in fecundity, both on the natural host plant and on V. faba , suggesting general rather than plant-species-specific effects of the symbiont. Throughout, we find significant genetic variation among aphid clones. The results provide no evidence that secondary symbionts have a major direct role in facilitating aphid utilization of particular host plant species.


2013 ◽  
Vol 79 (7) ◽  
pp. 2455-2458 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin J. Parker ◽  
Chelsea J. Spragg ◽  
Boran Altincicek ◽  
Nicole M. Gerardo

ABSTRACTHere we show that a bacterial endosymbiont,Regiella insecticola, protects pea aphids (Acyrthosiphon pisum) from the aphid-specific fungal entomopathogenZoophthora occidentalisbut not from the generalist insect fungal pathogenBeauveria bassiana. This finding highlights the complex influence of fungi on the dynamics of this economically important agricultural pest.


2019 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marisa Skaljac ◽  
Heiko Vogel ◽  
Natalie Wielsch ◽  
Sanja Mihajlovic ◽  
Andreas Vilcinskas

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S2-S2
Author(s):  
Sindhu Mohandas ◽  
Kanokporn Mongkolrattanothai ◽  
Leslie Stach ◽  
Regina Orbach ◽  
Michael Neely

Abstract Background Isavuconazole (ISZ), dosed as the pre-drug isavuconazonium (ISM), is active against a wide variety of clinically important fungal pathogens. ISM is approved for the treatment of invasive aspergillosis and mucormycosis in adults ≥18 years of age. We present our experience with ISM to treat proven or probable fungal infection in immunocompromised pediatric patients. Methods Retrospective review of patients who received ISM at our institution between April 2016 and April 2019, we abstracted demographic information, primary diagnosis, indication for ISM therapy, ISZ serum concentrations if available, and outcomes. Results Of 14 patients who received ISM, 11 were ≤18 years of age (range 6–18 years). Underlying conditions included leukemia (n = 7), lymphoma (n = 1), post BMT (n = 1), diabetes (n = 1), and cardiac transplant (n = 1). Nine (82%) had proven invasive fungal infection (IFI) with aspergillosis (n = 2), zygomycosis (n = 3), mixed aspergillosis and zygomycosis (n = 2), mixed Rhizopus and Scedosporium (n = 1), and pathology only (n = 1) and 2 had probable IFI. Five of these 11 patients received combination ISM and liposomal amphotericin initially and the other 6 received liposomal amphotericin with or without other azoles prior to changing to ISM monotherapy. This was followed by monotherapy with ISM in 10 patients after a mean of 26 days (range 6–63) and continued dual therapy in the one. ISM dosing was 10 mg/kg q8h on days 1 and 2, followed by q24 thereafter, up to a maximum of 372 mg/dose. There were 19 measured ISZ serum concentrations obtained from 8 patients after >1 week of verified inpatient dosing, ranging from 1.0 to 7.5 mg/L, above the MIC in all cases when known. Three (27%) patients died of underlying non-mycological causes, 1 (9%) died of progressive scedosporiosis, and 7 (64%) improved. ISM was well tolerated with no dose-limiting, drug-related toxicities noted. Conclusions ISM is a well-tolerated therapeutic option in pediatric patients at risk for or with invasive mycosis. Only 1 of our 11 patients died from progressive fungal disease.


2017 ◽  
Vol 83 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew R. Doremus ◽  
Kerry M. Oliver

ABSTRACT Insects and other animals commonly form symbioses with heritable bacteria, which can exert large influences on host biology and ecology. The pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum, is a model for studying effects of infection with heritable facultative symbionts (HFS), and each of its seven common HFS species has been reported to provide resistance to biotic or abiotic stresses. However, one common HFS, called X-type, rarely occurs as a single infection in field populations and instead typically superinfects individual aphids with Hamiltonella defensa, another HFS that protects aphids against attack by parasitic wasps. Using experimental aphid lines comprised of all possible infection combinations in a uniform aphid genotype, we investigated whether the most common strain of X-type provides any of the established benefits associated with aphid HFS as a single infection or superinfection with H. defensa. We found that X-type does not confer protection to any tested threats, including parasitoid wasps, fungal pathogens, or thermal stress. Instead, component fitness assays identified large costs associated with X-type infection, costs which were ameliorated in superinfected aphids. Together these findings suggest that X-type exploits the aphid/H. defensa mutualism and is maintained primarily as a superinfection by “hitchhiking” via the mutualistic benefits provided by another HFS. Exploitative symbionts potentially restrict the functions and distributions of mutualistic symbioses with effects that extend to other community members. IMPORTANCE Maternally transmitted bacterial symbionts are widespread and can have major impacts on the biology of arthropods, including insects of medical and agricultural importance. Given that host fitness and symbiont fitness are tightly linked, inherited symbionts can spread within host populations by providing beneficial services. Many insects, however, are frequently infected with multiple heritable symbiont species, providing potential alternative routes of symbiont maintenance. Here we show that a common pea aphid symbiont called X-type likely employs an exploitative strategy of hitchhiking off the benefits of a protective symbiont, Hamiltonella. Infection with X-type provides none of the benefits conferred by other aphid symbionts and instead results in large fitness costs, costs lessened by superinfection with Hamiltonella. These findings are corroborated by natural infections in field populations, where X-type is mostly found superinfecting aphids with Hamiltonella. Exploitative symbionts may be common in hosts with communities of heritable symbionts and serve to hasten the breakdown of mutualisms.


Author(s):  

Abstract A new distribution map is provided for Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris) (Macrosiphum pisum(Harris), M. onobrychis(Boy.)) (Hemipt., Aphididae) (Pea Aphis). Host Plants: Pea, beans and other legumes. A vector of virus diseases. Information is given on the geographical distribution in EUROPE (excl. USSR), Albania, Austria, Belgium, Britain, Bulgaria, Czechoslovakia, Denmark, Faeroe Islands, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Sardinia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Yugoslavia, ASIA (excl. USSR), Afghanistan, China, Cyprus, India, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Jammu, Japan, Jordan, Lebanon, Nepal, Pakistan, Philippines, Saudi Arabia, Sikkim, Syria, Turkey, Yemen Arab, Republic, USSR, AFRICA, Algeria, Egypt, Ethiopia, Kenya, Libya, Madeira, Malawi, Morocco, South Africa, Sudan, Tanzania, Uganda, Zambia, Zimbabwe, AUSTRALASIA and PACIFIC ISLANDS, Australia, Hawaii, New Zealand, NORTH AMERICA, Canada, Mexico, USA, SOUTH AMERICA, Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Peru, Uruguay, Venezuela.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document