scholarly journals Meiotic Double-Strand Break Proteins Influence Repair Pathway Utilization

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judith L. Yanowitz ◽  
Nicolas Macaisne ◽  
Zebulin Kessler
Keyword(s):  
Strand Break ◽  
Strand Exchange ◽  
Repair Pathway ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
C Elegans ◽  
Daughter Cells ◽  
Single Strand Annealing ◽  
Chromosome Fusions ◽  
Strand Annealing

Double-strand breaks (DSBs) are among the most deleterious lesions DNA can endure. Yet, DSBs are programmed at the onset of meiosis and are required to facilitate appropriate reduction of ploidy in daughter cells. Repair of these break is tightly controlled to favor homologous recombination (HR), the only repair pathway that can form crossovers. However, little is known about how the activities of alternative repair pathways are regulated at these stages. We discovered an unexpected synthetic interaction between the DSB machinery and strand-exchange proteins. Depleting theC. elegansDSB-promoting factors HIM-5 and DSB-2 suppresses the formation of chromosome fusions that arise in the absence of RAD-51 or other strand-exchange mediators. Our investigations reveal that non-homologous and theta-mediated end joining (c-NHEJ and TMEJ, respectively) and single strand annealing (SSA) function redundantly to repair DSBs when HR is compromised and that HIM-5 influences the utilization of TMEJ and SSA.

scholarly journals Helicase Q promotes homology-driven DNA double-strand break repair and prevents tandem duplications

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
J. A. Kamp ◽  
B. B. L. G. Lemmens ◽  
R. J. Romeijn ◽  
S. C. Changoer ◽  
R. van Schendel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Genome Instability ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Cellular Survival ◽  
C Elegans ◽  
Single Strand Annealing ◽  
Break Repair ◽  
Strand Annealing ◽  
Tandem Duplications

AbstractDNA double-strand breaks are a major threat to cellular survival and genetic integrity. In addition to high fidelity repair, three intrinsically mutagenic DNA break repair routes have been described, i.e. single-strand annealing (SSA), polymerase theta-mediated end-joining (TMEJ) and residual ill-defined microhomology-mediated end-joining (MMEJ) activity. Here, we identify C. elegans Helicase Q (HELQ-1) as being essential for MMEJ as well as for SSA. We also find HELQ-1 to be crucial for the synthesis-dependent strand annealing (SDSA) mode of homologous recombination (HR). Loss of HELQ-1 leads to increased genome instability: patchwork insertions arise at deletion junctions due to abortive rounds of polymerase theta activity, and tandem duplications spontaneously accumulate in genomes of helq-1 mutant animals as a result of TMEJ of abrogated HR intermediates. Our work thus implicates HELQ activity for all DSB repair modes guided by complementary base pairs and provides mechanistic insight into mutational signatures common in HR-defective cancers.

scholarly journals Rejoining of DNA Double-Strand Breaks as a Function of Overhang Length

2005 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 896-906 ◽  
Author(s):  
James M. Daley ◽  
Thomas E. Wilson
Keyword(s):  
Gc Content ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Nonhomologous End Joining ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Single Strand Annealing ◽  
Primary Determinant ◽  
Overhang Length ◽  
Strand Annealing

ABSTRACT The ends of spontaneously occurring double-strand breaks (DSBs) may contain various lengths of single-stranded DNA, blocking lesions, and gaps and flaps generated by end annealing. To investigate the processing of such structures, we developed an assay in which annealed oligonucleotides are ligated onto the ends of a linearized plasmid which is then transformed into Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Reconstitution of a marker occurs only when the oligonucleotides are incorporated and repair is in frame, permitting rapid analysis of complex DSB ends. Here, we created DSBs with compatible overhangs of various lengths and asked which pathways are required for their precise repair. Three mechanisms of rejoining were observed, regardless of overhang polarity: nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ), a Rad52-dependent single-strand annealing-like pathway, and a third mechanism independent of the first two mechanisms. DSBs with overhangs of less than 4 bases were mainly repaired by NHEJ. Repair became less dependent on NHEJ when the overhangs were longer or had a higher GC content. Repair of overhangs greater than 8 nucleotides was as much as 150-fold more efficient, impaired 10-fold by rad52 mutation, and highly accurate. Reducing the microhomology extent between long overhangs reduced their repair dramatically, to less than NHEJ of comparable short overhangs. These data support a model in which annealing energy is a primary determinant of the rejoining efficiency and mechanism.

scholarly journals RecF and RecR Play Critical Roles in the Homologous Recombination and Single-Strand Annealing Pathways of Mycobacteria

2015 ◽  
Vol 197 (19) ◽  
pp. 3121-3132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richa Gupta ◽  
Stewart Shuman ◽  
Michael S. Glickman
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Single Strand ◽  
Central Position ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Dna Double Strand Break ◽  
Single Strand Annealing ◽  
Strand Annealing

ABSTRACTMycobacteria encode three DNA double-strand break repair pathways: (i) RecA-dependent homologous recombination (HR), (ii) Ku-dependent nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ), and (iii) RecBCD-dependent single-strand annealing (SSA). Mycobacterial HR has two presynaptic pathway options that rely on the helicase-nuclease AdnAB and the strand annealing protein RecO, respectively. Ablation ofadnABorrecOindividually causes partial impairment of HR, but loss ofadnABandrecOin combination abolishes HR. RecO, which can accelerate annealing of single-stranded DNAin vitro, also participates in the SSA pathway. The functions of RecF and RecR, which, in other model bacteria, function in concert with RecO as mediators of RecA loading, have not been examined in mycobacteria. Here, we present a genetic analysis ofrecFandrecRin mycobacterial recombination. We find that RecF, like RecO, participates in the AdnAB-independent arm of the HR pathway and in SSA. In contrast, RecR is required for all HR in mycobacteria and for SSA. The essentiality of RecR as an agent of HR is yet another distinctive feature of mycobacterial DNA repair.IMPORTANCEThis study clarifies the molecular requirements for homologous recombination in mycobacteria. Specifically, we demonstrate that RecF and RecR play important roles in both the RecA-dependent homologous recombination and RecA-independent single-strand annealing pathways. Coupled with our previous findings (R. Gupta, M. Ryzhikov, O. Koroleva, M. Unciuleac, S. Shuman, S. Korolev, and M. S. Glickman, Nucleic Acids Res 41:2284–2295, 2013,http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks1298), these results revise our view of mycobacterial recombination and place the RecFOR system in a central position in homology-dependent DNA repair.

scholarly journals Conservative Repair of a Chromosomal Double-Strand Break by Single-Strand DNA through Two Steps of Annealing

2006 ◽  
Vol 26 (20) ◽  
pp. 7645-7657 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesca Storici ◽  
Joyce R. Snipe ◽  
Godwin K. Chan ◽  
Dmitry A. Gordenin ◽  
Michael A. Resnick
Keyword(s):  
Normal Cell ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Single Strand ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Single Strand Annealing ◽  
Repair Mechanisms ◽  
Strand Invasion ◽  
Strand Annealing

ABSTRACT The repair of chromosomal double-strand breaks (DSBs) is essential to normal cell growth, and homologous recombination is a universal process for DSB repair. We explored DSB repair mechanisms in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae using single-strand oligonucleotides with homology to both sides of a DSB. Oligonucleotide-directed repair occurred exclusively via Rad52- and Rad59-mediated single-strand annealing (SSA). Even the SSA domain of human Rad52 provided partial complementation for a null rad52 mutation. The repair did not involve Rad51-driven strand invasion, and moreover the suppression of strand invasion increased repair with oligonucleotides. A DSB was shown to activate targeting by oligonucleotides homologous to only one side of the break at large distances (at least 20 kb) from the break in a strand-biased manner, suggesting extensive 5′ to 3′ resection, followed by the restoration of resected DNA to the double-strand state. We conclude that long resected chromosomal DSB ends are repaired by a single-strand DNA oligonucleotide through two rounds of annealing. The repair by single-strand DNA can be conservative and may allow for accurate restoration of chromosomal DNAs with closely spaced DSBs.

scholarly journals FKBP25 participates in DNA double-strand break repair

2020 ◽  
Vol 98 (1) ◽  
pp. 42-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Dilworth ◽  
Fade Gong ◽  
Kyle Miller ◽  
Christopher J. Nelson
Keyword(s):  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Repair Pathway ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Peptide Bonds ◽  
Single Strand Annealing ◽  
Strand Annealing ◽  
Fk506 Binding Proteins

FK506-binding proteins (FKBPs) alter the conformation of proteins via cis–trans isomerization of prolyl-peptide bonds. While this activity can be demonstrated in vitro, the intractability of detecting prolyl isomerization events in cells has limited our understanding of the biological processes regulated by FKBPs. Here we report that FKBP25 is an active participant in the repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). FKBP25 influences DSB repair pathway choice by promoting homologous recombination (HR) and suppressing single-strand annealing (SSA). Consistent with this observation, cells depleted of FKBP25 form fewer Rad51 repair foci in response to etoposide and ionizing radiation, and they are reliant on the SSA repair factor Rad52 for viability. We find that FKBP25’s catalytic activity is required for promoting DNA repair, which is the first description of a biological function for this enzyme activity. Consistent with the importance of the FKBP catalytic site in HR, rapamycin treatment also impairs homologous recombination, and this effect is at least in part independent of mTor. Taken together these results identify FKBP25 as a component of the DNA DSB repair pathway.

scholarly journals Analysis of the Xenopus Werner syndrome protein in DNA double-strand break repair

2005 ◽  
Vol 171 (2) ◽  
pp. 217-227 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hong Yan ◽  
Jill McCane ◽  
Thomas Toczylowski ◽  
Chinyi Chen
Keyword(s):  
Werner Syndrome ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Double Strand Break ◽  
Single Strand ◽  
Repair Pathway ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Single Strand Annealing ◽  
Werner Syndrome Protein ◽  
Strand Annealing ◽  
Syndrome Protein

Werner syndrome is associated with premature aging and increased risk of cancer. Werner syndrome protein (WRN) is a RecQ-type DNA helicase, which seems to participate in DNA replication, double-strand break (DSB) repair, and telomere maintenance; however, its exact function remains elusive. Using Xenopus egg extracts as the model system, we found that Xenopus WRN (xWRN) is recruited to discrete foci upon induction of DSBs. Depletion of xWRN has no significant effect on nonhomologous end-joining of DSB ends, but it causes a significant reduction in the homology-dependent single-strand annealing DSB repair pathway. These results provide the first direct biochemical evidence that links WRN to a specific DSB repair pathway. The assay for single-strand annealing that was developed in this study also provides a powerful biochemical system for mechanistic analysis of homology-dependent DSB repair.

A Genomics-Based Screen for Yeast Mutants With an Altered Recombination/End-Joining Repair Ratio

Genetics ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 162 (2) ◽  
pp. 677-688 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas E Wilson
Keyword(s):  
Strand Break ◽  
Nonhomologous End Joining ◽  
Large Set ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Minimal Set ◽  
Single Strand Annealing ◽  
Yeast Assay ◽  
Strand Annealing ◽  
Yeast Mutants ◽  
Clear Increase

AbstractWe recently described a yeast assay suitable for genetic screening in which simple religation nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) and single-strand annealing (SSA) compete for repair of an I-SceI-created double-strand break. Here, the required allele has been introduced into an array of 4781 MATa deletion mutants and each strain screened individually. Two mutants (rad52 and srs2) showed a clear increase in the NHEJ/SSA ratio due to preferential impairment of SSA, but no mutant increased the absolute frequency of NHEJ significantly above the wild-type level. Seven mutants showed a decreased NHEJ/SSA ratio due to frank loss of NHEJ, which corresponded to all known structural/catalytic NHEJ components (yku70, yku80, dnl4, lif1, rad50, mre11, and xrs2); no new mutants in this category were identified. A clearly separable and surprisingly large set of 16 other mutants showed partial defects in NHEJ. Further examination of these revealed that NEJ1 can entirely account for the mating-type regulation of NHEJ, but that this regulatory role was distinct from the postdiauxic/stationary-phase induction of NHEJ that was deficient in other mutants (especially doa1, fyv6, and mck1). These results are discussed in the context of the minimal set of required proteins and regulatory inputs for NHEJ.

scholarly journals To Join or Not to Join: Decision Points Along the Pathway to Double-Strand Break Repair vs. Chromosome End Protection

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie M. Ackerson ◽  
Carlan Romney ◽  
P. Logan Schuck ◽  
Jason A. Stewart
Keyword(s):  
Genome Stability ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Decision Points ◽  
Chromosome Fusions ◽  
Non Homologous End Joining ◽  
Dna Ends

The regulation of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) and telomeres are diametrically opposed in the cell. DSBs are considered one of the most deleterious forms of DNA damage and must be quickly recognized and repaired. Telomeres, on the other hand, are specialized, stable DNA ends that must be protected from recognition as DSBs to inhibit unwanted chromosome fusions. Decisions to join DNA ends, or not, are therefore critical to genome stability. Yet, the processing of telomeres and DSBs share many commonalities. Accordingly, key decision points are used to shift DNA ends toward DSB repair vs. end protection. Additionally, DSBs can be repaired by two major pathways, namely homologous recombination (HR) and non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). The choice of which repair pathway is employed is also dictated by a series of decision points that shift the break toward HR or NHEJ. In this review, we will focus on these decision points and the mechanisms that dictate end protection vs. DSB repair and DSB repair choice.

Two alternative pathways of double-strand break repair that are kinetically separable and independently modulated

1992 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 1292-1303
Author(s):  
J Fishman-Lobell ◽  
N Rudin ◽  
J E Haber
Keyword(s):  
Direct Repeat ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Single Strand ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Alternative Pathways ◽  
Deletion Formation ◽  
Single Strand Annealing ◽  
Strand Annealing ◽  
Competing Pathways

HO endonuclease-induced double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae can undergo recombination by two distinct and competing pathways. In a plasmid containing a direct repeat, in which one repeat is interrupted by an HO endonuclease cut site, gap repair yields gene conversions while single-strand annealing produces deletions. Consistent with predictions of the single-strand annealing mechanism, deletion formation is not accompanied by the formation of a reciprocal recombination product. Deletions are delayed 60 min when the distance separating the repeats is increased by 4.4 kb. Moreover, the rate of deletion formation corresponds to the time at which complementary regions become single stranded. Gap repair processes are independent of distance but are reduced in rad52 mutants and in G1-arrested cells.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document