scholarly journals A system for gene expression noise control in yeast

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Max Mundt ◽  
Alexander Anders ◽  
Seán Murray ◽  
Victor Sourjik

AbstractGene expression noise arises from stochastic variation in the synthesis and degradation of mRNA and protein molecules and creates differences in protein numbers across populations of genetically identical cells. Such variability can lead to imprecision and reduced performance of both native and synthetic networks. In principle, gene expression noise can be controlled through the rates of transcription, translation and degradation, such that different combinations of those rates lead to the same protein concentrations but at different noise levels. Here, we present a “noise tuner” which allows orthogonal control over the transcription and the mRNA degradation rates by two different inducer molecules. Combining experiments with theoretical analysis, we show that in this system the noise is largely determined by the transcription rate whereas mean expression can be independently adjusted by mRNA stability. This noise tuner enables twofold changes in gene expression noise over a fivefold range of mean protein levels. We demonstrated the efficacy of the noise tuner in a complex regulatory network by varying gene expression noise in the mating pathway of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, which allowed us to control the output noise and the mutual information transduced through the pathway. The noise tuner thus represents an effective tool of gene expression noise control, both to interrogate noise sensitivity of natural networks and enhance performance of synthetic circuits.

Author(s):  
Supravat Dey ◽  
Mohammad Soltani ◽  
Abhyudai Singh

ABSTRACTThe genome contains several high-affinity non-functional binding sites for transcription factors (TFs) creating a hidden and unexplored layer of gene regulation. We investigate the role of such “decoy sites” in controlling noise (random fluctuations) in the level of a TF that is synthesized in stochastic bursts. Prior studies have assumed that decoy-bound TFs are protected from degradation, and in this case decoys function to buffer noise. Relaxing this assumption to consider arbitrary degradation rates for both bound/unbound TF states, we find rich noise behaviors. For low-affinity decoys, noise in the level of unbound TF always monotonically decreases to the Poisson limit with increasing decoy numbers. In contrast, for high affinity decoys, noise levels first increase with increasing decoy numbers, before decreasing back to the Poisson limit. Interestingly, while protection of bound TFs from degradation slows the time-scale of fluctuations in the unbound TF levels, decay of bounds TFs leads to faster fluctuations and smaller noise propagation to downstream target proteins. In summary, our analysis reveals stochastic dynamics emerging from nonspecific binding of TFs, and highlight the dual role of decoys as attenuators or amplifiers of gene expression noise depending on their binding affinity and stability of the bound TF.


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
François Bertaux ◽  
Samuel Marguerat ◽  
Vahid Shahrezaei

AbstractThe cell division rate, size, and gene expression programmes change in response to external conditions. These global changes impact on average concentrations of biomolecule and their variability or noise. Gene expression is inherently stochastic, and noise levels of individual proteins depend on synthesis and degradation rates as well as on cell-cycle dynamics. We have modelled stochastic gene expression inside growing and dividing cells to study the effect of division rates on noise in mRNA and protein expression. We use assumptions and parameters relevant to Escherichia coli, for which abundant quantitative data are available. We find that coupling of transcription, but not translation rates to the rate of cell division can result in protein concentration and noise homeostasis across conditions. Interestingly, we find that the increased cell size at fast division rates, observed in E. coli d other unicellular organisms, buffers noise levels even for proteins with decreased expression at faster growth. We then investigate the functional importance of these regulations using gene regulatory networks that exhibit bi-stability and oscillations. We find that network topology affects robustness to changes in division rate in complex and unexpected ways. In particular, a simple model of persistence, based on global physiological feedback, predicts increased proportion of persistors cells at slow division rates. Altogether, our study reveals how cell size regulation in response to cell division rate could help controlling gene expression noise. It also highlights that understanding of circuits’ robustness across growth conditions is key for the effective design of synthetic biological systems.


2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (11) ◽  
pp. 2618-2626 ◽  
Author(s):  
Max Mundt ◽  
Alexander Anders ◽  
Seán M. Murray ◽  
Victor Sourjik

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 172234 ◽  
Author(s):  
François Bertaux ◽  
Samuel Marguerat ◽  
Vahid Shahrezaei

The cell division rate, size and gene expression programmes change in response to external conditions. These global changes impact on average concentrations of biomolecule and their variability or noise. Gene expression is inherently stochastic, and noise levels of individual proteins depend on synthesis and degradation rates as well as on cell-cycle dynamics. We have modelled stochastic gene expression inside growing and dividing cells to study the effect of division rates on noise in mRNA and protein expression. We use assumptions and parameters relevant to Escherichia coli , for which abundant quantitative data are available. We find that coupling of transcription, but not translation rates to the rate of cell division can result in protein concentration and noise homeostasis across conditions. Interestingly, we find that the increased cell size at fast division rates, observed in E. coli and other unicellular organisms, buffers noise levels even for proteins with decreased expression at faster growth. We then investigate the functional importance of these regulations using gene regulatory networks that exhibit bi-stability and oscillations. We find that network topology affects robustness to changes in division rate in complex and unexpected ways. In particular, a simple model of persistence, based on global physiological feedback, predicts increased proportion of persister cells at slow division rates. Altogether, our study reveals how cell size regulation in response to cell division rate could help controlling gene expression noise. It also highlights that understanding circuits' robustness across growth conditions is key for the effective design of synthetic biological systems.


2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. David Van Dyken

ABSTRACTGene expression is inherently noisy, but little is known about whether noise affects cell function or, if so, how and by how much. Here I present a theoretical framework to quantify the fitness costs of gene expression noise and identify the evolutionary and synthetic targets of noise control. I find that gene expression noise reduces fitness by slowing the average rate of nutrient uptake and protein synthesis. This is a direct consequence of the hyperbolic (Michaelis-Menten) kinetics of most biological reactions, which I show cause “hyperbolic filtering”, a process that diminishes both the average rate and noise propagation of stochastic reactions. Interestingly, I find that transcriptional noise directly slows growth by slowing the average translation rate. Perhaps surprisingly, this is the largest fitness cost of transcriptional noise since translation strongly filters mRNA noise, making protein noise largely independent of transcriptional noise, consistent with empirical data. Translation, not transcription, then, is the primary target of protein noise control. Paradoxically, selection for protein-noise control favors increased ribosome-mRNA binding affinity, even though this increases translational bursting. However, I find that the efficacy of selection to suppress noise decays faster than linearly with increasing cell size. This predicts a stark, cell-size-mediated taxonomic divide in selection pressures for noise control: small unicellular species, including most prokaryotes, face fairly strong selection to suppress gene expression noise, whereas larger unicells, including most eukaryotes, experience extremely weak selection. I suggest that this taxonomic discrepancy in selection efficacy contributed to the evolution of greater gene-regulatory complexity in eukaryotes.ARTICLE SUMMARYGene expression is a probabilistic process, resulting in random variation in mRNA and protein abundance among cells called “noise”. Understanding how noise affects cell function is a major problem in biology. Here I present theory demonstrating that gene expression noise slows the average rate of cell division. Furthermore, by modeling stochastic gene expression with non-linearity, I identify novel mechanisms of cellular robustness. However, I find that the cost of noise, and therefore the strength of selection favoring robustness, decays faster than linearly with increasing cell size. This may help explain the vast differences in gene-regulatory complexity between prokaryotes and eukaryotes.


2021 ◽  
Vol 118 (42) ◽  
pp. e2018640118
Author(s):  
LaTasha C. R. Fraser ◽  
Ryan J. Dikdan ◽  
Supravat Dey ◽  
Abhyudai Singh ◽  
Sanjay Tyagi

Many eukaryotic genes are expressed in randomly initiated bursts that are punctuated by periods of quiescence. Here, we show that the intermittent access of the promoters to transcription factors through relatively impervious chromatin contributes to this “noisy” transcription. We tethered a nuclease-deficient Cas9 fused to a histone acetyl transferase at the promoters of two endogenous genes in HeLa cells. An assay for transposase-accessible chromatin using sequencing showed that the activity of the histone acetyl transferase altered the chromatin architecture locally without introducing global changes in the nucleus and rendered the targeted promoters constitutively accessible. We measured the gene expression variability from the gene loci by performing single-molecule fluorescence in situ hybridization against mature messenger RNAs (mRNAs) and by imaging nascent mRNA molecules present at active gene loci in single cells. Because of the increased accessibility of the promoter to transcription factors, the transcription from two genes became less noisy, even when the average levels of expression did not change. In addition to providing evidence for chromatin accessibility as a determinant of the noise in gene expression, our study offers a mechanism for controlling gene expression noise which is otherwise unavoidable.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. 3435-3443
Author(s):  
Jian Liu ◽  
Laureline Mosser ◽  
Catherine Botanch ◽  
Jean-Marie François ◽  
Jean-Pascal Capp

Abstract Chromatin structure clearly modulates gene expression noise, but the reverse influence has never been investigated, namely how the cell-to-cell expression heterogeneity of chromatin modifiers may generate variable rates of epigenetic modification. Sir2 is a well-characterized histone deacetylase of the Sirtuin family. It strongly influences chromatin silencing, especially at telomeres, subtelomeres and rDNA. This ability to influence epigenetic landscapes makes it a good model to study the largely unexplored interplay between gene expression noise and other epigenetic processes leading to phenotypic diversification. Here, we addressed this question by investigating whether noise in the expression of SIR2 was associated with cell-to-cell heterogeneity in the frequency of epigenetic silencing at subtelomeres in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Using cell sorting to isolate subpopulations with various expression levels, we found that heterogeneity in the cellular concentration of Sir2 does not lead to heterogeneity in the epigenetic silencing of subtelomeric URA3 between these subpopulations. We also noticed that SIR2 expression noise can generate cell-to-cell variability in viability, with lower levels being associated with better viability. This work shows that SIR2 expression fluctuations are not sufficient to generate cell-to-cell heterogeneity in the epigenetic silencing of URA3 at subtelomeres in Saccharomyces cerevisiae but can strongly affect cellular viability.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document