scholarly journals EFFECTORS OF THE SPINDLE ASSEMBLY CHECKPOINT BUT NOT THE MITOTIC EXIT NETWORK ARE CONFINED WITHIN THE NUCLEUS OF SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lydia R Heasley ◽  
Jennifer G DeLuca ◽  
Steven M Markus
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Envelope ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ◽  
Spindle Assembly ◽  
Mitotic Checkpoint ◽  
Mitotic Exit ◽  
Cell Cycle Checkpoints ◽  
Anaphase Promoting Complex ◽  
Mitotic Exit Network ◽  
And Function

The Spindle Assembly Checkpoint (SAC) prevents erroneous chromosome segregation by delaying mitotic progression when chromosomes are incorrectly attached to the mitotic spindle. This delay is mediated by Mitotic Checkpoint Complexes (MCCs), which assemble at unattached kinetochores and repress the activity of the Anaphase Promoting Complex/Cyclosome (APC/C). The cellular localizations of MCCs are likely critical for proper SAC function, yet remain poorly defined. We recently demonstrated that in mammalian cells, in which the nuclear envelope disassembles during mitosis, MCCs diffuse throughout the spindle region and cytoplasm. Here, we employed binucleate yeast zygotes to examine the localization dynamics of SAC effectors required for MCC assembly and function in budding yeast, in which the nuclear envelope remains intact throughout mitosis. Our findings indicate that in yeast MCCs are confined to the nuclear compartment and excluded from the cytoplasm during mitosis. In contrast, we find that effectors of the Mitotic Exit Network (MEN) - a pathway that initiates disassembly of the anaphase spindle only when it is properly oriented - are in fact freely exchanged between multiple nuclei within a shared cytoplasm. Our study provides insight into how cell cycle checkpoints have evolved to function in diverse cellular contexts.

scholarly journals p31comet acts to ensure timely spindle checkpoint silencing subsequent to kinetochore attachment

2011 ◽  
Vol 22 (22) ◽  
pp. 4236-4246 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert S. Hagan ◽  
Michael S. Manak ◽  
Håkon Kirkeby Buch ◽  
Michelle G. Meier ◽  
Patrick Meraldi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ◽  
Spindle Assembly ◽  
Mitotic Exit ◽  
Cyclin B ◽  
Anaphase Promoting Complex ◽  
Mitotic Progression ◽  
Microtubule Attachment ◽  
And Function ◽  
High Cyclin

The spindle assembly checkpoint links the onset of anaphase to completion of chromosome-microtubule attachment and is mediated by the binding of Mad and Bub proteins to kinetochores of unattached or maloriented chromosomes. Mad2 and BubR1 traffic between kinetochores and the cytosol, thereby transmitting a “wait anaphase” signal to the anaphase-promoting complex. It is generally assumed that this signal dissipates automatically upon kinetochore-microtubule binding, but it has been shown that under conditions of nocodazole-induced arrest p31comet, a Mad2-binding protein, is required for mitotic progression. In this article we investigate the localization and function of p31comet during normal, unperturbed mitosis in human and marsupial cells. We find that, like Mad2, p31comet traffics on and off kinetochores and is also present in the cytosol. Cells depleted of p31comet arrest in metaphase with mature bipolar kinetochore-microtubule attachments, a satisfied checkpoint, and high cyclin B levels. Thus p31comet is required for timely mitotic exit. We propose that p31comet is an essential component of the machinery that silences the checkpoint during each cell cycle.

scholarly journals Mitotic phosphorylation of tumor suppressor DAB2IP maintains spindle assembly checkpoint and chromosomal stability through activating PLK1-Mps1 signal pathway and stabilizing mitotic checkpoint complex

Oncogene ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lan Yu ◽  
Yue Lang ◽  
Ching-Cheng Hsu ◽  
Wei-Min Chen ◽  
Jui-Chung Chiang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ◽  
Spindle Assembly ◽  
Mitotic Checkpoint ◽  
Anaphase Promoting Complex ◽  
Independent Manner ◽  
Chromosome Separation ◽  
Surveillance Mechanism ◽  
Mitotic Phosphorylation ◽  
Mitotic Checkpoint Complex ◽  
Mitotic Regulation

AbstractChromosomal instability (CIN) is a driving force for cancer development. The most common causes of CIN include the dysregulation of the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC), which is a surveillance mechanism that prevents premature chromosome separation during mitosis by targeting anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C). DAB2IP is frequently silenced in advanced prostate cancer (PCa) and is associated with aggressive phenotypes of PCa. Our previous study showed that DAB2IP activates PLK1 and functions in mitotic regulation. Here, we report the novel mitotic phosphorylation of DAB2IP by Cdks, which mediates DAB2IP’s interaction with PLK1 and the activation of the PLK1-Mps1 pathway. DAB2IP interacts with Cdc20 in a phosphorylation-independent manner. However, the phosphorylation of DAB2IP inhibits the ubiquitylation of Cdc20 in response to SAC, and blocks the premature release of the APC/C-MCC. The PLK1-Mps1 pathway plays an important role in mitotic checkpoint complex (MCC) assembly. It is likely that DAB2IP acts as a scaffold to aid PLK1-Mps1 in targeting Cdc20. Depletion or loss of the Cdks-mediated phosphorylation of DAB2IP destabilizes the MCC, impairs the SAC, and increases chromosome missegregation and subsequent CIN, thus contributing to tumorigenesis. Collectively, these results demonstrate the mechanism of DAB2IP in SAC regulation and provide a rationale for targeting the SAC to cause lethal CIN against DAB2IP-deficient aggressive PCa, which exhibits a weak SAC.

scholarly journals Spindle assembly checkpoint: the third decade

2011 ◽  
Vol 366 (1584) ◽  
pp. 3595-3604 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Musacchio
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ◽  
Spindle Assembly ◽  
Mitotic Checkpoint ◽  
Anaphase Promoting Complex ◽  
Checkpoint Control ◽  
Checkpoint Response ◽  
The Third ◽  
Binding Interface ◽  
Mitotic Checkpoint Complex

The spindle assembly checkpoint controls cell cycle progression during mitosis, synchronizing it with the attachment of chromosomes to spindle microtubules. After the discovery of the mitotic arrest deficient ( MAD ) and budding uninhibited by benzymidazole ( BUB ) genes as crucial checkpoint components in 1991, the second decade of checkpoint studies (2001–2010) witnessed crucial advances in the elucidation of the mechanism through which the checkpoint effector, the mitotic checkpoint complex, targets the anaphase-promoting complex (APC/C) to prevent progression into anaphase. Concomitantly, the discovery that the Ndc80 complex and other components of the microtubule-binding interface of kinetochores are essential for the checkpoint response finally asserted that kinetochores are crucial for the checkpoint response. Nevertheless, the relationship between kinetochores and checkpoint control remains poorly understood. Crucial advances in this area in the third decade of checkpoint studies (2011–2020) are likely to be brought about by the characterization of the mechanism of kinetochore recruitment, activation and inactivation of checkpoint proteins, which remains elusive for the majority of checkpoint components. Here, we take a molecular view on the main challenges hampering this task.

scholarly journals Sumoylation promotes optimal APC/C activation and timely anaphase

eLife ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine C Lee ◽  
Bing Li ◽  
Hongtao Yu ◽  
Michael J Matunis
Keyword(s):  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ◽  
E3 Ligase ◽  
Spindle Assembly ◽  
Mitotic Exit ◽  
Regulatory Role ◽  
Anaphase Promoting Complex ◽  
Catalytic Core ◽  
Sumo Modification ◽  
Ubiquitin E3 Ligase ◽  
Anaphase Onset

The Anaphase Promoting Complex/Cyclosome (APC/C) is a ubiquitin E3 ligase that functions as the gatekeeper to mitotic exit. APC/C activity is controlled by an interplay of multiple pathways during mitosis, including the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC), that are not yet fully understood. Here, we show that sumoylation of the APC4 subunit of the APC/C peaks during mitosis and is critical for timely APC/C activation and anaphase onset. We have also identified a functionally important SUMO interacting motif in the cullin-homology domain of APC2 located near the APC4 sumoylation sites and APC/C catalytic core. Our findings provide evidence of an important regulatory role for SUMO modification and binding in affecting APC/C activation and mitotic exit.

scholarly journals Uncoupling Anaphase-Promoting Complex/Cyclosome Activity from Spindle Assembly Checkpoint Control by Deregulating Polo-Like Kinase 1

2005 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 2031-2044 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara C. M. van de Weerdt ◽  
Marcel A. T. M. van Vugt ◽  
Catherine Lindon ◽  
Jos J. W. Kauw ◽  
Marieke J. Rozendaal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Double Mutant ◽  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ◽  
Spindle Assembly ◽  
Mitotic Catastrophe ◽  
Anaphase Promoting Complex ◽  
Checkpoint Control ◽  
Mitotic Progression ◽  
Specific Antibodies ◽  
Mitotic Entry

ABSTRACT Polo-like kinase 1 (Plk1) plays a role in numerous events in mitosis, but how the multiple functions of Plk1 are separated is poorly understood. We studied regulation of Plk1 through two putative phosphorylation residues, Ser-137 and Thr-210. Using phospho-specific antibodies, we found that Thr-210 phosphorylation precedes Ser-137 phosphorylation in vivo, the latter occurring specifically in late mitosis. We show that expression of two activating mutants of these residues, S137D and T210D, results in distinct mitotic phenotypes. Whereas expression of both phospho-mimicking mutants as well as of the double mutant leads to accelerated mitotic entry, further progression through mitosis is dramatically different: the T210D mutant causes a spindle assembly checkpoint-dependent delay, whereas the expression of the S137D mutant or the double mutant results in untimely activation of the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C) and frequent mitotic catastrophe. Using nonphosphorylatable Plk1-S137A and Plk1-T210A mutants, we show that both sites contribute to proper mitotic progression. Based on these observations, we propose that Plk1 function is altered at different stages of mitosis through consecutive posttranslational events, e.g., at Ser-137 and Thr-210. Furthermore, our data show that uncontrolled Plk1 activation can uncouple APC/C activity from spindle assembly checkpoint control.

scholarly journals The HECT E3 ligase Smurf2 is required for Mad2-dependent spindle assembly checkpoint

2008 ◽  
Vol 183 (2) ◽  
pp. 267-277 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evan C. Osmundson ◽  
Dipankar Ray ◽  
Finola E. Moore ◽  
Qingshen Gao ◽  
Gerald H. Thomsen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ubiquitin Ligase ◽  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ◽  
Spindle Checkpoint ◽  
E3 Ligase ◽  
Spindle Assembly ◽  
Cyclin B ◽  
Carboxyl Terminus ◽  
Anaphase Promoting Complex ◽  
Mitotic Spindles ◽  
Anaphase Onset

Activation of the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C) by Cdc20 is critical for the metaphase–anaphase transition. APC/C-Cdc20 is required for polyubiquitination and degradation of securin and cyclin B at anaphase onset. The spindle assembly checkpoint delays APC/C-Cdc20 activation until all kinetochores attach to mitotic spindles. In this study, we demonstrate that a HECT (homologous to the E6-AP carboxyl terminus) ubiquitin ligase, Smurf2, is required for the spindle checkpoint. Smurf2 localizes to the centrosome, mitotic midbody, and centromeres. Smurf2 depletion or the expression of a catalytically inactive Smurf2 results in misaligned and lagging chromosomes, premature anaphase onset, and defective cytokinesis. Smurf2 inactivation prevents nocodazole-treated cells from accumulating cyclin B and securin and prometaphase arrest. The silencing of Cdc20 in Smurf2-depleted cells restores mitotic accumulation of cyclin B and securin. Smurf2 depletion results in enhanced polyubiquitination and degradation of Mad2, a critical checkpoint effector. Mad2 is mislocalized in Smurf2-depleted cells, suggesting that Smurf2 regulates the localization and stability of Mad2. These data indicate that Smurf2 is a novel mitotic regulator.

scholarly journals Regulated Separation of Sister Centromeres depends on the Spindle Assembly Checkpoint but not on the Anaphase Promoting Complex/Cyclosome

Cell Cycle ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 4 (11) ◽  
pp. 1561-1575 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan F. Gimenez-Abian ◽  
Laura A. Díaz-Martínez ◽  
Karin G. Wirth ◽  
Catherine A. Andrews ◽  
Gonzalo Giménez-Martín ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ◽  
Spindle Assembly ◽  
Anaphase Promoting Complex

scholarly journals PP2A-B56 opposes Mps1 phosphorylation of Knl1 and thereby promotes spindle assembly checkpoint silencing

2014 ◽  
Vol 206 (7) ◽  
pp. 833-842 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Espert ◽  
Pelin Uluocak ◽  
Ricardo Nunes Bastos ◽  
Davinderpreet Mangat ◽  
Philipp Graab ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Feedback Loop ◽  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ◽  
Spindle Assembly ◽  
Eukaryotic Cells ◽  
Aurora B ◽  
Safeguard Mechanism

The spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) monitors correct attachment of chromosomes to microtubules, an important safeguard mechanism ensuring faithful chromosome segregation in eukaryotic cells. How the SAC signal is turned off once all the chromosomes have successfully attached to the spindle remains an unresolved question. Mps1 phosphorylation of Knl1 results in recruitment of the SAC proteins Bub1, Bub3, and BubR1 to the kinetochore and production of the wait-anaphase signal. SAC silencing is therefore expected to involve a phosphatase opposing Mps1. Here we demonstrate in vivo and in vitro that BubR1-associated PP2A-B56 is a key phosphatase for the removal of the Mps1-mediated Knl1 phosphorylations necessary for Bub1/BubR1 recruitment in mammalian cells. SAC silencing is thus promoted by a negative feedback loop involving the Mps1-dependent recruitment of a phosphatase opposing Mps1. Our findings extend the previously reported role for BubR1-associated PP2A-B56 in opposing Aurora B and suggest that BubR1-bound PP2A-B56 integrates kinetochore surveillance and silencing of the SAC.

scholarly journals Spindle Assembly Checkpoint Protein Cdc20 Transcriptionally Activates Expression of Ubiquitin Carrier Protein UbcH10

2011 ◽  
Vol 286 (18) ◽  
pp. 15666-15677 ◽  
Author(s):  
Somsubhra Nath ◽  
Taraswi Banerjee ◽  
Debrup Sen ◽  
Tania Das ◽  
Susanta Roychoudhury
Keyword(s):  
Chromosomal Instability ◽  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ◽  
Spindle Assembly ◽  
Regulatory Function ◽  
Physical Interaction ◽  
Anaphase Promoting Complex ◽  
Transcriptional Regulatory ◽  
Subsequent Degradation ◽  
Ubiquitin Conjugating Enzyme ◽  
Wd40 Domain

The spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) ensures accurate segregation of chromosomes by monitoring kinetochore attachment of spindles during mitosis. Proper progression of mitosis depends on orderly ubiquitination and subsequent degradation of various mitotic inhibitors. At the molecular level, upon removal of SAC, Cdc20 activates E3 ubiquitin ligase anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome that, along with E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme UbcH10, executes this function. Both Cdc20 and UbcH10 are overexpressed in many cancer types and are associated with defective SAC function leading to chromosomal instability. The precise mechanism of correlated overexpression of these two proteins remains elusive. We show that Cdc20 transcriptionally up-regulates UbcH10 expression. The WD40 domain of Cdc20 is required for this activity. Physical interaction between Cdc20 and anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome-CBP/p300 complex and its subsequent recruitment to the UBCH10 promoter are involved in this transactivation process. This transcriptional regulatory function of Cdc20 was observed to be cell cycle-specific. We hypothesize that this co-regulated overexpression of both proteins contributes to chromosomal instability.

scholarly journals Intermediates in the assembly of mitotic checkpoint complexes and their role in the regulation of the anaphase-promoting complex

2016 ◽  
Vol 113 (4) ◽  
pp. 966-971 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharon Kaisari ◽  
Danielle Sitry-Shevah ◽  
Shirly Miniowitz-Shemtov ◽  
Avram Hershko
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Mitotic Spindle ◽  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ◽  
Mitotic Checkpoint ◽  
Anaphase Promoting Complex ◽  
Checkpoint Proteins ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Unknown Species ◽  
Mitotic Checkpoint Complex

The mitotic (or spindle assembly) checkpoint system prevents premature separation of sister chromatids in mitosis and thus ensures the fidelity of chromosome segregation. Kinetochores that are not attached properly to the mitotic spindle produce an inhibitory signal that prevents progression into anaphase. The checkpoint system acts on the Anaphase-Promoting Complex/Cyclosome (APC/C) ubiquitin ligase, which targets for degradation inhibitors of anaphase initiation. APC/C is inhibited by the Mitotic Checkpoint Complex (MCC), which assembles when the checkpoint is activated. MCC is composed of the checkpoint proteins BubR1, Bub3, and Mad2, associated with the APC/C coactivator Cdc20. The intermediary processes in the assembly of MCC are not sufficiently understood. It is also not clear whether or not some subcomplexes of MCC inhibit the APC/C and whether Mad2 is required only for MCC assembly and not for its action on the APC/C. We used purified subcomplexes of mitotic checkpoint proteins to examine these problems. Our results do not support a model in which Mad2 catalytically generates a Mad2-free APC/C inhibitor. We also found that the release of Mad2 from MCC caused a marked (although not complete) decrease in inhibitory action, suggesting a role of Mad2 in MCC for APC/C inhibition. A previously unknown species of MCC, which consists of Mad2, BubR1, and two molecules of Cdc20, contributes to the inhibition of APC/C by the mitotic checkpoint system.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document