scholarly journals Detection of task-relevant and task-irrelevant motion sequences: application to motor adaptation in goal-directed and whole-body movements

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daisuke Furuki ◽  
Ken Takiyama

AbstractMotor variability is inevitable in our body movements and is discussed from several various perspectives in motor neuroscience and biomechanics; it can originate from the variability of neural activities, it can reflect a large degree of freedom inherent in our body movements, it can decrease muscle fatigue, or it can facilitate motor learning. How to evaluate motor variability is thus a fundamental question in motor neuroscience and biomechanics. Previous methods have quantified (at least) two striking features of motor variability; the smaller variability in the task-relevant dimension than in the task-irrelevant dimension and the low-dimensional structure that is often referred to as synergy or principal component. However, those previous methods were not only unsuitable for quantifying those features simultaneously but also applicable in some limited conditions (e.g., a method cannot consider motion sequence, and another method cannot consider how each motion is relevant to performance). Here, we propose a flexible and straightforward machine learning technique that can quantify task-relevant variability, task-irrelevant variability, and the relevance of each principal component to task performance while considering the motion sequence and the relevance of each motion sequence to task performance in a data-driven manner. We validate our method by constructing a novel experimental setting to investigate goal-directed and whole-body movements. Furthermore, our setting enables the induction of motor adaptation by using perturbation and evaluating the modulation of task-relevant and task-irrelevant variabilities through motor adaptation. Our method enables the identification of a novel property of motor variability; the modulation of those variabilities differs depending on the perturbation schedule. Although a gradually imposed perturbation does not increase both task-relevant and task-irrelevant variabilities, a constant perturbation increases task-relevant variability.

2005 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 228-235 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharon E. Guttman ◽  
Lee A. Gilroy ◽  
Randolph Blake

When the senses deliver conflicting information, vision dominates spatial processing, and audition dominates temporal processing. We asked whether this sensory specialization results in cross-modal encoding of unisensory input into the task-appropriate modality. Specifically, we investigated whether visually portrayed temporal structure receives automatic, obligatory encoding in the auditory domain. In three experiments, observers judged whether the changes in two successive visual sequences followed the same or different rhythms. We assessed temporal representations by measuring the extent to which both task-irrelevant auditory information and task-irrelevant visual information interfered with rhythm discrimination. Incongruent auditory information significantly disrupted task performance, particularly when presented during encoding; by contrast, varying the nature of the rhythm-depicting visual changes had minimal impact on performance. Evidently, the perceptual system automatically and obligatorily abstracts temporal structure from its visual form and represents this structure using an auditory code, resulting in the experience of “hearing visual rhythms.”


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Cardis ◽  
Maura Casadio ◽  
Rajiv Ranganathan

AbstractMotor variability plays an important role in motor learning, although the exact mechanisms of how variability affects learning is not well understood. Recent evidence suggests that motor variability may have different effects on learning in redundant tasks, depending on whether it is present in the task space (where it affects task performance), or in the null space (where it has no effect on task performance). Here we examined the effect of directly introducing null and task space variability using a manipulandum during the learning of a motor task. Participants learned a bimanual shuffleboard task for 2 days, where their goal was to slide a virtual puck as close as possible towards a target. Critically, the distance traveled by the puck was determined by the sum of the left and right hand velocities, which meant that there was redundancy in the task. Participants were divided into five groups – based on both the dimension in which the variability was introduced and the amount of variability that was introduced during training. Results showed that although all groups were able to reduce error with practice, learning was affected more by the amount of variability introduced rather than the dimension in which variability was introduced. Specifically, groups with higher movement variability during practice showed larger errors at the end of practice compared to groups that had low variability during learning. These results suggest that although introducing variability can increase exploration of new solutions, this may come at a cost of decreased stability of the learned solution.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carolina Bonmassar ◽  
Florian Scharf ◽  
Andreas Widmann ◽  
Nicole Wetzel

Effects of attentional distraction by unexpected and task-irrelevant sounds on task performance are discussed to comprise costs due to orienting of attention toward a distracting event and benefits due to enhanced level of arousal evoked by the processing of such events. Highly arousing distractor sounds may facilitate information and task processing resulting in reduced distraction effects compared to moderately arousing distractor sounds. By measuring pupil dilation responses as a marker of arousal and task performance as a marker of distraction, we disentangled orienting costs and arousal level changes through variations of the emotional content of distractor sounds. While participants (N=60) performed a visual categorization task, an auditory oddball sequence including standard sounds, highly arousing emotional and moderately arousing neutral novel sounds was presented. Multilevel analyses revealed prolonged reaction times to novel sounds compared to standard sounds. Distraction effects decreased when emotional novel sounds were presented compared to neutral novel sounds. Pupil dilation responses were increased in response to novel sounds compared to standard sounds. This increase was larger for emotional than for neutral novel sounds. None of the considered models supported a correlation at trial level between reduced distraction effects and arousal increase reflected by the pupil in response to emotional novel sounds, indicating at least partly independent underlying mechanisms. An exploratory analysis revealed an impact of the baseline pupil size, that indicates tonic level of arousal, on performance and distraction effects. Moreover, a positive correlation between the negative affect scale in the Adult Temperament Questionnaire and RTs was observed.


1987 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard W. Foltin ◽  
Richard M. Capriotti ◽  
Margaret A. McEntee ◽  
Marian W. Fischman
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Annefloor H. M. Klep ◽  
Barbara van Knippenberg ◽  
Henk van der Flier ◽  
Annebel H. B. de Hoogh
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document