scholarly journals A three dimensional multiplane kinematic model for bilateral hind limb gait analysis in cats

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan P. Brown ◽  
Gina E. Bertocci ◽  
Kimberly A. Cheffer ◽  
Dena R. Howland
Keyword(s):  
Gait Analysis ◽  
Hind Limb ◽  
Sagittal Plane ◽  
External Rotation ◽  
Kinematic Model ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Joint Angles ◽  
Plane Model ◽  
Flexion Extension ◽  
Joint Flexion

AbstractBackground: Kinematic gait analysis is an important noninvasive technique used for quantitative evaluation and description of locomotion and other movements in healthy and injured populations. Three dimensional (3D) kinematic analysis offers additional outcome measures including internal-external rotation not characterized using sagittal plane analysis techniques.Methods: The objectives of this study were to 1) develop and evaluate a 3D hind limb multiplane kinematic model for gait analysis in cats using joint coordinate systems, 2) implement and compare two 3D stifle (knee) prediction techniques, and 3) compare flexion-extension determined using the multiplane model to a sagittal plane model. Walking gait was recorded in 3 female adult cats (age = 2.9 years, weight = 3.5 ± 0.2 kg). Kinematic outcomes included flexion-extension, internal-external rotation, and abduction-adduction of the hip, stifle, and tarsal (ankle) joints.Results: Each multiplane stifle prediction technique yielded similar findings. Joint angles determined using markers placed on skin above bony landmarks in vivo were similar to joint angles determined using a feline hind limb skeleton in which markers were placed directly on landmarks ex vivo. Differences in hip, stifle, and tarsal joint flexion-extension were demonstrated when comparing the multiplane model to the sagittal plane model.Conclusions: This multiplane cat kinematic model can predict joint rotational kinematics as a tool that can quantify frontal, transverse, and sagittal plane motion. This model has multiple advantages given its ability to characterize joint internal-external rotation and abduction-adduction. A further, important benefit is greater accuracy in representing joint flexion-extension movements.

scholarly journals A three dimensional multiplane kinematic model for bilateral hind limb gait analysis in cats

PLoS ONE ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (8) ◽  
pp. e0197837 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan P. Brown ◽  
Gina E. Bertocci ◽  
Kimberly A. Cheffer ◽  
Dena R. Howland
Keyword(s):  
Gait Analysis ◽  
Hind Limb ◽  
Kinematic Model ◽  
Three Dimensional

scholarly journals Deep Learning-Based Upper Limb Functional Assessment Using a Single Kinect v2 Sensor

Sensors ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (7) ◽  
pp. 1903 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ye Ma ◽  
Dongwei Liu ◽  
Laisi Cai
Keyword(s):  
Deep Learning ◽  
Upper Limb ◽  
Short Term Memory ◽  
External Rotation ◽  
Kinematic Model ◽  
Elbow Flexion ◽  
Supervised Machine Learning ◽  
Joint Angles ◽  
Kinect V2 ◽  
Flexion Extension

We develop a deep learning refined kinematic model for accurately assessing upper limb joint angles using a single Kinect v2 sensor. We train a long short-term memory recurrent neural network using a supervised machine learning architecture to compensate for the systematic error of the Kinect kinematic model, taking a marker-based three-dimensional motion capture system (3DMC) as the golden standard. A series of upper limb functional task experiments were conducted, namely hand to the contralateral shoulder, hand to mouth or drinking, combing hair, and hand to back pocket. Our deep learning-based model significantly improves the performance of a single Kinect v2 sensor for all investigated upper limb joint angles across all functional tasks. Using a single Kinect v2 sensor, our deep learning-based model could measure shoulder and elbow flexion/extension waveforms with mean CMCs >0.93 for all tasks, shoulder adduction/abduction, and internal/external rotation waveforms with mean CMCs >0.8 for most of the tasks. The mean deviations of angles at the point of target achieved and range of motion are under 5° for all investigated joint angles during all functional tasks. Compared with the 3DMC, our presented system is easier to operate and needs less laboratory space.

A Novel Training Bike and Camera System to Evaluate Pose of Cyclists

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raman Garimella ◽  
Koen Beyers ◽  
Thomas Peeters ◽  
Stijn Verwulgen ◽  
Seppe Sels ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Inertial Sensors ◽  
Sagittal Plane ◽  
Aerodynamic Drag ◽  
Linear Regression Analysis ◽  
The Body ◽  
Frontal Area ◽  
Motion Sensors ◽  
Joint Angles ◽  
Camera System ◽  
Flexion Extension

Abstract Aerodynamic drag force can account for up to 90% of the opposing force experienced by a cyclist. Therefore, aerodynamic testing and efficiency is a priority in cycling. An inexpensive method to optimize performance is required. In this study, we evaluate a novel indoor setup as a tool for aerodynamic pose training. The setup consists of a bike, indoor home trainer, camera, and wearable inertial motion sensors. A camera calculates frontal area of the cyclist and the trainer varies resistance to the cyclist by using this as an input. To guide a cyclist to assume an optimal pose, joint angles of the body are an objective metric. To track joint angles, two methods were evaluated: optical (RGB camera for the two-dimensional angles in sagittal plane of 6 joints), and inertial sensors (wearable sensors for three-dimensional angles of 13 joints). One (1) male amateur cyclist was instructed to recreate certain static and dynamic poses on the bike. The inertial sensors provide excellent results (absolute error = 0.28°) for knee joint. Based on linear regression analysis, frontal area can be best predicted (correlation > 0.4) by chest anterior/posterior tilt, pelvis left/right rotation, neck flexion/extension, chest left/right rotation, and chest left/right lateral tilt (p < 0.01).

Kinematic determinants of performance parameters during golf swing

2019 ◽  
Vol 233 (5) ◽  
pp. 554-561 ◽  
Author(s):  
Batbayar Khuyagbaatar ◽  
Tserenchimed Purevsuren ◽  
Yoon Hyuk Kim
Keyword(s):  
External Rotation ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Left Knee ◽  
Performance Parameters ◽  
Joint Angles ◽  
Lower Trunk ◽  
Left Elbow ◽  
Posterior Tilt ◽  
Shoulder External Rotation ◽  
Measures Of Performance

In golf, the trunk and pelvis kinematic variables are often related to measures of performance due to the highly complex and multi-joint movements involved in swings. However, it is unclear how specific body segments or joints contributed to the golf performance parameters. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to identify the key joints, including those of the upper and lower trunk, that are associated with golf performance parameters, such as X-Factor and pelvis motion. A motion capture system was used to obtain three-dimensional kinematics of golf swings performed by 10 low handicap male golfers. Based on regression analysis, right knee adduction, right shoulder external rotation and left elbow extension in ball address to top of the backswing and left knee adduction and lower trunk right bending with left rotation in top of the backswing to end of follow-through were presented as predictor variables for the X-Factor. For pelvis movement, a greater number of joint angles were associated with pelvis posterior tilt during backswing and pelvis motion to target with right rotation during downswing/follow-through. This study provides fundamental details of the movement mechanisms of major joints, as well as their relationships with performance parameters. Such understanding can be combined with training to improve the golfing skill and prevent possible injuries.

Kinematics of the Axially Loaded Ankle

1995 ◽  
Vol 16 (9) ◽  
pp. 577-582 ◽  
Author(s):  
James D. Michelson ◽  
Stephen L. Helgemo
Keyword(s):  
Axial Load ◽  
Sagittal Plane ◽  
External Rotation ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Axial Rotation ◽  
Ankle Injuries ◽  
Knee Amputation ◽  
Precise Understanding ◽  
Ankle Biomechanics

An apparatus that allowed the application of a 900 N axial load and the simultaneous measurement of rotation in the sagittal, coronal, and axial planes was used to study the normal kinematics of the ankle in 13 below-knee amputation specimens. Two testing routines were done on all specimens. In the first sequence, specimens were moved through a dorsiflexion (DF) and plantarflexion (PF) arc of 60° (25° DF and 35° PF). DF was associated with an average of 2.5° of external rotation, and PF was associated with an average of <1° of internal rotation. In the coronal plane, PF and DF were both associated with <1° of varus. In the second part of the testing, the ankle position in the sagittal plane (DF/PF) was fixed and the axial load was increased from 50 N to 750 N in 100-N intervals. Increasing the axial load caused an increase in external rotation and valgus of 1° to 2°. For axial rotation, external rotation was more pronounced in PF than DF. The effect of load on the increase on valgus was not affected by sagittal ankle position. The effect of increasing axial load on sagittal rotation was to increase DF or PF <2° over the entire range of loads and sagittal positions. The understanding of ankle biomechanics is essential to the formulation of rational guidelines for the treatment of ankle pathology and the prediction of the long-term consequences of ankle injuries. The incomplete understanding of this subject is evident when the disparate recommendations for a number of common conditions are considered. By examining the three-dimensional motion of the stable ankle, a more precise understanding of the abnormal three-dimensional motions associated with instability can be achieved. This knowledge will permit a logical approach to treatment of ankle fractures.

scholarly journals Kinematic Differences between Two Types of Forward Elevations of the Shoulder Joint: Flexion and Reaching Elevation

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-25
Author(s):  
Ryo Sahara ◽  
Junichiro Hamada ◽  
Kunio Yoshizaki ◽  
Kazuhiro Endo ◽  
Daisuke Segawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Elbow Joint ◽  
Glenohumeral Joint ◽  
External Rotation ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Coronal Plane ◽  
Shoulder Flexion ◽  
Joint Flexion ◽  
Motion Plane ◽  
Teres Minor

Background: Extension of the elbow joint is maintained during shoulder flexion. In contrast, the arm starts from the flexed position of the elbow joint and the joint gradually extends during reaching elevation. Objectives: This study aimed to compare the kinematic elements and electromyographic (EMG) activities of the rotator cuff muscles between flexion and reaching elevation. Methods: The study included 10 healthy young men. (average age, 21.5 ± 3.4 years), and measurements were performed on their dominant arms. A three-dimensional motion analyzer was used to record the following elements during shoulder flexion and reaching elevation: the angles of glenohumeral joint elevation and scapular upward rotation, scapulohumeral rhythm, external rotation of the humerus, and glenohumeral plane shifting from the coronal plane. The EMG activities in the supraspinatus, infraspinatus, subscapularis, and teres minor were recorded simultaneously. Results: The plane of reaching elevation was retained at 60° from the coronal plane. The glenohumeral planes (P < 0 .01) and the external rotation angles of the humerus below 90° of elevation (P < 0.05) were significantly different between both the motions. The EMG activities in the supraspinatus (P < .01), infraspinatus (P < 0.05), and teres minor (P < 0.01) were significantly lower while reaching elevation than those during flexion. Conclusion: The motion plane at 60° from the coronal plane, movement of the humeral external rotation, and EMG activities of the rotator cuff muscles were different during reaching elevation and shoulder flexion.

scholarly journals Cycling kinematics in healthy adults for musculoskeletal rehabilitation guidance

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Haeun Yum ◽  
Hyang Kim ◽  
Taeyong Lee ◽  
Moon Seok Park ◽  
Seung Yeol Lee
Keyword(s):  
Sagittal Plane ◽  
External Rotation ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Healthy Adults ◽  
Postoperative Rehabilitation ◽  
Kinematic Data ◽  
Average Value ◽  
The Right ◽  
Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation

Abstract Background Stationary cycling is commonly used for postoperative rehabilitation of physical disabilities; however, few studies have focused on the three-dimensional (3D) kinematics of rehabilitation. This study aimed to elucidate the three-dimensional lower limb kinematics of people with healthy musculoskeletal function and the effect of sex and age on kinematics using a controlled bicycle configuration. Methods Thirty-one healthy adults participated in the study. The position of the stationary cycle was standardized using the LeMond method by setting the saddle height to 85.5% of the participant’s inseam. The participants maintained a pedaling rate of 10–12 km/h, and the average value of three successive cycles of the right leg was used for analysis. The pelvis, hip, knee, and ankle joint motions during cycling were evaluated in the sagittal, coronal, and transverse planes. Kinematic data were normalized to 0–100% of the cycling cycle. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, Mann-Whitney U test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and k-fold cross-validation were used to analyze the data. Results In the sagittal plane, the cycling ranges of motion (ROMs) were 1.6° (pelvis), 43.9° (hip), 75.2° (knee), and 26.9° (ankle). The coronal plane movement was observed in all joints, and the specific ROMs were 6.6° (knee) and 5.8° (ankle). There was significant internal and external rotation of the hip (ROM: 11.6°), knee (ROM: 6.6°), and ankle (ROM: 10.3°) during cycling. There was no difference in kinematic data of the pelvis, hip, knee, and ankle between the sexes (p = 0.12 to 0.95) and between different age groups (p = 0.11 to 0.96) in all anatomical planes. Conclusions The kinematic results support the view that cycling is highly beneficial for comprehensive musculoskeletal rehabilitation. These results might help clinicians set a target of recovery ROM based on healthy and non-elite individuals and issue suitable guidelines to patients.

scholarly journals Relationships between Hip Flexibility and Pitching Biomechanics in Adolescent Baseball Pitchers

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maxwell L. Albiero ◽  
Wesley Kokott ◽  
Cody Dziuk ◽  
Janelle A. Cross
Keyword(s):  
External Rotation ◽  
Pearson Correlation ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Kinematic Chain ◽  
Abduction Angle ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Flexion Extension ◽  
Hip Abduction ◽  
Baseball Pitchers

Abstract Context: Inadequate hip active range of motion (AROM) may stifle the energy flow through the kinematic chain and decrease pitching performance while increasing the risk for pitcher injury. Objective: To examine the relationship of hip AROM and pitching biomechanics during a fastball pitch in adolescent baseball pitchers. Design: Cross-Sectional study. Setting: Biomechanics laboratory. Participants: A voluntary sample of 21 adolescent baseball pitchers (16.1 ± 0.8 yrs.; 183.9 ± 5.2 cm; 77.9 ± 8.3 kg). Main Outcome Measure (s): Bilateral hip internal rotation (IR), external rotation (ER), flexion, extension, and abduction AROM were measured. Three-dimensional biomechanics were assessed as participants threw from an indoor pitching mound to a strike zone net at regulation distance. Pearson correlation coefficients were used to determine correlations between hip AROM and biomechanical metrics. Results: Statistically significant negative correlations were found at foot contact between back hip ER AROM and back hip abduction angle (p=0.030, r=−0.474), back hip ER AROM and torso rotation angle (p=0.032, r=−0.468),and back hip abduction AROM and lead hip abduction angle (p=0.037, r=−0.458). Back hip extension AROM was positively correlated with increased stride length (p=0.043, r=0.446). Lead hip abduction AROM was also positively correlated with normalized elbow varus torque (p=0.034, r=0.464). Conclusions: There were several relationships between hip AROM and biomechanical variables during the pitching motion. The findings support the influence hip AROM can have on pitching biomechanics. Overall, greater movement at the hips allows for the kinematic chain to work at its maximal efficiency, increasing pitch velocity potential.

scholarly journals Estimation of 3D Knee Joint Angles during Cycling Using Inertial Sensors: Accuracy of a Novel Sensor-to-Segment Calibration Procedure Based on Pedaling Motion

Sensors ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (11) ◽  
pp. 2474 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sébastien Cordillet ◽  
Nicolas Bideau ◽  
Benoit Bideau ◽  
Guillaume Nicolas
Keyword(s):  
Knee Joint ◽  
Inertial Sensor ◽  
External Rotation ◽  
Calibration Method ◽  
Calibration Procedure ◽  
Angle Measurement ◽  
Measurement Unit ◽  
Joint Angles ◽  
Calibration Methods ◽  
Flexion Extension

This paper presents a novel sensor-to-segment calibration procedure for inertial sensor-based knee joint kinematics analysis during cycling. This procedure was designed to be feasible in-field, autonomously, and without any external operator or device. It combines a static standing up posture and a pedaling task. The main goal of this study was to assess the accuracy of the new sensor-to-segment calibration method (denoted as the ‘cycling’ method) by calculating errors in terms of body-segment orientations and 3D knee joint angles using inertial measurement unit (IMU)-based and optoelectronic-based motion capture. To do so, 14 participants were evaluated during pedaling motion at a workload of 100 W, which enabled comparisons of the cycling method with conventional calibration methods commonly employed in gait analysis. The accuracy of the cycling method was comparable to that of other methods concerning the knee flexion/extension angle, and did not exceed 3.8°. However, the cycling method presented the smallest errors for knee internal/external rotation (6.65 ± 1.94°) and abduction/adduction (5.92 ± 2.85°). This study demonstrated that a calibration method based on the completion of a pedaling task combined with a standing posture significantly improved the accuracy of 3D knee joint angle measurement when applied to cycling analysis.

Reliability and Accuracy in Three-Dimensional Gait Analysis: A Comparison of Two Lower Body Protocols

2013 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 105-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Felix Stief ◽  
Harald Böhm ◽  
Katja Michel ◽  
Ansgar Schwirtz ◽  
Leonhard Döderlein
Keyword(s):  
Knee Joint ◽  
Gait Analysis ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Frontal Plane ◽  
Transverse Plane ◽  
Lower Body ◽  
Landmark Identification ◽  
Gait Parameters ◽  
Custom Made ◽  
Flexion Extension

The standard Plug-in-Gait (PiG) protocol used in three-dimensional gait analysis is prone to errors arising from inconsistent anatomical landmark identification and knee axis malalignment. The purpose of this study was to estimate the reliability and accuracy of a custom made lower body protocol (MA) compared with the PiG protocol. Twenty-fve subjects volunteered to evaluate the intertrial reliability. In addition, intersession reliability was examined in 10 participants. An indirect indicator of accuracy according to the knee varus/valgus and flexion/extension range of motion (ROM) was used. Regarding frontal plane knee angles and moments as well as transverse plane motions in the knee and hip joint, the intersession errors were lower for the MA compared with the standard approach. In reference to the knee joint angle cross-talk, the MA produced 4.7° more knee flexion/extension ROM and resulted in 6.5° less knee varus/valgus ROM in the frontal plane. Therefore, the MA tested in this study produced a more accurate and reliable knee joint axis compared with the PiG protocol. These results are especially important for measuring frontal and transverse plane gait parameters.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document