scholarly journals USP7 couples DNA replication termination to mitotic entry

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Galarreta ◽  
Emilio Lecona ◽  
Pablo Valledor ◽  
Patricia Ubieto ◽  
Vanesa Lafarga ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Mechanism Of Action ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Essential Role ◽  
Premature Termination ◽  
Mitotic Entry ◽  
Entire Cell ◽  
Segregation Of Chromosomes

SUMMARYTo ensure a faithful segregation of chromosomes, DNA must be fully replicated before mitotic entry. However, how cells sense the completion of DNA replication and to what extent this is linked to the activation of the mitotic machinery remains poorly understood. We previously showed that USP7 is a replisome-associated deubiquitinase with an essential role in DNA replication. Here, we reveal that USP7 inhibition leads to the ubiquitination of MCM7, a hallmark of DNA replication termination. In addition, USP7 inhibition leads to the ubiquitination of additional replisome components such as POLD1, which are displaced from replisomes. Surprisingly, this premature termination of DNA replication occurs concomitant to a generalized activation of CDK1 throughout the entire cell cycle, which impairs chromosome segregation and is toxic for mammalian cells. Accordingly, the toxicity of USP7 inhibitors is alleviated by CDK1 inhibition. Our work sheds light into the mechanism of action of USP7 inhibitors and provides evidence to the concept that DNA replication termination is coupled to the activation of the mitotic program.

A murine replication protein accumulates temporarily in the heterochromatic regions of nuclei prior to initiation of DNA replication

1995 ◽  
Vol 108 (3) ◽  
pp. 927-934 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Starborg ◽  
E. Brundell ◽  
K. Gell ◽  
C. Larsson ◽  
I. White ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Mitotic Cell ◽  
Yeast Cells ◽  
Metaphase Chromosomes ◽  
Licensing Factor ◽  
Mammalian Homologue ◽  
Initiation Of Dna Replication

We have analyzed the expression of the murine P1 gene, the mammalian homologue of the yeast MCM3 protein, during the mitotic cell cycle. The MCM3 protein has previously been shown to be of importance for initiation of DNA replication in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We found that the murine P1 protein was present in the nuclei of mammalian cells throughout interphase of the cell cycle. This is in contrast to the MCM3 protein, which is located in the nuclei of yeast cells only between the M and the S phase of the cell cycle. Detailed analysis of the intranuclear localization of the P1 protein during the cell cycle revealed that it accumulates transiently in the heterochromatic regions towards the end of G1. The accumulation of the P1 protein in the heterochromatic regions prior to activation of DNA replication suggests that the mammalian P1 protein is also of importance for initiation of DNA replication. The MCM2-3.5 proteins have been suggested to represent yeast equivalents of a hypothetical replication licensing factor initially described in Xenopus. Our data support this model and indicate that the murine P1 protein could function as replication licensing factor. The chromosomal localization of the P1 gene was determined by fluorescence in situ hybridization to region 6p12 in human metaphase chromosomes.

Essential role of human CDT1 in DNA replication and chromatin licensing

2002 ◽  
Vol 115 (7) ◽  
pp. 1435-1440 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mickael Rialland ◽  
Francesco Sola ◽  
Corrado Santocanale
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Complex Formation ◽  
Fission Yeast ◽  
Origin Recognition Complex ◽  
Essential Role ◽  
Large Body ◽  
Transformed Cells ◽  
Minichromosome Maintenance

Formation of pre-replicative complexes at origins is an early cell cycle event essential for DNA duplication. A large body of evidence supports the notion that Cdc6 protein, through its interaction with the origin recognition complex, is required for pre-replicative complex assembly by loading minichromosome maintenance proteins onto DNA. In fission yeast and Xenopus, this reaction known as the licensing of chromatin for DNA replication also requires the newly identified Cdt1 protein. We studied the role of hCdt1 protein in the duplication of the human genome by antibody microinjection experiments and analyzed its expression during the cell cycle in human non-transformed cells. We show that hCdt1 is essential for DNA replication in intact human cells, that it executes its function in a window of the cell cycle overlapping with pre-replicative complex formation and that it is necessary for the loading of minichromosome maintenance proteins onto chromatin. Intriguingly, we observed that hCdt1 protein, in contrast to other licensing factors, is already present in serum-deprived G0 arrested cells and its levels increase only marginally upon re-entry in the cell cycle.

scholarly journals Centromere-localized Aurora B kinase is required for the fidelity of chromosome segregation

2019 ◽  
Vol 219 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Cai Liang ◽  
Zhenlei Zhang ◽  
Qinfu Chen ◽  
Haiyan Yan ◽  
Miao Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Essential Role ◽  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ◽  
Histone H3 ◽  
Spindle Assembly ◽  
Aurora B ◽  
Aurora B Kinase ◽  
Chromosome Missegregation ◽  
Proper Timing ◽  
Segregation Of Chromosomes

Aurora B kinase plays an essential role in chromosome bi-orientation, which is a prerequisite for equal segregation of chromosomes during mitosis. However, it remains largely unclear whether centromere-localized Aurora B is required for faithful chromosome segregation. Here we show that histone H3 Thr-3 phosphorylation (H3pT3) and H2A Thr-120 phosphorylation (H2ApT120) can independently recruit Aurora B. Disrupting H3pT3-mediated localization of Aurora B at the inner centromere impedes the decline in H2ApT120 during metaphase and causes H2ApT120-dependent accumulation of Aurora B at the kinetochore-proximal centromere. Consequently, silencing of the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) is delayed, whereas the fidelity of chromosome segregation is negligibly affected. Further eliminating an H2ApT120-dependent pool of Aurora B restores proper timing for SAC silencing but increases chromosome missegregation. Our data indicate that H2ApT120-mediated localization of Aurora B compensates for the loss of an H3pT3-dependent pool of Aurora B to correct improper kinetochore–microtubule attachments. This study provides important insights into how centromeric Aurora B regulates SAC and kinetochore attachment to microtubules to ensure error-free chromosome segregation.

scholarly journals DNA replication and spindle checkpoints cooperate during S phase to delay mitosis and preserve genome integrity

2014 ◽  
Vol 204 (2) ◽  
pp. 165-175 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria M. Magiera ◽  
Elisabeth Gueydon ◽  
Etienne Schwob
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Replication Stress ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Genome Integrity ◽  
Replication Forks ◽  
Mitotic Entry ◽  
Transient Activation ◽  
Spindle Checkpoints ◽  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoints

Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) replication and chromosome segregation must occur in ordered sequence to maintain genome integrity during cell proliferation. Checkpoint mechanisms delay mitosis when DNA is damaged or upon replication stress, but little is known on the coupling of S and M phases in unperturbed conditions. To address this issue, we postponed replication onset in budding yeast so that DNA synthesis is still underway when cells should enter mitosis. This delayed mitotic entry and progression by transient activation of the S phase, G2/M, and spindle assembly checkpoints. Disabling both Mec1/ATR- and Mad2-dependent controls caused lethality in cells with deferred S phase, accompanied by Rad52 foci and chromosome missegregation. Thus, in contrast to acute replication stress that triggers a sustained Mec1/ATR response, multiple pathways cooperate to restrain mitosis transiently when replication forks progress unhindered. We suggest that these surveillance mechanisms arose when both S and M phases were coincidently set into motion by a unique ancestral cyclin–Cdk1 complex.

scholarly journals Nonperiodic Activity of the Human Anaphase-Promoting Complex–Cdh1 Ubiquitin Ligase Results in Continuous DNA Synthesis Uncoupled from Mitosis

2000 ◽  
Vol 20 (20) ◽  
pp. 7613-7623 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claus Storgaard Sørensen ◽  
Claudia Lukas ◽  
Edgar R. Kramer ◽  
Jan-Michael Peters ◽  
Jiri Bartek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Dna Synthesis ◽  
Ubiquitin Ligase ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Cyclin B1 ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Anaphase Promoting Complex

ABSTRACT Ubiquitin-proteasome-mediated destruction of rate-limiting proteins is required for timely progression through the main cell cycle transitions. The anaphase-promoting complex (APC), periodically activated by the Cdh1 subunit, represents one of the major cellular ubiquitin ligases which, in Saccharomyces cerevisiae andDrosophila spp., triggers exit from mitosis and during G1 prevents unscheduled DNA replication. In this study we investigated the importance of periodic oscillation of the APC-Cdh1 activity for the cell cycle progression in human cells. We show that conditional interference with the APC-Cdh1 dissociation at the G1/S transition resulted in an inability to accumulate a surprisingly broad range of critical mitotic regulators including cyclin B1, cyclin A, Plk1, Pds1, mitosin (CENP-F), Aim1, and Cdc20. Unexpectedly, although constitutively assembled APC-Cdh1 also delayed G1/S transition and lowered the rate of DNA synthesis during S phase, some of the activities essential for DNA replication became markedly amplified, mainly due to a progressive increase of E2F-dependent cyclin E transcription and a rapid turnover of the p27Kip1 cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor. Consequently, failure to inactivate APC-Cdh1 beyond the G1/S transition not only inhibited productive cell division but also supported slow but uninterrupted DNA replication, precluding S-phase exit and causing massive overreplication of the genome. Our data suggest that timely oscillation of the APC-Cdh1 ubiquitin ligase activity represents an essential step in coordinating DNA replication with cell division and that failure of mechanisms regulating association of APC with the Cdh1 activating subunit can undermine genomic stability in mammalian cells.

scholarly journals LIN-5 Is a Novel Component of the Spindle Apparatus Required for Chromosome Segregation and Cleavage Plane Specification in Caenorhabditis elegans

2000 ◽  
Vol 148 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monique A. Lorson ◽  
H. Robert Horvitz ◽  
Sander van den Heuvel
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Caenorhabditis Elegans ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Cleavage Plane ◽  
Coiled Coil ◽  
Metaphase Plate ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Spindle Apparatus ◽  
Cytoplasmic Cleavage

Successful divisions of eukaryotic cells require accurate and coordinated cycles of DNA replication, spindle formation, chromosome segregation, and cytoplasmic cleavage. The Caenorhabditis elegans gene lin-5 is essential for multiple aspects of cell division. Cells in lin-5 null mutants enter mitosis at the normal time and form bipolar spindles, but fail chromosome alignment at the metaphase plate, sister chromatid separation, and cytokinesis. Despite these defects, cells exit from mitosis without delay and progress through subsequent rounds of DNA replication, centrosome duplication, and abortive mitoses. In addition, early embryos that lack lin-5 function show defects in spindle positioning and cleavage plane specification. The lin-5 gene encodes a novel protein with a central coiled-coil domain. This protein localizes to the spindle apparatus in a cell cycle- and microtubule-dependent manner. The LIN-5 protein is located at the centrosomes throughout mitosis, at the kinetochore microtubules in metaphase cells, and at the spindle during meiosis. Our results show that LIN-5 is a novel component of the spindle apparatus required for chromosome and spindle movements, cytoplasmic cleavage, and correct alternation of the S and M phases of the cell cycle.

scholarly journals Loss of CIC promotes mitotic dysregulation and chromosome segregation defects

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suganthi Chittaranjan ◽  
Jungeun Song ◽  
Susanna Y. Chan ◽  
Stephen Dongsoo Lee ◽  
Shiekh Tanveer Ahmad ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Chromosomal Instability ◽  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ◽  
Tumour Suppressor ◽  
Cell Cycle Regulators ◽  
Loss Of Function ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Cancer Types

AbstractBackgroundCIC is a transcriptional repressor inactivated by loss-of-function mutations in several cancer types, including gliomas, lung cancers, and gastric adenocarcinomas. CIC alterations and/or loss of CIC activity have been associated with poorer outcomes and more aggressive phenotypes across cancer types, which is consistent with the notion that CIC functions as a tumour suppressor across a wide range of contexts.ResultsUsing mammalian cells lacking functional CIC, we found that CIC deficiency was associated with chromosome segregation (CS) defects, resulting in chromosomal instability and aneuploidy. These CS defects were associated with transcriptional dysregulation of spindle assembly checkpoint and cell cycle regulators. We also identified novel CIC interacting proteins, including core members of the SWI/SNF complex, and showed that they cooperatively regulated the expression of genes involved in cell cycle regulation. Finally, we showed that loss of CIC and ARID1A cooperatively increased CS defects and reduced cell viability.ConclusionsOur study ascribes a novel role to CIC as an important regulator of the cell cycle and demonstrates that loss of CIC can lead to chromosomal instability and aneuploidy in human and murine cells through defects in CS, providing insight into the underlying mechanisms of CIC’s increasingly apparent role as a “pan-cancer” tumour suppressor.

scholarly journals E2F1: Cause and Consequence of DNA Replication Stress

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shahd Fouad ◽  
David Hauton ◽  
Vincenzo D'Angiolella
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Tumor Suppressor ◽  
Signaling Pathways ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Replication Stress ◽  
Checkpoint Control ◽  
Oncogenic Signaling ◽  
Dna Replication Stress ◽  
Oncogenic Signaling Pathways

In mammalian cells, cell cycle entry occurs in response to the correct stimuli and is promoted by the transcriptional activity of E2F family members. E2F proteins regulate the transcription of S phase cyclins and genes required for DNA replication, DNA repair, and apoptosis. The activity of E2F1, the archetypal and most heavily studied E2F family member, is tightly controlled by the DNA damage checkpoints to modulate cell cycle progression and initiate programmed cell death, when required. Altered tumor suppressor and oncogenic signaling pathways often result in direct or indirect interference with E2F1 regulation to ensure higher rates of cell proliferation independently of external cues. Despite a clear link between dysregulated E2F1 activity and cancer progression, literature on the contribution of E2F1 to DNA replication stress phenotypes is somewhat scarce. This review discusses how dysfunctional tumor suppressor and oncogenic signaling pathways promote the disruption of E2F1 transcription and hence of its transcriptional targets, and how such events have the potential to drive DNA replication stress. In addition to the involvement of E2F1 upstream of DNA replication stress, this manuscript also considers the role of E2F1 as a downstream effector of the response to this type of cellular stress. Lastly, the review introduces some reflections on how E2F1 activity is integrated with checkpoint control through post-translational regulation, and proposes an exploitable tumor weakness based on this axis.

scholarly journals CDK2 activity determines the timing of cell-cycle commitment and sequential DNA replication

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sungsoo Kim ◽  
Alessandra Leong ◽  
Chellam Nayar ◽  
Minah Kim ◽  
Hee Won Yang
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Genome Stability ◽  
Threshold Level ◽  
Cyclin Dependent Kinases ◽  
Safety Mechanism ◽  
Cdk2 Activity ◽  
Tightly Coupled ◽  
Rb Phosphorylation

AbstractTo enter the cell cycle, mammalian cells must cross a point of no return (the commitment point), after which they proceed through the cell cycle regardless of changes in external signaling. This process is tightly regulated by the cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) and downstream molecules such as retinoblastoma (Rb). Here we show that CDK2 activity coordinates the timing of cell-cycle commitment and DNA replication. CDK4/6 activation initiates Rb phosphorylation and E2F activity, causing a gradual increase in CDK2 activity. Once CDK2 activity reaches a threshold level, CDK2 triggers the commitment point by maintaining Rb phosphorylation and subsequently initiates DNA replication. While the timing of the commitment point is tightly coupled with DNA replication, our experiments, which acutely increased CDK2 activity, suggest that the timing of the commitment point is before DNA replication. These findings highlight how cells utilize a safety mechanism to maintain genome stability by protecting against incomplete DNA replication.

scholarly journals Cdc14 phosphatase directs centrosome re-duplication at the meiosis I to meiosis II transition in budding yeast

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Colette Fox ◽  
Juan Zou ◽  
Juri Rappsilber ◽  
Adele L. Marston
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Spindle Pole Body ◽  
Initial Step ◽  
Mitotic Cell ◽  
Spindle Pole ◽  
Fluorescence And Electron Microscopy ◽  
Meiosis I

Background Gametes are generated through a specialized cell division called meiosis, in which ploidy is reduced by half because two consecutive rounds of chromosome segregation, meiosis I and meiosis II, occur without intervening DNA replication. This contrasts with the mitotic cell cycle where DNA replication and chromosome segregation alternate to maintain the same ploidy. At the end of mitosis, CDKs are inactivated. This low CDK state in late mitosis/G1 allows for critical preparatory events for DNA replication and centrosome/spindle pole body (SPB) duplication. However, their execution is inhibited until S phase, where further preparatory events are also prevented. This “licensing” ensures that both the chromosomes and the centrosomes/SPBs replicate exactly once per cell cycle, thereby maintaining constant ploidy. Crucially, between meiosis I and meiosis II, centrosomes/SPBs must be re-licensed, but DNA re-replication must be avoided. In budding yeast, the Cdc14 protein phosphatase triggers CDK down regulation to promote exit from mitosis. Cdc14 also regulates the meiosis I to meiosis II transition, though its mode of action has remained unclear. Methods Fluorescence and electron microscopy was combined with proteomics to probe SPB duplication in cells with inactive or hyperactive Cdc14. Results We demonstrate that Cdc14 ensures two successive nuclear divisions by re-licensing SPBs at the meiosis I to meiosis II transition. We show that Cdc14 is asymmetrically enriched on a single SPB during anaphase I and provide evidence that this enrichment promotes SPB re-duplication. Cells with impaired Cdc14 activity fail to promote extension of the SPB half-bridge, the initial step in morphogenesis of a new SPB. Conversely, cells with hyper-active Cdc14 duplicate SPBs, but fail to induce their separation. Conclusion Our findings implicate reversal of key CDK-dependent phosphorylations in the differential licensing of cyclical events at the meiosis I to meiosis I transition.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document