Genomic consequences of a recent three-way admixture in supplemented wild brown trout populations revealed by ancestry tracts

Understanding the evolutionary consequences of human-mediated introductions of domestic strains into the wild and their subsequent admixture with natural populations is of major concern in conservation biology. In the brown trout Salmo trutta, decades of stocking practices have profoundly impacted the genetic makeup of wild populations. Small local Mediterranean populations in the Orb River watershed (Southern France) have been subject to successive introductions of domestic strains derived from the Atlantic and Mediterranean lineages. However, the genomic impacts of two distinct sources of stocking (locally-derived vs divergent) on the genetic integrity of wild populations remain poorly understood. Here, we evaluate the extent of admixture from both domestic strains within three wild populations of this watershed, using 75,684 mapped SNPs obtained from double-digest restriction-site-associated DNA sequencing (dd-RADseq). Using a local ancestry inference approach, we provide a detailed picture of admixture patterns across the brown trout genome at the haplotype level. By analysing the chromosomal ancestry profiles of admixed individuals, we reveal a wider diversity of hybrid and introgressed genotypes than estimated using classical methods for inferring ancestry and hybrid pedigree. In addition, the length distribution of introgressed tracts retained different timings of introgression between the two domestic strains. We finally reveal opposite consequences of admixture on the level of polymorphism of the recipient populations between domestic strains. Our study illustrates the potential of using the information contained in the genomic mosaic of ancestry tracts in combination with classical methods based on allele frequencies for analysing multiple-way admixture with population genomic data.