scholarly journals Cell cycle-controlled clearance of the CcrM DNA methyltransferase by Lon is dependent on DNA-facilitated proteolysis and substrate polar sequestration

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaofeng Zhou ◽  
Lucy Shapiro
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Methylation ◽  
Dna Methyltransferase ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Cell Cycle Control ◽  
Physical Contact ◽  
Substrate Selection ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Time Period ◽  
Adenine Methylation

AbstractN6-adenine methylation catalyzed by the DNA methyltransferase CcrM is an essential epigenetic event of theCaulobactercell cycle. Limiting CcrM to a specific time period during the cell cycle relies on temporal control ofccrMtranscription and CcrM proteolysis. We investigated how Lon, a protease from AAA+ superfamily conserved from bacteria to humans, temporally degrades CcrM to maintain differential chromosomal methylation state, thereby regulating transcription factor synthesis and enabling cell cycle progression. We demonstrate that CcrM degradation by Lon requires DNA as an adaptor for robust proteolysis. Lon, a DNA-bound protein, is constitutively active throughout the cell cycle, but allows CcrM mediated DNA methylation only when CcrM is transcribed and translated upon completion of DNA replication. An additional mechanism to limit CcrM activity to a narrow window of the cell cycle is its sequestration to the pole of the progeny stalked cell, which prevents physical contact with DNA-bound Lon. Thus, we have provided evidence for a novel mechanism for substrate selection by the Lon protease, providing robust cell cycle control mediated by DNA methylation.

Cdk1-Dependent Phosphorylation ofNPM Overrides G2/M Checkpoint and Increases Leukemic Blasts in Mice

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 1322-1322
Author(s):  
Wei Du ◽  
Yun Zhou ◽  
Suzette Pike ◽  
Qishen Pang
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Cell Cycle Control ◽  
Xenograft Model ◽  
Phosphorylation Sites ◽  
M Cell ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Cycle Arrest ◽  
Regulation Of Cell Cycle

Abstract An elevated level of nucleophosmin (NPM) is often found in actively proliferative cells including human tumors. To identify the regulatory role for NPM phosphorylation in proliferation and cell cycle control, a series of mutants targeting the consensus cyclin-dependent kinase (CKD) phosphorylation sites was created to mimic or abrogate either single-site or multi-site phosphorylation. Cells expressing the phosphomimetic NPM mutants showed enhanced proliferation and G2/M cell-cycle transition; whereas nonphosphorylatable mutants induced G2/M cell-cycle arrest. Simultaneous inactivation of two CKD phosphorylation sites at Ser10 and Ser70 (S10A/S70A, NPM-AA) induced phosphorylation of Cdk1 at Tyr15 (Cdc2Tyr15) and increased cytoplasmic accumulation of Cdc25C. Strikingly, stress-induced Cdk1Tyr15 and Cdc25C sequestration were completely suppressed by expression of a double phosphomimetic NPM mutant (S10E/S70E, NPM-EE). Further analysis revealed that phosphorylation of NPM at both Ser10 and Ser70 sites were required for proper interaction between Cdk1 and Cdc25C in mitotic cells. Moreover, the NPM-EE mutant directly bound to Cdc25C and prevented phosphorylation of Cdc25C at Ser216 during mitosis. Finally, NPM-EE overrided stress-induced G2/M arrest, increased peripheral-blood blasts and splenomegaly in a NOD/SCID xenograft model, and promoted leukemia development in Fanconi mouse hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells. Thus, these findings reveal a novel function of NPM on regulation of cell-cycle progression, in which Cdk1-dependent phosphorylation of NPM controls cell-cycle progression at G2/M transition through modulation of Cdc25C activity.

DNA methylation in Caulobacter and other Alphaproteobacteria during cell cycle progression

2014 ◽  
Vol 22 (9) ◽  
pp. 528-535 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saswat S. Mohapatra ◽  
Antonella Fioravanti ◽  
Emanuele G. Biondi
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Methylation ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Cycle Progression

scholarly journals In silico APC/C substrate discovery reveals cell cycle degradation of chromatin regulators including UHRF1

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer L. Kernan ◽  
Raquel C. Martinez-Chacin ◽  
Xianxi Wang ◽  
Rochelle L. Tiedemann ◽  
Thomas Bonacci ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Methylation ◽  
In Silico ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Vital Role ◽  
Regulatory Proteins ◽  
Phase Cell ◽  
Cell Physiology ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Chromatin Regulator

AbstractThe Anaphase-Promoting Complex/Cyclosome (APC/C) is an E3 ubiquitin ligase and critical regulator of cell cycle progression. Despite its vital role, it has remained challenging to globally map APC/C substrates. By combining orthogonal features of known substrates, we predicted APC/C substrates in silico. This analysis identified many known substrates and suggested numerous candidates. Unexpectedly, chromatin regulatory proteins are enriched among putative substrates and we show that several chromatin proteins bind APC/C, oscillate during the cell cycle and are degraded following APC/C activation, consistent with being direct APC/C substrates. Additional analysis revealed detailed mechanisms of ubiquitylation for UHRF1, a key chromatin regulator involved in histone ubiquitylation and DNA methylation maintenance. Disrupting UHRF1 degradation at mitotic exit accelerates G1-phase cell cycle progression and perturbs global DNA methylation patterning in the genome. We conclude that APC/C coordinates crosstalk between cell cycle and chromatin regulatory proteins. This has potential consequences in normal cell physiology, where the chromatin environment changes depending on proliferative state, as well as in disease.

scholarly journals The Multiple Roles of the Cdc14 Phosphatase in Cell Cycle Control

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 709
Author(s):  
Javier Manzano-López ◽  
Fernando Monje-Casas
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Cell Cycle Control ◽  
Multiple Roles ◽  
Special Focus ◽  
Cyclin Dependent Kinase ◽  
Yeast Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Cycle Progression

The Cdc14 phosphatase is a key regulator of mitosis in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cdc14 was initially described as playing an essential role in the control of cell cycle progression by promoting mitotic exit on the basis of its capacity to counteract the activity of the cyclin-dependent kinase Cdc28/Cdk1. A compiling body of evidence, however, has later demonstrated that this phosphatase plays other multiple roles in the regulation of mitosis at different cell cycle stages. Here, we summarize our current knowledge about the pivotal role of Cdc14 in cell cycle control, with a special focus in the most recently uncovered functions of the phosphatase.

scholarly journals Functional Differentiation of SWI/SNF Remodelers in Transcription and Cell Cycle Control

2006 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 651-661 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuri M. Moshkin ◽  
Lisette Mohrmann ◽  
Wilfred F. J. van Ijcken ◽  
C. Peter Verrijzer
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Structural Integrity ◽  
Function Analysis ◽  
Cell Cycle Control ◽  
Functional Differentiation ◽  
Transcription Control ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
The Core

ABSTRACT Drosophila BAP and PBAP represent two evolutionarily conserved subclasses of SWI/SNF chromatin remodelers. The two complexes share the same core subunits, including the BRM ATPase, but differ in a few signature subunits: OSA defines BAP, whereas Polybromo (PB) and BAP170 specify PBAP. Here, we present a comprehensive structure-function analysis of BAP and PBAP. An RNA interference knockdown survey revealed that the core subunits BRM and MOR are critical for the structural integrity of both complexes. Whole-genome expression profiling suggested that the SWI/SNF core complex is largely dysfunctional in cells. Regulation of the majority of target genes required the signature subunit OSA, PB, or BAP170, suggesting that SWI/SNF remodelers function mostly as holoenzymes. BAP and PBAP execute similar, independent, or antagonistic functions in transcription control and appear to direct mostly distinct biological processes. BAP, but not PBAP, is required for cell cycle progression through mitosis. Because in yeast the PBAP-homologous complex, RSC, controls cell cycle progression, our finding reveals a functional switch during evolution. BAP mediates G2/M transition through direct regulation of string/cdc25. Its signature subunit, OSA, is required for directing BAP to the string/cdc25 promoter. Our results suggest that the core subunits play architectural and enzymatic roles but that the signature subunits determine most of the functional specificity of SWI/SNF holoenzymes in general gene control.

Cell cycle control

2016 ◽  
pp. 31-41
Author(s):  
Simon M. Carr ◽  
Nicholas B. La Thangue
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Final Stage ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Cell Cycle Control ◽  
Control Mechanisms ◽  
Chromosomal Dna ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
M Phase ◽  
Cellular Components ◽  
Regulate Cell Cycle Progression

All cells arise by the division of existing cells in a highly regulated series of events known as the cell cycle. Whilst duplication of other cellular contents occurs throughout all stages of the cycle, chromosomal DNA is replicated only once at a stage known as S phase. Once this is complete, distribution of chromosomes and other cellular components occurs during the final stage of the cell cycle, known as M phase, or mitosis. The cell cycle is therefore regulated in a temporal fashion, so that entry into subsequent cell cycle stages only occurs once the previous stage has been completed. A number of signalling mechanisms monitor the integrity of cell cycle progression, and later cell cycle stages can be delayed if any errors need correction. This chapter gives an overview of the major control mechanisms that regulate cell cycle progression, and how these are circumvented during the onset of cancer.

scholarly journals Ubiquitin signaling in cell cycle control and tumorigenesis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabin Dang ◽  
Li Nie ◽  
Wenyi Wei
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Regulation ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Cell Cycle Control ◽  
Ubiquitin Ligases ◽  
E3 Ubiquitin Ligases ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Precise Control ◽  
Cycle Regulation

Abstract Cell cycle progression is a tightly regulated process by which DNA replicates and cell reproduces. The major driving force underlying cell cycle progression is the sequential activation of cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs), which is achieved in part by the ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis of their cyclin partners and kinase inhibitors (CKIs). In eukaryotic cells, two families of E3 ubiquitin ligases, anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome and Skp1-Cul1-F-box protein complex, are responsible for ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation of many of these CDK regulators, ensuring cell cycle progresses in a timely and precisely regulated manner. In the past couple of decades, accumulating evidence have demonstrated that the dysregulated cell cycle transition caused by inefficient proteolytic control leads to uncontrolled cell proliferation and finally results in tumorigenesis. Based upon this notion, targeting the E3 ubiquitin ligases involved in cell cycle regulation is expected to provide novel therapeutic strategies for cancer treatment. Thus, a better understanding of the diversity and complexity of ubiquitin signaling in cell cycle regulation will shed new light on the precise control of the cell cycle progression and guide anticancer drug development.

scholarly journals Inhibition of Cellular DNA Synthesis by the Human Cytomegalovirus IE86 Protein Is Necessary for Efficient Virus Replication

2006 ◽  
Vol 80 (8) ◽  
pp. 3872-3883 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dustin T. Petrik ◽  
Kimberly P. Schmitt ◽  
Mark F. Stinski
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Synthesis ◽  
Human Cytomegalovirus ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Cell Cycle Control ◽  
Single Amino Acid ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Artificial Chromosomes ◽  
Early Genes ◽  
Cellular Dna

ABSTRACT Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) expresses several proteins that manipulate normal cellular functions, including cellular transcription, apoptosis, immune response, and cell cycle control. The IE2 gene, which is expressed from the HCMV major immediate-early (MIE) promoter, encodes the IE86 protein. IE86 is a multifunctional protein that is essential for viral replication. The functions of IE86 include transactivation of cellular and viral early genes, negative autoregulation of the MIE promoter, induction of cell cycle progression from G0/G1 to G1/S, and arresting cell cycle progression at the G1/S transition in p53-positive human foreskin fibroblast (HFF) cells. Mutations were introduced into the IE2 gene in the context of the viral genome using bacterial artificial chromosomes (BACs). From these HCMV BACs, a recombinant virus (RV) with a single amino acid substitution in the IE86 protein was isolated that replicates slower and to lower titers than wild-type HCMV. HFF cells infected with the Q548R RV undergo cellular DNA synthesis and do not arrest at any point in the cell cycle. The Q548R RV is able to negatively autoregulate the MIE promoter, transactivate viral early genes, activate cellular E2F-responsive genes, and produce infectious virus. This is the first report of a viable recombinant HCMV that is unable to inhibit cellular DNA synthesis in infected HFF cells.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document