scholarly journals bioLQM: a java library for the manipulation and conversion of Logical Qualitative Models of biological networks

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aurélien Naldi
Keyword(s):  
Biological Networks ◽  
Regulatory Networks ◽  
Model Simulation ◽  
Biological Regulatory Networks ◽  
Interactive Tools ◽  
Graphical Interfaces ◽  
Qualitative Models ◽  
Import And Export ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Java Library

AbstractHere we introduce bioLQM, a new Java software toolkit for the conversion, modification, and analysis of Logical Qualitative Models of biological regulatory networks, aiming to foster the development of novel complementary tools by providing core modelling operations. Based on the definition of multi-valued logical models, it implements import and export facilities, notably for the recent SBML-qual exchange format, as well as for formats used by several popular tools, facilitating the design of workflows combining these tools. Model modifications enable the definition of various perturbations, as well as model reduction, easing the analysis of large models. Another modification enables the study of multi-valued models with tools limited to the Boolean case. Finally, bioLQM provides a framework for the development of novel analysis tools. The current version implements the usual updating modes for model simulation (notably synchronous, asynchronous, and random asynchronous), as well as some static analysis features for the identification of attractors. The bioLQM software can be integrated into analysis workflows through command line and scripting interfaces. As a Java library, it further provides core data structures to the GINsim and EpiLog interactive tools, which supply graphical interfaces and additional analysis methods for cellular and multi-cellular qualitative models.

scholarly journals Informeasure: an R/Bioconductor package to quantify nonlinear dependence between variables in biological networks from an information theory perspective

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
CHU PAN
Keyword(s):  
Information Theory ◽  
Mutual Information ◽  
Biological Networks ◽  
Regulatory Networks ◽  
Partial Information ◽  
R Package ◽  
Nonlinear Dependence ◽  
Bioconductor Package ◽  
Information Measures ◽  
Biological Regulatory Networks

Using information measures to infer biological regulatory networks can observe nonlinear relationship between variables, but it is computationally challenging and there is currently no convenient tool available. We here describe an information theory R package named Informeasure that devotes to quantifying nonlinear dependence between variables in biological regulatory networks from an information theory perspective. This package compiles most of the information measures currently available: mutual information, conditional mutual information, interaction information, partial information decomposition and part mutual information. The first estimator is used to infer bivariate networks while the last four estimators are dedicated to analysis of trivariate networks. The base installation of this turn-key package allows users to approach these information measures out of the box. Informeasure is implemented in R program and is available as an R/Bioconductor package at https://bioconductor.org/packages/Informeasure.

DReSS: a method to quantitatively describe the influence of structural perturbations on state spaces of genetic regulatory networks

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ziqiao Yin ◽  
Binghui Guo ◽  
Shuangge Ma ◽  
Yifan Sun ◽  
Zhilong Mi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Biological Networks ◽  
Regulatory Networks ◽  
Genetic Regulatory Networks ◽  
Random Networks ◽  
Graph Distance ◽  
State Spaces ◽  
Biological Regulatory Networks ◽  
Structural Perturbations ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Index Family

Abstract Structures of genetic regulatory networks are not fixed. These structural perturbations can cause changes to the reachability of systems’ state spaces. As system structures are related to genotypes and state spaces are related to phenotypes, it is important to study the relationship between structures and state spaces. However, there is still no method can quantitively describe the reachability differences of two state spaces caused by structural perturbations. Therefore, Difference in Reachability between State Spaces (DReSS) is proposed. DReSS index family can quantitively describe differences of reachability, attractor sets between two state spaces and can help find the key structure in a system, which may influence system’s state space significantly. First, basic properties of DReSS including non-negativity, symmetry and subadditivity are proved. Then, typical examples are shown to explain the meaning of DReSS and the differences between DReSS and traditional graph distance. Finally, differences of DReSS distribution between real biological regulatory networks and random networks are compared. Results show most structural perturbations in biological networks tend to affect reachability inside and between attractor basins rather than to affect attractor set itself when compared with random networks, which illustrates that most genotype differences tend to influence the proportion of different phenotypes and only a few ones can create new phenotypes. DReSS can provide researchers with a new insight to study the relation between genotypes and phenotypes.

scholarly journals SBML Level 3 package: Qualitative Models, Version 1, Release 1

2015 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 691-730 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudine Chaouiya ◽  
Sarah M. Keating ◽  
Duncan Berenguier ◽  
Aurélien Naldi ◽  
Denis Thieffry ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Biological Networks ◽  
Quantitative Methods ◽  
Expression Data ◽  
Qualitative Modelling ◽  
The Core ◽  
Qualitative Models ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Influence Graphs ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Modelling Methods

Summary Quantitative methods for modelling biological networks require an in-depth knowledge of the biochemical reactions and their stoichiometric and kinetic parameters. In many practical cases, this knowledge is missing. This has led to the development of several qualitative modelling methods using information such as, for example, gene expression data coming from functional genomic experiments. The SBML Level 3 Version 1 Core specification does not provide a mechanism for explicitly encoding qualitative models, but it does provide a mechanism for SBML packages to extend the Core specification and add additional syntactical constructs.The SBML Qualitative Models package for SBML Level 3 adds features so that qualitative models can be directly and explicitly encoded. The approach taken in this package is essentially based on the definition of regulatory or influence graphs. The SBML Qualitative Models package defines the structure and syntax necessary to describe qualitative models that associate discrete levels of activities with entity pools and the transitions between states that describe the processes involved. This is particularly suited to logical models (Boolean or multi-valued) and some classes of Petri net models can be encoded with the approach.

scholarly journals Biological regulatory networks are less nonlinear than expected by chance

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Santosh Manicka ◽  
Kathleen Johnson ◽  
David Murrugarra ◽  
Michael Levin
Keyword(s):  
Biological Networks ◽  
Regulatory Networks ◽  
Boolean Network ◽  
Network Models ◽  
Decomposition Methods ◽  
Boolean Logic ◽  
Nonlinear Interactions ◽  
Biological Regulatory Networks ◽  
Probabilistic Generalization ◽  
Selection For

Nonlinearity is a characteristic of complex biological regulatory networks that has implications ranging from therapy to control. To better understand its nature, we analyzed a suite of published Boolean network models, containing a variety of complex nonlinear interactions, with an approach involving a probabilistic generalization of Boolean logic that George Boole himself had proposed. Leveraging the continuous-nature of this formulation using Taylor-decomposition methods revealed the distinct layers of nonlinearity of the models. A comparison of the resulting series of model approximations with the corresponding sets of randomized ensembles furthermore revealed that the biological networks are relatively more linearly approximable. We hypothesize that this is a result of optimization by natural selection for the purpose of controllability.

Algorithmic and Stochastic Representations of Gene Regulatory Networks and Protein-Protein Interactions

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 413-425 ◽  
Author(s):  
Athanasios Alexiou ◽  
Stylianos Chatzichronis ◽  
Asma Perveen ◽  
Abdul Hafeez ◽  
Ghulam Md. Ashraf
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Biological Networks ◽  
Regulatory Networks ◽  
Review Paper ◽  
Boolean Networks ◽  
Diagnostic Tools ◽  
Complex Nature ◽  
Cellular Interactions ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Deterministic Models

Background:Latest studies reveal the importance of Protein-Protein interactions on physiologic functions and biological structures. Several stochastic and algorithmic methods have been published until now, for the modeling of the complex nature of the biological systems.Objective:Biological Networks computational modeling is still a challenging task. The formulation of the complex cellular interactions is a research field of great interest. In this review paper, several computational methods for the modeling of GRN and PPI are presented analytically.Methods:Several well-known GRN and PPI models are presented and discussed in this review study such as: Graphs representation, Boolean Networks, Generalized Logical Networks, Bayesian Networks, Relevance Networks, Graphical Gaussian models, Weight Matrices, Reverse Engineering Approach, Evolutionary Algorithms, Forward Modeling Approach, Deterministic models, Static models, Hybrid models, Stochastic models, Petri Nets, BioAmbients calculus and Differential Equations.Results:GRN and PPI methods have been already applied in various clinical processes with potential positive results, establishing promising diagnostic tools.Conclusion:In literature many stochastic algorithms are focused in the simulation, analysis and visualization of the various biological networks and their dynamics interactions, which are referred and described in depth in this review paper.

scholarly journals Differential Co-Expression Analyses Allow the Identification of Critical Signalling Pathways Altered during Tumour Transformation and Progression

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (24) ◽  
pp. 9461
Author(s):  
Aurora Savino ◽  
Paolo Provero ◽  
Valeria Poli
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Biology ◽  
Regulatory Networks ◽  
Tumour Progression ◽  
External Perturbation ◽  
Data Types ◽  
Differential Gene ◽  
Gene Regulatory ◽  
Experimental Validations ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Future Work

Biological systems respond to perturbations through the rewiring of molecular interactions, organised in gene regulatory networks (GRNs). Among these, the increasingly high availability of transcriptomic data makes gene co-expression networks the most exploited ones. Differential co-expression networks are useful tools to identify changes in response to an external perturbation, such as mutations predisposing to cancer development, and leading to changes in the activity of gene expression regulators or signalling. They can help explain the robustness of cancer cells to perturbations and identify promising candidates for targeted therapy, moreover providing higher specificity with respect to standard co-expression methods. Here, we comprehensively review the literature about the methods developed to assess differential co-expression and their applications to cancer biology. Via the comparison of normal and diseased conditions and of different tumour stages, studies based on these methods led to the definition of pathways involved in gene network reorganisation upon oncogenes’ mutations and tumour progression, often converging on immune system signalling. A relevant implementation still lagging behind is the integration of different data types, which would greatly improve network interpretability. Most importantly, performance and predictivity evaluation of the large variety of mathematical models proposed would urgently require experimental validations and systematic comparisons. We believe that future work on differential gene co-expression networks, complemented with additional omics data and experimentally tested, will considerably improve our insights into the biology of tumours.

scholarly journals BioNetLink - An Architecture for Working with Network Data

2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 68-79
Author(s):  
Matthias Klapperstück ◽  
Falk Schreiber
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Data ◽  
Biological Networks ◽  
Regulatory Networks ◽  
Large Data ◽  
Biological Data ◽  
Network Data ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
Dynamic Views ◽  
Gene Regulatory ◽  
Multiple Network

Summary The visualization of biological data gained increasing importance in the last years. There is a large number of methods and software tools available that visualize biological data including the combination of measured experimental data and biological networks. With growing size of networks their handling and exploration becomes a challenging task for the user. In addition, scientists also have an interest in not just investigating a single kind of network, but on the combination of different types of networks, such as metabolic, gene regulatory and protein interaction networks. Therefore, fast access, abstract and dynamic views, and intuitive exploratory methods should be provided to search and extract information from the networks. This paper will introduce a conceptual framework for handling and combining multiple network sources that enables abstract viewing and exploration of large data sets including additional experimental data. It will introduce a three-tier structure that links network data to multiple network views, discuss a proof of concept implementation, and shows a specific visualization method for combining metabolic and gene regulatory networks in an example.

Modulation of Biological Regulatory Networks During Nephrogenesis

2006 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 677-683 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth S. Ramos ◽  
M. Hadi Falahatpisheh ◽  
Adrian Nanez ◽  
Qiang He
Keyword(s):  
Regulatory Networks ◽  
Biological Regulatory Networks
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document