scholarly journals Cytoplasmic sequestration of the RhoA effector mDiaphanous1 by Prohibitin2 promotes muscle differentiation

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amena Saleh ◽  
Gunasekaran Subramaniam ◽  
Swasti Raychaudhuri ◽  
Jyotsna Dhawan
Keyword(s):  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Inhibitory Effects ◽  
Interacting Protein ◽  
Over Expression ◽  
Muscle Gene Expression ◽  
Binding Domains ◽  
Cytoskeletal Dynamics ◽  
Summary Statement ◽  
Muscle Gene ◽  
Independent Mutant

AbstractAdhesion and growth factor dependent signalling control muscle gene expression through common effectors, coupling cytoskeletal dynamics to transcriptional activation. Earlier, we showed that mDiaphanous1, an effector of adhesion-dependent RhoA-signalling promotes MyoD expression in myoblasts, linking contractility to lineage determination. Here, we report that paradoxically, mDia1 negatively regulates MyoD function in myotubes. Knockdown of endogenous mDia1 during differentiation enhances MyoD and Myogenin expression, while over-expression of mDia1ΔN3, a RhoA-independent mutant, suppresses Myogenin promoter activity and expression. We investigated mechanisms that may counteract mDia1 to promote Myogenin expression and timely differentiation by analysing mDia1-interacting proteins. We report that mDia1 has a stage-specific interactome, including Prohibitin2, MyoD, Akt2, and β-Catenin, of which Prohibitin2 colocalises with mDia1 in cytoplasmic punctae and opposes mDia1 function in myotubes. Co-expression of mDia1-binding domains of Prohibitin2 reverses the anti-myogenic effects of mDia1ΔN3. Our results suggest that Prohibitin2 sequesters mDiaphanous1 to dampen its activity and finetune RhoA-mDiaphanous1 signalling to promote differentiation. Overall, we report that mDia1 is multi-functional signaling effector with opposing functions in different cellular stages, but is modulated by a differentiation-dependent interactome.Summary statementmDia1 has common and stage-specific functions in muscle cells. In myotubes, mDia1 is sequestered by an interacting protein Prohibitin2, which promotes Myogenin expression and mitigates mDia1’s inhibitory effects on differentiation.Graphical abstract

scholarly journals Multiple Signal Input and Output Domains of the 160-Kilodalton Nuclear Receptor Coactivator Proteins

1999 ◽  
Vol 19 (9) ◽  
pp. 6164-6173 ◽  
Author(s):  
Han Ma ◽  
Heng Hong ◽  
Shih-Ming Huang ◽  
Ryan A. Irvine ◽  
Paul Webb ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Receptor ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Thyroid Hormone Receptor ◽  
Activation Function ◽  
Creb Binding Protein ◽  
Activation Domain ◽  
Nuclear Receptor Coactivator ◽  
Interacting Protein ◽  
Binding Domains ◽  
Signal Input

ABSTRACT Members of the 160-kDa nuclear receptor coactivator family (p160 coactivators) bind to the conserved AF-2 activation function found in the hormone binding domains of nuclear receptors (NR) and are potent transcriptional coactivators for NRs. Here we report that the C-terminal region of p160 coactivators glucocorticoid receptor interacting protein 1 (GRIP1), steroid receptor coactivator 1 (SRC-1a), and SRC-1e binds the N-terminal AF-1 activation function of the androgen receptor (AR), and p160 coactivators can thereby enhance transcriptional activation by AR. While they all interact efficiently with AR AF-1, these same coactivators have vastly different binding strengths with and coactivator effects on AR AF-2. p160 activation domain AD1, which binds secondary coactivators CREB binding protein (CBP) and p300, was previously implicated as the principal domain for transmitting the activating signal to the transcription machinery. We identified a new highly conserved motif in the AD1 region which is important for CBP/p300 binding. Deletion of AD1 only partially reduced p160 coactivator function, due to signaling through AD2, another activation domain located at the C-terminal end of p160 coactivators. C-terminal coactivator fragments lacking AD1 but containing AD2 and the AR AF-1 binding site served as efficient coactivators for full-length AR and AR AF-1. The two signal input domains (one that binds NR AF-2 domains and one that binds AF-1 domains of some but not all NRs) and the two signal output domains (AD1 and AD2) of p160 coactivators played different relative roles for two different NRs: AR and thyroid hormone receptor.

scholarly journals Mutational analysis of the DNA binding, dimerization, and transcriptional activation domains of MEF2C.

1996 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. 2627-2636 ◽  
Author(s):  
J D Molkentin ◽  
B L Black ◽  
J F Martin ◽  
E N Olson
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Mutational Analysis ◽  
Gene Activation ◽  
Positive Control ◽  
Dominant Negative ◽  
Activation Domains ◽  
Muscle Gene Expression ◽  
Transcriptional Activation Domains ◽  
Muscle Gene

There are four members of the myocyte enhancer factor 2 (MEF2) family of transcription factors in vertebrates, MEF2A, -B, -C, and -D, which have homology within a MADS box at their amino termini and an adjacent motif known as the MEF2 domain. These factors activate muscle gene expression by binding as homo- and heterodimers to an A/T-rich DNA sequence in the control regions of muscle-specific genes. To understand the mechanisms of muscle gene activation of MEF2 factors, we generated a series of deletion and site-directed mutants of MEF2C. These mutants demonstrated that the MADS and MEF2 domains mediate DNA binding and dimerization, whereas the carboxyl terminus is required for transcriptional activation. Amino acids that are essential for MEF2 site-dependent transcription but which do not affect DNA binding were also identified in the MEF2 domain. This type of positive-control mutant demonstrates that the transcription activation domain of MEF2C, although separate from the MEF2 domain, is dependent on this domain for transcriptional activation through the MEF2 site. MEF2 mutants that are defective for DNA binding act as dominant negative mutants and can inhibit activation of MEF2-dependent genes by wild-type MEF2C.

scholarly journals Modulation of Smooth Muscle Gene Expression by Association of Histone Acetyltransferases and Deacetylases with Myocardin

2005 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 364-376 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dongsun Cao ◽  
Zhigao Wang ◽  
Chun-Li Zhang ◽  
Jiyeon Oh ◽  
Weibing Xing ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Smooth Muscle ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Histone Deacetylases ◽  
Serum Response Factor ◽  
Gene Activation ◽  
Muscle Gene Expression ◽  
P300 Binding ◽  
Muscle Genes ◽  
Muscle Gene

ABSTRACT Differentiation of smooth muscle cells is accompanied by the transcriptional activation of an array of muscle-specific genes controlled by serum response factor (SRF). Myocardin is a cardiac and smooth muscle-specific expressed transcriptional coactivator of SRF and is sufficient and necessary for smooth muscle gene expression. Here, we show that myocardin induces the acetylation of nucleosomal histones surrounding SRF-binding sites in the control regions of smooth muscle genes. The promyogenic activity of myocardin is enhanced by p300, a histone acetyltransferase that associates with the transcription activation domain of myocardin. Conversely, class II histone deacetylases interact with a domain of myocardin distinct from the p300-binding domain and suppress smooth muscle gene activation by myocardin. These findings point to myocardin as a nexus for positive and negative regulation of smooth muscle gene expression by changes in chromatin acetylation.

miR-125b enhances metastasis and progression of cancer via the TXNIP and HIF1α pathway in pancreatic cancer

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Pengli Wang ◽  
Dan Zheng ◽  
Hongyang Qi ◽  
Qi Gao
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Hypoxia Inducible Factor ◽  
Immunofluorescence Assay ◽  
Luciferase Assay ◽  
Interacting Protein ◽  
Over Expression ◽  
Thioredoxin Interacting Protein ◽  
Cellular Processes ◽  
And Migration

BACKGROUND: MicroRNAs (miRNAs) play potential role in the development of various types of cancer conditions including pancreatic cancer (PC) targeting several cellular processes. Present study was aimed to evaluate function of miR-125b and the mechanism involved in PC. METHODS: Cell migration, MTT and BrdU study was done to establish the migration capability, cell viability and cell proliferation respectively. Binding sites for miR-125b were recognized by luciferase assay, expression of protein by western blot and immunofluorescence assay. In vivo study was done by BALB/c nude xenograft mice for evaluating the function of miR-125b. RESULTS: The study showed that expression of miR-125b was elevated in PC cells and tissues, and was correlated to proliferation and migration of cells. Also, over-expression of miR-125b encouraged migration, metastasis and proliferation of BxPC-3 cells, the suppression reversed it. We also noticed that thioredoxin-interacting protein (TXNIP) was the potential target of miR-125b. The outcomes also suggested that miR-125b governed the expression of TXNIP inversely via directly attaching to the 3′-UTR activating hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF1α). Looking into the relation between HIF1α and TXNIP, we discovered that TXNIP caused the degradation and export of HIF1α by making a complex with it. CONCLUSION: The miR-125b-TXNIP-HIF1α pathway may serve useful strategy for diagnosing and treating PC.

scholarly journals Spanning the gap: unraveling RSC dynamics in vivo

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heinz Neumann ◽  
Bryan J. Wilkins
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Posttranslational Modifications ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Binding Mode ◽  
Binding Modes ◽  
Binding Domains ◽  
Binding Interface ◽  
The Many ◽  
And Function

AbstractMultiple reports over the past 2 years have provided the first complete structural analyses for the essential yeast chromatin remodeler, RSC, providing elaborate molecular details for its engagement with the nucleosome. However, there still remain gaps in resolution, particularly within the many RSC subunits that harbor histone binding domains.Solving contacts at these interfaces is crucial because they are regulated by posttranslational modifications that control remodeler binding modes and function. Modifications are dynamic in nature often corresponding to transcriptional activation states and cell cycle stage, highlighting not only a need for enriched spatial resolution but also temporal understanding of remodeler engagement with the nucleosome. Our recent work sheds light on some of those gaps by exploring the binding interface between the RSC catalytic motor protein, Sth1, and the nucleosome, in the living nucleus. Using genetically encoded photo-activatable amino acids incorporated into histones of living yeast we are able to monitor the nucleosomal binding of RSC, emphasizing the regulatory roles of histone modifications in a spatiotemporal manner. We observe that RSC prefers to bind H2B SUMOylated nucleosomes in vivo and interacts with neighboring nucleosomes via H3K14ac. Additionally, we establish that RSC is constitutively bound to the nucleosome and is not ejected during mitotic chromatin compaction but alters its binding mode as it progresses through the cell cycle. Our data offer a renewed perspective on RSC mechanics under true physiological conditions.

scholarly journals Circulating leptin and its muscle gene expression in Nellore cattle with divergent feed efficiency

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lúcio Flávio Macedo Mota ◽  
Cristina Moreira Bonafé ◽  
Pâmela Almeida Alexandre ◽  
Miguel Henrique Santana ◽  
Francisco José Novais ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Feed Efficiency ◽  
Muscle Gene Expression ◽  
Nellore Cattle ◽  
Muscle Gene

scholarly journals Glucocorticoid Receptor Phosphorylation Differentially Affects Target Gene Expression

2008 ◽  
Vol 22 (8) ◽  
pp. 1754-1766 ◽  
Author(s):  
Weiwei Chen ◽  
Thoa Dang ◽  
Raymond D. Blind ◽  
Zhen Wang ◽  
Claudio N. Cavasotto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Glucocorticoid Receptor ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Leucine Zipper ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Divalent Cations ◽  
Phosphorylation Site ◽  
Transcriptional Response ◽  
Receptor Occupancy ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Interacting Protein

Abstract The glucocorticoid receptor (GR) is phosphorylated at multiple sites within its N terminus (S203, S211, S226), yet the role of phosphorylation in receptor function is not understood. Using a range of agonists and GR phosphorylation site-specific antibodies, we demonstrated that GR transcriptional activation is greatest when the relative phosphorylation of S211 exceeds that of S226. Consistent with this finding, a replacement of S226 with an alanine enhances GR transcriptional response. Using a battery of compounds that perturb different signaling pathways, we found that BAPTA-AM, a chelator of intracellular divalent cations, and curcumin, a natural product with antiinflammatory properties, reduced hormone-dependent phosphorylation at S211. This change in GR phosphorylation was associated with its decreased nuclear retention and transcriptional activation. Molecular modeling suggests that GR S211 phosphorylation promotes a conformational change, which exposes a novel surface potentially facilitating cofactor interaction. Indeed, S211 phosphorylation enhances GR interaction with MED14 (vitamin D receptor interacting protein 150). Interestingly, in U2OS cells expressing a nonphosphorylated GR mutant S211A, the expression of IGF-binding protein 1 and interferon regulatory factor 8, both MED14-dependent GR target genes, was reduced relative to cells expressing wild-type receptor across a broad range of hormone concentrations. In contrast, the induction of glucocorticoid-induced leucine zipper, a MED14-independent GR target, was similar in S211A- and wild-type GR-expressing cells at high hormone levels, but was reduced in S211A cells at low hormone concentrations, suggesting a link between GR phosphorylation, MED14 involvement, and receptor occupancy. Phosphorylation also affected the magnitude of repression by GR in a gene-selective manner. Thus, GR phosphorylation at S211 and S226 determines GR transcriptional response by modifying cofactor interaction. Furthermore, the effect of GR S211 phosphorylation is gene specific and, in some cases, dependent upon the amount of activated receptor.

scholarly journals Kruppel-like Factor 4 Abrogates Myocardin-induced Activation of Smooth Muscle Gene Expression

2005 ◽  
Vol 280 (10) ◽  
pp. 9719-9727 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan Liu ◽  
Sanjay Sinha ◽  
Oliver G. McDonald ◽  
Yueting Shang ◽  
Mark H. Hoofnagle ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Smooth Muscle ◽  
Muscle Gene Expression ◽  
Muscle Gene
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document