scholarly journals Measuring Endoplasmic Reticulum Signal Sequences Translocation Efficiency Using the Xbp1 Arrest Peptide

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Theresa Kriegler ◽  
Anastasia Magoulopoulou ◽  
Rocio Amate Marchal ◽  
Tara Hessa
Keyword(s):  
Signal Sequence ◽  
Dominant Role ◽  
Complex Signal ◽  
Secretory Proteins ◽  
Signal Sequences ◽  
Functional Efficiency ◽  
Nascent Chain ◽  
Er Targeting ◽  
Translational Arrest ◽  
Two Phases

SummarySecretory proteins translocate across the mammalian ER membrane co-translationally via the ribosome-sec61 translocation channel complex. Signal sequences within the polypeptide, which guide this event, are diverse in their hydrophobicity, charge, length, and amino acid composition. Despite the known sequence diversity in the ER-targeting signals, it is generally assumed that they have a dominant role in determining co-translational targeting and translocation initiation process. We have analyzed co-translational events experienced by secretory proteins carrying efficient, versus inefficient (poorly hydrophobic) signal sequences, using an assay based on Xbp1 peptide-mediated translational arrest. With this method we were able to measure the functional efficiency of ER signal sequences. We show that an efficient signal sequence experiences a two-phases event in which the nascent chain is pulled from the ribosome during its translocation, thus resuming translation and yielding full-length products. Conversely, the inefficient signal sequence experiences a single weaker pulling event, suggesting inadequate engagement by the translocation machinery of these marginally hydrophobic signal sequences.

scholarly journals NAC functions as a modulator of SRP during the early steps of protein targeting to the endoplasmic reticulum

2012 ◽  
Vol 23 (16) ◽  
pp. 3027-3040 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ying Zhang ◽  
Uta Berndt ◽  
Hanna Gölz ◽  
Arlette Tais ◽  
Stefan Oellerer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endoplasmic Reticulum ◽  
Protein Targeting ◽  
Signal Sequence ◽  
Signal Recognition Particle ◽  
Signal Recognition ◽  
Signal Sequences ◽  
Chain Complexes ◽  
Ribosomal Tunnel ◽  
Nascent Chain ◽  
Combined Data

Nascent polypeptide-associated complex (NAC) was initially found to bind to any segment of the nascent chain except signal sequences. In this way, NAC is believed to prevent mistargeting due to binding of signal recognition particle (SRP) to signalless ribosome nascent chain complexes (RNCs). Here we revisit the interplay between NAC and SRP. NAC does not affect SRP function with respect to signalless RNCs; however, NAC does affect SRP function with respect to RNCs targeted to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). First, early recruitment of SRP to RNCs containing a signal sequence within the ribosomal tunnel is NAC dependent. Second, NAC is able to directly and tightly bind to nascent signal sequences. Third, SRP initially displaces NAC from RNCs; however, when the signal sequence emerges further, trimeric NAC·RNC·SRP complexes form. Fourth, upon docking to the ER membrane NAC remains bound to RNCs, allowing NAC to shield cytosolically exposed nascent chain domains not only before but also during cotranslational translocation. The combined data indicate a functional interplay between NAC and SRP on ER-targeted RNCs, which is based on the ability of the two complexes to bind simultaneously to distinct segments of a single nascent chain.

Discovery of functional motifs in h-regions of trypanosome signal sequences

2010 ◽  
Vol 426 (2) ◽  
pp. 135-145 ◽  
Author(s):  
Josh Duffy ◽  
Bhargavi Patham ◽  
Kojo Mensa-Wilmot
Keyword(s):  
Amino Acids ◽  
Signal Sequence ◽  
Bioinformatic Analysis ◽  
Surface Glycoprotein ◽  
Secretory Proteins ◽  
Signal Peptides ◽  
Hydrophobic Core ◽  
Signal Sequences ◽  
Peptide Motifs ◽  
Physiological Relevance

N-terminal signal peptides direct secretory proteins into the ER (endoplasmic reticulum) of eukaryotes or the periplasmic space of prokaryotes. A hydrophobic core (h-region) is important for signal sequence function; however, the mechanism of h-region action is not resolved. To gain new insight into signal sequences, bioinformatic analysis of h-regions from humans, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Trypanosoma brucei and Escherichia coli was performed. Each species contains a unique set of peptide motifs (h-motifs) characterized by identity components (i.e. sequence of conserved amino acids) joined by spacers. Human h-motifs have four identity components, whereas those from the other species utilize three identity components. Example of h-motifs are human Hs3 {L-x(2)-[AGILPV]-L-x(0,2)-L}, S. cerevisiae Sc1 [L-x(0,2)-S-x(0,3)-A], T. brucei Tb2 {L-x(1,2)-L-[AILV]} and E. coli Ec1 [A-x(0,2)-L-x(0,3)-A]. The physiological relevance of h-motifs was tested with a T. brucei microsomal system for translocation of a VSG (variant surface glycoprotein)-117 signal peptide. Disruption of h-motifs by scrambling of sequences in h-regions produced defective signal peptides, although the hydrophobicity of the peptide was not altered. We conclude that: (i) h-regions harbour h-motifs, and are not random hydrophobic amino acids; (ii) h-regions from different species contain unique sets of h-motifs; and (iii) h-motifs contribute to the biological activity of ER signal peptides. h-Regions are ‘scaffolds’ in which functional h-motifs are embedded. A hypothetical model for h-motif interactions with a Sec61p protein translocon is presented.

scholarly journals Signal Sequence Recognition in Cotranslational Translocation by Protein Components of the Endoplasmic Reticulum Membrane

1998 ◽  
Vol 142 (2) ◽  
pp. 355-364 ◽  
Author(s):  
Walther Mothes ◽  
Berit Jungnickel ◽  
Josef Brunner ◽  
Tom A. Rapoport
Keyword(s):  
Endoplasmic Reticulum ◽  
Binding Site ◽  
Signal Sequence ◽  
Specific Binding ◽  
Secretory Proteins ◽  
Endoplasmic Reticulum Membrane ◽  
Detergent Solution ◽  
Signal Sequences ◽  
Sequence Recognition ◽  
Protein Components

We have investigated the role of membrane proteins and lipids during early phases of the cotranslational insertion of secretory proteins into the translocation channel of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane. We demonstrate that all steps, including the one during which signal sequence recognition occurs, can be reproduced with purified translocation components in detergent solution, in the absence of bulk lipids or a bilayer. Photocross-linking experiments with native membranes show that upon complete insertion into the channel signal sequences are both precisely positioned with respect to the protein components of the channel and contact lipids. Together, these results indicate that signal sequences are bound to a specific binding site at the interface between the channel and the surrounding lipids, and are recognized ultimately by protein–protein interactions. Our data also suggest that at least some signal sequences reach the binding site by transfer through the interior of the channel.

scholarly journals Signal sequence-dependent function of the TRAM protein during early phases of protein transport across the endoplasmic reticulum membrane.

1996 ◽  
Vol 134 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Voigt ◽  
B Jungnickel ◽  
E Hartmann ◽  
T A Rapoport
Keyword(s):  
Protein Transport ◽  
Signal Sequence ◽  
Chain Complex ◽  
Secretory Proteins ◽  
Endoplasmic Reticulum Membrane ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Hydrophobic Core ◽  
Sequence Dependent ◽  
Nascent Chain ◽  
Er Membrane

Cotranslational translocation of proteins across the mammalian ER membrane involves, in addition to the signal recognition particle receptor and the Sec61p complex, the translocating chain-associating membrane (TRAM) protein, the function of which is still poorly understood. Using reconstituted proteoliposomes, we show here that the translocation of most, but not all, secretory proteins requires the function of TRAM. Experiments with hybrid proteins demonstrate that the structure of the signal sequence determines whether or not TRAM is needed. Features that distinguish TRAM-dependent and -independent signal sequences include the length of their charged, NH2-terminal region and the structure of their hydrophobic core. In cases where TRAM is required for translocation, it is not needed for the initial interaction of the ribosome/nascent chain complex with the ER membrane but for a subsequent step inside the membrane in which the nascent chain is inserted into the translocation site in a protease-resistant manner. Thus, TRAM functions in a signal sequence-dependent manner at a critical, early phase of the translocation process.

scholarly journals Signal Sequences Encode Information for Protein Folding in the Endoplasmic Reticulum

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sha Sun ◽  
Xia Li ◽  
Malaiyalam Mariappan
Keyword(s):  
Endoplasmic Reticulum ◽  
Protein Folding ◽  
Protein Translocation ◽  
Signal Sequence ◽  
Signal Sequences ◽  
Sequence Dependent ◽  
Proteomic Approach ◽  
Multiple Protein ◽  
Nascent Chain ◽  
In Cells

SummaryRoughly one-third of newly synthesized proteins enter into the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) via the Sec61 translocon. It is unclear how nascent chains bind correct chaperones and properly fold upon entering the ER lumen. We find that signal sequences harbor information to recruit specific chaperones for protein folding in the ER. Using a substrate-trapping proteomic approach, we identify that marginally hydrophobic signal sequences are transiently clogged at the Sec61 translocon, which recruits BiP chaperone through Sec63 to bind onto nascent chains. Surprisingly, this privileged BiP binding not only releases clogged nascent chains into the ER lumen but also prevent inappropriate interactions and promotes folding and maturation. Signal sequence swapping bypasses BiP-dependent unclogging and translocation, but the translocated nascent chain is terminally misfolded after binding the wrong chaperone in the ER lumen. Thus, signal sequence-dependent chaperone recruitment explains why signal sequences are paradoxically diverse and use multiple protein translocation pathways in cells.

scholarly journals Structural features within the nascent chain regulate alternative targeting of secretory proteins to mitochondria

2013 ◽  
Vol 32 (7) ◽  
pp. 1036-1051 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natalie V Pfeiffer ◽  
Daniela Dirndorfer ◽  
Sven Lang ◽  
Ulrike K Resenberger ◽  
Lisa M Restelli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Structural Features ◽  
Secretory Proteins ◽  
Nascent Chain

scholarly journals Signal sequence insufficiency contributes to neurodegeneration caused by transmembrane prion protein

2010 ◽  
Vol 188 (4) ◽  
pp. 515-526 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neena S. Rane ◽  
Oishee Chakrabarti ◽  
Lionel Feigenbaum ◽  
Ramanujan S. Hegde
Keyword(s):  
Prion Protein ◽  
Protein Translocation ◽  
Signal Sequence ◽  
Signal Sequences ◽  
Hydrophobic Domain ◽  
Sequence Variations ◽  
Sufficient Magnitude ◽  
The Impact

Protein translocation into the endoplasmic reticulum is mediated by signal sequences that vary widely in primary structure. In vitro studies suggest that such signal sequence variations may correspond to subtly different functional properties. Whether comparable functional differences exist in vivo and are of sufficient magnitude to impact organism physiology is unknown. Here, we investigate this issue by analyzing in transgenic mice the impact of signal sequence efficiency for mammalian prion protein (PrP). We find that replacement of the average efficiency signal sequence of PrP with more efficient signals rescues mice from neurodegeneration caused by otherwise pathogenic PrP mutants in a downstream hydrophobic domain (HD). This effect is explained by the demonstration that efficient signal sequence function precludes generation of a cytosolically exposed, disease-causing transmembrane form of PrP mediated by the HD mutants. Thus, signal sequences are functionally nonequivalent in vivo, with intrinsic inefficiency of the native PrP signal being required for pathogenesis of a subset of disease-causing PrP mutations.

scholarly journals Stage- and ribosome-specific alterations in nascent chain-Sec61p interactions accompany translocation across the ER membrane.

1995 ◽  
Vol 129 (4) ◽  
pp. 957-970 ◽  
Author(s):  
C V Nicchitta ◽  
E C Murphy ◽  
R Haynes ◽  
G S Shelness
Keyword(s):  
Protein Translocation ◽  
Signal Sequence ◽  
Near Neighbor ◽  
Cross Linking ◽  
Dramatic Reduction ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Early Stages ◽  
Nascent Chain ◽  
Chemical Cross Linking ◽  
Er Membrane

Near-neighbor interactions between translocating nascent chains and Sec61p were investigated by chemical cross-linking. At stages of translocation before signal sequence cleavage, nascent chains could be cross-linked to Sec61p at high (60-80%) efficiencies. Cross-linking occurred through the signal sequence and the mature portion of wild-type and signal cleavage mutant nascent chains. At later stages of translocation, as represented through truncated translocation intermediates, cross-linking to Sec61p was markedly reduced. Dissociation of the ribosome into its large and small subunits after assembly of the precursor into the translocon, but before cross-linking, resulted in a dramatic reduction in subsequent cross-linking yield, indicating that at early stages of translocation, nascent chain-Sec61p interactions are in part mediated through interactions of the ribosome with components of the ER membrane, such as Sec61p. Dissociation of the ribosome was, however, without effect on subsequent translocation. These results are discussed with respect to a model in which Sec61p performs a function essential for the initiation of protein translocation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document