scholarly journals Bub1 is not required for the checkpoint response to unattached kinetochores in diploid human cells

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cerys E. Currie ◽  
Mar Mora-Santos ◽  
Chris Smith ◽  
Andrew D. McAinsh ◽  
Jonathan B.A. Millar
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ◽  
Mitotic Checkpoint ◽  
Human Cells ◽  
Anaphase Promoting Complex ◽  
Pathway Model ◽  
Checkpoint Response ◽  
Conflicting Evidence ◽  
Dual Pathway ◽  
Mitotic Checkpoint Complex

AbstractError-free chromosome segregation during mitosis depends on a functional spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC). The SAC is a multi-component signaling system that is recruited to incorrectly attached kinetochores to catalyze the formation of a soluble inhibitor, known as the mitotic checkpoint complex (MCC), which binds and inhibits the anaphase promoting complex [1]. We have previously proposed that two separable pathways, composed of KNL1-Bub3-Bub1 (KBB) and Rod-Zwilch-Zw10 (RZZ), recruit Mad1-Mad2 complexes to human kinetochores to activate the SAC [2]. We refer to this as the dual pathway model. Although Bub1 is absolutely required for MCC formation in yeast (which lack RZZ), there is conflicting evidence as to whether this is also the case in human cells based on siRNA studies [2–5]. Here we report, using genome editing, that Bub1 is not strictly required for the SAC response to unattached kinetochores in human diploid hTERT-RPE1 cells, consistent with the dual pathway model.

scholarly journals Intermediates in the assembly of mitotic checkpoint complexes and their role in the regulation of the anaphase-promoting complex

2016 ◽  
Vol 113 (4) ◽  
pp. 966-971 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharon Kaisari ◽  
Danielle Sitry-Shevah ◽  
Shirly Miniowitz-Shemtov ◽  
Avram Hershko
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Mitotic Spindle ◽  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ◽  
Mitotic Checkpoint ◽  
Anaphase Promoting Complex ◽  
Checkpoint Proteins ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Unknown Species ◽  
Mitotic Checkpoint Complex

The mitotic (or spindle assembly) checkpoint system prevents premature separation of sister chromatids in mitosis and thus ensures the fidelity of chromosome segregation. Kinetochores that are not attached properly to the mitotic spindle produce an inhibitory signal that prevents progression into anaphase. The checkpoint system acts on the Anaphase-Promoting Complex/Cyclosome (APC/C) ubiquitin ligase, which targets for degradation inhibitors of anaphase initiation. APC/C is inhibited by the Mitotic Checkpoint Complex (MCC), which assembles when the checkpoint is activated. MCC is composed of the checkpoint proteins BubR1, Bub3, and Mad2, associated with the APC/C coactivator Cdc20. The intermediary processes in the assembly of MCC are not sufficiently understood. It is also not clear whether or not some subcomplexes of MCC inhibit the APC/C and whether Mad2 is required only for MCC assembly and not for its action on the APC/C. We used purified subcomplexes of mitotic checkpoint proteins to examine these problems. Our results do not support a model in which Mad2 catalytically generates a Mad2-free APC/C inhibitor. We also found that the release of Mad2 from MCC caused a marked (although not complete) decrease in inhibitory action, suggesting a role of Mad2 in MCC for APC/C inhibition. A previously unknown species of MCC, which consists of Mad2, BubR1, and two molecules of Cdc20, contributes to the inhibition of APC/C by the mitotic checkpoint system.

scholarly journals Spindle assembly checkpoint: the third decade

2011 ◽  
Vol 366 (1584) ◽  
pp. 3595-3604 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Musacchio
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ◽  
Spindle Assembly ◽  
Mitotic Checkpoint ◽  
Anaphase Promoting Complex ◽  
Checkpoint Control ◽  
Checkpoint Response ◽  
The Third ◽  
Binding Interface ◽  
Mitotic Checkpoint Complex

The spindle assembly checkpoint controls cell cycle progression during mitosis, synchronizing it with the attachment of chromosomes to spindle microtubules. After the discovery of the mitotic arrest deficient ( MAD ) and budding uninhibited by benzymidazole ( BUB ) genes as crucial checkpoint components in 1991, the second decade of checkpoint studies (2001–2010) witnessed crucial advances in the elucidation of the mechanism through which the checkpoint effector, the mitotic checkpoint complex, targets the anaphase-promoting complex (APC/C) to prevent progression into anaphase. Concomitantly, the discovery that the Ndc80 complex and other components of the microtubule-binding interface of kinetochores are essential for the checkpoint response finally asserted that kinetochores are crucial for the checkpoint response. Nevertheless, the relationship between kinetochores and checkpoint control remains poorly understood. Crucial advances in this area in the third decade of checkpoint studies (2011–2020) are likely to be brought about by the characterization of the mechanism of kinetochore recruitment, activation and inactivation of checkpoint proteins, which remains elusive for the majority of checkpoint components. Here, we take a molecular view on the main challenges hampering this task.

scholarly journals Aneuploid abortion correlates positively with MAD1 overexpression and miR-125b down-regulation

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan Zhao ◽  
Hui Li ◽  
Guangxin Chen ◽  
Lijun Du ◽  
Peiyan Xu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ◽  
Mitotic Checkpoint ◽  
Early Embryo ◽  
Vital Role ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Embryo Abortion ◽  
Protein Levels ◽  
Mitotic Checkpoint Complex

Abstract Background Aneuploidy is the most frequent cause of early-embryo abortion. Any defect in chromosome segregation would fail to satisfy the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) during mitosis, halting metaphase and causing aneuploidy. The mitotic checkpoint complex (MCC), comprising MAD1, MAD2, Cdc20, BUBR1 and BUB3, plays a vital role in SAC activation. Studies have confirmed that overexpression of MAD2 and BUBR1 can facilitate correct chromosome segregation and embryo stability. Research also proves that miR-125b negatively regulates MAD1 expression by binding to its 3′UTR. However, miR-125b, Mad1 and Bub3 gene expression in aneuploid embryos of spontaneous abortion has not been reported to date. Methods In this study, embryonic villi from miscarried pregnancies were collected and divided into two groups (aneuploidy and euploidy) based on High-throughput ligation-dependent probe amplification (HLPA) and Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analyses. RNA levels of miR-125b, MAD1 and BUB3 were detected by Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR); protein levels of MAD1 and BUB3 were analysed by Western blotting. Results statistical analysis (p < 0.05) showed that miR-125b and BUB3 were significantly down-regulated in the aneuploidy group compared to the control group and that MAD1 was significantly up-regulated. Additionally, the MAD1 protein level was significantly higher in aneuploidy abortion villus, but BUB3 protein was only mildly increased. Correlation analysis revealed that expression of MAD1 correlated negatively with miR-125b. Conclusion These results suggest that aneuploid abortion correlates positively with MAD1 overexpression, which might be caused by insufficient levels of miR-125b. Taken together, our findings first confirmed the negative regulatory mode between MAD1 and miR-125b, providing a basis for further mechanism researches in aneuploid abortion.

scholarly journals Mechanism of APC/CCDC20 activation by mitotic phosphorylation

2016 ◽  
Vol 113 (19) ◽  
pp. E2570-E2578 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renping Qiao ◽  
Florian Weissmann ◽  
Masaya Yamaguchi ◽  
Nicholas G. Brown ◽  
Ryan VanderLinden ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Mitotic Checkpoint ◽  
Anaphase Promoting Complex ◽  
Loop Region ◽  
Evolutionarily Conserved ◽  
Terminal Loop ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Mitotic Phosphorylation ◽  
Mitotic Checkpoint Complex

Chromosome segregation and mitotic exit are initiated by the 1.2-MDa ubiquitin ligase APC/C (anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome) and its coactivator CDC20 (cell division cycle 20). To avoid chromosome missegregation, APC/CCDC20 activation is tightly controlled. CDC20 only associates with APC/C in mitosis when APC/C has become phosphorylated and is further inhibited by a mitotic checkpoint complex until all chromosomes are bioriented on the spindle. APC/C contains 14 different types of subunits, most of which are phosphorylated in mitosis on multiple sites. However, it is unknown which of these phospho-sites enable APC/CCDC20 activation and by which mechanism. Here we have identified 68 evolutionarily conserved mitotic phospho-sites on human APC/C bound to CDC20 and have used the biGBac technique to generate 47 APC/C mutants in which either all 68 sites or subsets of them were replaced by nonphosphorylatable or phospho-mimicking residues. The characterization of these complexes in substrate ubiquitination and degradation assays indicates that phosphorylation of an N-terminal loop region in APC1 is sufficient for binding and activation of APC/C by CDC20. Deletion of the N-terminal APC1 loop enables APC/CCDC20 activation in the absence of mitotic phosphorylation or phospho-mimicking mutations. These results indicate that binding of CDC20 to APC/C is normally prevented by an autoinhibitory loop in APC1 and that its mitotic phosphorylation relieves this inhibition. The predicted location of the N-terminal APC1 loop implies that this loop controls interactions between the N-terminal domain of CDC20 and APC1 and APC8. These results reveal how APC/C phosphorylation enables CDC20 to bind and activate the APC/C in mitosis.

scholarly journals Defining pathways of spindle checkpoint silencing: functional redundancy between Cdc20 ubiquitination and p31comet

2011 ◽  
Vol 22 (22) ◽  
pp. 4227-4235 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luying Jia ◽  
Bing Li ◽  
Ross T. Warrington ◽  
Xing Hao ◽  
Shixuan Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Spindle Checkpoint ◽  
Functional Redundancy ◽  
Mitotic Checkpoint ◽  
Human Cells ◽  
Unresolved Issue ◽  
Anaphase Promoting Complex ◽  
Anaphase Onset ◽  
Mitotic Checkpoint Complex

The spindle checkpoint senses unattached or improperly attached kinetochores during mitosis, inhibits the anaphase-promoting complex or cyclosome (APC/C), and delays anaphase onset to prevent aneuploidy. The mitotic checkpoint complex (MCC) consisting of BubR1, Bub3, Mad2, and Cdc20 is a critical APC/C-inhibitory checkpoint complex in human cells. At the metaphase–anaphase transition, the spindle checkpoint turns off, and MCC disassembles to allow anaphase onset. The molecular mechanisms of checkpoint inactivation are poorly understood. A major unresolved issue is the role of Cdc20 autoubiquitination in this process. Although Cdc20 autoubiquitination can promote Mad2 dissociation from Cdc20, a nonubiquitinatable Cdc20 mutant still dissociates from Mad2 during checkpoint inactivation. Here, we show that depletion of p31comet delays Mad2 dissociation from Cdc20 mutants that cannot undergo autoubiquitination. Thus both p31comet and ubiquitination of Cdc20 are critical mechanisms of checkpoint inactivation. They act redundantly to promote Mad2 dissociation from Cdc20.

scholarly journals Mitotic phosphorylation of tumor suppressor DAB2IP maintains spindle assembly checkpoint and chromosomal stability through activating PLK1-Mps1 signal pathway and stabilizing mitotic checkpoint complex

Oncogene ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lan Yu ◽  
Yue Lang ◽  
Ching-Cheng Hsu ◽  
Wei-Min Chen ◽  
Jui-Chung Chiang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ◽  
Spindle Assembly ◽  
Mitotic Checkpoint ◽  
Anaphase Promoting Complex ◽  
Independent Manner ◽  
Chromosome Separation ◽  
Surveillance Mechanism ◽  
Mitotic Phosphorylation ◽  
Mitotic Checkpoint Complex ◽  
Mitotic Regulation

AbstractChromosomal instability (CIN) is a driving force for cancer development. The most common causes of CIN include the dysregulation of the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC), which is a surveillance mechanism that prevents premature chromosome separation during mitosis by targeting anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C). DAB2IP is frequently silenced in advanced prostate cancer (PCa) and is associated with aggressive phenotypes of PCa. Our previous study showed that DAB2IP activates PLK1 and functions in mitotic regulation. Here, we report the novel mitotic phosphorylation of DAB2IP by Cdks, which mediates DAB2IP’s interaction with PLK1 and the activation of the PLK1-Mps1 pathway. DAB2IP interacts with Cdc20 in a phosphorylation-independent manner. However, the phosphorylation of DAB2IP inhibits the ubiquitylation of Cdc20 in response to SAC, and blocks the premature release of the APC/C-MCC. The PLK1-Mps1 pathway plays an important role in mitotic checkpoint complex (MCC) assembly. It is likely that DAB2IP acts as a scaffold to aid PLK1-Mps1 in targeting Cdc20. Depletion or loss of the Cdks-mediated phosphorylation of DAB2IP destabilizes the MCC, impairs the SAC, and increases chromosome missegregation and subsequent CIN, thus contributing to tumorigenesis. Collectively, these results demonstrate the mechanism of DAB2IP in SAC regulation and provide a rationale for targeting the SAC to cause lethal CIN against DAB2IP-deficient aggressive PCa, which exhibits a weak SAC.

scholarly journals Mad2, Bub3, and Mps1 regulate chromosome segregation and mitotic synchrony in Giardia intestinalis, a binucleate protist lacking an anaphase-promoting complex

2014 ◽  
Vol 25 (18) ◽  
pp. 2774-2787 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan-Jesus Vicente ◽  
W. Zacheus Cande
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Mitotic Checkpoint ◽  
Giardia Intestinalis ◽  
Anaphase Promoting Complex ◽  
Critical Importance ◽  
Minimal Set ◽  
Left Hand ◽  
Mitotic Checkpoint Complex ◽  
Mitotic Synchrony

The binucleate pathogen Giardia intestinalis is a highly divergent eukaryote with a semiopen mitosis, lacking an anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C) and many of the mitotic checkpoint complex (MCC) proteins. However, Giardia has some MCC components (Bub3, Mad2, and Mps1) and proteins from the cohesin system (Smc1 and Smc3). Mad2 localizes to the cytoplasm, but Bub3 and Mps1 are either located on chromosomes or in the cytoplasm, depending on the cell cycle stage. Depletion of Bub3, Mad2, or Mps1 resulted in a lowered mitotic index, errors in chromosome segregation (including lagging chromosomes), and abnormalities in spindle morphology. During interphase, MCC knockdown cells have an abnormal number of nuclei, either one nucleus usually on the left-hand side of the cell or two nuclei with one mislocalized. These results suggest that the minimal set of MCC proteins in Giardia play a major role in regulating many aspects of mitosis, including chromosome segregation, coordination of mitosis between the two nuclei, and subsequent nuclear positioning. The critical importance of MCC proteins in an organism that lacks their canonical target, the APC/C, suggests a broader role for these proteins and hints at new pathways to be discovered.

scholarly journals Aneuploid Abortion Positively Correlate With MAD1 Overexpression and mir125b Depression

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan Zhao ◽  
Hui Li ◽  
Haibo Li ◽  
Guangxin Chen ◽  
LiJun Du ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ◽  
Mitotic Checkpoint ◽  
Early Embryo ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Fish Analysis ◽  
Embryo Abortion ◽  
Protein Levels ◽  
Qrt Pcr ◽  
Mitotic Checkpoint Complex

Abstract Background: Aneuploid is the most frequent cause of early embryo abortion, and any defect in chromosome segregation would fail to satisfy spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) during mitosis, which could lead to the halted metaphase and aneuploid occurrence. Mitotic checkpoint complex(MCC), a complex compound of MAD1、MAD2、Cdc20、BUBR1 and BUB3, plays an important role in SAC activation. Studies have confirmed that the overexpression of MAD2 and BUBR1 can facilitate the correct chromosome segregation and embryo stability. Research identifications also proved that miR-125b negatively regulated MAD1 expression by binding to its 3’UTR. However, the expression of mir125b, MAD1 and BUB3 genes in aneuploidy embryos of spontaneous abortion has not been reported.Methods: In this study, embryonic villi from miscarriage pregnant women were collected and divided into two groups (aneuploidy and euploidy) by HLPA and FISH analysis. The RNA levels of mir125b, MAD1 and BUB3 were detected through QRT-PCR, while Western blot was further used to analyze the protein levels of MAD1 and BUB3.Results: SPSS 17.0 statistical analysis(P<0.05) showed that mir125b and BUB3 were significantly down-regulated in aneuploidy group compared to the control group, MAD1 was significantly up-regulated in RNA level; Additionally, MAD1 protein level was also significantly higher while BUB3 was mildly increased in aneuploidy abortion villus. Correlation analysis revealed that the expression of MAD1 was negatively correlated with Mir125b.Conclusion: these results suggested that aneuploid abortion was positively correlated with MAD1 overexpression which might be caused by insufficient mir125b.

scholarly journals “Wait anaphase” signals are not confined to the mitotic spindle

2017 ◽  
Vol 28 (9) ◽  
pp. 1186-1194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lydia R. Heasley ◽  
Steven M. Markus ◽  
Jennifer G. DeLuca
Keyword(s):  
Mitotic Spindle ◽  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ◽  
Mitotic Checkpoint ◽  
Anaphase Promoting Complex ◽  
Mitotic Progression ◽  
Close Proximity ◽  
A Cell ◽  
Spindle Microtubules ◽  
Mitotic Checkpoint Complex ◽  
Fusion Approach

The spindle assembly checkpoint ensures the faithful inheritance of chromosomes by arresting mitotic progression in the presence of kinetochores that are not attached to spindle microtubules. This is achieved through inhibition of the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome by a kinetochore-derived “wait anaphase” signal known as the mitotic checkpoint complex. It remains unclear whether the localization and activity of these inhibitory complexes are restricted to the mitotic spindle compartment or are diffusible throughout the cytoplasm. Here we report that “wait anaphase” signals are indeed able to diffuse outside the confines of the mitotic spindle compartment. Using a cell fusion approach to generate multinucleate cells, we investigate the effects of checkpoint signals derived from one spindle compartment on a neighboring spindle compartment. We find that spindle compartments in close proximity wait for one another to align all chromosomes before entering anaphase synchronously. Synchrony is disrupted in cells with increased interspindle distances and cellular constrictions between spindle compartments. In addition, when mitotic cells are fused with interphase cells, “wait anaphase” signals are diluted, resulting in premature mitotic exit. Overall our studies reveal that anaphase inhibitors are diffusible and active outside the confines of the mitotic spindle from which they are derived.

scholarly journals Role of ubiquitylation of components of mitotic checkpoint complex in their dissociation from anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome

2018 ◽  
Vol 115 (8) ◽  
pp. 1777-1782 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danielle Sitry-Shevah ◽  
Sharon Kaisari ◽  
Adar Teichner ◽  
Shirly Miniowitz-Shemtov ◽  
Avram Hershko
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Ubiquitin Ligase ◽  
Mitotic Spindle ◽  
Mitotic Checkpoint ◽  
Terminal Region ◽  
Anaphase Promoting Complex ◽  
Lysine Residues ◽  
Mitotic Checkpoint Complex

The mitotic checkpoint system ensures the fidelity of chromosome segregation in mitosis by preventing premature initiation of anaphase until correct bipolar attachment of chromosomes to the mitotic spindle is reached. It promotes the assembly of a mitotic checkpoint complex (MCC), composed of BubR1, Bub3, Cdc20, and Mad2, which inhibits the activity of the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C) ubiquitin ligase. When the checkpoint is satisfied, anaphase is initiated by the disassembly of MCC. Previous studies indicated that the dissociation of APC/C-bound MCC requires ubiquitylation and suggested that the target of ubiquitylation is the Cdc20 component of MCC. However, it remained unknown how ubiquitylation causes the release of MCC from APC/C and its disassembly and whether ubiquitylation of additional proteins is involved in this process. We find that ubiquitylation causes the dissociation of BubR1 from Cdc20 in MCC and suggest that this may lead to the release of MCC components from APC/C. BubR1 in MCC is ubiquitylated by APC/C, although to a lesser degree than Cdc20. The extent of BubR1 ubiquitylation was markedly increased in recombinant MCC that contained a lysine-less mutant of Cdc20. Mutation of lysine residues to arginines in the N-terminal region of BubR1 partially inhibited its ubiquitylation and slowed down the release of MCC from APC/C, provided that Cdc20 ubiquitylation was also blocked. It is suggested that ubiquitylation of both Cdc20 and BubR1 may be involved in their dissociation from each other and in the release of MCC components from APC/C.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document