scholarly journals Aurora B-mediated exclusion of HP1a from latesegregating chromatin prevents formation of micronuclei

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brandt Warecki ◽  
William Sullivan
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Envelope ◽  
Genome Integrity ◽  
Aurora B ◽  
Channel Formation ◽  
Cellular Mechanisms ◽  
Chromatin Interactions ◽  
Phosphorylation Event ◽  
Nuclear Envelope Assembly ◽  
X Irradiation ◽  
Insight Into

ABSTRACTLate-segregating acentric chromosomes pose a serious risk to genomic integrity when they are excluded from dividing daughter nuclei and form damage-prone micronuclei. Insight into the cellular mechanisms that prevent the formation of micronuclei from acentrics come from studies demonstrating that acentrics reincorporate into daughter telophase nuclei by passing through Aurora B kinase-dependent channels in the nuclear envelope of Drosophila neuroblasts. Here, we uncover a mechanism of nuclear envelope channel formation in which localized concentrations of Aurora B preferentially phosphorylate H3(S10) on heterochromatic acentrics and their associated DNA tethers. This phosphorylation event prevents HP1a from associating with heterochromatin and results in localized inhibition of nuclear envelope reassembly on endonuclease- and X-irradiation-induced acentrics and the main daughter nuclei at the sites of acentric entry to promote the formation of channels. Finally, we find that HP1a also specifies initiation sites of nuclear envelope reassembly on undamaged chromatin. Taken together, these results demonstrate that Aurora B-mediated regulation of HP1a-chromatin interactions plays a key role maintaining genome integrity by locally preventing nuclear envelope assembly and facilitating incorporation of late-segregating acentrics into daughter nuclei.

scholarly journals Significance of Mast Cell Formed Extracellular Traps in Microbial Defense

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Elieh Ali Komi ◽  
Wolfgang M. Kuebler
Keyword(s):  
State Of The Art ◽  
Extracellular Dna ◽  
Cellular Mechanisms ◽  
Extracellular Traps ◽  
Synthetic Chemicals ◽  
Dna Strands ◽  
Associated Proteins ◽  
Microbial Defense ◽  
And Function ◽  
Insight Into

AbstractMast cells (MCs) are critically involved in microbial defense by releasing antimicrobial peptides (such as cathelicidin LL-37 and defensins) and phagocytosis of microbes. In past years, it has become evident that in addition MCs may eliminate invading pathogens by ejection of web-like structures of DNA strands embedded with proteins known together as extracellular traps (ETs). Upon stimulation of resting MCs with various microorganisms, their products (including superantigens and toxins), or synthetic chemicals, MCs become activated and enter into a multistage process that includes disintegration of the nuclear membrane, release of chromatin into the cytoplasm, adhesion of cytoplasmic granules on the emerging DNA web, and ejection of the complex into the extracellular space. This so-called ETosis is often associated with cell death of the producing MC, and the type of stimulus potentially determines the ratio of surviving vs. killed MCs. Comparison of different microorganisms with specific elimination characteristics such as S pyogenes (eliminated by MCs only through extracellular mechanisms), S aureus (removed by phagocytosis), fungi, and parasites has revealed important aspects of MC extracellular trap (MCET) biology. Molecular studies identified that the formation of MCET depends on NADPH oxidase-generated reactive oxygen species (ROS). In this review, we summarize the present state-of-the-art on the biological relevance of MCETosis, and its underlying molecular and cellular mechanisms. We also provide an overview over the techniques used to study the structure and function of MCETs, including electron microscopy and fluorescence microscopy using specific monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) to detect MCET-associated proteins such as tryptase and histones, and cell-impermeant DNA dyes for labeling of extracellular DNA. Comparing the type and biofunction of further MCET decorating proteins with ETs produced by other immune cells may help provide a better insight into MCET biology in the pathogenesis of autoimmune and inflammatory disorders as well as microbial defense.

The microtubule aster formation and its role in nuclear envelope assembly around the sperm chromatin inXenopus egg extracts

2003 ◽  
Vol 48 (18) ◽  
pp. 1912-1918
Author(s):  
Ning Yang ◽  
Zhongcai Chen ◽  
Ping Lu ◽  
Chuanmao Zhang ◽  
Zhonghe Zhai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Envelope ◽  
Sperm Chromatin ◽  
Egg Extracts ◽  
Nuclear Envelope Assembly ◽  
Microtubule Aster

BAF is required for emerin assembly into the reforming nuclear envelope

2001 ◽  
Vol 114 (24) ◽  
pp. 4575-4585 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tokuko Haraguchi ◽  
Takako Koujin ◽  
Miriam Segura-Totten ◽  
Kenneth K. Lee ◽  
Yosuke Matsuoka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Envelope ◽  
Hela Cells ◽  
Core Region ◽  
Lamin B ◽  
The Core ◽  
Double Stranded Dna ◽  
Recessive Form ◽  
Nuclear Envelope Assembly

Mutations in emerin cause the X-linked recessive form of Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy (EDMD). Emerin localizes at the inner membrane of the nuclear envelope (NE) during interphase, and diffuses into the ER when the NE disassembles during mitosis. We analyzed the recruitment of wildtype and mutant GFP-tagged emerin proteins during nuclear envelope assembly in living HeLa cells. During telophase, emerin accumulates briefly at the ‘core’ region of telophase chromosomes, and later distributes over the entire nuclear rim. Barrier-to-autointegration factor (BAF), a protein that binds nonspecifically to double-stranded DNA in vitro, co-localized with emerin at the ‘core’ region of chromosomes during telophase. An emerin mutant defective for binding to BAF in vitro failed to localize at the ‘core’ in vivo, and subsequently failed to localize at the reformed NE. In HeLa cells that expressed BAF mutant G25E, which did not show ‘core’ localization, the endogenous emerin proteins failed to localize at the ‘core’ region during telophase, and did not assemble into the NE during the subsequent interphase. BAF mutant G25E also dominantly dislocalized LAP2β and lamin A from the NE, but had no effect on the localization of lamin B. We conclude that BAF is required for the assembly of emerin and A-type lamins at the reforming NE during telophase, and may mediate their stability in the subsequent interphase.

scholarly journals Ran GTPase Cycle and Importins α and β Are Essential for Spindle Formation and Nuclear Envelope Assembly in LivingCaenorhabditis elegans Embryos

2002 ◽  
Vol 13 (12) ◽  
pp. 4355-4370 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Askjaer ◽  
Vincent Galy ◽  
Eva Hannak ◽  
Iain W. Mattaj
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Envelope ◽  
Cell Function ◽  
Small Gtpase ◽  
Spindle Formation ◽  
Ran Gtpase ◽  
Early Embryos ◽  
Nuclear Envelope Assembly ◽  
Importin Α ◽  
Gtpase Cycle

The small GTPase Ran has been found to play pivotal roles in several aspects of cell function. We have investigated the role of the Ran GTPase cycle in spindle formation and nuclear envelope assembly in dividing Caenorhabditis elegans embryos in real time. We found that Ran and its cofactors RanBP2, RanGAP, and RCC1 are all essential for reformation of the nuclear envelope after cell division. Reducing the expression of any of these components of the Ran GTPase cycle by RNAi leads to strong extranuclear clustering of integral nuclear envelope proteins and nucleoporins. Ran, RanBP2, and RanGAP are also required for building a mitotic spindle, whereas astral microtubules are normal in the absence of these proteins. RCC1(RNAi) embryos have similar abnormalities in the initial phase of spindle formation but eventually recover to form a bipolar spindle. Irregular chromatin structures and chromatin bridges due to spindle failure were frequently observed in embryos where the Ran cycle was perturbed. In addition, connection between the centrosomes and the male pronucleus, and thus centrosome positioning, depends upon the Ran cycle components. Finally, we have demonstrated that both IMA-2 and IMB-1, the homologues of vertebrate importin α and β, are essential for both spindle assembly and nuclear formation in early embryos.

Nuclear Envelope Assembly in Gametes and Pronuclei

2002 ◽  
pp. 111-129 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Poccia ◽  
T. Barona ◽  
P. Collas ◽  
B. Larijani
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Envelope ◽  
Nuclear Envelope Assembly

scholarly journals Phosphorylation-dependent mitotic SUMOylation drives nuclear envelope–chromatin interactions

2021 ◽  
Vol 220 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Ptak ◽  
Natasha O. Saik ◽  
Ashwini Premashankar ◽  
Diego L. Lapetina ◽  
John D. Aitchison ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Nuclear Envelope ◽  
Spatial Organization ◽  
G1 Phase ◽  
Nuclear Pore ◽  
Nuclear Pore Complexes ◽  
Chromatin Binding ◽  
Chromatin Interactions ◽  
Sumo Ligase ◽  
Pore Complexes

In eukaryotes, chromatin binding to the inner nuclear membrane (INM) and nuclear pore complexes (NPCs) contributes to spatial organization of the genome and epigenetic programs important for gene expression. In mitosis, chromatin–nuclear envelope (NE) interactions are lost and then formed again as sister chromosomes segregate to postmitotic nuclei. Investigating these processes in S. cerevisiae, we identified temporally and spatially controlled phosphorylation-dependent SUMOylation events that positively regulate postmetaphase chromatin association with the NE. Our work establishes a phosphorylation-mediated targeting mechanism of the SUMO ligase Siz2 to the INM during mitosis, where Siz2 binds to and SUMOylates the VAP protein Scs2. The recruitment of Siz2 through Scs2 is further responsible for a wave of SUMOylation along the INM that supports the assembly and anchorage of subtelomeric chromatin at the INM and localization of an active gene (INO1) to NPCs during the later stages of mitosis and into G1-phase.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document