scholarly journals PRC1-dependent compaction of Hox gene clusters prevents transcriptional derepression during early Drosophila embryogenesis

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thierry Cheutin ◽  
Giacomo Cavalli

Summary paragraphPolycomb-group (PcG) proteins are conserved chromatin factors that maintain the silencing of key developmental genes, notably the Hox gene clusters, outside of their expression domains [1-3]. Polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2) trimethylates lysine K27 of histone H3 [4], and PRC1 collaborates with PRC2 in gene silencing. Genome-wide studies have revealed large H3K27me3 chromatin domains bound by PcG proteins, and Polycomb domains fold into distinct nuclear structures [5-9]. Although PRC1 is involved in chromatin compaction [10-16], it is unknown whether PRC1-dependent transcriptional silencing is a consequence of its role on higher-order chromatin folding. This is because depletion of PRC1 proteins typically induces both chromatin unfolding and ectopic transcription, and ectopic transcription can open chromatin by itself. To disentangle these two components, we analysed the temporal effects of two PRC1 proteins, Polyhomeotic (Ph) and Polycomb (Pc), on Hox gene clusters during Drosophila embryogenesis. We show that the absence of Ph or Pc affects the higher-order chromatin folding of Hox clusters prior to ectopic Hox gene transcription, demonstrating that PRC1 primary function during early embryogenesis is to compact its target chromatin. During later embryogenesis, we observed further chromatin opening at Hox complexes in both Ph and Pc mutants, which was coupled to strong deregulation of Hox genes at this stage of development. Moreover, the differential effects of Ph and Pc on Hox cluster folding matches the differences in ectopic Hox gene expression observed in these two mutants, suggesting that the degree of Hox derepression in PcG mutants depends on the degree of structural constraints imposed by each PcG component. In summary, our data demonstrate that binding of PRC1 to large genomic domains during early embryogenesis induces the formation of compact chromatin to prevent ectopic gene expression at later time-points. Thus, epigenetic mechanisms such as Polycomb mediated silencing act by folding chromatin domains and impose an architectural layer to gene regulation.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 2895-2895 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandre Krause ◽  
Alexander Kohlmann ◽  
Torsten Haferlach ◽  
Claudia Schoch ◽  
Susanne Schnittger ◽  
...  

Abstract The t(10;11)(p13;q14) is a recurring translocation associated with the CALM/AF10 fusion gene which is found in undifferentiated leukemia, acute myeloid leukemia, acute lymphoblastic leukemia and malignant lymphoma with poor prognosis. The CALM/AF10 fusion protein was reported to be the most common fusion protein in T-ALL with TCR gamma delta rearrangement. We have analyzed samples from 9 patients with different types of leukemia: case 1 (AML M2), case 2 (AML M0), case 3 (Pre T-ALL), case 4 (Acute Undifferentiated Leukemia), case 5 (PreT-ALL), case 6 and 7 (ProT-ALL), case 8 (T-ALL), case 9 (AML), with a t(10;11) translocation suggesting a CALM/AF10-rearrangement. The samples were analyzed for the presence of the CALM/AF10 and AF10/CALM mRNA by RT-PCR and sequence analysis. All these patients were found positive for the CALM/AF10 fusion. In addition, we analyzed a series of twenty-nine patients with T-ALL with gamma delta rearrangement. Among these patients, four were positive for CALM/AF10 transcripts, indicating a high incidence of CALM/AF10 fusions in this group of leukemia. We found three different breakpoints in CALM at nucleotide 1926, 2091 and a new exon, with 106 bases inserted after nt 2064 of CALM in patient 4. In AF10 four breakpoints were identified: at nucleotide position 424, 589, 883 and 979. In seven patients it was also possible to amplify the reciprocal AF10/CALM fusion transcript (case 1, 3, 4, 8, 9, 10 and 11). There was no correlation between disease phenotype and breakpoint location. The patients were 5 to 46 years old (median 25). Ten CALM/AF10 positive patients were further analyzed using oligonucleotide microarrays representing 33,000 different genes (U133 set, Affymetrix). Analysis of microarray gene expression signatures of these patients revealed high expression levels of the homeobox gene MEIS1 and the HOXA cluster genes HOXA1, HOXA4, HOXA5, HOXA7, HOXA9, and HOXA10. The overexpression of HOX genes seen in these CALM/AF10 positive leukemias is reminiscent of the pattern seen in leukemias with rearrangements of the MLL gene, and complex aberrant karyotypes suggesting a common effector pathway (i.e. HOX gene deregulation) for these diverse leukemias. It is known that alhambra, the Drosophila homologue of AF10 can act on polycomb group responsive elements, which play a critical role in the regulation of the HOX gene clusters. It is thus conceivable that the CALM/AF10 fusion proteins acts in a dominant negative fashion on wild type AF10 function relieving the repression that is presumably normally exerted by AF10 on the expression of HOX genes.


2009 ◽  
Vol 126 ◽  
pp. S250
Author(s):  
Nicolas Di-Poi ◽  
Juan I. Montoya-Burgos ◽  
Hilary Miller ◽  
Nicolas Denans ◽  
Olivier Pourquié ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 602-610 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Di-Poi ◽  
J. I. Montoya-Burgos ◽  
D. Duboule

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex RJ Lima ◽  
Saloe B Poubel ◽  
Juliana N Roson ◽  
Loyze PO de Lima ◽  
Hellida M Costa-Silva ◽  
...  

Background: Genomic organization and gene expression regulation in trypanosomes are remarkable because protein-coding genes are organized into codirectional gene clusters with unrelated functions. Moreover, there is no dedicated promoter for each gene, resulting in polycistronic gene transcription, with posttranscriptional control playing a major role. Nonetheless, these parasites harbor epigenetic modifications at critical regulatory genome features that dynamically change among parasite stages, which are not fully understood. Results: Here, we investigated the impact of chromatin changes in a scenario commanded by posttranscriptional control exploring the parasite Trypanosoma cruzi and its differentiation program using genome-wide approaches supported by transmission electron microscopy. The integration of FAIRE and MNase-seq data, two complementary epigenomic approaches, enabled us to identify differences in T. cruzi genome compartments, putative transcriptional start regions and virulence factors. In addition, we also detected developmental chromatin regulation at tRNA loci (tDNA), which seems to be linked to the translation regulatory mechanism required for parasite differentiation. Strikingly, a positive correlation was observed between active chromatin and steady-state transcription levels. Conclusion: Taken together, our results indicate that chromatin changes reflect the unusual gene expression regulation of trypanosomes and the differences among parasite developmental stages, even in the context of a lack of canonical transcriptional control of protein-coding genes.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seema Bhatlekar ◽  
Jeremy Z. Fields ◽  
Bruce M. Boman

HOX genes encode an evolutionarily conserved set of transcription factors that control how the phenotype of an organism becomes organized during development based on its genetic makeup. For example, in bilaterian-type animals, HOX genes are organized in gene clusters that encode anatomic segment identity, that is, whether the embryo will form with bilateral symmetry with a head (anterior), tail (posterior), back (dorsal), and belly (ventral). Although HOX genes are known to regulate stem cell (SC) differentiation and HOX genes are dysregulated in cancer, the mechanisms by which dysregulation of HOX genes in SCs causes cancer development is not fully understood. Therefore, the purpose of this manuscript was (i) to review the role of HOX genes in SC differentiation, particularly in embryonic, adult tissue-specific, and induced pluripotent SC, and (ii) to investigate how dysregulated HOX genes in SCs are responsible for the development of colorectal cancer (CRC) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). We analyzed HOX gene expression in CRC and AML using information from The Cancer Genome Atlas study. Finally, we reviewed the literature on HOX genes and related therapeutics that might help us understand ways to develop SC-specific therapies that target aberrant HOX gene expression that contributes to cancer development.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex RJ Lima ◽  
Saloe B Poubel ◽  
Juliana N Rosón ◽  
Loyze PO de Lima ◽  
Hellida M Costa-Silva ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Genomic organization and gene expression regulation in trypanosomes are remarkable because protein-coding genes are organized into codirectional gene clusters with unrelated functions. Moreover, there is no dedicated promoter for each gene, resulting in polycistronic gene transcription, with posttranscriptional control playing a major role. Nonetheless, these parasites harbor epigenetic modifications at critical regulatory genome features that dynamically change among parasite stages, which are not fully understood. Results: Here, we investigated the impact of chromatin changes in a scenario commanded by posttranscriptional control exploring the parasite Trypanosoma cruzi and its differentiation program using genome-wide approaches supported by transmission electron microscopy. The integration of FAIRE and MNase-seq data, two complementary epigenomic approaches, enabled us to identify differences in T. cruzi genome compartments, putative transcriptional start regions and virulence factors. In addition, we also detected developmental chromatin regulation at tRNA loci (tDNA), which seems to be linked to the translation regulatory mechanism required for parasite differentiation. Strikingly, a positive correlation was observed between active chromatin and steady-state transcription levels. Conclusion: Taken together, our results indicate that chromatin changes reflect the unusual gene expression regulation of trypanosomes and the differences among parasite developmental stages, even in the context of a lack of canonical transcriptional control of protein-coding genes.


1998 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 39A-39A ◽  
Author(s):  
H TAYLOR ◽  
K BLOCK ◽  
A KARDANA ◽  
P IGARASHI
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document