scholarly journals Hidden partners: Using cross-docking calculations to predict binding sites for proteins with multiple interactions

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathalie Lagarde ◽  
Alessandra Carbone ◽  
Sophie Sacquin-Mora
Keyword(s):  
Nucleic Acid ◽  
Binding Site ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Protein Binding Sites ◽  
Cross Docking ◽  
Multiple Binding Sites ◽  
Multiple Binding ◽  
Docking Calculations

AbstractProtein-protein interactions control a large range of biological processes and their identification is essential to understand the underlying biological mechanisms. To complement experimental approaches, in silico methods are available to investigate protein-protein interactions. Cross-docking methods, in particular, can be used to predict protein binding sites. However, proteins can interact with numerous partners and can present multiple binding sites on their surface, which may alter the binding site prediction quality. We evaluate the binding site predictions obtained using complete cross-docking simulations of 358 proteins with two different scoring schemes accounting for multiple binding sites. Despite overall good binding site prediction performances, 68 cases were still associated with very low prediction quality, presenting individual area under the specificity-sensitivity ROC curve (AUC) values below the random AUC threshold of 0.5, since cross-docking calculations can lead to the identification of alternate protein binding sites (that are different from the reference experimental sites). For the large majority of these proteins, we show that the predicted alternate binding sites correspond to interaction sites with hidden partners, i.e. partners not included in the original cross-docking dataset. Among those new partners, we find proteins, but also nucleic acid molecules. Finally, for proteins with multiple binding sites on their surface, we investigated the structural determinants associated with the binding sites the most targeted by the docking partners.AbbreviationsANOVA: ANalysis Of Variance; AUC: Area Under the Curve; Best Interface: BI; CAPRI: Critical Assessment of Prediction of Interactions; CC-D: Complete Cross-Docking; DNA: DesoxyriboNucleic Acid; FDR: False Discovery Rate; FRIres(type): Fraction of each Residue type in the Interface; FP: False Positives; GI: Global Interface; HCMD: Help Cure Muscular Dystrophy; JET: Joint Evolutionary Tree; MAXDo: Molecular Association via Cross Docking; NAI: Nucleic Acid Interface; NPV: Negative Predicted Value; PDB: Protein Data Bank; PIP: Protein Interface Propensity; PiQSi: Protein Quaternary Structure investigation; PPIs: Protein-Protein Interactions; PPV: Positive Predicted Value; Prec.: Precision; PrimI: Primary Interface; RNA: RiboNucleic Acid; ROC: Receiver Operating Characteristic; SecI: Secondary Interface; Sen.: Sensitivity; Spe.: Specificity; TN: True Negatives; TP: True Positives; WCG: World Community Grid.

Effects of Multiple Binding Sites on Studies of Hydrogen Bonding between Nitroxide Radicals and Solvent Molecules

1993 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Imad Al-Bala'a ◽  
Richard D. Bates
Keyword(s):  
Hydrogen Bonding ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Binding Site ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Hyperfine Coupling Constant ◽  
Hydrogen Donor ◽  
Complex Formation Constants ◽  
Multiple Binding Sites ◽  
Multiple Binding ◽  
Solvent Molecules

The role of more than one binding site on a nitroxide free radical in magnetic resonance determinations of the properties of the complex formed with a hydrogen donor is examined. The expression that relates observed hyperfine couplings in EPR spectra to complex formation constants and concentrations of each species in solution becomes much more complex when multiple binding sites are present, but reduces to a simpler form when binding at the two sites occurs independently and the binding at the non-nitroxide site does not produce significant differences in the hyperfine coupling constant in the complexed radical. Effects on studies of hydrogen bonding between multiple binding site nitroxides and hydrogen donor solvent molecules by other magnetic resonance methods are potentially more extreme.

scholarly journals Possible multiple binding sites for o-aminophenol on uridine diphosphate glucuronyltransferase

1977 ◽  
Vol 163 (1) ◽  
pp. 125-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
R D Howland ◽  
L D Bohm
Keyword(s):  
Binding Site ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Fold Increase ◽  
Prior Treatment ◽  
Uridine Diphosphate ◽  
Adult Rats ◽  
Ph Optimum ◽  
Acceptor Substrate ◽  
Multiple Binding Sites ◽  
Multiple Binding

1. Hepatic microsomal UDP-glucuronyltransferase (EC 2.4.1.17) derived from either weanling or adult rats exhibits three pH optima, at pH 5.4, 7.2 and 9.2, when o-aminophenol is the acceptor substrate, whereas p-nitrophenol is the acceptor substrate only on pH optimum is observed, at pH 5.4.2. Prior treatment of rats of either age with 3-methylcholanthrene results in a 2-3-fold increase in o-aminophenol conjugation at pH 5.4 and a 6-9-fold increase at pH 9.2. At pH 7.2, the induced enzyme is 2 to 3 times more active towards o-aminophenol than the control enzyme, but no pH optimum is demonstrable. 3. o-Aminophenol conjugation at pH 5.4 and 9.2 is inhibited competitively by both p-nitrophenol and p-nitrophenyl glucuronide, suggesting that the two phenolic aglycones share the same binding site. At pH 7.2, however, p-nitrophenyl glucuronide does not inhibit o-aminophenol conjugation, suggesting that the binding site at this pH is not shared by the two phenols. These data are consistent with the existence of more than one binding site for o-aminophenol on UDP-glucuronyltransferase.

scholarly journals Avidity observed between a bivalent inhibitor and an enzyme monomer with a single active site

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shiran Lacham-Hartman ◽  
Yulia Shmidov ◽  
Evette S. Radisky ◽  
Ronit Bitton ◽  
David B. Lukatsky ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ligand Binding ◽  
Binding Affinity ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Protein Complex ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Biological Interactions ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Regulatory Pathways ◽  
Multiple Binding Sites ◽  
Ligand Binding Sites

AbstractAlthough myriad protein–protein interactions in nature use polyvalent binding, in which multiple ligands on one entity bind to multiple receptors on another, to date an affinity advantage of polyvalent binding has been demonstrated experimentally only in cases where the target receptor molecules are clustered prior to complex formation. Here, we demonstrate cooperativity in binding affinity (i.e., avidity) for a protein complex in which an engineered dimer of the amyloid precursor protein inhibitor (APPI), possessing two fully functional inhibitory loops, interacts with mesotrypsin, a soluble monomeric protein that does not self-associate or cluster spontaneously. We found that each inhibitory loop of the purified APPI homodimer was over three-fold more potent than the corresponding loop in the monovalent APPI inhibitor. This observation is consistent with a suggested mechanism whereby the two APPI loops in the homodimer simultaneously and reversibly bind two corresponding mesotrypsin monomers to mediate mesotrypsin dimerization. We propose a simple model for such dimerization that quantitatively explains the observed cooperativity in binding affinity. Binding cooperativity in this system reveals that the valency of ligands may affect avidity in protein–protein interactions including those of targets that are not surface-anchored and do not self-associate spontaneously. In this scenario, avidity may be explained by the enhanced concentration of ligand binding sites in proximity to the monomeric target, which may favor rebinding of the multiple ligand binding sites with the receptor molecules upon dissociation of the protein complex.Impact statementLacham-Hartman et al. demonstrate enhancement of binding affinity through avidity in a complex between a bivalent ligand and a soluble monomeric target with a single binding site. Avidity effects have previously been demonstrated only for clustered receptor molecules presenting multiple binding sites. Our model may explain how polyvalent ligands can agonize or antagonize biological interactions involving nonclustered target molecules that are crucial for intra- and extracellular structural, metabolic, signaling, and regulatory pathways.

scholarly journals Norstictic acid is a selective allosteric transcriptional regulator

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie M Garlick ◽  
Steven M Sturlis ◽  
Paul A Bruno ◽  
Joel A Yates ◽  
Amanda Peiffer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Binding Site ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Transcriptional Coactivator ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Ppi Networks ◽  
Binding Surface ◽  
Inhibitor Discovery

Inhibitors of transcriptional protein-protein interactions (PPIs) have high value both as tools and for therapeutic applications. The PPI network mediated by the transcriptional coactivator Med25, for example, regulates stress-response and motility pathways and dysregulation of the PPI networks contributes to oncogenesis and metastasis. The canonical transcription factor binding sites within Med25 are large (~900 square angstroms) and have little topology, and thus do not present an array of attractive small-molecule binding sites for inhibitor discovery. Here we demonstrate that the depsidone natural product norstictic acid functions through an alternative binding site to block Med25-transcriptional activator PPIs in vitro and in cell culture. Norstictic acid targets a binding site comprised of a highly dynamic loop flanking one canonical binding surface and in doing so, it both orthosterically and allosterically alters Med25-driven transcription in a patient-derived model of triple negative breast cancer. These results highlight the potential of Med25 as a therapeutic target as well as the inhibitor discovery opportunities presented by structurally dynamic loops within otherwise challenging proteins.

scholarly journals Chromatin Opening and Transactivator Potentiation by RAP1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

1999 ◽  
Vol 19 (8) ◽  
pp. 5279-5288 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liuning Yu ◽  
Randall H. Morse
Keyword(s):  
Binding Site ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Accessory Protein ◽  
Dna Binding Domain ◽  
Transcriptional Activators ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Chromatin Opening

ABSTRACT Transcriptional activators function in vivo via binding sites that may be packaged into chromatin. Here we show that whereas the transcriptional activator GAL4 is strongly able to perturb chromatin structure via a nucleosomal binding site in yeast, GCN4 does so poorly. Correspondingly, GCN4 requires assistance from an accessory protein, RAP1, for activation of the HIS4 promoter, whereas GAL4 does not. The requirement for RAP1 for GCN4-mediated HIS4activation is dictated by the DNA-binding domain of GCN4 and not the activation domain, suggesting that RAP1 assists GCN4 in gaining access to its binding site. Consistent with this, overexpression of GCN4 partially alleviates the requirement for RAP1, whereas HIS4activation via a weak GAL4 binding site requires RAP1. RAP1 is extremely effective at interfering with positioning of a nucleosome containing its binding site, consistent with a role in opening chromatin at the HIS4 promoter. Furthermore, increasing the spacing between binding sites for RAP1 and GCN4 by 5 or 10 bp does not impair HIS4 activation, indicating that cooperative protein-protein interactions are not involved in transcriptional facilitation by RAP1. We conclude that an important role of RAP1 is to assist activator binding by opening chromatin.

Binding of Fatty Acids to Albumin: A Case Study of Lipid-Protein Interactions

Physiology ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 264-270 ◽  
Author(s):  
JA Hamilton
Keyword(s):  
Fatty Acids ◽  
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Resonance Spectroscopy ◽  
Multiple Binding Sites ◽  
13C Nuclear Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Multiple Binding ◽  
Lipid Protein Interactions

13C-nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy provides structural and dynamic details of lipid-protein interactions in complexes of fatty acids and serum albumin. With native fatty acids as nonperturbing probes, this determines microscopic properties of fatty acids in individual binding sites of albumin, rather than average properties reflecting multiple binding sites.

scholarly journals Ethylene Binding Site Affinity in Ripening Apples

1993 ◽  
Vol 118 (5) ◽  
pp. 609-612 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sylvia M. Blankenship ◽  
Edward C. Sisler
Keyword(s):  
Binding Site ◽  
Malus Domestica ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Multiple Binding Sites ◽  
Ethylene Binding ◽  
Multiple Binding ◽  
Apple Tissue ◽  
Scatchard Plots

Scatchard plots for ethylene binding in apples (Malus domestica Borkh.), which were harvested weekly for 5 weeks to include the ethylene climacteric rise, showed C50 values (concentration of ethylene needed to occupy 50% of the ethylene binding sites) of 0.10, 0.11, 0.34, 0.40, and 0.57 μl ethylene/liter-1, respectively, for each of the 5 weeks. Higher ethylene concentrations were required to saturate the binding sites during the climacteric rise than at other times. Diffusion of 14C-ethylene from the binding sites was curvilinear and did not show any indication of multiple binding sites. Ethylene was not metabolized by apple tissue.

Partial Purification of a Specific Plasminogen Activator from Porcine Parotid Glands

1974 ◽  
Vol 31 (03) ◽  
pp. 403-414 ◽  
Author(s):  
Terence Cartwright
Keyword(s):  
Nucleic Acid ◽  
Salivary Glands ◽  
Plasminogen Activator ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Partial Purification ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Parotid Glands ◽  
Two Stage ◽  
Preliminary Characterization ◽  
Specific Inhibitors

SummaryA method is described for the extraction with buffers of near physiological pH of a plasminogen activator from porcine salivary glands. Substantial purification of the activator was achieved although this was to some extent complicated by concomitant extraction of nucleic acid from the glands. Preliminary characterization experiments using specific inhibitors suggested that the activator functioned by a similar mechanism to that proposed for urokinase, but with some important kinetic differences in two-stage assay systems. The lack of reactivity of the pig gland enzyme in these systems might be related to the tendency to protein-protein interactions observed with this material.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document