scholarly journals Control of meiotic double-strand-break formation by ATM: local and global views

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Agnieszka Lukaszewicz ◽  
Julian Lange ◽  
Scott Keeney ◽  
Maria Jasin
Keyword(s):  
Strand Break ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Genome Integrity ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Time Loss ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Research Perspectives ◽  
The Right ◽  
Break Formation

ABSTRACTDNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) generated by the SPO11 protein initiate meiotic recombination, an essential process for successful chromosome segregation during gametogenesis. The activity of SPO11 is controlled by multiple factors and regulatory mechanisms, such that the number of DSBs is limited and DSBs form at distinct positions in the genome and at the right time. Loss of this control can affect genome integrity or cause meiotic arrest by mechanisms that are not fully understood. Here we focus on the DSB-responsive kinase ATM and its functions in regulating meiotic DSB numbers and distribution. We review the recently discovered roles of ATM in this context, discuss their evolutionary conservation, and examine future research perspectives.

scholarly journals DNA Double-Strand Break Repair: All Roads Lead to HeterochROMAtin Marks

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre Caron ◽  
Enrico Pobega ◽  
Sophie E. Polo
Keyword(s):  
De Novo ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Genome Integrity ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Break ◽  
The Impact

In response to DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), chromatin modifications orchestrate DNA repair pathways thus safeguarding genome integrity. Recent studies have uncovered a key role for heterochromatin marks and associated factors in shaping DSB repair within the nucleus. In this review, we present our current knowledge of the interplay between heterochromatin marks and DSB repair. We discuss the impact of heterochromatin features, either pre-existing in heterochromatin domains or de novo established in euchromatin, on DSB repair pathway choice. We emphasize how heterochromatin decompaction and mobility further support DSB repair, focusing on recent mechanistic insights into these processes. Finally, we speculate about potential molecular players involved in the maintenance or the erasure of heterochromatin marks following DSB repair, and their implications for restoring epigenome function and integrity.

scholarly journals Focused Genetic Recombination of Bacteriophage T4 Initiated by Double-Strand Breaks

Genetics ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 162 (2) ◽  
pp. 543-556
Author(s):  
Victor Shcherbakov ◽  
Igor Granovsky ◽  
Lidiya Plugina ◽  
Tamara Shcherbakova ◽  
Svetlana Sizova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Recombination ◽  
Bacteriophage T4 ◽  
Proximal Part ◽  
Coupling Model ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
The Right ◽  
Frequency Distance

Abstract A model system for studying double-strand-break (DSB)-induced genetic recombination in vivo based on the ets1 segCΔ strain of bacteriophage T4 was developed. The ets1, a 66-bp DNA fragment of phage T2L containing the cleavage site for the T4 SegC site-specific endonuclease, was inserted into the proximal part of the T4 rIIB gene. Under segC+ conditions, the ets1 behaves as a recombination hotspot. Crosses of the ets1 against rII markers located to the left and to the right of ets1 gave similar results, thus demonstrating the equal and symmetrical initiation of recombination by either part of the broken chromosome. Frequency/distance relationships were studied in a series of two- and three-factor crosses with other rIIB and rIIA mutants (all segC+) separated from ets1 by 12-2100 bp. The observed relationships were readily interpretable in terms of the modified splice/patch coupling model. The advantages of this localized or focused recombination over that distributed along the chromosome, as a model for studying the recombination-replication pathway in T4 in vivo, are discussed.

scholarly journals End-resection at DNA double-strand breaks in the three domains of life

2013 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 314-320 ◽  
Author(s):  
John K. Blackwood ◽  
Neil J. Rzechorzek ◽  
Sian M. Bray ◽  
Joseph D. Maman ◽  
Luca Pellegrini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Homologous Chromosomes ◽  
Domains Of Life ◽  
Strand Invasion ◽  
End Resection

During DNA repair by HR (homologous recombination), the ends of a DNA DSB (double-strand break) must be resected to generate single-stranded tails, which are required for strand invasion and exchange with homologous chromosomes. This 5′–3′ end-resection of the DNA duplex is an essential process, conserved across all three domains of life: the bacteria, eukaryota and archaea. In the present review, we examine the numerous and redundant helicase and nuclease systems that function as the enzymatic analogues for this crucial process in the three major phylogenetic divisions.

scholarly journals i-BLESS is an ultra-sensitive method for detection of DNA double-strand breaks

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Biernacka ◽  
Yingjie Zhu ◽  
Magdalena Skrzypczak ◽  
Romain Forey ◽  
Benjamin Pardo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Fate ◽  
Genome Stability ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Universal Method ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Agarose Beads ◽  
Genome Wide ◽  
Dna Double Strand Break

AbstractMaintenance of genome stability is a key issue for cell fate that could be compromised by chromosome deletions and translocations caused by DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). Thus development of precise and sensitive tools for DSBs labeling is of great importance for understanding mechanisms of DSB formation, their sensing and repair. Until now there has been no high resolution and specific DSB detection technique that would be applicable to any cells regardless of their size. Here, we present i-BLESS, a universal method for direct genome-wide DNA double-strand break labeling in cells immobilized in agarose beads. i-BLESS has three key advantages: it is the only unbiased method applicable to yeast, achieves a sensitivity of one break at a given position in 100,000 cells, and eliminates background noise while still allowing for fixation of samples. The method allows detection of ultra-rare breaks such as those forming spontaneously at G-quadruplexes.

scholarly journals ATM-dependent pathways of chromatin remodelling and oxidative DNA damage responses

2017 ◽  
Vol 372 (1731) ◽  
pp. 20160283 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Daniel Berger ◽  
Fintan K. T. Stanley ◽  
Shaun Moore ◽  
Aaron A. Goodarzi
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Oxidative Dna Damage ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Chromatin Remodelling ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Biochemical Network ◽  
Regulatory Function ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
The Impact

Ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) is a serine/threonine protein kinase with a master regulatory function in the DNA damage response. In this role, ATM commands a complex biochemical network that signals the presence of oxidative DNA damage, including the dangerous DNA double-strand break, and facilitates subsequent repair. Here, we review the current state of knowledge regarding ATM-dependent chromatin remodelling and epigenomic alterations that are required to maintain genomic integrity in the presence of DNA double-strand breaks and/or oxidative stress. We will focus particularly on the roles of ATM in adjusting nucleosome spacing at sites of unresolved DNA double-strand breaks within complex chromatin environments, and the impact of ATM on preserving the health of cells within the mammalian central nervous system. This article is part of the themed issue ‘Chromatin modifiers and remodellers in DNA repair and signalling’.

scholarly journals RAP80 suppresses the vulnerability of R-loops during DNA double-strand break repair

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takaaki Yasuhara ◽  
Reona Kato ◽  
Motohiro Yamauchi ◽  
Yuki Uchihara ◽  
Lee Zou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Active Regions ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Critical Component ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Chromosome Translocations ◽  
Dna Double Strand Break

AbstractR-loops, consisting of ssDNA and DNA-RNA hybrids, are potentially vulnerable unless they are appropriately processed. Recent evidence suggests that R-loops can form in the proximity of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) within transcriptionally active regions. Yet, how the vulnerability of R-loops is overcome during DSB repair remains unclear. Here, we identify RAP80 as a factor suppressing the vulnerability of ssDNA in R-loops and chromosome translocations and deletions during DSB repair. Mechanistically, RAP80 prevents unscheduled nucleolytic processing of ssDNA in R-loops by CtIP. This mechanism promotes efficient DSB repair via transcription-associated end-joining dependent on BRCA1, Polθ, and LIG1/3. Thus, RAP80 suppresses the vulnerability of R-loops during DSB repair, thereby precluding genomic abnormalities in a critical component of the genome caused by deleterious R-loop processing.

scholarly journals Regulation of DNA Double-Strand Break Repair by Non-Coding RNAs

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roopa Thapar
Keyword(s):  
Strand Break ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Break ◽  
Protein Dna Interactions ◽  
Damage Response ◽  
Non Coding Rnas ◽  
Non Homologous End Joining

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are deleterious lesions that are generated in response to ionizing radiation or replication fork collapse that can lead to genomic instability and cancer.  Eukaryotes have evolved two major pathways, namely homologous recombination (HR) and non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) to repair DSBs.  Whereas the roles of protein-DNA interactions in HR and NHEJ have been fairly well defined, the functions of small and long non-coding RNAs and RNA-DNA hybrids in the DNA damage response is just beginning to be elucidated.  This review summarizes recent discoveries on the identification of non-coding RNAs and RNA-mediated regulation of DSB repair

scholarly journals Staphylococcal DNA repair is required for infection

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kam Pou Ha ◽  
Rebecca S. Clarke ◽  
Gyu-Lee Kim ◽  
Jane L. Brittan ◽  
Jessica E. Rowley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Human Blood ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Reporter System ◽  
Gram Positive ◽  
Fluorescent Reporter ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Break ◽  
Transposon Mutants

AbstractThe repair of DNA damage is essential for bacterial viability and contributes to adaptation via increased rates of mutation and recombination. However, the mechanisms by which DNA is damaged and repaired during infection are poorly understood. Using a panel of transposon mutants, we identified the rexBA operon as important for the survival of Staphylococcus aureus in whole human blood. Mutants lacking rexB were also attenuated for virulence in murine models of both systemic and skin infections. We then demonstrated that RexAB is a member of the AddAB family of helicase/nuclease complexes responsible for initiating the repair of DNA double strand breaks. Using a fluorescent reporter system, we were able to show that neutrophils cause staphylococcal DNA double strand breaks via the oxidative burst, which are repaired by RexAB, leading to induction of the mutagenic SOS response. We found that RexAB homologues in Enterococcus faecalis and Streptococcus gordonii also promoted survival of these pathogens in human blood, suggesting that DNA double strand break repair is required for Gram-positive bacteria to survive in host tissues. Together, these data demonstrate that DNA is a target of host immune cells, leading to double-strand breaks, and that repair of this damage by an AddAB-family enzyme enables the survival of Gram-positive pathogens during infection.

scholarly journals βarrestin-1 regulates DNA repair by acting as an E3-ubiquitin ligase adaptor for 53BP1

2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 1200-1213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ainhoa Nieto ◽  
Makoto R. Hara ◽  
Victor Quereda ◽  
Wayne Grant ◽  
Vanessa Saunders ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Ionizing Radiation ◽  
Ubiquitin Ligase ◽  
E3 Ubiquitin Ligase ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Molecular Scaffold ◽  
Strand Breaks

Abstract Cellular DNA is constantly under threat from internal and external insults, consequently multiple pathways have evolved to maintain chromosomal fidelity. Our previous studies revealed that chronic stress, mediated by continuous stimulation of the β2-adrenergic-βarrestin-1 signaling axis suppresses activity of the tumor suppressor p53 and impairs genomic integrity. In this pathway, βarrestin-1 (βarr1) acts as a molecular scaffold to promote the binding and degradation of p53 by the E3-ubiquitin ligase, MDM2. We sought to determine whether βarr1 plays additional roles in the repair of DNA damage. Here we demonstrate that in mice βarr1 interacts with p53-binding protein 1 (53BP1) with major consequences for the repair of DNA double-strand breaks. 53BP1 is a principle component of the DNA damage response, and when recruited to the site of double-strand breaks in DNA, 53BP1 plays an important role coordinating repair of these toxic lesions. Here, we report that βarr1 directs 53BP1 degradation by acting as a scaffold for the E3-ubiquitin ligase Rad18. Consequently, knockdown of βarr1 stabilizes 53BP1 augmenting the number of 53BP1 DNA damage repair foci following exposure to ionizing radiation. Accordingly, βarr1 loss leads to a marked increase in irradiation resistance both in cells and in vivo. Thus, βarr1 is an important regulator of double strand break repair, and disruption of the βarr1/53BP1 interaction offers an attractive strategy to protect cells against high levels of exposure to ionizing radiation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document