scholarly journals Additive and interactive effects of spatial attention and expectation on perceptual decisions

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arianna Zuanazzi ◽  
Uta Noppeney
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Attention ◽  
Interactive Effects ◽  
Signal Probability ◽  
Direct Influence ◽  
Top Down ◽  
Perceptual Inference ◽  
Effective Interactions ◽  
Task Relevance ◽  
Task Irrelevant

AbstractSpatial attention and expectation are two critical top-down mechanisms controlling perceptual inference. Based on previous research it remains unclear whether their influence on perceptual decisions is additive or interactive.We developed a novel multisensory approach that orthogonally manipulated spatial attention (i.e. task relevance) and expectation (i.e. signal probability) selectively in audition and evaluated their effects on observers’ responses in vision. Critically, while experiment 1 manipulated expectation directly via the probability of task-relevant auditory targets across hemifields, experiment 2 manipulated it indirectly via task-irrelevant auditory non-targets.Surprisingly, our results demonstrate that spatial attention and signal probability influence perceptual decisions either additively or interactively. These seemingly contradictory results can be explained parsimoniously by a model that combines spatial attention, general and spatially selective response probabilities as predictors with no direct influence of signal probability. Our model provides a novel perspective on how spatial attention and expectations facilitate effective interactions with the environment.

Multisensory objects and the orienting of spatial attention

2012 ◽  
Vol 25 (0) ◽  
pp. 90
Author(s):  
Serena Mastroberardino ◽  
Valerio Santangelo ◽  
Emiliano Macaluso
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Attention ◽  
Functional Imaging ◽  
Inferior Frontal Gyrus ◽  
Frontal Eye Fields ◽  
Imaging Data ◽  
Top Down ◽  
Task Constraints ◽  
Task Requirements ◽  
Visual Element ◽  
Task Irrelevant

The presentation of an auditory stimulus semantically-congruent with a visual element of a multi-objects display can enhance processing of that element. Here we used multisensory objects (MO) as non-informative cues in a spatial cueing paradigm, aiming to directly assess the interplay between MO integration and spatial attention. We presented two pictures (e.g., left — dog, right — cat) plus a central sound (e.g., a dog’s bark) that defined the location of the MO (left, in this example). This was followed by a target (a Gabor patch) either at the MO location or in the opposite hemifield. Subjects discriminated the orientation of the Gabor, while ignoring all task-irrelevant pictures and sounds. Further, we manipulated the task requirements including ‘easy’ or ‘difficult’ discrimination (Gabor tilt = ±5° or ±10°), and by presenting either a single unilateral Gabor (Exp. 1, ‘low’ competition) or two Gabors bilaterally (red and blue, with the target now defined by colour; Exp. 2, ‘high’ competition). Functional imaging data revealed activation of frontal regions when the target was presented on the opposite side of the MO (invalid trials). The frontal eye-fields activated irrespective of task requirements, while the inferior frontal gyrus activated only when the MO-cue was invalid and competition was low (Exp. 1 only). These findings show that MOs automatically affect the distribution of spatial attention, and that re-orienting operations on invalid trials activate dorsal and ventral frontal areas depending on top-down task constraints. Overall, the results are consistent with the hypothesis linking the integration of multisensory objects with biases of spatial attention.

scholarly journals Modality-specific and multisensory mechanisms of spatial attention and expectation

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arianna Zuanazzi ◽  
Uta Noppeney
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Attention ◽  
Natural Environment ◽  
Sensory Modality ◽  
Behavioral Effects ◽  
Signal Probability ◽  
Task Relevance ◽  
Sensory Modalities ◽  
The Brain ◽  
Primary Modality

AbstractIn our natural environment, the brain needs to combine signals from multiple sensory modalities into a coherent percept. While spatial attention guides perceptual decisions by prioritizing processing of signals that are task-relevant, spatial expectations encode the probability of signals over space. Previous studies have shown that behavioral effects of spatial attention generalize across sensory modalities. However, because they manipulated spatial attention as signal probability over space, these studies could not dissociate attention and expectation or assess their interaction.In two experiments, we orthogonally manipulated spatial attention (i.e., task-relevance) and expectation (i.e., signal probability) selectively in one sensory modality (i.e., primary modality) (experiment 1: audition, experiment 2: vision) and assessed their effects on primary and secondary sensory modalities in which attention and expectation were held constant.Our results show behavioral effects of spatial attention that are comparable for audition and vision as primary modalities; yet, signal probabilities were learnt more slowly in audition, so that spatial expectations were formed later in audition than vision. Critically, when these differences in learning between audition and vision were accounted for, both spatial attention and expectation affected responses more strongly in the primary modality in which they were manipulated, and generalized to the secondary modality only in an attenuated fashion. Collectively, our results suggest that both spatial attention and expectation rely on modality-specific and multisensory mechanisms.

scholarly journals ERP Evidence for Cross-Modal Audiovisual Effects of Endogenous Spatial Attention within Hemifields

2004 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 272-288 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Eimer ◽  
José van Velzen ◽  
Jon Driver
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Attention ◽  
Visual Stimuli ◽  
Focus Of Attention ◽  
Modal Interactions ◽  
Spatial Selection ◽  
Task Relevance ◽  
Auditory Erps ◽  
Task Irrelevant ◽  
Directing Attention ◽  
Primary Modality

Previous ERP studies have uncovered cross-modal interactions in endogenous spatial attention. Directing attention to one side to judge stimuli from one particular modality can modulate early modality-specific ERP components not only for that modality, but also for other currently irrelevant modalities. However, past studies could not determine whether the spatial focus of attention in the task-irrelevant secondary modality was similar to the primary modality, or was instead diffuse across one hemifield. Here, auditory or visual stimuli could appear at any one of four locations (two on each side). In different blocks, subjects judged stimuli at only one of these four locations, for an auditory (Experiment 1) or visual (Experiment 2) task. Early attentional modulations of visual and auditory ERPs were found for stimuli at the currently relevant location, compared with those at the irrelevant location within the same hemifield, thus demonstrating within-hemifield tuning of spatial attention. Crucially, this was found not only for the currently relevant modality, but also for the currently irrelevant modality. Moreover, these within-hemifield attention effects were statistically equivalent regardless of the task relevance of the modality, for both the auditory and visual ERP data. These results demonstrate that within-hemifield spatial attention for one task-relevant modality can transfer cross-modally to a task-irrelevant modality, consistent with spatial selection at a multimodal level of representation.

scholarly journals Oculomotor capture by stimuli that signal the availability of reward

2015 ◽  
Vol 114 (4) ◽  
pp. 2316-2327 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michel Failing ◽  
Tom Nissens ◽  
Daniel Pearson ◽  
Mike Le Pelley ◽  
Jan Theeuwes
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Eye Movement ◽  
Early Selection ◽  
Top Down ◽  
Oculomotor Capture ◽  
Task Relevance ◽  
Selection Processes ◽  
High Reward ◽  
Task Irrelevant ◽  
And Task

It is well known that eye movement patterns are influenced by both goal- and salience-driven factors. Recent studies, however, have demonstrated that objects that are nonsalient and task irrelevant can still capture our eyes if moving our eyes to those objects has previously produced reward. Here we demonstrate that training such an association between eye movements to an object and delivery of reward is not needed. Instead, an object that merely signals the availability of reward captures the eyes even when it is physically nonsalient and never relevant for the task. Furthermore, we show that oculomotor capture by reward is more reliably observed in saccades with short latencies. We conclude that a stimulus signaling high reward has the ability to capture the eyes independently of bottom-up physical salience or top-down task relevance and that the effect of reward affects early selection processes.

scholarly journals Neural Correlates of Task-related Refixation Behaviour

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Radha Nila Meghanathan ◽  
Cees van Leeuwen ◽  
Marcello Giannini ◽  
Andrey R. Nikolaev
Keyword(s):  
Working Memory ◽  
Memory Load ◽  
Top Down ◽  
Working Memory Load ◽  
Factors Affecting ◽  
Task Relevance ◽  
Two Factors ◽  
Related Potentials ◽  
Task Irrelevant ◽  
Saccade Preparation

AbstractInformation uptake during scene viewing under free viewing conditions is crucially determined by the scanning plan. This plan is determined both by top-down and bottom-up factors. To capture top-down factors affecting saccade planning, we compared EEG between first fixations and refixations on items varying in task-relevance. First fixations and refixations impose different working memory costs because first fixations involve encoding of new items whereas refixations involve rehearsal of existing items in working memory. These memory requirements also differ with the task-relevance of the item being encoded. Together, these two factors of task-relevance and memory processes related to refixation behavior would affect saccade planning. In a visual task involving search and memorization of multiple targets, we compared saccade-related potentials (SRPs) between first fixations and refixations for task-relevant (target) and task-irrelevant (distractor) items. We assessed the interval preceding a saccade away from the fixation of interest. Studying this presaccadic interval revealed how mechanisms related to saccade preparation are affected by task-relevance and refixation behavior. We found higher SRP amplitudes for first fixations than refixations over the occipital region for task-relevant items only. Our findings indicate that saccade planning is modulated by both task-relevance of an item and working memory load.

scholarly journals Color Can Shorten Breakthrough Times in Continuous Flash Suppression through Increased Salience and Task Relevance

Vision ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 13
Author(s):  
Christian Valuch
Keyword(s):  
Visual Search ◽  
Response Times ◽  
Top Down ◽  
Interocular Suppression ◽  
Continuous Flash Suppression ◽  
Task Relevance ◽  
Mediated Effects ◽  
Dominant Eye ◽  
Human Participants ◽  
And Task

Color can enhance the perception of relevant stimuli by increasing their salience and guiding visual search towards stimuli that match a task-relevant color. Using Continuous Flash Suppression (CFS), the current study investigated whether color facilitates the discrimination of targets that are difficult to perceive due to interocular suppression. Gabor patterns of two or four cycles per degree (cpd) were shown as targets to the non-dominant eye of human participants. CFS masks were presented at a rate of 10 Hz to the dominant eye, and participants had the task to report the target’s orientation as soon as they could discriminate it. The 2-cpd targets were robustly suppressed and resulted in much longer response times compared to 4-cpd targets. Moreover, only for 2-cpd targets, two color-related effects were evident. First, in trials where targets and CFS masks had different colors, targets were reported faster than in trials where targets and CFS masks had the same color. Second, targets with a known color, either cyan or yellow, were reported earlier than targets whose color was randomly cyan or yellow. The results suggest that the targets’ entry to consciousness may have been speeded by color-mediated effects relating to increased (bottom-up) salience and (top-down) task relevance.

Occipitoparietal alpha-band responses to the graded allocation of top-down spatial attention

2014 ◽  
Vol 112 (6) ◽  
pp. 1307-1316 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabel Dombrowe ◽  
Claus C. Hilgetag
Keyword(s):  
Visual Field ◽  
Spatial Attention ◽  
Brain Regions ◽  
Alpha Band ◽  
Top Down ◽  
Attentional Resources ◽  
Parietal Lobes ◽  
Visual Spatial ◽  
Entire Visual Field ◽  
Band Activity

The voluntary, top-down allocation of visual spatial attention has been linked to changes in the alpha-band of the electroencephalogram (EEG) signal measured over occipital and parietal lobes. In the present study, we investigated how occipitoparietal alpha-band activity changes when people allocate their attentional resources in a graded fashion across the visual field. We asked participants to either completely shift their attention into one hemifield, to balance their attention equally across the entire visual field, or to attribute more attention to one-half of the visual field than to the other. As expected, we found that alpha-band amplitudes decreased stronger contralaterally than ipsilaterally to the attended side when attention was shifted completely. Alpha-band amplitudes decreased bilaterally when attention was balanced equally across the visual field. However, when participants allocated more attentional resources to one-half of the visual field, this was not reflected in the alpha-band amplitudes, which just decreased bilaterally. We found that the performance of the participants was more strongly reflected in the coherence between frontal and occipitoparietal brain regions. We conclude that low alpha-band amplitudes seem to be necessary for stimulus detection. Furthermore, complete shifts of attention are directly reflected in the lateralization of alpha-band amplitudes. In the present study, a gradual allocation of visual attention across the visual field was only indirectly reflected in the alpha-band activity over occipital and parietal cortexes.

scholarly journals Predictive Coding Models for Pain Perception

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuru Song ◽  
Mingchen Yao ◽  
Helen Kemprecos ◽  
Áine Byrne ◽  
Zhengdong Xiao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Data ◽  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Pain Perception ◽  
Predictive Coding ◽  
Oscillatory Activity ◽  
Top Down ◽  
Perceptual Inference ◽  
Bottom Up ◽  
Temporal Coordination ◽  
Mechanistic Insight

AbstractPain is a complex, multidimensional experience that involves dynamic interactions between sensory-discriminative and affective-emotional processes. Pain experiences have a high degree of variability depending on their context and prior anticipation. Viewing pain perception as a perceptual inference problem, we use a predictive coding paradigm to characterize both evoked and spontaneous pain. We record the local field potentials (LFPs) from the primary somatosensory cortex (S1) and the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) of freely behaving rats—two regions known to encode the sensory-discriminative and affective-emotional aspects of pain, respectively. We further propose a framework of predictive coding to investigate the temporal coordination of oscillatory activity between the S1 and ACC. Specifically, we develop a high-level, empirical and phenomenological model to describe the macroscopic dynamics of bottom-up and top-down activity. Supported by recent experimental data, we also develop a mechanistic mean-field model to describe the mesoscopic population neuronal dynamics in the S1 and ACC populations, in both naive and chronic pain-treated animals. Our proposed predictive coding models not only replicate important experimental findings, but also provide new mechanistic insight into the uncertainty of expectation, placebo or nocebo effect, and chronic pain.Author SummaryPain perception in the mammalian brain is encoded through multiple brain circuits. The experience of pain is often associated with brain rhythms or neuronal oscillations at different frequencies. Understanding the temporal coordination of neural oscillatory activity from different brain regions is important for dissecting pain circuit mechanisms and revealing differences between distinct pain conditions. Predictive coding is a general computational framework to understand perceptual inference by integrating bottom-up sensory information and top-down expectation. Supported by experimental data, we propose a predictive coding framework for pain perception, and develop empirical and biologically-constrained computational models to characterize oscillatory dynamics of neuronal populations from two cortical circuits—one for the sensory-discriminative experience and the other for affective-emotional experience, and further characterize their temporal coordination under various pain conditions. Our computational study of biologically-constrained neuronal population model reveals important mechanistic insight on pain perception, placebo analgesia, and chronic pain.

scholarly journals Layer-dependent multiplicative effects of spatial attention on contrast responses in human early visual cortex

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fanhua Guo ◽  
Chengwen Liu ◽  
Chencan Qian ◽  
Zihao Zhang ◽  
Kaibao Sun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Cortex ◽  
Spatial Attention ◽  
Middle Layer ◽  
Additive Effect ◽  
List Type ◽  
Strong Nonlinearity ◽  
Top Down ◽  
Contrast Gain ◽  
Early Visual Cortex ◽  
Deep Layers

AbstractAttention mechanisms at different cortical layers of human visual cortex remain poorly understood. Using submillimeter-resolution fMRI at 7T, we investigated the effects of top-down spatial attention on the contrast responses across different cortical depths in human early visual cortex. Gradient echo (GE) T2* weighted BOLD signal showed an additive effect of attention on contrast responses across cortical depths. Compared to the middle cortical depth, attention modulation was stronger in the superficial and deep depths of V1, and also stronger in the superficial depth of V2 and V3. Using ultra-high resolution (0.3mm in-plane) balanced steady-state free precession (bSSFP) fMRI, a multiplicative scaling effect of attention was found in the superficial and deep layers, but not in the middle layer of V1. Attention modulation of low contrast response was strongest in the middle cortical depths, indicating baseline enhancement or contrast gain of attention modulation on feedforward input. Finally, the additive effect of attention on T2* BOLD can be explained by strong nonlinearity of BOLD signals from large blood vessels, suggesting multiplicative effect of attention on neural activity. These findings support that top-down spatial attention mainly operates through feedback connections from higher order cortical areas, and a distinct mechanism of attention may also be associated with feedforward input through subcortical pathway.HighlightsResponse or activity gain of spatial attention in superficial and deep layersContrast gain or baseline shift of attention in V1 middle layerNonlinearity of large blood vessel causes additive effect of attention on T2* BOLD

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document