scholarly journals Performance-optimized hierarchical models only partially predict neural responses during perceptual decision making

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Gwilliams ◽  
Jean-Rémi King
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Human Subjects ◽  
Brain Activity ◽  
Hand Movement ◽  
Temporal Organization ◽  
Natural Image ◽  
Neural Responses ◽  
Perceptual Decision Making ◽  
Healthy Human ◽  
Perceptual Decision

AbstractModels of perceptual decision making have historically been designed to maximally explain behaviour and brain activity independently of their ability to actually perform tasks. More recently, performance-optimized models have been shown to correlate with brain responses to images and thus present a complementary approach to understand perceptual processes. In the present study, we compare how these approaches comparatively account for the spatio-temporal organization of neural responses elicited by ambiguous visual stimuli. Forty-six healthy human subjects performed perceptual decisions on briefly flashed stimuli constructed from ambiguous characters. The stimuli were designed to have 7 orthogonal properties, ranging from low-sensory levels (e.g. spatial location of the stimulus) to conceptual (whether stimulus is a letter or a digit) and task levels (i.e. required hand movement). Magneto-encephalography source and decoding analyses revealed that these 7 levels of representations are sequentially encoded by the cortical hierarchy, and actively maintained until the subject responds. This hierarchy appeared poorly correlated to normative, drift-diffusion, and 5-layer convolutional neural networks (CNN) optimized to accurately categorize alpha-numeric characters, but partially matched the sequence of activations of 3/6 state-of-the-art CNNs trained for natural image labeling (VGG-16, VGG-19, MobileNet). Additionally, we identify several systematic discrepancies between these CNNs and brain activity, revealing the importance of single-trial learning and recurrent processing. Overall, our results strengthen the notion that performance-optimized algorithms can converge towards the computational solution implemented by the human visual system, and open possible avenues to improve artificial perceptual decision making.

scholarly journals A perceptual decision making EEG/fMRI data set

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasmin K. Georgie ◽  
Camillo Porcaro ◽  
Stephen D. Mayhew ◽  
Andrew P. Bagshaw ◽  
Dirk Ostwald
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Human Subjects ◽  
Open Science ◽  
Fmri Data ◽  
Imaging Data ◽  
Perceptual Decision Making ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Perceptual Decision ◽  
Neuroimaging Data ◽  
Science Framework

AbstractWe present a neuroimaging data set comprising behavioural, electroencephalographic (EEG), and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data that were acquired from human subjects performing a perceptual decision making task. EEG data were acquired both independently and simultaneously with fMRI data. Potential data usages include the validation of biocomputational accounts of human perceptual decision making or the empirical validation of simultaneous EEG/fMRI data processing algorithms. The dataset is available from the Open Science Framework and organized according to the Brain Imaging Data Structure standard.

scholarly journals Influence of expected reward on perceptual decision making

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohsen Rakhshan ◽  
Vivian Lee ◽  
Emily Chu ◽  
Lauren Harris ◽  
Lillian Laiks ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Sensory Processing ◽  
Human Subjects ◽  
Target Selection ◽  
Judgment Task ◽  
Neural Mechanisms ◽  
Perceptual Bias ◽  
Perceptual Decision Making ◽  
Perceptual Decision ◽  
Reward Effects

AbstractPerceptual decision making is influenced by reward expected from alternative options or actions, but the underlying neural mechanisms are currently unknown. More specifically, it is debated whether reward effects are mediated through changes in sensory processing and/or later stages of decision making. To address this question, we conducted two experiments in which human subjects made saccades to what they perceived to be the first or second of two visually identical but asynchronously presented targets, while we manipulated expected reward from correct and incorrect responses on each trial. We found that unequal reward caused similar shifts in target selection (reward bias) between the two experiments. Moreover, observed reward biases were independent of the individual’s sensitivity to sensory signals. These findings suggest that the observed reward effects were determined heuristically via modulation of decision-making processes instead of sensory processing and thus, are more compatible with response bias rather than perceptual bias. To further explain our findings and uncover plausible neural mechanisms, we simulated our experiments with a cortical network model and tested alternative mechanisms for how reward could exert its influence. We found that our observations are more compatible with reward-dependent input to the output layer of the decision circuit. Together, our results suggest that during a temporal judgment task, the influence of reward information on perceptual choice is more compatible with changing later stages of decision making rather than early sensory processing.

scholarly journals Humans sacrifice decision-making for action execution when a demanding control of movement is required

2020 ◽  
Vol 124 (2) ◽  
pp. 497-509
Author(s):  
Amélie J. Reynaud ◽  
Clara Saleri Lunazzi ◽  
David Thura
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Human Subjects ◽  
Behavioral Study ◽  
Perceptual Decision Making ◽  
Action Execution ◽  
Perceptual Decision ◽  
Context Dependent ◽  
Unique Context

Recent hypotheses propose that choices and movements share optimization principles derived from economy, possibly implemented by one unique context-dependent regulation signal determining both processes’ speed. In the present behavioral study conducted on human subjects, we demonstrate that action properties indeed influence perceptual decision-making, but that decision duration and action vigor are actually independently set depending on the difficulty of the movement executed to report a choice.

scholarly journals Spectral signature and behavioral consequence of spontaneous shifts of pupil-linked arousal in human

eLife ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ella Podvalny ◽  
Leana E King ◽  
Biyu J He
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Resting State ◽  
Pupil Size ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Spectral Power ◽  
Brain Activity ◽  
Spectral Signature ◽  
Perceptual Decision Making ◽  
Perceptual Decision ◽  
Pupil Constriction

Arousal levels perpetually rise and fall spontaneously. How markers of arousal - pupil size and frequency content of brain activity - relate to each other and influence behavior in humans is poorly understood. We simultaneously monitored magnetoencephalography and pupil in healthy volunteers at rest and during a visual perceptual decision-making task. Spontaneously varying pupil size correlates with power of brain activity in most frequency bands across large-scale resting-state cortical networks. Pupil size recorded at prestimulus baseline correlates with subsequent shifts in detection bias (c) and sensitivity (d'). When dissociated from pupil-linked state, prestimulus spectral power of resting state networks still predicts perceptual behavior. Fast spontaneous pupil constriction and dilation correlate with large-scale brain activity as well but not perceptual behavior. Our results illuminate the relation between central and peripheral arousal markers and their respective roles in human perceptual decision-making.

Reward modulates the association between sensory noise and brain activity during perceptual decision-making

2020 ◽  
Vol 149 ◽  
pp. 107675
Author(s):  
Christian Baeuchl ◽  
Nils Kroemer ◽  
Shakoor Pooseh ◽  
Johannes Petzold ◽  
Sebastian Bitzer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Brain Activity ◽  
Perceptual Decision Making ◽  
Perceptual Decision ◽  
Sensory Noise

scholarly journals Separable neural signatures of confidence during perceptual decisions

eLife ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tarryn Balsdon ◽  
Pascal Mamassian ◽  
Valentin Wyart
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Neural Circuit ◽  
Spectral Power ◽  
Brain Activity ◽  
Neural Representation ◽  
Perceptual Decision Making ◽  
Perceptual Decision ◽  
Decision Confidence ◽  
Electrical Brain Activity ◽  
Human Participants

Perceptual confidence is an evaluation of the validity of perceptual decisions. While there is behavioural evidence that confidence evaluation differs from perceptual decision-making, disentangling these two processes remains a challenge at the neural level. Here, we examined the electrical brain activity of human participants in a protracted perceptual decision-making task where observers tend to commit to perceptual decisions early whilst continuing to monitor sensory evidence for evaluating confidence. Premature decision commitments were revealed by patterns of spectral power overlying motor cortex, followed by an attenuation of the neural representation of perceptual decision evidence. A distinct neural representation was associated with the computation of confidence, with sources localised in the superior parietal and orbitofrontal cortices. In agreement with a dissociation between perception and confidence, these neural resources were recruited even after observers committed to their perceptual decisions, and thus delineate an integral neural circuit for evaluating perceptual decision confidence.

scholarly journals Separable neural signatures of confidence during perceptual decisions

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Balsdon ◽  
P. Mamassian ◽  
V. Wyart
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Neural Circuit ◽  
Spectral Power ◽  
Brain Activity ◽  
Neural Representation ◽  
Perceptual Decision Making ◽  
Perceptual Decision ◽  
Electrical Brain Activity ◽  
Sensory Evidence ◽  
Human Participants

AbstractPerceptual confidence is an evaluation of the validity of perceptual decisions. While there is behavioural evidence that confidence evaluation differs from perceptual decision-making, disentangling these two processes remains a challenge at the neural level. Here we examined the electrical brain activity of human participants in a protracted perceptual decision-making task where observers tend to commit to perceptual decisions early whilst continuing to monitor sensory evidence for evaluating confidence. Premature decision commitments were revealed by patterns of spectral power overlying motor cortex, followed by an attenuation of the neural representation of perceptual decision evidence. A distinct neural representation was associated with suboptimalities affecting confidence reports, with sources localised in the superior parietal and orbitofrontal cortices. In agreement with a dissociation between perception and confidence, these neural resources were recruited even after observers committed to their perceptual decisions, and thus delineate an integral neural circuit for the computation of confidence.

scholarly journals Evidence accumulation during perceptual decision-making is sensitive to the dynamics of attentional selection

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dragan Rangelov ◽  
Jason B. Mattingley
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Brain Activity ◽  
Sensory Information ◽  
Neural Correlates ◽  
Attentional Selection ◽  
Adaptive Behaviour ◽  
Perceptual Decision Making ◽  
Perceptual Decision ◽  
Sensory Inputs

AbstractThe ability to select and combine multiple sensory inputs in support of accurate decisions is a hallmark of adaptive behaviour. Attentional selection is often needed to prioritize stimuli that are task-relevant and to attenuate potentially distracting sources of sensory information. As most studies of perceptual decision-making to date have made use of task-relevant stimuli only, relatively little is known about how attention modulates decision making. To address this issue, we developed a novel ‘integrated’ decision-making task, in which participants judged the average direction of successive target motion signals while ignoring concurrent and spatially overlapping distractor motion signals. In two experiments that varied the role of attentional selection, we used linear regression to quantify the influence of target and distractor stimuli on behaviour. Using electroencephalography, we characterised the neural correlates of decision making, attentional selection and feature-specific responses to target and distractor signals. While targets strongly influenced perceptual decisions and associated neural activity, we also found that concurrent and spatially coincident distractors exerted a measurable bias on both behaviour and brain activity. Our findings suggest that attention operates as a real-time but imperfect filter during perceptual decision-making by dynamically modulating the contributions of task-relevant and irrelevant sensory inputs.

Discarding optimality: Throwing out the baby with the bathwater?

2018 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Simen ◽  
Fuat Balcı
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Perceptual Decision Making ◽  
Reward Rate ◽  
Perceptual Decision ◽  
Standard Observer ◽  
Rate Maximization ◽  
Reward Rate Maximization ◽  
Descriptive Standard ◽  
Observer Model

AbstractRahnev & Denison (R&D) argue against normative theories and in favor of a more descriptive “standard observer model” of perceptual decision making. We agree with the authors in many respects, but we argue that optimality (specifically, reward-rate maximization) has proved demonstrably useful as a hypothesis, contrary to the authors’ claims.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document