scholarly journals Gene regulatory network architecture in different developmental contexts influences the genetic basis of morphological evolution

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebastian Kittelmann ◽  
Alexandra D. Buffry ◽  
Franziska A. Franke ◽  
Isabel Almudi ◽  
Marianne Yoth ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Regulatory Network ◽  
Regulatory Network ◽  
Network Architecture ◽  
Regulatory Networks ◽  
Genetic Basis ◽  
Morphological Evolution ◽  
Phenotypic Change ◽  
Phenotypic Evolution ◽  
Gene Regulatory ◽  
And Function

AbstractConvergent phenotypic evolution is often caused by recurrent changes at particular nodes in the underlying gene regulatory networks (GRNs). The genes at such evolutionary ‘hotspots’ are thought to maximally affect the phenotype with minimal pleiotropic consequences. This has led to the suggestion that if a GRN is understood in sufficient detail, the path of evolution may be predictable. The repeated evolutionary loss of larval trichomes among Drosophila species is caused by the loss of shavenbaby (svb) expression. svb is also required for development of leg trichomes, but the evolutionary gain of trichomes in the ‘naked valley’ on T2 femurs in Drosophila melanogaster is caused by the loss of microRNA-92a (miR-92a) expression rather than changes in svb. We compared the expression and function of components between the larval and leg trichome GRNs to investigate why the genetic basis of trichome pattern evolution differs in these developmental contexts. We found key differences between the two networks in both the genes employed, and in the regulation and function of common genes. These differences in the GRNs reveal why mutations in svb are unlikely to contribute to leg trichome evolution and how instead miR-92a represents the key evolutionary switch in this context. Our work shows that variability in GRNs across different developmental contexts, as well as whether a morphological feature is lost versus gained, influence the nodes at which a GRN evolves to cause morphological change. Therefore, our findings have important implications for understanding the pathways and predictability of evolution.Author SummaryA major goal of biology is to identify the genetic cause of organismal diversity. Convergent evolution of traits is often caused by changes in the same genes – evolutionary ‘hotspots’. shavenbaby is a ‘hotspot’ for larval trichome loss in Drosophila, however microRNA-92a underlies the gain of leg trichomes. To understand this difference in the genetics of phenotypic evolution, we compared the expression and function of genes in the underlying regulatory networks. We found that the pathway of evolution is influenced by differences in gene regulatory network architecture in different developmental contexts, as well as by whether a trait is lost or gained. Therefore, hotspots in one context may not readily evolve in a different context. This has important implications for understanding the genetic basis of phenotypic change and the predictability of evolution.

scholarly journals Gene regulatory network architecture in different developmental contexts influences the genetic basis of morphological evolution

PLoS Genetics ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. e1007375 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebastian Kittelmann ◽  
Alexandra D. Buffry ◽  
Franziska A. Franke ◽  
Isabel Almudi ◽  
Marianne Yoth ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Regulatory Network ◽  
Regulatory Network ◽  
Network Architecture ◽  
Genetic Basis ◽  
Morphological Evolution ◽  
Gene Regulatory ◽  
Developmental Contexts

scholarly journals Improving gene regulatory network structure using redundancy reduction in the MRNET algorithm

RSC Advances ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (37) ◽  
pp. 23222-23233 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei Liu ◽  
Wen Zhu ◽  
Bo Liao ◽  
Haowen Chen ◽  
Siqi Ren ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systems Biology ◽  
Gene Regulatory Network ◽  
Gene Regulatory Networks ◽  
Network Structure ◽  
Regulatory Network ◽  
Regulatory Networks ◽  
Central Problem ◽  
Expression Data ◽  
Redundancy Reduction ◽  
Gene Regulatory

Inferring gene regulatory networks from expression data is a central problem in systems biology.

scholarly journals Perturbation-based gene regulatory network inference to unravel oncogenic mechanisms

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Morgan ◽  
Matthew Studham ◽  
Andreas Tjärnberg ◽  
Holger Weishaupt ◽  
Fredrik J. Swartling ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Regulatory Network ◽  
Regulatory Network ◽  
Regulatory Networks ◽  
Network Inference ◽  
Gene Regulatory Network Inference ◽  
Validation Data ◽  
Regulatory Interactions ◽  
Link Type ◽  
Gene Regulatory ◽  
Novel Interactions

AbstractThe gene regulatory network (GRN) of human cells encodes mechanisms to ensure proper functioning. However, if this GRN is dysregulated, the cell may enter into a disease state such as cancer. Understanding the GRN as a system can therefore help identify novel mechanisms underlying disease, which can lead to new therapies. Reliable inference of GRNs is however still a major challenge in systems biology.To deduce regulatory interactions relevant to cancer, we applied a recent computational inference framework to data from perturbation experiments in squamous carcinoma cell line A431. GRNs were inferred using several methods, and the false discovery rate was controlled by the NestBoot framework. We developed a novel approach to assess the predictiveness of inferred GRNs against validation data, despite the lack of a gold standard. The best GRN was significantly more predictive than the null model, both in crossvalidated benchmarks and for an independent dataset of the same genes under a different perturbation design. It agrees with many known links, in addition to predicting a large number of novel interactions from which a subset was experimentally validated. The inferred GRN captures regulatory interactions central to cancer-relevant processes and thus provides mechanistic insights that are useful for future cancer research.Data available at GSE125958Inferred GRNs and inference statistics available at https://dcolin.shinyapps.io/CancerGRN/ Software available at https://bitbucket.org/sonnhammergrni/genespider/src/BFECV/Author SummaryCancer is the second most common cause of death globally, and although cancer treatments have improved in recent years, we need to understand how regulatory mechanisms are altered in cancer to combat the disease efficiently. By applying gene perturbations and inference of gene regulatory networks to 40 genes known or suspected to have a role in cancer due to interactions with the oncogene MYC, we deduce their underlying regulatory interactions. Using a recent computational framework for inference together with a novel method for cross validation, we infer a reliable regulatory model of this system in a completely data driven manner, not reliant on literature or priors. The novel interactions add to the understanding of the progressive oncogenic regulatory process and may provide new targets for therapy.

PAGeneRN

2020 ◽  
pp. 1052-1075 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dina Elsayad ◽  
A. Ali ◽  
Howida A. Shedeed ◽  
Mohamed F. Tolba
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Data Analysis ◽  
Network Analysis ◽  
Gene Regulatory Network ◽  
Gene Expression Data ◽  
Regulatory Network ◽  
Regulatory Networks ◽  
Expression Data ◽  
Gene Expression Data Analysis ◽  
Gene Regulatory

The gene expression analysis is an important research area of Bioinformatics. The gene expression data analysis aims to understand the genes interacting phenomena, gene functionality and the genes mutations effect. The Gene regulatory network analysis is one of the gene expression data analysis tasks. Gene regulatory network aims to study the genes interactions topological organization. The regulatory network is critical for understanding the pathological phenotypes and the normal cell physiology. There are many researches that focus on gene regulatory network analysis but unfortunately some algorithms are affected by data size. Where, the algorithm runtime is proportional to the data size, therefore, some parallel algorithms are presented to enhance the algorithms runtime and efficiency. This work presents a background, mathematical models and comparisons about gene regulatory networks analysis different techniques. In addition, this work proposes Parallel Architecture for Gene Regulatory Network (PAGeneRN).

scholarly journals Predicting genotype-specific gene regulatory networks

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deborah Weighill ◽  
Marouen Ben Guebila ◽  
Kimberly Glass ◽  
John Quackenbush ◽  
John Platig
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Gene Regulatory Network ◽  
Gene Regulatory Networks ◽  
Genetic Variants ◽  
Regulatory Network ◽  
Regulatory Networks ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Disease Etiology ◽  
Gene Regulatory ◽  
The Impact

AbstractThe majority of disease-associated genetic variants are thought to have regulatory effects, including the disruption of transcription factor (TF) binding and the alteration of downstream gene expression. Identifying how a person’s genotype affects their individual gene regulatory network has the potential to provide important insights into disease etiology and to enable improved genotype-specific disease risk assessments and treatments. However, the impact of genetic variants is generally not considered when constructing gene regulatory networks. To address this unmet need, we developed EGRET (Estimating the Genetic Regulatory Effect on TFs), which infers a genotype-specific gene regulatory network (GRN) for each individual in a study population by using message passing to integrate genotype-informed TF motif predictions - derived from individual genotype data, the predicted effects of variants on TF binding and gene expression, and TF motif predictions - with TF protein-protein interactions and gene expression. Comparing EGRET networks for two blood-derived cell lines identified genotype-associated cell-line specific regulatory differences which were subsequently validated using allele-specific expression, chromatin accessibility QTLs, and differential TF binding from ChIP-seq. In addition, EGRET GRNs for three cell types across 119 individuals captured regulatory differences associated with disease in a cell-type-specific manner. Our analyses demonstrate that EGRET networks can capture the impact of genetic variants on complex phenotypes, supporting a novel fine-scale stratification of individuals based on their genetic background. EGRET is available through the Network Zoo R package (netZooR v0.9; netzoo.github.io).

scholarly journals Towards a study of gene regulatory constraints to morphological evolution of the Drosophila ocellar region

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Aguilar-Hidalgo ◽  
D. Becerra-Alonso ◽  
D. García-Morales ◽  
F. Casares
Keyword(s):  
Bayesian Networks ◽  
Morphological Variation ◽  
Regulatory Networks ◽  
Morphological Evolution ◽  
Model Parameters ◽  
Regulatory Interactions ◽  
Regulatory Constraints ◽  
Gene Regulatory ◽  
Morphological Variants ◽  
And Function

ABSTRACTThe morphology and function of organs depend on coordinated changes in gene expression during development. These changes are controlled by transcription factors, signaling pathways and their regulatory interactions, which are represented by gene regulatory networks (GRNs). Therefore, the structure of an organ GRN restricts the morphological and functional variations that the organ can experience –its potential morphospace. Therefore, two important questions arise when studying any GRN: what is the predicted available morphospace and what are the regulatory linkages that contribute the most to control morphological variation within this space. Here, we explore these questions by analyzing a small “3-node” GRN model that captures the Hh-driven regulatory interactions controlling a simple visual structure: the ocellar region of Drosophila. Analysis of the model predicts that random variation of model parameters results in a specific non-random distribution of morphological variants. Study of a limited sample of Drosophilids and other dipterans finds a correspondence between the predicted phenotypic range and that found in nature. As an alternative to simulations, we apply Bayesian Networks methods in order to identify the set of parameters with the largest contribution to morphological variation. Our results predict the potential morphological space of the ocellar complex, and identify likely candidate processes to be responsible for ocellar morphological evolution using Bayesian networks. We further discuss the assumptions that the approach we have taken entails and their validity.

scholarly journals Neural Gene Network Constructor: A Neural Based Model for Reconstructing Gene Regulatory Network

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhang Zhang ◽  
Lifei Wang ◽  
Shuo Wang ◽  
Ruyi Tao ◽  
Jingshu Xiao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Gene Regulatory Network ◽  
Gene Expression Data ◽  
Gene Regulatory Networks ◽  
Network Structure ◽  
Regulatory Network ◽  
Gene Network ◽  
Regulatory Networks ◽  
Expression Data ◽  
Gene Regulatory

SummaryReconstructing gene regulatory networks (GRNs) and inferring the gene dynamics are important to understand the behavior and the fate of the normal and abnormal cells. Gene regulatory networks could be reconstructed by experimental methods or from gene expression data. Recent advances in Single Cell RNA sequencing technology and the computational method to reconstruct trajectory have generated huge scRNA-seq data tagged with additional time labels. Here, we present a deep learning model “Neural Gene Network Constructor” (NGNC), for inferring gene regulatory network and reconstructing the gene dynamics simultaneously from time series gene expression data. NGNC is a model-free heterogenous model, which can reconstruct any network structure and non-linear dynamics. It consists of two parts: a network generator which incorporating gumbel softmax technique to generate candidate network structure, and a dynamics learner which adopting multiple feedforward neural networks to predict the dynamics. We compare our model with other well-known frameworks on the data set generated by GeneNetWeaver, and achieve the state of the arts results both on network reconstruction and dynamics learning.

Inferring Gene Regulatory Networks from Genetical Genomics Data

2010 ◽  
pp. 79-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bing Liu ◽  
Ina Hoeschele ◽  
Alberto de la Fuente
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Gene Regulatory Network ◽  
Regulatory Network ◽  
Regulatory Networks ◽  
Network Inference ◽  
Dna Marker ◽  
Search Space ◽  
Genetical Genomics ◽  
Gene Regulatory Network Inference ◽  
Gene Regulatory

In this chapter, we review the current state of Gene Regulatory Network inference based on ‘Genetical Genomics’ experiments (Brem & Kruglyak, 2005; Brem, Yvert, Clinton & Kruglyak, 2002; Jansen, 2003; Jansen & Nap, 2001; Schadt et al., 2003) as a special case of causal network inference in ‘Systems Genetics’ (Threadgill, 2006). In a Genetical Genomics experiment, a segregating or genetically randomized population is DNA marker genotyped and gene-expression profiled on a genomewide scale. The genotypes are regarded as natural, multifactorial perturbations resulting in different gene-expression ‘phenotypes’, and causal relationships can therefore be established between the measured genotypes and the gene-expression phenotypes. In this chapter, we review different computational approaches to Gene Regulatory Network inference based on the joint analysis of DNA marker and expression data and additionally of DNA sequence information if available. This includes different methods for expression QTL mapping, selection of regulator-target pairs, construction of an encompassing network, which strongly constrains the network search space, and pairwise and multivariate methods for Gene Regulatory Network inference, such as Bayesian Networks and Structural Equation Modeling.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document