scholarly journals Label-free quantification with FDR-controlled match-between-runs

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fengchao Yu ◽  
Sarah E. Haynes ◽  
Alexey I. Nesvizhskii

AbstractMissing values weaken the power of label-free quantitative proteomic experiments to uncover true quantitative differences between biological samples or experimental conditions. Match-between-runs (MBR) has become a common approach to mitigate the missing value problem, where peptides identified by tandem mass spectra in one run are transferred to another by inference based on m/z, charge state, retention time, and ion mobility when applicable. Though tolerances are used to ensure such transferred identifications are reasonably located and meet certain quality thresholds, little work has been done to evaluate the statistical confidence of MBR. Here, we present a mixture model-based approach to estimate the false discovery rate (FDR) of peptide and protein identification transfer, which we implement in the label-free quantification tool IonQuant. Using several benchmarking datasets generated on both Orbitrap and timsTOF mass spectrometers, we demonstrate that IonQuant with FDR-controlled MBR results in superior performance compared to MaxQuant. We further illustrate the need for FDR-controlled MBR in sparse datasets such as those from single-cell proteomics experiments.

Molecules ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (17) ◽  
pp. 5330
Author(s):  
Christina Johannsen ◽  
Christian J. Koehler ◽  
Bernd Thiede

(1) Background: Mass spectrometry-based quantitative proteome profiling is most commonly performed by label-free quantification (LFQ), stable isotopic labeling with amino acids in cell culture (SILAC), and reporter ion-based isobaric labeling methods (TMT and iTRAQ). Isobaric peptide termini labeling (IPTL) was described as an alternative to these methods and is based on crosswise labeling of both peptide termini and MS2 quantification. High quantification accuracy was assumed for IPTL because multiple quantification points are obtained per identified MS2 spectrum. A direct comparison of IPTL with other quantification methods has not been performed yet because IPTL commonly requires digestion with endoproteinase Lys-C. (2) Methods: To enable tryptic digestion of IPTL samples, a novel labeling for IPTL was developed that combines metabolic labeling (Arg-0/Lys-0 and Arg-d4/Lys-d4, respectively) with crosswise N-terminal dimethylation (d4 and d0, respectively). (3) Results: The comparison of IPTL with LFQ revealed significantly more protein identifications for LFQ above homology ion scores but not above identity ion scores. (4) Conclusions: The quantification accuracy was superior for LFQ despite the many quantification points obtained with IPTL.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zeeshan Hamid ◽  
Kip D. Zimmerman ◽  
Hector Guillen-Ahlers ◽  
Cun Li ◽  
Peter Nathanielsz ◽  
...  

Introduction: Reliable and effective label-free quantification (LFQ) analyses are dependent not only on the method of data acquisition in the mass spectrometer, but also on the downstream data processing, including software tools, query database, data normalization and imputation. In non-human primates (NHP), LFQ is challenging because the query databases for NHP are limited since the genomes of these species are not comprehensively annotated. This invariably results in limited discovery of proteins and associated Post Translational Modifications (PTMs) and a higher fraction of missing data points. While identification of fewer proteins and PTMs due to database limitations can negatively impact uncovering important and meaningful biological information, missing data also limits downstream analyses (e.g., multivariate analyses), decreases statistical power, biases statistical inference, and makes biological interpretation of the data more challenging. In this study we attempted to address both issues: first, we used the MetaMorphues proteomics search engine to counter the limits of NHP query databases and maximize the discovery of proteins and associated PTMs, and second, we evaluated different imputation methods for accurate data inference. Results: Using the MetaMorpheus proteomics search engine we obtained quantitative data for 1,622 proteins and 10,634 peptides including 58 different PTMs (biological, metal and artifacts) across a diverse age range of NHP brain frontal cortex. However, among the 1,622 proteins identified, only 293 proteins were quantified across all samples with no missing values, emphasizing the importance of implementing an accurate and statically valid imputation method to fill in missing data. In our imputation analysis we demonstrate that Single Imputation methods that borrow information from correlated proteins such as Generalized Ridge Regression (GRR), Random Forest (RF), local least squares (LLS), and a Bayesian Principal Component Analysis methods (BPCA), are able to estimate missing protein abundance values with great accuracy. Conclusions: Overall, this study offers a detailed comparative analysis of LFQ data generated in NHP and proposes strategies for improved LFQ in NHP proteomics data.


2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 1477-1485 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johannes Griss ◽  
Florian Stanek ◽  
Otto Hudecz ◽  
Gerhard Dürnberger ◽  
Yasset Perez-Riverol ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 41 (8) ◽  
pp. 3833-3842
Author(s):  
SASIKARN KOMKLEOW ◽  
CHURAT WEERAPHAN ◽  
DARANEE CHOKCHAICHAMNANKIT ◽  
PAPADA CHAISURIYA ◽  
CHRIS VERATHAMJAMRAS ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 90 (21) ◽  
pp. 12670-12677 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefano Fornasaro ◽  
Alois Bonifacio ◽  
Elena Marangon ◽  
Mauro Buzzo ◽  
Giuseppe Toffoli ◽  
...  

Lab on a Chip ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 9 (7) ◽  
pp. 884 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tsi-Hsuan Hsu ◽  
Meng-Hua Yen ◽  
Wei-Yu Liao ◽  
Ji-Yen Cheng ◽  
Chau-Hwang Lee

2014 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 1281-1292 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan K. Van Riper ◽  
Ebbing P. de Jong ◽  
LeeAnn Higgins ◽  
John V. Carlis ◽  
Timothy J. Griffin

2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 1410-1424 ◽  
Author(s):  
MHD Rami Al Shweiki ◽  
Susann Mönchgesang ◽  
Petra Majovsky ◽  
Domenika Thieme ◽  
Diana Trutschel ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 1314-1320 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael R. Hoopmann ◽  
Jason M. Winget ◽  
Luis Mendoza ◽  
Robert L. Moritz

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document