scholarly journals Nonstructural protein 1 of SARS-CoV-2 is a potent pathogenicity factor redirecting host protein synthesis machinery toward viral RNA

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuai Yuan ◽  
Lei Peng ◽  
Jonathan J. Park ◽  
Yingxia Hu ◽  
Swapnil C. Devarkar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Protein Synthesis ◽  
Viral Protein ◽  
Nonstructural Protein ◽  
Differential Expression Analysis ◽  
Human Cells ◽  
Viral Rna ◽  
Host Protein ◽  
Viral Protein Synthesis ◽  
Pathogenicity Factor ◽  
Nonstructural Protein 1

SummaryThe COVID-19 pandemic affects millions of people worldwide with a rising death toll. The causative agent, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), uses its nonstructural protein 1 (Nsp1) to redirect host translation machinery to the viral RNA by binding to the ribosome and suppressing cellular, but not viral, protein synthesis through yet unknown mechanisms. We show here that among all viral proteins, Nsp1 has the largest impact on host viability in the cells of human lung origin. Differential expression analysis of mRNA-seq data revealed that Nsp1 broadly alters the transcriptome in human cells. The changes include repression of major gene clusters in ribosomal RNA processing, translation, mitochondria function, cell cycle and antigen presentation; and induction of factors in transcriptional regulation. We further gained a mechanistic understanding of the Nsp1 function by determining the cryo-EM structure of the Nsp1-40S ribosomal subunit complex, which shows that Nsp1 inhibits translation by plugging the mRNA entry channel of the 40S. We also determined the cryo-EM structure of the 48S preinitiation complex (PIC) formed by Nsp1, 40S, and the cricket paralysis virus (CrPV) internal ribosome entry site (IRES) RNA, which shows that this 48S PIC is nonfunctional due to the incorrect position of the 3’ region of the mRNA. Results presented here elucidate the mechanism of host translation inhibition by SARS-CoV-2, provide insight into viral protein synthesis, and furnish a comprehensive understanding of the impacts from one of the most potent pathogenicity factors of SARS-CoV-2.HighlightsORF screen identified Nsp1 as a major cellular pathogenicity factor of SARS-CoV-2Nsp1 broadly alters the gene expression programs in human cellsNsp1 inhibits translation by blocking mRNA entry channelNsp1 prevents physiological conformation of the 48S PIC

scholarly journals Targeting Stem-loop 1 of the SARS-CoV-2 5’UTR to suppress viral translation and Nsp1 evasion

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Setu M. Vora ◽  
Pietro Fontana ◽  
Valerie Leger ◽  
Ying Zhang ◽  
Tian-Min Fu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Protein Synthesis ◽  
Nonstructural Protein ◽  
Host Protein ◽  
Locked Nucleic Acid ◽  
Viral Protein Synthesis ◽  
Stem Loop ◽  
Viral Translation ◽  
Nonstructural Protein 1 ◽  
Host Protein Synthesis

SARS-CoV-2 is a highly pathogenic virus that evades anti-viral immunity by interfering with host protein synthesis, mRNA stability, and protein trafficking. The SARS-CoV-2 nonstructural protein 1 (Nsp1) uses its C-terminal domain to block the mRNA entry channel of the 40S ribosome to inhibit host protein synthesis. However, how SARS-CoV-2 circumvents Nsp1-mediated suppression for viral protein synthesis and if the mechanism can be targeted therapeutically remain unclear. Here we show that N- and C-terminal domains of Nsp1 coordinate to drive a tuned ratio of viral to host translation, likely to maintain a certain level of host fitness while maximizing replication. We reveal that the SL1 region of the SARS-CoV-2 5’ UTR is necessary and sufficient to evade Nsp1-mediated translational suppression. Targeting SL1 with locked nucleic acid antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) inhibits viral translation and makes SARS-CoV-2 5’ UTR vulnerable to Nsp1 suppression, hindering viral replication in vitro at a nanomolar concentration. Thus, SL1 allows Nsp1 to switch infected cells from host to SARS-CoV-2 translation, presenting a therapeutic target against COVID-19 that is conserved among immune-evasive variants. This unique strategy of unleashing a virus’ own virulence mechanism against itself could force a critical trade off between drug resistance and pathogenicity.

scholarly journals Specific Inhibition of Coxsackievirus B3 Translation and Replication by Phosphorothioate Antisense Oligodeoxynucleotides

2001 ◽  
Vol 45 (4) ◽  
pp. 1043-1052 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aikun Wang ◽  
Paul K. M. Cheung ◽  
Huifang Zhang ◽  
Christopher M. Carthy ◽  
Lubos Bohunek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Protein Synthesis ◽  
Translation Initiation ◽  
Viral Protein ◽  
Plaque Assay ◽  
Rna Replication ◽  
Coxsackievirus B3 ◽  
Viral Rna ◽  
Antisense Oligodeoxynucleotides ◽  
Viral Protein Synthesis ◽  
Rna Translation

ABSTRACT The 5′ and 3′ untranslated regions (UTRs) of coxsackievirus B3 (CVB3) RNA form highly ordered secondary structures that have been confirmed to play important regulatory roles in viral cap-independent internal translation initiation and RNA replication. We previously demonstrated that deletions in different regions of the 5′ UTR significantly reduced viral RNA translation and infectivity. Such observations suggested strongly that viral RNA translation and replication could be blocked if highly specific antisense oligodeoxynucleotides (AS-ODNs) were applied to target crucial sites within the 5′ and 3′ UTRs. In this study, seven phosphorothioate AS-ODNs were synthesized, and the antiviral activity was evaluated by Lipofectin transfection of HeLa cells with AS-ODNs followed by infection of CVB3. Analysis by Western blotting, reverse transcription-PCR, and viral plaque assay demonstrated that viral protein synthesis, genome replication, and infectivity of CVB3 were strongly inhibited by the AS-ODNs complementary to different regions of the 5′ and 3′ UTRs. The most effective sites are located at the proximate terminus of the 5′ UTR (AS-1), the proximate terminus of the 3′ UTR (AS-7), the core sequence of the internal ribosome entry site (AS-2), and the translation initiation codon region (AS-4). These AS-ODNs showed highly sequence-specific and dose-dependent inhibitory effects on both viral protein synthesis and RNA replication. It is noteworthy that the highest inhibitory activities were obtained with AS-1 and AS-7 targeting the termini of the 5′ and 3′ UTRs. The percent inhibition values of AS-1 and AS-7 for CVB3 protein VP1 synthesis and RNA replication were 70.6 and 79.6 for AS-1 and 73.7 and 79.7 for AS-7, respectively. These data suggest that CVB3 infectivity can be inhibited effectively by AS-ODNs.

scholarly journals Paramyxovirus-Induced Shutoff of Host and Viral Protein Synthesis: Role of the P and V Proteins in Limiting PKR Activation

2007 ◽  
Vol 82 (2) ◽  
pp. 828-839 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria D. Gainey ◽  
Patrick J. Dillon ◽  
Kimberly M. Clark ◽  
Mary J. Manuse ◽  
Griffith D. Parks
Keyword(s):  
Protein Synthesis ◽  
Hela Cells ◽  
Viral Protein ◽  
Time Course ◽  
Translation Initiation Factor ◽  
Host Protein ◽  
Initiation Factor ◽  
Viral Protein Synthesis ◽  
Viral Mrnas ◽  
V Protein

ABSTRACT The paramyxovirus simian virus 5 (SV5) establishes highly productive persistent infections of epithelial cells without inducing a global inhibition of translation. Here we show that an SV5 mutant (the P/V-CPI− mutant) with substitutions in the P subunit of the viral polymerase and the accessory V protein also establishes highly productive infections like wild-type (WT) SV5 but that cells infected with the P/V-CPI− mutant show an overall shutdown of both host and viral translation at late times postinfection. Reduced host and viral protein synthesis with the P/V-CPI− virus was not due to lower levels of mRNA or caspase-dependent apoptosis and correlated with phosphorylation of the translation initiation factor eIF-2α. WT SV5 was a poor activator of the eIF-2α kinase protein kinase R (PKR). By contrast, the P/V-CPI− mutant induced PKR phosphorylation, which correlated with the time course of translation inhibition but was independent of interferon signaling. In HeLa cells that expressed the PKR inhibitor influenza A virus NS1 or reovirus sigma3, the rate of host protein synthesis at late times after infection with the P/V-CPI− mutant was restored to ∼50% that of control HeLa cells. By contrast, the rates of P/V-CPI− viral protein synthesis in HeLa cells expressing NS1 or sigma3 were dramatically enhanced, between 5- and 20-fold, while levels of viral mRNA were increased only slightly (NS1-expressing cells) or remained constant (sigma3-expressing cells). Similar results were found using HeLa cells where PKR levels were reduced due to knockdown by small interfering RNA. Expression of either the WT P or the WT V protein from the genome of the P/V-CPI− mutant resulted in lower levels of PKR activation and rates of host and viral protein synthesis that closely matched those seen with WT SV5. Despite higher rates of translation, cells infected with the V- or P-complemented virus accumulated viral mRNAs to lower levels than that seen with the parental P/V-CPI− mutant. We present a model in which the paramyxovirus P/V gene products limit induction of PKR by limiting the synthesis of aberrant viral mRNAs and double-stranded RNA and thus prevent the shutdown of translation by a mechanism that differs from that of other PKR inhibitors such as NS1 and sigma3.

scholarly journals Stress granule-inducing eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4A inhibitors block influenza A virus replication

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick D. Slaine ◽  
Mariel Kleer ◽  
Nathan Smith ◽  
Denys A. Khaperskyy ◽  
Craig McCormick
Keyword(s):  
Protein Synthesis ◽  
Influenza A Virus ◽  
Viral Protein ◽  
Influenza A ◽  
Translation Initiation Factor ◽  
Host Protein ◽  
Initiation Factor ◽  
Viral Protein Synthesis ◽  
Infected Cells ◽  
Pateamine A

ABSTRACTEukaryotic translation initiation factor 4A (eIF4A) is a helicase that facilitates assembly of the translation preinitiation complex by unwinding structured mRNA 5’ untranslated regions. Pateamine A (PatA) and silvestrol are natural products that disrupt eIF4A function and arrest translation, thereby triggering the formation of cytoplasmic aggregates of stalled preinitiation complexes known as stress granules (SGs). Here we examined the effects of eIF4A inhibition by PatA and silvestrol on influenza A virus (IAV) protein synthesis and replication in cell culture. Treatment of infected cells with either PatA or silvestrol at early times post-infection results in SG formation, arrest of viral protein synthesis and failure to replicate the viral genome. PatA, which irreversibly binds to eIF4A, sustained long-term blockade of IAV replication following drug withdrawal, and inhibited IAV replication at concentrations that had minimal cytotoxicity. By contrast, the antiviral effects of silvestrol were fully reversible; drug withdrawal caused rapid SG dissolution and resumption of viral protein synthesis. IAV inhibition by silvestrol was invariably associated with cytotoxicity. PatA blocked replication of genetically divergent IAV strains, suggesting common dependence on host eIF4A activity. This study demonstrates the feasibility of targeting core host protein synthesis machinery to prevent viral replication.IMPORTANCEInfluenza A virus (IAV) relies on cellular protein synthesis to decode viral messenger RNAs. Pateamine A and silvestrol are natural products that inactivate an essential protein synthesis protein known as eIF4A. Here we show that IAV is sensitive to these eIF4A inhibitor drugs. Treatment of infected cells with pateamine A or silvestrol prevented synthesis of viral proteins, viral genome replication and release of infectious virions. The irreversible eIF4A inhibitor pateamine A sustained long-term blockade of viral replication, whereas viral protein synthesis quickly resumed after silvestrol was removed from infected cells. Prolonged incubation of either infected or uninfected cells with these drugs induced the programmed cell death cascade called apoptosis. Our findings suggest that core components of the host protein synthesis machinery are viable targets for antiviral drug discovery. The most promising drug candidates should selectively block protein synthesis in infected cells without perturbing bystander uninfected cells.

scholarly journals Rotavirus Nonstructural Protein NSP3 Is Not Required for Viral Protein Synthesis

2006 ◽  
Vol 80 (18) ◽  
pp. 9031-9038 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hilda Montero ◽  
Carlos F. Arias ◽  
Susana Lopez
Keyword(s):  
Protein Synthesis ◽  
Viral Protein ◽  
Nonstructural Protein ◽  
Consensus Sequence ◽  
Initiation Factor ◽  
Cell Protein ◽  
Viral Protein Synthesis ◽  
Viral Mrnas ◽  
Initiation Of Translation ◽  
Cellular Mrnas

ABSTRACT Initiation is the rate-limiting step in protein synthesis and therefore an important target for regulation. For the initiation of translation of most cellular mRNAs, the cap structure at the 5′ end is bound by the translation factor eukaryotic initiation factor 4E (eIF4E), while the poly(A) tail, at the 3′ end, is recognized by the poly(A)-binding protein (PABP). eIF4G is a scaffold protein that brings together eIF4E and PABP, causing the circularization of the mRNA that is thought to be important for an efficient initiation of translation. Early in infection, rotaviruses take over the host translation machinery, causing a severe shutoff of cell protein synthesis. Rotavirus mRNAs lack a poly(A) tail but have instead a consensus sequence at their 3′ ends that is bound by the viral nonstructural protein NSP3, which also interacts with eIF4GI, using the same region employed by PABP. It is widely believed that these interactions lead to the translation of rotaviral mRNAs, impairing at the same time the translation of cellular mRNAs. In this work, the expression of NSP3 in infected cells was knocked down using RNA interference. Unexpectedly, under these conditions the synthesis of viral proteins was not decreased, while the cellular protein synthesis was restored. Also, the yield of viral progeny increased, which correlated with an increased synthesis of viral RNA. Silencing the expression of eIF4GI further confirmed that the interaction between eIF4GI and NSP3 is not required for viral protein synthesis. These results indicate that NSP3 is neither required for the translation of viral mRNAs nor essential for virus replication in cell culture.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document