scholarly journals Investigating genetic correlations and causal effects between caffeine consumption and sleep behaviours

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorien L. Treur ◽  
Mark Gibson ◽  
Amy E Taylor ◽  
Peter J Rogers ◽  
Marcus R Munafò
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Correlation ◽  
Sleep Duration ◽  
Genetic Variants ◽  
Mendelian Randomization ◽  
Association Studies ◽  
Genetic Correlations ◽  
Causal Effects ◽  
Genome Wide Association Studies ◽  
Caffeine Consumption ◽  
Insomnia Complaints

AbstractStudy Objectives:Higher caffeine consumption has been linked to poorer sleep and insomnia complaints. We investigated whether these observational associations are the result of genetic risk factors influencing both caffeine consumption and poorer sleep, and/or whether they reflect (possibly bidirectional) causal effects.Methods:Summary-level data were available from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) on caffeine consumption (n=91,462), sleep duration, and chronotype (i.e., being a ‘morning’ versus an ‘evening’ person) (both n=128,266), and insomnia complaints (n=113,006). Linkage disequilibrium (LD) score regression was used to calculate genetic correlations, reflecting the extent to which genetic variants influencing caffeine consumption and sleep behaviours overlap. Causal effects were tested with bidirectional, two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR), an instrumental variable approach that utilizes genetic variants robustly associated with an exposure variable as an instrument to test causal effects. Estimates from individual genetic variants were combined using inverse-variance weighted meta-analysis, weighted median regression and MR Egger regression methods.Results:There was no clear evidence for genetic correlation between caffeine consumption and sleep duration (rg=0.000,p=0.998), chronotype (rg=0.086,p=0.192) or insomnia (rg=-0.034,p=0.700). Two-sample Mendelian randomization analyses did not support causal effects from caffeine consumption to sleep behaviours, or the other way around.Conclusions:We found no evidence in support of genetic correlation or causal effects between caffeine consumption and sleep. While caffeine may have acute effects on sleep when taken shortly before habitual bedtime, our findings suggest that a more sustained pattern of high caffeine consumption is likely associated with poorer sleep through shared environmental factors.

scholarly journals Mendelian randomization studies of biomarkers and type 2 diabetes

2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 249-260 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Abbasi
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Genetic Variants ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Mendelian Randomization ◽  
Association Studies ◽  
Causal Effects ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Genome Wide Association Studies ◽  
Glycaemic Traits

Many biomarkers are associated with type 2 diabetes (T2D) risk in epidemiological observations. The aim of this study was to identify and summarize current evidence for causal effects of biomarkers on T2D. A systematic literature search in PubMed and EMBASE (until April 2015) was done to identify Mendelian randomization studies that examined potential causal effects of biomarkers on T2D. To replicate the findings of identified studies, data from two large-scale, genome-wide association studies (GWAS) were used: DIAbetes Genetics Replication And Meta-analysis (DIAGRAMv3) for T2D and the Meta-Analyses of Glucose and Insulin-related traits Consortium (MAGIC) for glycaemic traits. GWAS summary statistics were extracted for the same genetic variants (or proxy variants), which were used in the original Mendelian randomization studies. Of the 21 biomarkers (from 28 studies), ten have been reported to be causally associated with T2D in Mendelian randomization. Most biomarkers were investigated in a single cohort study or population. Of the ten biomarkers that were identified, nominally significant associations with T2D or glycaemic traits were reached for those genetic variants related to bilirubin, pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, delta-6 desaturase and dimethylglycine based on the summary data from DIAGRAMv3 or MAGIC. Several Mendelian randomization studies investigated the nature of associations of biomarkers with T2D. However, there were only a few biomarkers that may have causal effects on T2D. Further research is needed to broadly evaluate the causal effects of multiple biomarkers on T2D and glycaemic traits using data from large-scale cohorts or GWAS including many different genetic variants.

scholarly journals Evidence for genetic correlations and bidirectional, causal effects between smoking and sleep behaviours

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Gibson ◽  
Marcus R Munafò ◽  
Amy E Taylor ◽  
Jorien L. Treur
Keyword(s):  
Smoking Cessation ◽  
Sleep Duration ◽  
Association Studies ◽  
Genetic Correlations ◽  
Smoking Initiation ◽  
Causal Effects ◽  
Poor Sleep ◽  
Genome Wide Association Studies ◽  
Level Data ◽  
Increased Risk

AbstractIntroductionCigarette smokers are at increased risk of poor sleep behaviours. However, it is largely unknown whether these associations are due to shared (genetic) risk factors and/or causal effects (which may be bi-directional).MethodsWe obtained summary-level data of genome-wide association studies of smoking (smoking initiation (n=74,035), cigarettes per day (n=38,181) and smoking cessation (n=41,278)) and sleep behaviours (sleep duration and chronotype, or ‘morningness’) (n=128,266) and insomnia (n=113,006)). Using LD score regression, we calculated genetic correlations between smoking and sleep behaviours. To investigate causal effects, we employed Mendelian randomization (MR), both with summary-level data and individual level data (n=333,581 UK Biobank participants). For MR with summary-level data, individual genetic variants were combined with inverse-variance weighted meta-analysis, weighted median regression and MR Egger regression methods.ResultsWe found positive genetic correlations between insomnia and smoking initiation (rg=0.27, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.49) and insomnia and cigarettes per day (rg=0.15, 0.01 to 0.28), and negative genetic correlations between sleep duration and smoking initiation (rg=-0.14, -0.26 to -0.01) and chronotype and smoking cessation (rg=-0.18, -0.31 to -0.06). MR analyses provided strong evidence that smoking more cigarettes per day causally decreases the odds of being a morning person, and weak evidence that insomnia causally increases smoking heaviness and decreases smoking cessation odds.ConclusionsSmoking and sleep behaviours show moderate genetic correlation. Heavier smoking seems to causally affect circadian rhythm and there is some indication that insomnia increases smoking heaviness and hampers cessation. Our findings point to sleep as a potentially interesting smoking treatment target.

scholarly journals A comprehensive evaluation of methods for Mendelian randomization using realistic simulations and an analysis of 38 biomarkers for risk of type 2 diabetes

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guanghao Qi ◽  
Nilanjan Chatterjee
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Mendelian Randomization ◽  
Association Studies ◽  
Real Data ◽  
Causal Effects ◽  
Type I ◽  
Genome Wide Association Studies ◽  
Simulation Studies ◽  
Sample Sizes

Abstract Background Previous studies have often evaluated methods for Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis based on simulations that do not adequately reflect the data-generating mechanisms in genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and there are often discrepancies in the performance of MR methods in simulations and real data sets. Methods We use a simulation framework that generates data on full GWAS for two traits under a realistic model for effect-size distribution coherent with the heritability, co-heritability and polygenicity typically observed for complex traits. We further use recent data generated from GWAS of 38 biomarkers in the UK Biobank and performed down sampling to investigate trends in estimates of causal effects of these biomarkers on the risk of type 2 diabetes (T2D). Results Simulation studies show that weighted mode and MRMix are the only two methods that maintain the correct type I error rate in a diverse set of scenarios. Between the two methods, MRMix tends to be more powerful for larger GWAS whereas the opposite is true for smaller sample sizes. Among the other methods, random-effect IVW (inverse-variance weighted method), MR-Robust and MR-RAPS (robust adjust profile score) tend to perform best in maintaining a low mean-squared error when the InSIDE assumption is satisfied, but can produce large bias when InSIDE is violated. In real-data analysis, some biomarkers showed major heterogeneity in estimates of their causal effects on the risk of T2D across the different methods and estimates from many methods trended in one direction with increasing sample size with patterns similar to those observed in simulation studies. Conclusion The relative performance of different MR methods depends heavily on the sample sizes of the underlying GWAS, the proportion of valid instruments and the validity of the InSIDE assumption. Down-sampling analysis can be used in large GWAS for the possible detection of bias in the MR methods.

scholarly journals Bias in two-sample Mendelian randomization when using heritable covariable-adjusted summary associations

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fernando Pires Hartwig ◽  
Kate Tilling ◽  
George Davey Smith ◽  
Deborah A Lawlor ◽  
Maria Carolina Borges
Keyword(s):  
Waist Circumference ◽  
Genetic Variants ◽  
Mendelian Randomization ◽  
Causal Effect ◽  
Association Studies ◽  
Real Data ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Effect Estimate ◽  
Genome Wide Association Studies ◽  
Residual Confounding

Abstract Background Two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) allows the use of freely accessible summary association results from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) to estimate causal effects of modifiable exposures on outcomes. Some GWAS adjust for heritable covariables in an attempt to estimate direct effects of genetic variants on the trait of interest. One, both or neither of the exposure GWAS and outcome GWAS may have been adjusted for covariables. Methods We performed a simulation study comprising different scenarios that could motivate covariable adjustment in a GWAS and analysed real data to assess the influence of using covariable-adjusted summary association results in two-sample MR. Results In the absence of residual confounding between exposure and covariable, between exposure and outcome, and between covariable and outcome, using covariable-adjusted summary associations for two-sample MR eliminated bias due to horizontal pleiotropy. However, covariable adjustment led to bias in the presence of residual confounding (especially between the covariable and the outcome), even in the absence of horizontal pleiotropy (when the genetic variants would be valid instruments without covariable adjustment). In an analysis using real data from the Genetic Investigation of ANthropometric Traits (GIANT) consortium and UK Biobank, the causal effect estimate of waist circumference on blood pressure changed direction upon adjustment of waist circumference for body mass index. Conclusions Our findings indicate that using covariable-adjusted summary associations in MR should generally be avoided. When that is not possible, careful consideration of the causal relationships underlying the data (including potentially unmeasured confounders) is required to direct sensitivity analyses and interpret results with appropriate caution.

scholarly journals A Novel Method for Mendelian Randomization Analyses With Pleiotropy and Linkage Disequilibrium in Genetic Variants From Individual Data

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuquan Wang ◽  
Tingting Li ◽  
Liwan Fu ◽  
Siqian Yang ◽  
Yue-Qing Hu
Keyword(s):  
Linkage Disequilibrium ◽  
Genetic Variants ◽  
Mendelian Randomization ◽  
Causal Effect ◽  
Association Studies ◽  
Random Effect ◽  
Pleiotropic Effect ◽  
Genome Wide Association Studies ◽  
The Novel ◽  
Novel Method

Mendelian randomization makes use of genetic variants as instrumental variables to eliminate the influence induced by unknown confounders on causal estimation in epidemiology studies. However, with the soaring genetic variants identified in genome-wide association studies, the pleiotropy, and linkage disequilibrium in genetic variants are unavoidable and may produce severe bias in causal inference. In this study, by modeling the pleiotropic effect as a normally distributed random effect, we propose a novel mixed-effects regression model-based method PLDMR, pleiotropy and linkage disequilibrium adaptive Mendelian randomization, which takes linkage disequilibrium into account and also corrects for the pleiotropic effect in causal effect estimation and statistical inference. We conduct voluminous simulation studies to evaluate the performance of the proposed and existing methods. Simulation results illustrate the validity and advantage of the novel method, especially in the case of linkage disequilibrium and directional pleiotropic effects, compared with other methods. In addition, by applying this novel method to the data on Atherosclerosis Risk in Communications Study, we conclude that body mass index has a significant causal effect on and thus might be a potential risk factor of systolic blood pressure. The novel method is implemented in R and the corresponding R code is provided for free download.

scholarly journals A transcriptome-wide Mendelian randomization study to uncover tissue-dependent regulatory mechanisms across the human phenome

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tom G Richardson ◽  
Gibran Hemani ◽  
Tom R Gaunt ◽  
Caroline L Relton ◽  
George Davey Smith
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Genetic Variants ◽  
Complex Traits ◽  
Mendelian Randomization ◽  
Drug Repositioning ◽  
Association Studies ◽  
Thyroid Tissue ◽  
Genome Wide Association Studies ◽  
Tissue Specific ◽  
Genome Wide

AbstractBackgroundDeveloping insight into tissue-specific transcriptional mechanisms can help improve our understanding of how genetic variants exert their effects on complex traits and disease. By applying the principles of Mendelian randomization, we have undertaken a systematic analysis to evaluate transcriptome-wide associations between gene expression across 48 different tissue types and 395 complex traits.ResultsOverall, we identified 100,025 gene-trait associations based on conventional genome-wide corrections (P < 5 × 10−08) that also provided evidence of genetic colocalization. These results indicated that genetic variants which influence gene expression levels in multiple tissues are more likely to influence multiple complex traits. We identified many examples of tissue-specific effects, such as genetically-predicted TPO, NR3C2 and SPATA13 expression only associating with thyroid disease in thyroid tissue. Additionally, FBN2 expression was associated with both cardiovascular and lung function traits, but only when analysed in heart and lung tissue respectively.We also demonstrate that conducting phenome-wide evaluations of our results can help flag adverse on-target side effects for therapeutic intervention, as well as propose drug repositioning opportunities. Moreover, we find that exploring the tissue-dependency of associations identified by genome-wide association studies (GWAS) can help elucidate the causal genes and tissues responsible for effects, as well as uncover putative novel associations.ConclusionsThe atlas of tissue-dependent associations we have constructed should prove extremely valuable to future studies investigating the genetic determinants of complex disease. The follow-up analyses we have performed in this study are merely a guide for future research. Conducting similar evaluations can be undertaken systematically at http://mrcieu.mrsoftware.org/Tissue_MR_atlas/.

Daytime sleepiness, night sleep changes and ALS: a Mendelian randomization study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gan Zhang ◽  
Linjing Zhang ◽  
Tao Huang ◽  
Dongsheng Fan
Keyword(s):  
Sleep Duration ◽  
Daytime Sleepiness ◽  
Mendelian Randomization ◽  
Association Studies ◽  
Sleep Efficiency ◽  
Genome Wide Association Studies ◽  
Night Sleep ◽  
Inverse Variance ◽  
Point Increase ◽  
Increased Risk

Abstract Background Observational studies have indicated that there is a high prevalence of daytime sleepiness and night sleep changes in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). However, the actual relation between these symptoms and ALS remains unclear. We aimed to determine whether daytime sleepiness and night sleep changes have an effect on ALS. Methods We used 2-sample mendelian randomization to estimate the effects of daytime sleepiness, sleep efficiency, number of sleep episodes and sleep duration on ALS. Summary statistics we used was from resent and large genome-wide association studies on the traits we chosen (n = 85,670–452,071) and ALS (cases n = 20,806, controls n = 59,804). Inverse variance weighted method was used as the main method for assessing causality. Results A genetically predicted 1-point increase in the assessment of daytime sleepiness was significantly associated with an increased risk of ALS (inverse-variance-weighted (IVW) odds ratio = 2.70, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.27–5.76; P = 0.010). ALS was not associated with a genetically predicted 1-SD increase in sleep efficiency (IVW 1.01, 0.64–1.58; P = 0.973), Number of sleep episodes (IVW 1.02, 0.80–1.30; P = 0.859) or sleep duration (IVW 1.00, 1.00–1.01; P = 0.250). Conclusions Our results provide novel evidence that daytime sleepiness causes an increase in the risk of ALS and indicate that daytime sleepiness may be inherent in preclinical and clinical ALS patients, rather than simply affected by potential influencing factors.

scholarly journals Assessing the Causal Effects of Human Serum Metabolites on 5 Major Psychiatric Disorders

2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 804-813 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jian Yang ◽  
Bin Yan ◽  
Binbin Zhao ◽  
Yajuan Fan ◽  
Xiaoyan He ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Human Serum ◽  
Psychiatric Disorders ◽  
Genetic Variants ◽  
Association Studies ◽  
Autism Spectrum ◽  
Causal Effects ◽  
Human Diseases ◽  
Genome Wide Association Studies ◽  
Serum Metabolites ◽  
Intermediate Phenotypes

Abstract Psychiatric disorders are the leading cause of disability worldwide while the pathogenesis remains unclear. Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have made great achievements in detecting disease-related genetic variants. However, functional information on the underlying biological processes is often lacking. Current reports propose the use of metabolic traits as functional intermediate phenotypes (the so-called genetically determined metabotypes or GDMs) to reveal the biological mechanisms of genetics in human diseases. Here we conducted a two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis that uses GDMs to assess the causal effects of 486 human serum metabolites on 5 major psychiatric disorders, which respectively were schizophrenia (SCZ), major depression (MDD), bipolar disorder (BIP), autism spectrum disorder (ASD), and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Using genetic variants as proxies, our study has identified 137 metabolites linked to the risk of psychiatric disorders, including 2-methoxyacetaminophen sulfate, which affects SCZ (P = 1.7 × 10–5) and 1-docosahexaenoylglycerophosphocholine, which affects ADHD (P = 5.6 × 10–5). Fourteen significant metabolic pathways involved in the 5 psychiatric disorders assessed were also detected, such as glycine, serine, and threonine metabolism for SCZ (P = .0238), Aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis for both MDD (P = .0144) and ADHD (P = .0029). Our study provided novel insights into integrating metabolomics with genomics in order to understand the mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis of human diseases.

scholarly journals MR-LDP: a two-sample Mendelian randomization for GWAS summary statistics accounting for linkage disequilibrium and horizontal pleiotropy

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Qing Cheng ◽  
Yi Yang ◽  
Xingjie Shi ◽  
Kar-Fu Yeung ◽  
Can Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Linkage Disequilibrium ◽  
Genetic Variants ◽  
Mendelian Randomization ◽  
Association Studies ◽  
Alternative Methods ◽  
Genome Wide Association Studies ◽  
Summary Statistics ◽  
Causal Relationships ◽  
Disease Outcomes

Abstract The proliferation of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) has prompted the use of two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) with genetic variants as instrumental variables (IVs) for drawing reliable causal relationships between health risk factors and disease outcomes. However, the unique features of GWAS demand that MR methods account for both linkage disequilibrium (LD) and ubiquitously existing horizontal pleiotropy among complex traits, which is the phenomenon wherein a variant affects the outcome through mechanisms other than exclusively through the exposure. Therefore, statistical methods that fail to consider LD and horizontal pleiotropy can lead to biased estimates and false-positive causal relationships. To overcome these limitations, we proposed a probabilistic model for MR analysis in identifying the causal effects between risk factors and disease outcomes using GWAS summary statistics in the presence of LD and to properly account for horizontal pleiotropy among genetic variants (MR-LDP) and develop a computationally efficient algorithm to make the causal inference. We then conducted comprehensive simulation studies to demonstrate the advantages of MR-LDP over the existing methods. Moreover, we used two real exposure–outcome pairs to validate the results from MR-LDP compared with alternative methods, showing that our method is more efficient in using all-instrumental variants in LD. By further applying MR-LDP to lipid traits and body mass index (BMI) as risk factors for complex diseases, we identified multiple pairs of significant causal relationships, including a protective effect of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol on peripheral vascular disease and a positive causal effect of BMI on hemorrhoids.

scholarly journals Sleep Deficits and Cannabis Use Behaviors: An Analysis of Shared Genetics Using Linkage Disequilibrium Score Regression and Polygenic Risk Prediction

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evan A. Winiger ◽  
Jarrod M. Ellingson ◽  
Claire L. Morrison ◽  
Robin P. Corley ◽  
Joëlle A. Pasman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Linkage Disequilibrium ◽  
Sleep Duration ◽  
Association Studies ◽  
Genetic Correlations ◽  
Cannabis Use ◽  
European Ancestry ◽  
Risk Scores ◽  
Genome Wide Association Studies ◽  
Short Sleep Duration ◽  
Polygenic Risk

AbstractStudy ObjectivesEstimate the genetic relationship of cannabis use with sleep deficits and eveningness chronotype.MethodsWe used linkage disequilibrium score regression (LDSC) to analyze genetic correlations between sleep deficits and cannabis use behaviors. Secondly, we generated sleep deficit polygenic risk scores (PRSs) and estimated their ability to predict cannabis use behaviors using logistic regression. Summary statistics came from existing genome wide association studies (GWASs) of European ancestry that were focused on sleep duration, insomnia, chronotype, lifetime cannabis use, and cannabis use disorder (CUD). A target sample for PRS prediction consisted of high-risk participants and participants from twin/family community-based studies (n = 796, male = 66%; mean age = 26.81). Target data consisted of self-reported sleep (sleep duration, feeling tired, and taking naps) and cannabis use behaviors (lifetime use, number of lifetime uses, past 180-day use, age of first use, and lifetime CUD symptoms).ResultsSignificant genetic correlation between lifetime cannabis use and eveningness chronotype (rG = 0.24, p < 0.01), as well as between CUD and both short sleep duration (<7 h) (rG = 0.23, p = 0.02) and insomnia (rG = 0.20, p = 0.02). Insomnia PRS predicted earlier age of first cannabis use (β = −0.09, p = 0.02) and increased lifetime CUD symptom count use (β = 0.07, p = 0.03).ConclusionCannabis use is genetically associated with both sleep deficits and an eveningness chronotype, suggesting that there are genes that predispose individuals to both cannabis use and sleep deficits.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document