scholarly journals Biased gene retention in the face of massive nuclear introgression obscures species relationships

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evan S. Forsythe ◽  
Andrew D. L. Nelson ◽  
Mark A. Beilstein
Keyword(s):  
Introgressive Hybridization ◽  
Taxon Sampling ◽  
Species Relationships ◽  
Genome Composition ◽  
Haplotype Blocks ◽  
Gene Retention ◽  
The Face ◽  
Phylogenomic Analyses ◽  
Close Relatives ◽  
Cytoplasmic Introgression

AbstractPhylogenomic analyses are recovering previously hidden histories of hybridization, revealing the genomic consequences of these events on the architecture of extant genomes. We exploit a suite of genomic resources to show that introgressive hybridization occurred between close relatives of Arabidopsis, impacting our understanding of species relationships in the group. The composition of introgressed and retained genes indicates that selection against incompatible cytonuclear and nuclear-nuclear interactions likely acted during introgression, while neutral processes also contributed to genome composition through the retention of ancient haplotype blocks. We also developed a divergence-based test to distinguish donor from recipient lineages without the requirement of additional taxon-sampling. Finally, to our great surprise, we find that cytonuclear discordance appears to have arisen via extensive nuclear, rather than cytoplasmic, introgression, meaning that most of the genome was displaced during introgression, while only a small proportion of native alleles were retained.

scholarly journals Biased Gene Retention in the Face of Introgression Obscures Species Relationships

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (9) ◽  
pp. 1646-1663 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evan S Forsythe ◽  
Andrew D L Nelson ◽  
Mark A Beilstein
Keyword(s):  
Statistical Tests ◽  
Nuclear Genome ◽  
Introgressive Hybridization ◽  
Species Relationships ◽  
Genome Composition ◽  
Haplotype Blocks ◽  
Gene Retention ◽  
The Face ◽  
Phylogenomic Analyses ◽  
Close Relatives

Abstract Phylogenomic analyses are recovering previously hidden histories of hybridization, revealing the genomic consequences of these events on the architecture of extant genomes. We applied phylogenomic techniques and several complementary statistical tests to show that introgressive hybridization appears to have occurred between close relatives of Arabidopsis, resulting in cytonuclear discordance and impacting our understanding of species relationships in the group. The composition of introgressed and retained genes indicates that selection against incompatible cytonuclear and nuclear–nuclear interactions likely acted during introgression, whereas linkage also contributed to genome composition through the retention of ancient haplotype blocks. We also applied divergence-based tests to determine the species branching order and distinguish donor from recipient lineages. Surprisingly, these analyses suggest that cytonuclear discordance arose via extensive nuclear, rather than cytoplasmic, introgression. If true, this would mean that most of the nuclear genome was displaced during introgression whereas only a small proportion of native alleles were retained.

Chitinophaga oryzae sp. nov., an epiphytic bacterium isolated from rice root surfaces

2021 ◽  
Vol 71 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nantawan Niemhom ◽  
Chanwit Suriyachadkun ◽  
Chokchai Kittiwongwattana
Keyword(s):  
Type Species ◽  
Rrna Gene ◽  
Major Polar Lipid ◽  
Bacterial Strains ◽  
Respiratory Quinone ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Link Type ◽  
Major Respiratory Quinone ◽  
Phylogenomic Analyses ◽  
Close Relatives

Two Gram-stain-negative, non-motile, rod-shaped bacterial strains were isolated from the surfaces of rice roots. They were designated as strains 1303T and 1310. Their colonies were circular, entire, opaque, convex and yellow. They were chitinase- and catalase-positive, reduced nitrate and grew at 16–37 °C (optimum, 30 °C), pH 5.0–10.0 (optimum, pH 7.0) and 0–2.0% NaCl (optimum, 1.0 %). Based on the 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis, they were classified as members of the genus Chitinophaga . Results of phylogenetic and phylogenomic analyses indicated that they formed a cluster with Chitinophaga eiseniae YC6729T, Chitinophaga qingshengii JN246T, Chitinophaga varians 10-7 W-9003T and Chitinophaga fulva G-6-1-13T. When the genomic sequences of strains 1303T and 1310 were compared with their close relatives, the average nucleotide identity and digital DNA–DNA hybridization values were below the cut-off levels. Phosphatidylethanolamine was the major polar lipid. MK-7 was the major respiratory quinone. iso-C15 : 0, C16 : 1  ω5c, iso-C17 : 0 3-OH and summed feature 3 (C16 : 1  ω7c/C16 : 1  ω6c) were the predominant fatty acids. Differential characteristics between both strains and their close relatives were also observed. Based on the distinctions in genotypic, phenotypic and chemotypic features, strains 1303T and 1310 represent members of a novel species of the genus Chitinophaga , for which the name Chitinophaga oryzae sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain is 1303T (=KACC 22075T=TBRC 12926T).

scholarly journals Genomic divergence and lack of introgressive hybridization between two 13-year periodical cicadas support life cycle switching in the face of climate change

2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (21) ◽  
pp. 5543-5556 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takuya Koyama ◽  
Hiromu Ito ◽  
Tomochika Fujisawa ◽  
Hiroshi Ikeda ◽  
Satoshi Kakishima ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Climate Change ◽  
Life Cycle ◽  
Introgressive Hybridization ◽  
Periodical Cicadas ◽  
Genomic Divergence ◽  
The Face

scholarly journals Corallimorpharians are not “naked corals”: insights into relationships between Scleractinia and Corallimorpharia from phylogenomic analyses

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mei Fang Lin ◽  
Wen Hwa Chou ◽  
Marcelo V Kitahara ◽  
Chao Lun Allen Chen ◽  
David John Miller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Evolutionary Relationship ◽  
Single Copy ◽  
Scleractinian Corals ◽  
Amino Acid Sequences ◽  
Compositional Bias ◽  
Nuclear Markers ◽  
Protein Coding ◽  
Mitochondrial Sequences ◽  
Phylogenomic Analyses ◽  
Close Relatives

Calcification is one of the most distinctive traits of scleractinian corals. Their hard skeletons form the substratum of reef ecosystems and confer on corals their remarkable diversity of shapes. Corallimorpharians are non-calcifying, close relatives of scleractinian corals, and the evolutionary relationship between these two groups is key to understanding the evolution of calcification in the coral lineage. One pivotal question is whether scleractinians are a monophyletic group, paraphyly being an alternative possibility if corallimorpharians are corals that have lost their ability to calcify, as is implied by the “naked-coral” hypothesis. Despite major efforts, relationships between scleractinians and corallimorpharians remain equivocal and controversial. Although the complete mitochondrial genomes of a range of scleractinians and corallimorpharians have been obtained, heterogeneity in composition and evolutionary rates means that mitochondrial sequences are insufficient to understand the relationship between these two groups. To overcome these limitations, transcriptome data were generated for three representative corallimorpharians. These were used in combination with sequences available for a representative range of scleractinians to identify 291 orthologous single copy protein-coding nuclear markers. Unlike the mitochondrial sequences, these nuclear markers do not display any distinct compositional bias in their nucleotide or amino-acid sequences. A range of phylogenomic approaches congruently reveal a topology consistent with scleractinian monophyly and corallimorpharians as the sister clade of scleractinians.

scholarly journals Phylogenomic analysis of the Chilean clade ofLiolaemuslizards (Squamata: Liolaemidae) based on sequence capture data

PeerJ ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. e3941 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alejandra Panzera ◽  
Adam D. Leaché ◽  
Guillermo D’Elía ◽  
Pedro F. Victoriano
Keyword(s):  
Incomplete Lineage Sorting ◽  
Phylogenetic Analyses ◽  
Strong Support ◽  
Taxon Sampling ◽  
Phylogenomic Analysis ◽  
Molecular Systematic ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Protein Coding ◽  
Protein Coding Genes ◽  
Phylogenomic Analyses

The genusLiolaemusis one of the most ecologically diverse and species-rich genera of lizards worldwide. It currently includes more than 250 recognized species, which have been subject to many ecological and evolutionary studies. Nevertheless,Liolaemuslizards have a complex taxonomic history, mainly due to the incongruence between morphological and genetic data, incomplete taxon sampling, incomplete lineage sorting and hybridization. In addition, as many species have restricted and remote distributions, this has hampered their examination and inclusion in molecular systematic studies. The aims of this study are to infer a robust phylogeny for a subsample of lizards representing the Chilean clade (subgenusLiolaemus sensu stricto), and to test the monophyly of several of the major species groups. We use a phylogenomic approach, targeting 541 ultra-conserved elements (UCEs) and 44 protein-coding genes for 16 taxa. We conduct a comparison of phylogenetic analyses using maximum-likelihood and several species tree inference methods. The UCEs provide stronger support for phylogenetic relationships compared to the protein-coding genes; however, the UCEs outnumber the protein-coding genes by 10-fold. On average, the protein-coding genes contain over twice the number of informative sites. Based on our phylogenomic analyses, all the groups sampled are polyphyletic.Liolaemus tenuis tenuisis difficult to place in the phylogeny, because only a few loci (nine) were recovered for this species. Topologies or support values did not change dramatically upon exclusion ofL. t. tenuisfrom analyses, suggesting that missing data did not had a significant impact on phylogenetic inference in this data set. The phylogenomic analyses provide strong support for sister group relationships betweenL. fuscus,L. monticola,L. nigroviridisandL. nitidus, andL. plateiandL. velosoi. Despite our limited taxon sampling, we have provided a reliable starting hypothesis for the relationships among many major groups of the Chilean clade ofLiolaemusthat will help future work aimed at resolving theLiolaemusphylogeny.

scholarly journals Corallimorpharians are not “naked corals”: insights into relationships between Scleractinia and Corallimorpharia from phylogenomic analyses

PeerJ ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. e2463 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mei Fang Lin ◽  
Wen Hwa Chou ◽  
Marcelo V. Kitahara ◽  
Chao Lun Allen Chen ◽  
David John Miller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Evolutionary Relationship ◽  
Single Copy ◽  
Scleractinian Corals ◽  
Amino Acid Sequences ◽  
Compositional Bias ◽  
Nuclear Markers ◽  
Protein Coding ◽  
Mitochondrial Sequences ◽  
Phylogenomic Analyses ◽  
Close Relatives

Calcification is one of the most distinctive traits of scleractinian corals. Their hard skeletons form the substratum of reef ecosystems and confer on corals their remarkable diversity of shapes. Corallimorpharians are non-calcifying, close relatives of scleractinian corals, and the evolutionary relationship between these two groups is key to understanding the evolution of calcification in the coral lineage. One pivotal question is whether scleractinians are a monophyletic group, paraphyly being an alternative possibility if corallimorpharians are corals that have lost their ability to calcify, as is implied by the “naked-coral” hypothesis. Despite major efforts, relationships between scleractinians and corallimorpharians remain equivocal and controversial. Although the complete mitochondrial genomes of a range of scleractinians and corallimorpharians have been obtained, heterogeneity in composition and evolutionary rates means that mitochondrial sequences are insufficient to understand the relationship between these two groups. To overcome these limitations, transcriptome data were generated for three representative corallimorpharians. These were used in combination with sequences available for a representative range of scleractinians to identify 291 orthologous single copy protein-coding nuclear markers. Unlike the mitochondrial sequences, these nuclear markers do not display any distinct compositional bias in their nucleotide or amino-acid sequences. A range of phylogenomic approaches congruently reveal a topology consistent with scleractinian monophyly and corallimorpharians as the sister clade of scleractinians.

An Analysis of the Sectional Classification of Anthurium (Araceae): Comparing Infrageneric Groupings and Their Diagnostic Morphology with a Molecular Phylogeny of the Genus

2019 ◽  
Vol 104 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mónica M. Carlsen ◽  
Thomas B. Croat
Keyword(s):  
Molecular Phylogeny ◽  
Evolutionary History ◽  
Morphological Characters ◽  
Taxon Sampling ◽  
Species Relationships ◽  
History Of ◽  
Sectional Classification

This study presents an evaluation of the currently accepted sectional classification of the genus Anthurium Schott (Araceae) in light of a recently published molecular phylogeny for the group. In general, disagreements between these two occur because many diagnostic morphological characters used in the sectional classification turned out to be highly homoplasious within Anthurium, with multiple independent gains or losses of seemingly similar morphologies in distantly related clades. A new sectional classification of Anthurium that more accurately represents species relationships and the evolutionary history of the genus is much needed, and here we propose the first steps toward it. Results from this study suggest that out of the 18 sections and two series recognized in Anthurium, only seven of these groups are monophyletic (i.e., sections Andiphilum (Schott) Croat, Calomystrium (Schott) Engl., Dactylophyllium (Schott) Engl., Leptanthurium (Schott) Engl., Polyphyllium Engl., Tetraspermium (Schott) Engl., and the newly recognized section Multinervia (Croat) Carlsen & Croat, previously a series within section Pachyneurium (Schott) Engl.). All other sections are either not monophyletic or their monophyly could not be accurately tested. A complete revision of the sectional classification of Anthurium will require a more comprehensive taxon sampling and a better supported molecular phylogeny.

scholarly journals Phylogenomics investigation of sparids (Teleostei: Spariformes) using high-quality proteomes highlights the importance of taxon sampling

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Paschalis Natsidis ◽  
Alexandros Tsakogiannis ◽  
Pavlos Pavlidis ◽  
Costas S. Tsigenopoulos ◽  
Tereza Manousaki
Keyword(s):  
Phylogenetic Relationships ◽  
Taxon Sampling ◽  
Phylogenomic Analysis ◽  
High Quality ◽  
Orthology Assignment ◽  
Gene Sets ◽  
Puffer Fish ◽  
Commercial Value ◽  
Phylogenomic Analyses ◽  
High Quality Genome

Abstract Sparidae (Teleostei: Spariformes) are a family of fish constituted by approximately 150 species with high popularity and commercial value, such as porgies and seabreams. Although the phylogeny of this family has been investigated multiple times, its position among other teleost groups remains ambiguous. Most studies have used a single or few genes to decipher the phylogenetic relationships of sparids. Here, we conducted a thorough phylogenomic analysis using five recently available Sparidae gene-sets and 26 high-quality, genome-predicted teleost proteomes. Our analysis suggested that Tetraodontiformes (puffer fish, sunfish) are the closest relatives to sparids than all other groups used. By analytically comparing this result to our own previous contradicting finding, we show that this discordance is not due to different orthology assignment algorithms; on the contrary, we prove that it is caused by the increased taxon sampling of the present study, outlining the great importance of this aspect in phylogenomic analyses in general.

scholarly journals Phylogenomic analyses of species relationships in the genusSabal(Arecaceae) using targeted sequence capture

2015 ◽  
Vol 117 (1) ◽  
pp. 106-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karolina Heyduk ◽  
Dorset W. Trapnell ◽  
Craig F. Barrett ◽  
Jim Leebens-Mack
Keyword(s):  
Species Relationships ◽  
Sequence Capture ◽  
Phylogenomic Analyses ◽  
Targeted Sequence Capture

scholarly journals Comparison and Phylogenetic Analyses of Nine Complete Chloroplast Genomes of Zingibereae

Forests ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 710
Author(s):  
Heng Liang ◽  
Juan Chen
Keyword(s):  
Ribosomal Rna ◽  
Phylogenetic Analyses ◽  
Plastome Evolution ◽  
Chloroplast Genomes ◽  
The Family ◽  
Phylogenomic Analyses ◽  
Close Relatives ◽  
Rna Genes ◽  
Insight Into ◽  
Simple Sequence

Zingibereae is a large tribe in the family Zingiberaceae, which contains plants with important medicinal, edible, and ornamental values. Although tribes of Zingiberaceae are well circumscribed, the circumscription of many genera within Zingibereae and the relationships among them remain elusive, especially for the genera of Boesenbergia, Curcuma, Kaempferia and Pyrgophyllum. In this study, we investigated the plastome variation in nine species representing five genera of Zingibereae. All plastomes showed a typical quadripartite structure with lengths ranging from 162,042 bp to 163,539 bp and contained 132–134 genes, consisting of 86–88 coding genes, 38 transfer RNA genes and eight ribosomal RNA genes. Moreover, the characteristics of the long repeats sequences and simple sequence repeats (SSRs) were detected. In addition, we conducted phylogenomic analyses of the Zingibereae and related taxa with plastomes data from additional 32 species from Genbank. Our results confirmed that Stahlianthus is closely related to Curcuma, supporting the idea of merging it into Curcuma. Kaempferia, Boesenbergia and Zingiber were confirmed as close relatives and grouped together as the Kaempferia group. Pyrgophyllum is not allied with the Curcuma clade but instead is embedded within the Hedychium clade. Our results demonstrate the power of plastid phylogenomics in improving the phylogenetic relationships within Zingibereae and provide a new insight into plastome evolution in Zingibereceae.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document