scholarly journals High concentrations of boric acid induce autophagy in cancer cell lines

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruslan Al-Ali ◽  
Rogelio Gonzalez-Sarmiento

AbstractBackground/AimBoric acid (BA) is thought to have anticancer effects, but only a handful of studies tackled this subject. Though a very common compound, little is known about its therapeutic value, mechanisms and effective doses. This study investigates into its therapeutic value and autophagy as a possible mechanism.Materials and MethodsWe evaluated the potency of BA treatment in seven different cell lines. We hypothesized that autophagy is involved in the mechanism of BA toxicity in tumor cells based on observations in plants, insects and cancer cell lines. Changes in autophagy-related proteins were measured after BA treatment. Finally, we suspected that blockage of autophagy would increase the effectiveness of BA treatment and enable the use of smaller doses.ResultsOur results demonstrate that all studied cell lines did not suffer mortality in low to medium doses of BA (up to 5mM). However, a high dose (over 25mM) could inflict significant death in all cell lines. Those high doses caused P62/SQSTM1 consumption and LC3II-B accumulation after 3 days of treatment. Using small doses of BA in combination with autophagy blockage did not improve cytotoxicity in lung cancer cell lines.ConclusionWe conclude that high concentrations of BA affect autophagy in short-term treatments. Not enough data is available about BA toxicity, so BA use as cancer treatment can be possible if new toxicity studies are performed.

2006 ◽  
Vol 114 (S 1) ◽  
Author(s):  
B Trojanowicz ◽  
Z Chen ◽  
J Bialek ◽  
Y Radestock ◽  
S Hombach-Klonisch ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Sang-ah Lim ◽  
Joon Young Lee ◽  
Won Ho Jung ◽  
Eun Hye Lim ◽  
Moon Kyung Joo ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 1463-1467 ◽  
Author(s):  
KAZUTO TAKAHASHI ◽  
MASASHI HOSOKAWA ◽  
HIROYUKI KASAJIMA ◽  
KAZUTERU HATANAKA ◽  
KAZUHIRO KUDO ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 2 (8) ◽  
pp. 51
Author(s):  
B. Helfrich ◽  
T. Troiani ◽  
D. Raben ◽  
B. Frederick ◽  
D. Gustafson ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 20-30
Author(s):  
Parichehr Hanachi ◽  
Hojat Sadeghi Ali Abadi ◽  
Nasim Ghorbani ◽  
Roshanak Zarringhalami ◽  
Khadijeh Kiarostami ◽  
...  

Acta Naturae ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 133-139 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. M. Scherbakov ◽  
O. E. Andreeva

Phytoestrogens are a group of plant-derived compounds with an estrogen-like activity. In mammalians, phytoestrogens bind to the estrogen receptor (ER) and participate in the regulation of cell growth and gene transcription. There are several reports of the cytotoxic effects of phytoestrogens in different cancer cell lines. The aim of this study was to measure the phytoestrogen activity against breast cancer cells with different levels of ER expression and to elucidate the molecular pathways regulated by the leader compound. Methods used in the study include immunoblotting, transfection with a luciferase reporter vector, and a MTT test. We demonstrated the absence of a significant difference between ER+ and ER- breast cancer cell lines in their response to cytotoxic stimuli: treatment with high doses of phytoestrogens (apigenin, genistein, quercetin, naringenin) had the same efficiency in ER-positive and ER-negative cells. Incubation of breast cancer cells with apigenin revealed the highest cytotoxicity of this compound; on the contrary, naringenin treatment resulted in a low cytotoxic activity. It was shown that high doses of apigenin (50 М) do not display estrogen-like activity and can suppress ER activation by 17-estradiol. Cultivation of HER2-positive breast cancer SKBR3 cells in the presence of apigenin resulted in a decrease in HER2/neu expression, accompanied by cleavage of an apoptosis substrate PARP. Therefore, the cytotoxic effects of phytoestrogens are not associated with the steroid receptors of breast cancer cells. Apigenin was found to be the most effective phytoestrogen that strongly inhibits the growth of breast cancer cells, including HER2-positive ones.


2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 457-463
Author(s):  
H. Mozdarani ◽  
O. Azadbakht ◽  
S. Ghorbainan Klachai ◽  
S. Mozdarani ◽  
H. Nosrati ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document