scholarly journals Exploring barriers and facilitators to integrated hypertension-HIV management in Ugandan HIV clinics using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR)

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Muddu ◽  
Andrew K. Tusubira ◽  
Brenda Nakirya ◽  
Rita Nalwoga ◽  
Fred C. Semitala ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Health System ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Implementation Research ◽  
Barriers And Facilitators ◽  
Health System Strengthening ◽  
Prior Work ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Inner Setting ◽  
Hiv Integration

AbstractBackgroundPersons Living with HIV (PLHIV) receiving antiretroviral therapy have increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Integration of services for hypertension (HTN), the primary CVD risk factor, into HIV clinics is recommended in Uganda. Our prior work demonstrated multiple gaps in implementation of integrated HTN care along the HIV treatment cascade. In this study, we sought to explore barriers to, and facilitators of, integrating HTN screening and treatment into HIV clinics in Eastern Uganda.MethodsWe conducted a qualitative study at three HIV clinics with low, intermediate, and high HTN care cascade performance, which we classified based on our prior work. Guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), we conducted semi-structured interviews with health services managers, health care providers and hypertensive PLHIV (n=83). Interviews were transcribed verbatim. Three qualitative researchers used both deductive (CFIR model-driven) and inductive (open coding) methods to develop relevant codes and themes. Ratings were performed to determine valence and strengths of each CFIR construct regarding influencing HTN/HIV integration.ResultsOf the 39 CFIR constructs assessed, 17 were relevant to either barriers or facilitators to HTN/HIV integration. Six constructs strongly distinguished performance and were barriers, three of which were in the Inner setting (Organizational Incentives & Rewards, Available Resources, Access to Knowledge & Information); two in Characteristics of individuals (Knowledge & Beliefs about the Intervention and Self-efficacy) and one in Intervention characteristics (Design Quality & Packaging). Four additional constructs were weakly distinguishing and negatively influenced HTN/HIV integration. There were four facilitators for HTN/HIV integration related to the intervention (Relative advantage, Adaptability, Complexity and Compatibility). The remaining four constructs negatively influenced HTN/HIV integration but were non-distinguishing.ConclusionUsing the CFIR, we have shown that while there are modifiable barriers to HTN/HIV integration in the Inner setting, Outer setting, Characteristics of individuals and implementation Process, HTN/HIV integration is of interest to patients, health care providers and managers. Improving access to HTN care among PLHIV will require overcoming barriers and capitalizing on the facilitators using a health system strengthening approach. These findings are a springboard for designing contextually appropriate interventions for HTN/HIV integration in low- and middle-income countries.Contribution to the literatureWe used the widely used and validated CFIR to assess the HIV program for HTN/HIV integration.To our knowledge, this is the first study to explore barriers and facilitators to integrating hypertension screening and treatment into HIV clinics using the CFIR.The barriers and facilitators identified are a basis for designing contextualized implementation interventions for HTN/HIV integration in Uganda and other LMIC using a health system strengthening approach.

scholarly journals Exploring barriers and facilitators to integrated hypertension-HIV management in Ugandan HIV clinics using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Muddu ◽  
Andrew K. Tusubira ◽  
Brenda Nakirya ◽  
Rita Nalwoga ◽  
Fred C. Semitala ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Implementation Research ◽  
Health System Strengthening ◽  
Relative Advantage ◽  
Prior Work ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Inner Setting ◽  
Hiv Integration

Abstract BackgroundPersons Living with HIV (PLHIV) receiving antiretroviral therapy have increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Integration of services for hypertension (HTN), the primary CVD risk factor, into HIV clinics is recommended in Uganda. Our prior work demonstrated multiple gaps in implementation of integrated HTN care along the HIV treatment cascade. In this study, we sought to explore barriers to, and facilitators of, integrating HTN screening and treatment into HIV clinics in Eastern Uganda.MethodsWe conducted a qualitative study at three HIV clinics with low, intermediate, and high HTN care cascade performance, which we classified based on our prior work. Guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), we conducted semi-structured interviews with health services managers, health care providers and hypertensive PLHIV (n=83). Interviews were transcribed verbatim. Three qualitative researchers used both deductive (CFIR model-driven) and inductive (open coding) methods to develop relevant codes and themes. Ratings were performed to determine valence and strengths of each CFIR construct regarding influencing HTN/HIV integration. ResultsOf the 39 CFIR constructs assessed, 17 were relevant to either barriers or facilitators to HTN/HIV integration. Six constructs strongly distinguished performance and were barriers, three of which were in the Inner setting (Organizational Incentives & Rewards, Available Resources, Access to Knowledge & Information); two in Characteristics of individuals (Knowledge & Beliefs about the Intervention and Self-efficacy) and one in Intervention characteristics (Design Quality & Packaging). Four additional constructs were weakly distinguishing and negatively influenced HTN/HIV integration. There were four facilitators for HTN/HIV integration related to the intervention (Relative advantage, Adaptability, Complexity and Compatibility). The remaining three constructs negatively influenced HTN/HIV integration but were non-distinguishing. ConclusionUsing the CFIR, we have shown that while there are modifiable barriers to HTN/HIV integration in the Inner setting, Outer setting, Characteristics of individuals and implementation Process, HTN/HIV integration is of interest to patients, health care providers and managers. Improving access to HTN care among PLHIV will require overcoming barriers and capitalizing on the facilitators using a health system strengthening approach. These findings are a springboard for designing contextually appropriate interventions for HTN/HIV integration in low- and middle-income countries.

scholarly journals Exploring barriers and facilitators to integrated hypertension-HIV management in Ugandan HIV clinics using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Muddu ◽  
Andrew K. Tusubira ◽  
Brenda Nakirya ◽  
Rita Nalwoga ◽  
Fred C. Semitala ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Implementation Research ◽  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
Health System Strengthening ◽  
Relative Advantage ◽  
Prior Work ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Hiv Services ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Hiv Integration

Abstract Background: Persons Living with HIV (PLHIV) receiving antiretroviral therapy have increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Integration of services for hypertension (HTN), the primary CVD risk factor, into HIV clinics is recommended in Uganda. Our prior work demonstrated multiple gaps in implementation of integrated HTN care along the HIV treatment cascade. In this study, we sought to explore barriers to and facilitators of integrating HTN screening and treatment into HIV clinics in Eastern Uganda. Methods: We conducted a qualitative study at three HIV clinics with low, intermediate, and high HTN care cascade performance, which we classified based on our prior work. Guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), we conducted semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions with health services managers, health care providers and hypertensive PLHIV (n=83). Interviews were transcribed verbatim. Three qualitative researchers used the deductive (CFIR-driven) method to develop relevant codes and themes. Ratings were performed to determine valence and strengths of each CFIR construct regarding influencing HTN/HIV integration. Results: Barriers to HTN/HIV integration arose from six CFIR constructs: organizational incentives & rewards, available resources, access to knowledge & information, knowledge & beliefs about the intervention, self-efficacy and planning. The barriers include: lack of functional BP machines, inadequate supply of anti-hypertensive medicines, additional workload to providers for HTN services, PLHIV’s inadequate knowledge about HTN care, sub-optimal knowledge, skills and self-efficacy of healthcare providers to screen and treat HTN and inadequate planning for integrated HTN/HIV services. Relative advantage of offering HTN and HIV services in a one-stop centre, simplicity (non-complex nature) of HTN/HIV integrated care, adaptability and compatibility of HTN care with existing HIV services are the facilitators for HTN/HIV integration. The remaining CFIR constructs were non-significant regarding influencing HTN/HIV integration. Conclusion: Using the CFIR, we have shown that while there are modifiable barriers to HTN/HIV integration, HTN/HIV integration is of interest to patients, healthcare providers and managers. Improving access to HTN care among PLHIV will require overcoming barriers and capitalizing on facilitators using a health system strengthening approach. These findings are a springboard for designing contextually appropriate interventions for HTN/HIV integration in low- and middle-income countries.

scholarly journals Provider perspectives on barriers and facilitators to adjuvant endocrine therapy-related symptom management.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 155-155
Author(s):  
Cleo A. Samuel ◽  
Kea Turner ◽  
Heidi AS Donovan ◽  
G J. Van Londen
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Endocrine Therapy ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Symptom Management ◽  
Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy ◽  
Barriers And Facilitators ◽  
System Level ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Provider Perspectives ◽  
Related Symptom

155 Background: Adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET)-related symptom management (SM) among breast cancer survivors (BCS) typically involves a multidisciplinary team of health care providers; yet few studies have examined provider perspectives on AET-related SM. The purpose of this study was to examine provider perspectives on the barriers and facilitators to AET-related SM among BCS and opportunities for improvement. Methods: We conducted 3 focus groups (FGs) with a multidisciplinary group of health care providers (n = [6] physician; n = [7] non-physician) experienced in caring for BCS undergoing AET. We utilized semi-structured discussion guides to elicit provider perspectives on AET-related SM and its barriers and facilitators as well as recommendations for improvement. All FGs were held at the University of Pittsburgh, audiotaped, and transcribed. We analyzed FG transcripts using qualitative software to identify key themes. Results: Providers described patient-, provider-, and system- level facilitators and barriers to AET-related SM. At the patient-level, facilitators included social support and provider communication about symptoms while cancer-related distress, misinformation and misinterpretation of online information were identified as barriers. Provider-level facilitators included strong relationships with other providers and ongoing communication with patients; however, lack of time, insufficient resources, and challenges distinguishing AET-related symptoms from other conditions were key provider-level barriers. Finally, at the system-level, electronic health records were described as both a facilitator and barrier to SM. Moreover, poor care coordination among different providers and lack of clear guidelines on which provider “owns” AET-related SM emerged as key system-level barriers. Conclusions: Findings suggest that efforts to improve AET-related SM should span multiple levels, in order to address patient-, provider-, and system-level barriers to SM. Recommendations include increased education for patients, greater access to clinical decision support tools for providers, and improved coordination of survivorship resources within hospitals.

scholarly journals A Survey of Family Planning Training, Knowledge, and Practices Among Health Care Providers Within the Military Health System at Joint Base Lewis–McChord

2018 ◽  
Vol 184 (5-6) ◽  
pp. e394-e399 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth I Deans ◽  
Alison L Batig ◽  
Sarah Cordes ◽  
Alicia N Scribner ◽  
Peter E Nielsen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Family Planning ◽  
Health System ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Military Health System ◽  
Military Health ◽  
The Military

The public’s trust and information brokers in health care, public health and research

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (7/8) ◽  
pp. 929-948 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jodyn Platt ◽  
Minakshi Raj ◽  
Sharon L.R. Kardia
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Health System ◽  
Information Sharing ◽  
Health Information ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Content Type ◽  
The Public ◽  
Information Brokers

Purpose Nations such as the USA are investing in technologies such as electronic health records in order to collect, store and transfer information across boundaries of health care, public health and research. Health information brokers such as health care providers, public health departments and university researchers function as “access points” to manage relationships between the public and the health system. The relationship between the public and health information brokers is influenced by trust; and this relationship may predict the trust that the public has in the health system as a whole, which has implications for public trust in the system, and consequently, legitimacy of involved institutions, under circumstances of health information data sharing in the future. This paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach In this study, the authors aimed to examine characteristics of trustors (i.e. the public) that predict trust in health information brokers; and further, to identify the factors that influence trust in brokers that also predict system trust. The authors developed a survey that was administered to US respondents in 2014 using GfK’s nationally representative sample, with a final sample of 1,011 participants and conducted ordinary least squares regression for data analyses. Findings Results suggest that health care providers are the most trusted information brokers of those examined. Beliefs about medical deceptive behavior were negatively associated with trust in each of the information brokers examined; however, psychosocial factors were significantly associated with trust in brokers, suggesting that individual attitudes and beliefs are influential on trust in brokers. Positive views of information sharing and the expectation of benefits of information sharing for health outcomes and health care quality are associated with system trust. Originality/value This study suggests that demonstrating the benefits and value of information sharing could be beneficial for building public trust in the health system; however, trust in brokers of information are variable across the public; that is, knowledge, attitudes and beliefs are associated with the level of trust different individuals have in various health information brokers – suggesting that the need for a personalized approach to building trust.

Barriers and Facilitators to Testing in Primary Care Among Health Care Providers

2011 ◽  
Vol 103 (5) ◽  
pp. 432-438 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emma M. Simmons ◽  
Monique J. Brown ◽  
Kay Slye ◽  
Mindy Ma ◽  
Madeline Y. Sutton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Barriers And Facilitators ◽  
Care Providers

Full Disclosure When Bad Things Happen

2007 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 131-132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sherri Lee Simons
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Health System ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Health Care Systems ◽  
Institute Of Medicine ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Full Disclosure ◽  
Care Systems

SINCE THE RELEASE OF THE Institute of Medicine report “To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System,” much attention has been focused on redesigning health care systems and implementing safer practices.1 At the same time, health care providers continue to grapple with the ways in which institutions and caregivers respond when preventable injuries occur.2–5

scholarly journals Explaining the impact of mHealth on maternal and child health care in low- and middle-income countries: A realist synthesis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eveline Muika Kabongo ◽  
Ferdinand Mukumbang ◽  
Peter N/A Delobelle ◽  
Edward N/A Nicol
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Child Health ◽  
Health System ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Maternal And Child Health ◽  
Child Health Care ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
And Child Health

Abstract Background: Despite the growing global application of mobile health (mHealth) technology in maternal and child health, contextual factors, and mechanisms by which interventional outcomes are generated, have not been subjected to a systematic examination. In this study, we sought to uncover context, mechanisms, and outcome elements of various mHealth interventions based on implementation and evaluation studies to formulate theories or models explicating how mHealth interventions work (or not) both for health care providers and for pregnant women and mothers.Method: We undertook a realist synthesis. An electronic search of six online databases (Medline, PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, Academic Search Premier, and Health Systems Evidence) was performed. Using appropriate Boolean phrases terms and selection procedures, 32 articles were identified. A theory-driven approach, narrative synthesis, was applied to synthesize the data. Thematic content analysis was used to delineate elements of the intervention, including its context, actors, mechanisms, and outcomes. Abduction and retroduction were applied using a realist evaluation heuristic tool to formulate generative theories.Results: We formulated two configurational models illustrating how and why mHealth impacts the implementation and uptake of maternal and child care services. Implementation-related mechanisms include buy-in from health care providers, perceived support of health care providers’ motivation, and perceived ease of use and usefulness. These mechanisms were influenced by adaptive health system conditions including organization, resource availability, policy implementation dynamics, experience with technology, network infrastructure, and connectivity. For pregnant women and mothers, mechanisms that trigger mHealth use and consequently uptake of maternal and child health care include perceived satisfaction, motivation, and positive psychological support. Information overload was identified as a potential negative mechanism impacting the uptake of maternal and child health care. These mechanisms were influenced by health system conditions, socio-cultural characteristics, socio-economic and demographics characteristics, network infrastructure and connectivity, and awareness.Conclusion: Models developed in this study provide a detailed understanding of the implementation and uptake of mHealth interventions and how and why they impact maternal and child health care in low- and middle-income countries. These models provide a foundation for the ‘white box’ of theory-driven evaluation of mHealth interventions and can improve rollout and implementation where required.

scholarly journals Readiness to Deliver Person-Focused Care in A Fragile Situation: The Case of Mental Health Services in Lebanon

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aya Noubani ◽  
Karin Diaconu ◽  
Giulia Loffreda ◽  
Shadi Saleh
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Mental Health Services ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Health System ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Mental Healthcare ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Health Seeking

Abstract Background: Evidence suggests wide variability in the provision of mental healthcare across countries. Countries experiencing fragility related risks suffer from a high burden of mental-ill health and additionally have limited capacity to scale up mental health services given financial and human resource shortages. Integration of mental health services into routine primary care is one potential strategy for enhancing service availability, however little is known about the experiences of currently active health care providers involved in mental health and psychosocial support (MHPSS) service provision at primary care level. This study aims to determine how healthcare providers offering MHPSS services at primary care levels in Lebanon perceive mental health and the health system’s ability to address the rising mental ill-health burden with a view to identify opportunities for strengthening MHPSS service implementation geared towards integrated person focused care model.Methods: A qualitative study design was adopted including 15 semi-structured interviews and 2 participatory group model-building workshops with health care providers (HCPs) involved in mental healthcare delivery at primary care level. Participants were recruited from two contrasting fragility contexts (Beirut and Beqaa). During workshops, causal loop diagrams depicting shared understandings of factors leading to stress and mental ill health, associated health seeking behaviors, and challenges and barriers within the health system were elicited. This research is part of a larger study focused on understanding the dynamics shaping mental health perceptions and health seeking behaviours among community members residing in Lebanon. Results: Findings are organized around a causal loop diagram depicting three central dynamics as described by workshop participants. First, participants linked financial constraints at household levels and the inability to secure one’s livelihood with contextual socio-political stressors, principally referring to integration challenges between host communities and Syrian refugees. In a second dynamic, participants linked exposure to war, conflict and displacement to the occurrence of traumatic events and high levels of distress as well as tense family and community relations. Finally, participants described a third dynamic linking cultural norms and patriarchal systems to exposure to violence and intergenerational trauma among Lebanon’s populations. When describing help-seeking pathways, participants noted the strong influence of social stigma within both the community and among health professionals; the latter was noted to negatively affect patient-provider relationships. Participants additionally spoke of difficulties in the delivery of mental health services and linked this to the design of the health system itself, noting the current system being geared towards patient centered care, which focuses on the patient’s experiences with a disease only, rather than person focused care where providers and patients acknowledge broader structural and social influences on health and work together to reach appropriate decisions for tackling health and other social needs. Barriers to delivery of person focused care include the lack of coherent mental health information systems, limited human capacity to deliver MHPSS services among primary health care staff and inadequate service integration and coordination among the many providers of mental health services in our study contexts. Critically however, provider accounts demonstrate readiness and willingness of health professionals to engage with integrated person focused care models of care.Conclusion: Mental ill health is a major public health problem with implications for individual health and wellbeing; in a fragile context such as Lebanon, the burden of mental ill health is expected to rise and this presents substantive challenges for the existing health system. Concrete multi-sectoral efforts and investments are required to 1) reduce stigma and improve public perceptions surrounding mental ill health and associated needs for care seeking and 2) promote the implementation of integrated person focused care for addressing mental health.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document