scholarly journals PTE, a novel module to target Polycomb Repressive Complex 1 to the Cyclin D2 oncogene

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarina R. Cameron ◽  
Soumyadeep Nandi ◽  
Tatyana G. Kahn ◽  
Juan I. Barrasa ◽  
Per Stenberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cpg Island ◽  
Protein Complexes ◽  
Cpg Islands ◽  
Biochemical Properties ◽  
Polycomb Group ◽  
Cyclin D2 ◽  
Polycomb Response Element ◽  
Multiple Protein ◽  
Polycomb Repression ◽  
Polycomb Repressive Complex 1

AbstractPolycomb Group proteins are essential epigenetic repressors. They form multiple protein complexes of which two kinds, PRC1 and PRC2, are indispensable for repression. Although much is known about their biochemical properties, how PRC1 and PRC2 are targeted to specific genes is poorly understood. Here we establish the Cyclin D2 (CCND2) oncogene as a simple model to address this question. We provide the evidence that coordinated recruitment of PRC1 and PRC2 complexes to CCND2 involves a combination of a specialized PRC1 targeting element (PTE) and an adjacent CpG-island, which together act as a human Polycomb Response Element. Chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis of CCND2 in different transcriptional states indicates that histone modifications produced by PRC1 and PRC2 are not sufficient to recruit either of the complexes. However, catalytic activity of PRC2 helps to anchor PRC1 at the PTE. Our analyses suggest that coordinated targeting of PRC1 and PRC2 complexes by juxtaposed AT-rich PTEs and CpG-islands may be a general feature of Polycomb repression in mammals.

Histone H3K4 trimethylation: dynamic interplay with pre-mRNA splicing

2016 ◽  
Vol 94 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
James R. Davie ◽  
Wayne Xu ◽  
Genevieve P. Delcuve
Keyword(s):  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Cpg Island ◽  
Protein Complexes ◽  
Cpg Islands ◽  
Mrna Splicing ◽  
Chromatin Remodelers ◽  
Multiple Protein ◽  
H3k4me3 Mark ◽  
Histone H3k4 ◽  
Enzyme Complexes

Histone H3 lysine 4 trimethylation (H3K4me3) is often stated as a mark of transcriptionally active promoters. However, closer study of the positioning of H3K4me3 shows the mark locating primarily after the first exon at the 5′ splice site and overlapping with a CpG island in mammalian cells. There are several enzyme complexes that are involved in the placement of the H3K4me3 mark, including multiple protein complexes containing SETD1A, SETD1B, and MLL1 enzymes (writers). CXXC1, which is associated with SETD1A and SETD1B, target these enzymes to unmethylated CpG islands. Lysine demethylases (KDM5 family members, erasers) demethylate H3K4me3. The H3K4me3 mark is recognized by several proteins (readers), including lysine acetyltransferase complexes, chromatin remodelers, and RNA bound proteins involved in pre-mRNA splicing. Interestingly, attenuation of H3K4me3 impacts pre-mRNA splicing, and inhibition of pre-mRNA splicing attenuates H3K4me3.

scholarly journals Functional characterization of human Polycomb-like 3 isoforms identifies them as components of distinct EZH2 protein complexes

2011 ◽  
Vol 434 (2) ◽  
pp. 333-342 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gaylor Boulay ◽  
Claire Rosnoblet ◽  
Cateline Guérardel ◽  
Pierre-Olivier Angrand ◽  
Dominique Leprince
Keyword(s):  
Cell Fate ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Protein Complexes ◽  
Functional Characterization ◽  
Polycomb Group ◽  
Phd Finger ◽  
Reverse Transcription Pcr ◽  
Tudor Domain ◽  
Self Association ◽  
Polycomb Repressive Complex 1

PcG (Polycomb group) proteins are conserved transcriptional repressors essential to regulate cell fate and to maintain epigenetic cellular memory. They work in concert through two main families of chromatin-modifying complexes, PRC1 (Polycomb repressive complex 1) and PRC2–4. In Drosophila, PRC2 contains the H3K27 histone methyltransferase E(Z) whose trimethylation activity towards PcG target genes is stimulated by PCL (Polycomb-like). In the present study, we have examined hPCL3, one of its three human paralogues. Through alternative splicing, hPCL3 encodes a long isoform, hPCL3L, containing an N-terminal TUDOR domain and two PHDs (plant homeodomains) and a smaller isoform, hPCL3S, lacking the second PHD finger (PHD2). By quantitative reverse transcription–PCR analyses, we showed that both isoforms are widely co-expressed at high levels in medulloblastoma. By co-immunoprecipitation analyses, we demonstrated that both isoforms interact with EZH2 through their common TUDOR domain. However, the hPCL3L-specific PHD2 domain, which is better conserved than PHD1 in the PCL family, is also involved in this interaction and implicated in the self-association of hPCL3L. Finally, we have demonstrated that both hPCL3 isoforms are physically associated with EZH2, but in different complexes. Our results provide the first evidence that the two hPCL3 isoforms belong to different complexes and raise important questions about their relative functions, particularly in tumorigenesis.

scholarly journals Mammalian Polyhomeotic Homologues Phc2 and Phc1 Act in Synergy To Mediate Polycomb Repression of Hox Genes

2005 ◽  
Vol 25 (15) ◽  
pp. 6694-6706 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyo-ichi Isono ◽  
Yu-ichi Fujimura ◽  
Jun Shinga ◽  
Makoto Yamaki ◽  
Jiyang O-Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hox Genes ◽  
Protein Complexes ◽  
Axial Skeleton ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Polycomb Group ◽  
Polycomb Repression ◽  
Evolutionarily Conserved ◽  
Direct Binding ◽  
Multimeric Protein ◽  
Dose Dependent

ABSTRACT The Polycomb group (PcG) gene products form multimeric protein complexes and contribute to anterior-posterior (A-P) specification via the transcriptional regulation of Hox cluster genes. The Drosophila polyhomeotic genes and their mammalian orthologues, Phc1, Phc2, and Phc3, encode nuclear proteins that are constituents of evolutionarily conserved protein complexes designated class II PcG complexes. In this study, we describe the generation and phenotypes of Phc2-deficient mice. We show posterior transformations of the axial skeleton and premature senescence of mouse embryonic fibroblasts associated with derepression of Hox cluster genes and Cdkn2a genes, respectively. Synergistic actions of a Phc2 mutation with Phc1 and Rnf110 mutations during A-P specification, coimmunoprecipitation of their products from embryonic extracts, and chromatin immunoprecipitation by anti-Phc2 monoclonal antibodies suggest that Hox repression by Phc2 is mediated through the class II PcG complexes, probably via direct binding to the Hox locus. The genetic interactions further reveal the functional overlap between Phc2 and Phc1 and a strict dose-dependent requirement during A-P specification and embryonic survival. Functional redundancy between Phc2 and Phc1 leads us to hypothesize that the overall level of polyhomeotic orthologues in nuclei is a parameter that is critical in enabling the class II PcG complexes to exert their molecular functions.

scholarly journals Evolution of the D. melanogaster chromatin landscape and its associated proteins

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elise Parey ◽  
Anton Crombach
Keyword(s):  
Protein Complexes ◽  
Replication Timing ◽  
Fruit Fly ◽  
Biochemical Properties ◽  
Polycomb Group ◽  
A Genome ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Associated Proteins ◽  
Binary Division ◽  
Inference Methods

AbstractIn the nucleus of eukaryotic cells, genomic DNA associates with numerous protein complexes and RNAs, forming the chromatin landscape. Through a genome-wide study of chromatin-associated proteins in Drosophila cells, five major chromatin types were identified as a refinement of the traditional binary division into hetero- and euchromatin. These five types are defined by distinct but overlapping combinations of proteins and differ in biological and biochemical properties, including transcriptional activity, replication timing and histone modifications. In this work, we assess the evolutionary relationships of chromatin-associated proteins and present an integrated view of the evolution and conservation of the fruit fly D. melanogaster chromatin landscape. We combine homology prediction across a wide range of species with gene age inference methods to determine the origin of each chromatin-associated protein. This provides insight into the emergence of the different chromatin types. Our results indicate that the two euchromatic types, YELLOW and RED, were one single activating type that split early in eukaryotic history. Next, we provide evidence that GREEN-associated proteins are involved in a centromere drive and expanded in a lineage-specific way in D. melanogaster. Our results on BLUE chromatin support the hypothesis that the emergence of Polycomb Group proteins is linked to eukaryotic multicellularity. In light of these results, we discuss how the regulatory complexification of chromatin links to the origins of eukaryotic multicellularity.

scholarly journals Comparative Analysis of Chromatin Binding by Sex Comb on Midleg (SCM) and Other Polycomb Group Repressors at a Drosophila Hox Gene

2010 ◽  
Vol 30 (11) ◽  
pp. 2584-2593 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liangjun Wang ◽  
Neal Jahren ◽  
Ellen L. Miller ◽  
Carrie S. Ketel ◽  
Daniel R. Mallin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chromatin Immunoprecipitation ◽  
Polycomb Group ◽  
S2 Cells ◽  
Chromatin Binding ◽  
Hox Gene ◽  
Functional Relationships ◽  
Polycomb Response Element ◽  
Sex Comb ◽  
Polycomb Repressive Complex 1

ABSTRACT Sex Comb on Midleg (SCM) is a transcriptional repressor in the Polycomb group (PcG), but its molecular role in PcG silencing is not known. Although SCM can interact with Polycomb repressive complex 1 (PRC1) in vitro, biochemical studies have indicated that SCM is not a core constituent of PRC1 or PRC2. Nevertheless, SCM is just as critical for Drosophila Hox gene silencing as canonical subunits of these well-characterized PcG complexes. To address functional relationships between SCM and other PcG components, we have performed chromatin immunoprecipitation studies using cultured Drosophila Schneider line 2 (S2) cells and larval imaginal discs. We find that SCM associates with a Polycomb response element (PRE) upstream of the Ubx gene which also binds PRC1, PRC2, and the DNA-binding PcG protein Pleiohomeotic (PHO). However, SCM is retained at this Ubx PRE despite genetic disruption or knockdown of PHO, PRC1, or PRC2, suggesting that SCM chromatin targeting does not require prior association of these other PcG components. Chromatin immunoprecipitations (IPs) to test the consequences of SCM genetic disruption or knockdown revealed that PHO association is unaffected, but reduced levels of PRE-bound PRC2 and PRC1 were observed. We discuss these results in light of current models for recruitment of PcG complexes to chromatin targets.

Chromatin modulation and gene regulation in plants: insight about PRC1 function

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 957-966 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiannan Wang ◽  
Wen-Hui Shen
Keyword(s):  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Protein Complexes ◽  
Histone H3 ◽  
Short Review ◽  
Polycomb Group ◽  
Trithorax Group ◽  
The Core ◽  
Evolutionarily Conserved ◽  
Trithorax Group Proteins ◽  
Polycomb Repressive Complex 1

In plant and metazoan, Polycomb Group (PcG) proteins play key roles in regulating developmental processes by repression of gene expression. PcG proteins function as multi-protein complexes; among them the best characterized ones are Polycomb Repressive Complex 1 (PRC1) and PRC2. PRC2 catalyzes histone H3 lysine 27 trimethylation (H3K27me3), and PRC1 can bind H3K27me3 and catalyzes H2A monoubiquitination. While the PRC2 components and molecular functions are evolutionarily conserved, varied PRC1 complexes are found and they show high divergences between animals and plants. In addition to the core subunits, an exponentially increasing number of PRC1-associated factors have been identified in Arabidopsis thaliana. Recent studies have also unraveled cross-component interactions and intertwined roles of PRC1 and PRC2 in chromatin modulation. In addition, complexities of interactions and functions between PcG and Trithorax Group proteins have been observed. This short review summarizes up current knowledge to provide insight about repressive functional mechanism of PRC1 and its interplay with other factors.

scholarly journals DNA Methylation of Human Choline Kinase Alpha Promoter-Associated CpG Islands in MCF-7 Cells

Genes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 853
Author(s):  
Siti Aisyah Faten Mohamed Sa’dom ◽  
Sweta Raikundalia ◽  
Shaharum Shamsuddin ◽  
Wei Cun See Too ◽  
Ling Ling Few
Keyword(s):  
Dna Methylation ◽  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Binding Site ◽  
Promoter Activity ◽  
Cytosine Methylation ◽  
Cpg Island ◽  
Cpg Islands ◽  
Site Directed Mutagenesis ◽  
Choline Kinase ◽  
Mcf 7

Choline kinase (CK) is the enzyme catalyzing the first reaction in CDP-choline pathway for the biosynthesis of phosphatidylcholine. Higher expression of the α isozyme of CK has been implicated in carcinogenesis, and inhibition or downregulation of CKα (CHKA) is a promising anticancer approach. This study aimed to investigate the regulation of CKα expression by DNA methylation of the CpG islands found on the promoter of this gene in MCF-7 cells. Four CpG islands have been predicted in the 2000 bp promoter region of ckα (chka) gene. Six CpG island deletion mutants were constructed using PCR site-directed mutagenesis method and cloned into pGL4.10 vectors for promoter activity assays. Deletion of CpG4C region located between –225 and –56 significantly increased the promoter activity by 4-fold, indicating the presence of important repressive transcription factor binding site. The promoter activity of methylated full-length promoter was significantly lower than the methylated CpG4C deletion mutant by 16-fold. The results show that DNA methylation of CpG4C promotes the binding of the transcription factor that suppresses the promoter activity. Electrophoretic mobility shift assay analysis showed that cytosine methylation at MZF1 binding site in CpG4C increased the binding of putative MZF1 in nuclear extract. In conclusion, the results suggest that DNA methylation decreased the promoter activity by promoting the binding of putative MZF1 transcription factor at CpG4C region of the ckα gene promoter.

A Proline-Rich Region in the Zeste Protein Essential for Transvection and white Repression by Zeste1

Genetics ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 148 (4) ◽  
pp. 1865-1874
Author(s):  
Christina Rosen ◽  
Dale Dorsett ◽  
Joseph Jack
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Homologous Chromosome ◽  
Protein Complexes ◽  
Dna Binding Protein ◽  
Polycomb Group ◽  
The Self ◽  
Rich Region ◽  
Interaction Domain ◽  
Proline Rich Region

Abstract The DNA-binding protein encoded by the zeste gene of Drosophila activates transcription and mediates interchromosomal interactions such as transvection. The mutant protein encoded by the zeste1 (z1) allele retains the ability to support transvection, but represses white. Similar to transvection, repression requires Zeste-Zeste protein interactions and a second copy of white, either on the homologous chromosome or adjacent on the same chromosome. We characterized two pseudorevertants of z1 (z1-35 and z1-42) and another zeste mutation (z78c) that represses white. The z1 lesion alters a lysine residue located between the N-terminal DNA-binding domain and the C-terminal hydrophobic repeats involved in Zeste self-interactions. The z78c mutation alters a histidine near the site of the z1 lesion. Both z1 pseudorevertants retain the z1 lesion and alter different prolines in a proline-rich region located between the z1 lesion and the self-interaction domain. The pseudorevertants retain the ability to self-interact, but fail to repress white or support transvection at Ultrabithorax. To account for these observations and evidence indicating that Zeste affects gene expression through Polycomb group (Pc-G) protein complexes that epigenetically maintain chromatin states, we suggest that the regions affected by the z1, z78c, and pseudorevertant lesions mediate interactions between Zeste and the maintenance complexes.

scholarly journals Identification of polycomb repressive complex 1 and 2 core components in hexaploid bread wheat

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (S1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Beáta Strejčková ◽  
Radim Čegan ◽  
Ales Pecinka ◽  
Zbyněk Milec ◽  
Jan Šafář
Keyword(s):  
Bread Wheat ◽  
Developmental Stages ◽  
Gene Families ◽  
Polycomb Group ◽  
Transcriptional Analysis ◽  
Histone H2a ◽  
Polycomb Repressive Complex ◽  
Core Components ◽  
High Level ◽  
Polycomb Repressive Complex 1

Abstract Background Polycomb repressive complexes 1 and 2 play important roles in epigenetic gene regulation by posttranslationally modifying specific histone residues. Polycomb repressive complex 2 is responsible for the trimethylation of lysine 27 on histone H3; Polycomb repressive complex 1 catalyzes the monoubiquitination of histone H2A at lysine 119. Both complexes have been thoroughly studied in Arabidopsis, but the evolution of polycomb group gene families in monocots, particularly those with complex allopolyploid origins, is unknown. Results Here, we present the in silico identification of the Polycomb repressive complex 1 and 2 (PRC2, PRC1) subunits in allohexaploid bread wheat, the reconstruction of their evolutionary history and a transcriptional analysis over a series of 33 developmental stages. We identified four main subunits of PRC2 [E(z), Su(z), FIE and MSI] and three main subunits of PRC1 (Pc, Psc and Sce) and determined their chromosomal locations. We found that most of the genes coding for subunit proteins are present as paralogs in bread wheat. Using bread wheat RNA-seq data from different tissues and developmental stages throughout plant ontogenesis revealed variable transcriptional activity for individual paralogs. Phylogenetic analysis showed a high level of protein conservation among temperate cereals. Conclusions The identification and chromosomal location of the Polycomb repressive complex 1 and 2 core components in bread wheat may enable a deeper understanding of developmental processes, including vernalization, in commonly grown winter wheat.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document