scholarly journals Spatially explicit approach to population abundance estimation in field surveys

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nao Takashina ◽  
Buntarou Kusumoto ◽  
Maria Beger ◽  
Suren Rathnayake ◽  
Hugh P. Possingham

AbstractThe abundance of species is a fundamental consideration in ecology and conservation biology. Although broad models have been proposed to estimate the population abundance using existing data, available data is often limited. With no information available, a population estimation will rely on time consuming field surveys. Typically, time is a critical constraint in conservation and often management decisions must be made quickly under the data limited situation. Depending on time and budgetary constraints, the required accuracy of field survey changes significantly. Hence, it is desirable to set up an effective survey design to minimize time and effort of sampling given required accuracy. We examine a spatially-explicit approach to population estimation using spatial point processes, enabling us to explicitly and consistently discuss various sampling designs. We find that the accuracy of abundance estimation varies with both ecological factors and survey design. Although the spatial scale of sampling does not affect estimation accuracy when the underlying individual distribution is random, it decreases with the sampled unit size if individuals tend to form clusters. These results are derived analytically and checked numerically. Obtained insights provide a benchmark to predict the quality of population estimation, and improve survey designs for ecological studies and conservation.

2018 ◽  
Vol 453 ◽  
pp. 88-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nao Takashina ◽  
Buntarou Kusumoto ◽  
Maria Beger ◽  
Suren Rathnayake ◽  
Hugh P. Possingham

Author(s):  
Jan Smyčka ◽  
Cristina Roquet ◽  
Julien Renaud ◽  
Wilfried Thuiller ◽  
Niklaus E. Zimmermann ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas H. Dobler ◽  
Juergen Geist ◽  
Katharina Stoeckl ◽  
Kentaro Inoue

Author(s):  
Toshiaki Jo ◽  
Hiroki Yamanaka

Environmental DNA (eDNA) analysis is a promising tool for non-disruptive and cost-efficient estimation of species abundance. However, its practical applicability in natural environments is limited because it is unclear whether eDNA concentrations actually represent species abundance in the field. Although the importance of accounting for eDNA dynamics, such as transport and degradation, has been discussed, the influences of eDNA characteristics, including production source and state, and methodology, including collection and quantification strategy and abundance metrics, on the accuracy of eDNA-based abundance estimation were entirely overlooked. We conducted a meta-analysis using 56 previous eDNA literature and investigated the relationships between the accuracy (R2) of eDNA-based abundance estimation and eDNA characteristics and methodology. Our meta-regression analysis found that R2 values were significantly lower for crustaceans than fish, suggesting that less frequent eDNA production owing to their external morphology and physiology may impede accurate estimation of their abundance via eDNA. Moreover, R2 values were positively associated with filter pore size, indicating that selective collection of larger-sized eDNA, which is typically fresher, could improve the estimation accuracy of species abundance. Furthermore, R2 values were significantly lower for natural than laboratory conditions, while there was no difference in the estimation accuracy among natural environments. Our findings shed a new light on the importance of what characteristics of eDNA should be targeted for more accurate estimation of species abundance. Further empirical studies are required to validate our findings and fully elucidate the relationship between eDNA characteristics and eDNA-based abundance estimation.


2015 ◽  
Vol 370 (1681) ◽  
pp. 20140276 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giulio A. De Leo ◽  
Fiorenza Micheli

Marine reserves (MRs) are used worldwide as a means of conserving biodiversity and protecting depleted populations. Despite major investments in MRs, their environmental and social benefits have proven difficult to demonstrate and are still debated. Clear expectations of the possible outcomes of MR establishment are needed to guide and strengthen empirical assessments. Previous models show that reserve establishment in overcapitalized, quota-based fisheries can reduce both catch and population abundance, thereby negating fisheries and even conservation benefits. By using a stage-structured, spatially explicit stochastic model, we show that catches under quota-based fisheries that include a network of MRs can exceed maximum sustainable yield (MSY) under conventional quota management if reserves provide protection to old, large spawners that disproportionally contribute to recruitment outside the reserves. Modelling results predict that the net fishery benefit of MRs is lost when gains in fecundity of old, large individuals are small, is highest in the case of sedentary adults with high larval dispersal, and decreases with adult mobility. We also show that environmental variability may mask fishery benefits of reserve implementation and that MRs may buffer against collapse when sustainable catch quotas are exceeded owing to stock overestimation or systematic overfishing.


2015 ◽  
Vol 103 (5) ◽  
pp. 1344-1353 ◽  
Author(s):  
José M. Fedriani ◽  
Thorsten Wiegand ◽  
Gemma Calvo ◽  
Alberto Suárez-Esteban ◽  
Miguel Jácome ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document