scholarly journals LET-99-dependent spatial restriction of active force generators makes spindle’s position robust

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Bouvrais ◽  
L. Chesneau ◽  
S. Pastezeur ◽  
M. Delattre ◽  
J. Pécréaux
Keyword(s):  
Biochemical Networks ◽  
Active Force ◽  
Mitotic Progression ◽  
Contact Density ◽  
Posterior Displacement ◽  
C Elegans ◽  
Anaphase Onset ◽  
Pulling Forces ◽  
Pulling Force ◽  
Force Generator

AbstractDuring the asymmetric division of the Caenorhabditis elegans nematode zygote, the polarity cues distribution and daughter cell fates depend on the correct positioning of the mitotic spindle, which results from both centering and cortical pulling forces. Revealed by anaphase spindle rocking, these pulling forces are regulated by the force generator dynamics, which are in turn consequent of mitotic progression. We found a novel, additional, regulation of these forces by the spindle position. It controls astral microtubule availability at the cortex, on which the active force generators can pull. Importantly, this positional control relies on the polarity dependent LET-99 cortical band, which restricts or concentrates generators to a posterior crescent. After delaying anaphase onset, we detected this positional pulling force regulation in C. elegans as a precocious spindle rocking with respect to anaphase onset. We ascribed this control to the microtubule dynamics at the cortex. Indeed, in mapping the cortical contacts, we found a correlation between the centrosome–cortex distance and the microtubule contact density. In turn, it modulates pulling force generator activity. We modelled this control, predicting and experimentally validating that the posterior crescent extent controlled where the anaphase oscillations started, in addition to mitotic progression. We found in particular that the oscillation onset position resists changes in cellular geometry and moderate variations of active force generator count. Finally, we propose that spatially restricting force generator to a posterior crescent sets the spindle’s final position, reflecting polarity through the LET-99 dependent restriction of force generators to a posterior crescent. This regulation superimposes that of force generator processivity. This novel control confers a low dependence on microtubule and active force generator exact numbers or dynamics, provided that they exceed the threshold needed for posterior displacement. Interestingly, this robustness originates in cell mechanics rather than biochemical networks.

scholarly journals The coordination of spindle-positioning forces during the asymmetric division of the C. elegans zygote is revealed by distinct microtubule dynamics at the cortex

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Bouvrais ◽  
L. Chesneau ◽  
Y. Le Cunff ◽  
D. Fairbrass ◽  
N. Soler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Direct Proof ◽  
Cell Periphery ◽  
Mitotic Progression ◽  
Spindle Positioning ◽  
Anteroposterior Axis ◽  
C Elegans ◽  
Pulling Force ◽  
The Stability ◽  
Force Generator ◽  
Spindle Position

ABSTRACTIn the Caenorhabditis elegans zygote, astral microtubules generate forces, pushing against and pulling from the cell periphery. They are essential to position the mitotic spindle. By measuring the dynamics of astral microtubules at the cortex, we revealed the presence of two populations, residing there for 0.4 s and 1.8 s, which correspond to the pulling and pushing events, respectively. Such an experiment offers a unique opportunity to monitor both forces that position the spindle under physiological conditions and study their variations along the anteroposterior axis (space) and the mitotic progression (time). By investigating pulling-force-generating events at the microscopic level, we showed that an anteroposterior asymmetry in dynein on-rate – encoding pulling-force imbalance – is sufficient to cause posterior spindle displacement. The regulation by spindle position – reflecting the number of microtubule contacts in the posterior-most region – reinforces this imbalance only in late-anaphase. Furthermore, we exhibited the first direct proof that the force-generator increasing persistence to pull (processivity) accounts for the temporal control of pulling force throughout mitosis. We thus propose a three-fold control of pulling force, by the polarity, spindle position and mitotic progression. Focusing on pushing force, we discovered a correlation between its density and the stability of the spindle position during metaphase, which strongly suggests that the pushing force contributes to maintaining the spindle at the cell centre. This force remains constant and symmetric along the anteroposterior axis during the division. The pulling one increases in intensity and becomes dominant at anaphase. In conclusion, the two-population study enabled us to decipher the complex regulation of the spindle positioning during cell division.

scholarly journals Local cortical pulling-force repression switches centrosomal centration and posterior displacement in C. elegans

2007 ◽  
Vol 179 (7) ◽  
pp. 1347-1354 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akatsuki Kimura ◽  
Shuichi Onami
Keyword(s):  
Image Processing ◽  
Spatial Distribution ◽  
Dynamic Positioning ◽  
Cell Stage ◽  
Local Regulation ◽  
Posterior Displacement ◽  
Temporal Regulation ◽  
C Elegans ◽  
Pulling Force ◽  
Micrometer Scale

Centrosome positioning is actively regulated by forces acting on microtubules radiating from the centrosomes. Two mechanisms, center-directed and polarized cortical pulling, are major contributors to the successive centering and posteriorly displacing migrations of the centrosomes in single-cell–stage Caenorhabditis elegans. In this study, we analyze the spatial distribution of the forces acting on the centrosomes to examine the mechanism that switches centrosomal migration from centering to displacing. We clarify the spatial distribution of the forces using image processing to measure the micrometer-scale movements of the centrosomes. The changes in distribution show that polarized cortical pulling functions during centering migration. The polarized cortical pulling force directed posteriorly is repressed predominantly in the lateral regions during centering migration and is derepressed during posteriorly displacing migration. Computer simulations show that this local repression of cortical pulling force is sufficient for switching between centering and displacing migration. Local regulation of cortical pulling might be a mechanism conserved for the precise temporal regulation of centrosomal dynamic positioning.

scholarly journals Tumor suppressor APC is an attenuator of spindle-pulling forces during C. elegans asymmetric cell division

2018 ◽  
Vol 115 (5) ◽  
pp. E954-E963 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenji Sugioka ◽  
Lars-Eric Fielmich ◽  
Kota Mizumoto ◽  
Bruce Bowerman ◽  
Sander van den Heuvel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Division ◽  
Tumor Suppressor ◽  
Mitotic Spindle ◽  
Asymmetric Cell Division ◽  
Cell Cortex ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
C Elegans ◽  
Pulling Forces ◽  
Underlying Mechanisms ◽  
Pulling Force

The adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) tumor suppressor has dual functions in Wnt/β-catenin signaling and accurate chromosome segregation and is frequently mutated in colorectal cancers. Although APC contributes to proper cell division, the underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood. Here we show that Caenorhabditis elegans APR-1/APC is an attenuator of the pulling forces acting on the mitotic spindle. During asymmetric cell division of the C. elegans zygote, a LIN-5/NuMA protein complex localizes dynein to the cell cortex to generate pulling forces on astral microtubules that position the mitotic spindle. We found that APR-1 localizes to the anterior cell cortex in a Par–aPKC polarity-dependent manner and suppresses anterior centrosome movements. Our combined cell biological and mathematical analyses support the conclusion that cortical APR-1 reduces force generation by stabilizing microtubule plus-ends at the cell cortex. Furthermore, APR-1 functions in coordination with LIN-5 phosphorylation to attenuate spindle-pulling forces. Our results document a physical basis for the attenuation of spindle-pulling force, which may be generally used in asymmetric cell division and, when disrupted, potentially contributes to division defects in cancer.

scholarly journals Material aging causes centrosome weakening and disassembly during mitotic exit

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthäus Mittasch ◽  
Vanna M. Tran ◽  
Manolo U. Rios ◽  
Anatol W. Fritsch ◽  
Stephen J. Enos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mitotic Chromosome ◽  
Mitotic Exit ◽  
C Elegans ◽  
Anaphase Onset ◽  
Pulling Forces ◽  
Mechanical Transition ◽  
Induced Flow ◽  
Brittle State ◽  
Strength And Ductility

ABSTRACTCentrosomes must resist microtubule-mediated forces for mitotic chromosome segregation. During mitotic exit, however, centrosomes are deformed and fractured by those same forces, which is a key step in centrosome disassembly. How the functional material properties of centrosomes change throughout the cell cycle, and how they are molecularly tuned remain unknown. Here, we used optically-induced flow perturbations to determine the molecular basis of centrosome strength and ductility in C. elegans embryos. We found that both properties declined sharply at anaphase onset, long before natural disassembly. This mechanical transition required PP2A phosphatase and correlated with inactivation of PLK-1 (Polo Kinase) and SPD-2 (Cep192). In vitro, PLK-1 and SPD-2 directly protected centrosome scaffolds from force-induced disassembly. Our results suggest that, prior to anaphase, PLK-1 and SPD-2 confer strength and ductility to the centrosome scaffold so that it can resist microtubule-pulling forces. In anaphase, centrosomes lose PLK-1 and SPD-2 and transition to a weak, brittle state that enables force-mediated centrosome disassembly.

scholarly journals Regulated changes in material properties underlie centrosome disassembly during mitotic exit

2020 ◽  
Vol 219 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthäus Mittasch ◽  
Vanna M. Tran ◽  
Manolo U. Rios ◽  
Anatol W. Fritsch ◽  
Stephen J. Enos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Material Properties ◽  
Mitotic Exit ◽  
C Elegans ◽  
Anaphase Onset ◽  
Pulling Forces ◽  
Mechanical Transition ◽  
Induced Flow ◽  
Brittle State ◽  
Strength And Ductility

Centrosomes must resist microtubule-mediated forces for mitotic chromosome segregation. During mitotic exit, however, centrosomes are deformed and fractured by those same forces, which is a key step in centrosome disassembly. How the functional material properties of centrosomes change throughout the cell cycle, and how they are molecularly tuned, remain unknown. Here, we used optically induced flow perturbations to determine the molecular basis of centrosome strength and ductility in C. elegans embryos. We found that both properties declined sharply at anaphase onset, long before natural disassembly. This mechanical transition required PP2A phosphatase and correlated with inactivation of PLK-1 (Polo kinase) and SPD-2 (Cep192). In vitro, PLK-1 and SPD-2 directly protected centrosome scaffolds from force-induced disassembly. Our results suggest that, before anaphase, PLK-1 and SPD-2 respectively confer strength and ductility to the centrosome scaffold so that it can resist microtubule-pulling forces. In anaphase, centrosomes lose PLK-1 and SPD-2 and transition to a weak, brittle state that enables force-mediated centrosome disassembly.

scholarly journals Optogenetic dissection of mitotic spindle positioning in vivo

eLife ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lars-Eric Fielmich ◽  
Ruben Schmidt ◽  
Daniel J Dickinson ◽  
Bob Goldstein ◽  
Anna Akhmanova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mitotic Spindle ◽  
Membrane Anchor ◽  
Spindle Positioning ◽  
C Elegans ◽  
Cell Cleavage ◽  
Evolutionarily Conserved ◽  
Pulling Forces ◽  
Endogenous Proteins ◽  
Pulling Force

The position of the mitotic spindle determines the plane of cell cleavage, and thereby daughter cell location, size, and content. Spindle positioning is driven by dynein-mediated pulling forces exerted on astral microtubules, which requires an evolutionarily conserved complex of Gα∙GDP, GPR-1/2Pins/LGN, and LIN-5Mud/NuMA proteins. To examine individual functions of the complex components, we developed a genetic strategy for light-controlled localization of endogenous proteins in C. elegans embryos. By replacing Gα and GPR-1/2 with a light-inducible membrane anchor, we demonstrate that Gα∙GDP, Gα∙GTP, and GPR-1/2 are not required for pulling-force generation. In the absence of Gα and GPR-1/2, cortical recruitment of LIN-5, but not dynein itself, induced high pulling forces. The light-controlled localization of LIN-5 overruled normal cell-cycle and polarity regulation and provided experimental control over the spindle and cell-cleavage plane. Our results define Gα∙GDP–GPR-1/2Pins/LGN as a regulatable membrane anchor, and LIN-5Mud/NuMA as a potent activator of dynein-dependent spindle-positioning forces.

scholarly journals The tumor suppressor APC is an attenuator of spindle-pulling forces during C. elegans asymmetric cell division

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenji Sugioka ◽  
Lars-Eric Fielmich ◽  
Kota Mizumoto ◽  
Bruce Bowerman ◽  
Sander van den Heuvel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Division ◽  
Mitotic Spindle ◽  
Asymmetric Cell Division ◽  
Cell Cortex ◽  
Colorectal Cancers ◽  
Adenomatous Polyposis ◽  
Polyposis Coli ◽  
C Elegans ◽  
Pulling Forces ◽  
Pulling Force

AbstractThe adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) tumor suppressor has dual functions in Wnt/ß-catenin signaling and accurate chromosome segregation, and is frequently mutated in colorectal cancers. Although APC contributes to proper cell division, the underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood. Here we show that C. elegans APR-1/APC is an attenuator of the pulling forces acting on the mitotic spindle. During asymmetric cell division of the C. elegans zygote, a LIN-5/NuMA protein complex localizes dynein to the cell cortex to generate pulling forces on astral microtubules that position the mitotic spindle. We found that APR-1 localizes to the anterior cell cortex in a Par-aPKC polarity-dependent manner and suppresses anterior centrosome movements. Our combined cell biological and mathematical analyses support the conclusion that cortical APR-1 reduces force generation by stabilizing microtubule plus ends at the cell cortex. Furthermore, APR-1 functions in coordination with LIN-5 phosphorylation to attenuate spindle pulling forces. Our results document a physical basis for spindle-pulling force attenuation, which may be generally used in asymmetric cell division, and when disrupted potentially contributes to division defects in cancer.Significance StatementAPC (adenomatous polyposis coli) is a Wnt signaling component as well as a microtubule-associated protein, and its mutations are frequently associated with colorectal cancers in humans. Although APC stabilizes microtubules (MTs), its mechanical role during cell division is largely unknown. Here we show that APC is an attenuator of forces acting on the mitotic spindle during asymmetric cell division of the C. elegans zygote. We performed live-imaging, laser-microsurgery, and numerical simulation to show how APC suppresses spindle pulling force generation by stabilizing microtubule plus-ends and reducing microtubule catastrophe frequency at the cell cortex. Our study is the first to document a mechanical role for the APC protein, and provides a physical basis for spindle-pulling force attenuation.

scholarly journals LET-99 inhibits lateral posterior pulling forces during asymmetric spindle elongation in C. elegans embryos

2010 ◽  
Vol 189 (3) ◽  
pp. 481-495 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lori E. Krueger ◽  
Jui-Ching Wu ◽  
Meng-Fu Bryan Tsou ◽  
Lesilee S. Rose
Keyword(s):  
Spindle Pole ◽  
G Protein Signaling ◽  
Protein Signaling ◽  
Posterior Cortex ◽  
C Elegans ◽  
Pulling Forces ◽  
Lateral Posterior ◽  
Spindle Elongation ◽  
Pulling Force ◽  
Precise Distribution

Cortical pulling on astral microtubules positions the mitotic spindle in response to PAR polarity cues and G protein signaling in many systems. In Caenorhabditis elegans single-cell embryos, posterior spindle displacement depends on Gα and its regulators GPR-1/2 and LIN-5. GPR-1/2 and LIN-5 are necessary for cortical pulling forces and become enriched at the posterior cortex, which suggests that higher forces act on the posterior spindle pole compared with the anterior pole. However, the precise distribution of cortical forces and how they are regulated remains to be determined. Using spindle severing, single centrosome assays, and centrosome fragmentation, we show that both the anterior and posterior cortices generate more pulling force than the lateral–posterior region. Lateral inhibition depends on LET-99, which inhibits GPR-1/2 localization to produce a bipolar GPR-1/2 pattern. Thus, rather than two domains of cortical force, there are three. We propose that the attenuation of lateral forces prevents counterproductive pulling, resulting in a higher net force toward the posterior that contributes to spindle elongation and displacement.

scholarly journals Two populations of cytoplasmic dynein contribute to spindle positioning in C. elegans embryos

2017 ◽  
Vol 216 (9) ◽  
pp. 2777-2793 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruben Schmidt ◽  
Lars-Eric Fielmich ◽  
Ilya Grigoriev ◽  
Eugene A. Katrukha ◽  
Anna Akhmanova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cytoplasmic Dynein ◽  
Force Generation ◽  
Cell Cortex ◽  
Animal Cells ◽  
Spindle Positioning ◽  
C Elegans ◽  
Knockout Mutants ◽  
Pulling Forces ◽  
Endogenous Proteins ◽  
Pulling Force

The position of the mitotic spindle is tightly controlled in animal cells as it determines the plane and orientation of cell division. Contacts between cytoplasmic dynein and astral microtubules (MTs) at the cell cortex generate pulling forces that position the spindle. An evolutionarily conserved Gα-GPR-1/2Pins/LGN–LIN-5Mud/NuMA cortical complex interacts with dynein and is required for pulling force generation, but the dynamics of this process remain unclear. In this study, by fluorescently labeling endogenous proteins in Caenorhabditis elegans embryos, we show that dynein exists in two distinct cortical populations. One population directly depends on LIN-5, whereas the other is concentrated at MT plus ends and depends on end-binding (EB) proteins. Knockout mutants lacking all EBs are viable and fertile and display normal pulling forces and spindle positioning. However, EB protein–dependent dynein plus end tracking was found to contribute to force generation in embryos with a partially perturbed dynein function, indicating the existence of two mechanisms that together create a highly robust force-generating system.

scholarly journals Merotelic kinetochores in mammalian tissue cells

2005 ◽  
Vol 360 (1455) ◽  
pp. 553-568 ◽  
Author(s):  
E.D Salmon ◽  
D Cimini ◽  
L.A Cameron ◽  
J.G DeLuca
Keyword(s):  
Mitotic Spindle ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Metaphase Plate ◽  
Mammalian Tissue ◽  
Anaphase Onset ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Pulling Forces ◽  
Tissue Cells ◽  
Early Mitosis

Merotelic kinetochore attachment is a major source of aneuploidy in mammalian tissue cells in culture. Mammalian kinetochores typically have binding sites for about 20–25 kinetochore microtubules. In prometaphase, kinetochores become merotelic if they attach to microtubules from opposite poles rather than to just one pole as normally occurs. Merotelic attachments support chromosome bi-orientation and alignment near the metaphase plate and they are not detected by the mitotic spindle checkpoint. At anaphase onset, sister chromatids separate, but a chromatid with a merotelic kinetochore may not be segregated correctly, and may lag near the spindle equator because of pulling forces toward opposite poles, or move in the direction of the wrong pole. Correction mechanisms are important for preventing segregation errors. There are probably more than 100 times as many PtK1 tissue cells with merotelic kinetochores in early mitosis, and about 16 times as many entering anaphase as the 1% of cells with lagging chromosomes seen in late anaphase. The role of spindle mechanics and potential functions of the Ndc80/Nuf2 protein complex at the kinetochore/microtubule interface is discussed for two correction mechanisms: one that functions before anaphase to reduce the number of kinetochore microtubules to the wrong pole, and one that functions after anaphase onset to move merotelic kinetochores based on the ratio of kinetochore microtubules to the correct versus incorrect pole.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document