scholarly journals A data citation roadmap for scientific publishers

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helena Cousijn ◽  
Amye Kenall ◽  
Emma Ganley ◽  
Melissa Harrison ◽  
David Kernohan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Science Policy ◽  
Expert Group ◽  
Early Adopters ◽  
Joint Declaration ◽  
Data Citation ◽  
Starting Point ◽  
Data Transparency ◽  
Scientific Publishers

AbstractThis article presents a practical roadmap for scholarly publishers to implement data citation in accordance with the Joint Declaration of Data Citation Principles (JDDCP), a synopsis and harmonization of the recommendations of major science policy bodies. It was developed by the Publishers Early Adopters Expert Group as part of the Data Citation Implementation Pilot (DCIP) project, an initiative of FORCE11.org and the NIH BioCADDIE program. The structure of the roadmap presented here follows the “life of a paper” workflow and includes the categories Pre-submission, Submission, Production, and Publication. The roadmap is intended to be publisher-agnostic so that all publishers can use this as a starting point when implementing JDDCP-compliant data citation. Authors reading this roadmap will also better know what to expect from publishers and how to enable their own data citations to gain maximum impact, as well as complying with what will become increasingly common funder mandates on data transparency.

scholarly journals A Data Citation Roadmap for Scholarly Data Repositories

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Fenner ◽  
Mercè Crosas ◽  
Jeffrey Grethe ◽  
David Kennedy ◽  
Henning Hermjakob ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Science Policy ◽  
Expert Group ◽  
Data Repositories ◽  
Data Publication ◽  
Link Type ◽  
Joint Declaration ◽  
Data Citation ◽  
Scholarly Data ◽  
Three Phases

AbstractThis article presents a practical roadmap for scholarly data repositories to implement data citation in accordance with the Joint Declaration of Data Citation Principles, a synopsis and harmonization of the recommendations of major science policy bodies. The roadmap was developed by the Repositories Expert Group, as part of the Data Citation Implementation Pilot (DCIP) project, an initiative of FORCE11.org and the NIH BioCADDIE (https://biocaddie.org) program. The roadmap makes 11 specific recommendations, grouped into three phases of implementation: a) required steps needed to support the Joint Declaration of Data Citation Principles, b) recommended steps that facilitate article/data publication workflows, and c) optional steps that further improve data citation support provided by data repositories.

scholarly journals Contributor Information in DataCite Metadata

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Fenner
Keyword(s):  
Joint Declaration ◽  
Data Citation

The Force11 Joint Declaration of Data Citation Principles (Data Citation Synthesis Group, 2014) highlight the importance of giving scholarly credit to all contributors:Data citations should facilitate giving scholarly credit and normative and legal attribution to all contributors to the data, ...

scholarly journals Achieving human and machine accessibility of cited data in scholarly publications

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joan Starr ◽  
Eleni Castro ◽  
Mercè Crosas ◽  
Michel Dumontier ◽  
Robert R. Downs ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Short Article ◽  
Joint Declaration ◽  
Cross Domain ◽  
Widespread Adoption ◽  
Scholarly Publications ◽  
Data Citation ◽  
Scholarly Data ◽  
Operational Guidance

This short article provides operational guidance on implementing scholarly data citation and data deposition, in conformance with the Joint Declaration of Data Citation Principles (JDDCP, http://force11.org/datacitation) to help achieve widespread, uniform human and machine accessibility of deposited data. The JDDCP is the outcome of a cross-domain effort to establish core principles around cited data in scholarly publications. It deals with important issues in identification, deposition, description, accessibility, persistence, and evidential status of cited data. Eighty-five scholarly, governmental, and funding institutions have now endorsed the JDDCP. The purpose of this article is to provide the necessary guidance for JDDCP-endorsing organizations to implement these principles and to achieve their widespread adoption.

scholarly journals Achieving human and machine accessibility of cited data in scholarly publications

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joan Starr ◽  
Eleni Castro ◽  
Mercè Crosas ◽  
Michel Dumontier ◽  
Robert R. Downs ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Scientific Data ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Data Repositories ◽  
Staff Members ◽  
Joint Declaration ◽  
Scholarly Publications ◽  
Comprehensive Exploitation ◽  
Data Citation ◽  
Persistent Data ◽  
Scholarly Data

Reproducibility and reusability of research results is an important concern in scientific communication and science policy. A foundational element of reproducibility and reusability is the open and persistently available presentation of research data. However, many common approaches for primary data publication in use today do not achieve sufficient long-term robustness, openness, accessibility or uniformity. Nor do they permit comprehensive exploitation by modern Web technologies. This has led to several authoritative studies recommending uniform direct citation of data archived in persistent repositories. Data are to be considered as first-class scholarly objects, and treated similarly in many ways to cited and archived scientific and scholarly literature. Here we briefly review the most current and widely agreed set of principle-based recommendations for scholarly data citation, the Joint Declaration of Data Citation Principles (JDDCP). We then present a framework for operationalizing the JDDCP; and a set of initial recommendations on identifier schemes, identifier resolution behavior, required metadata elements, and best practices for realizing programmatic machine actionability of cited data. The main target audience for the common implementation guidelines in this article consists of publishers, scholarly organizations, and persistent data repositories, including technical staff members in these organizations. But ordinary researchers can also benefit from these recommendations. The guidance provided here is intended to help achieve widespread, uniform human and machine accessibility of deposited data, in support of significantly improved verification, validation, reproducibility and re-use of scholarly/scientific data.

scholarly journals Achieving human and machine accessibility of cited data in scholarly publications

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joan Starr ◽  
Eleni Castro ◽  
Mercè Crosas ◽  
Michel Dumontier ◽  
Robert R. Downs ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Scientific Data ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Data Repositories ◽  
Staff Members ◽  
Joint Declaration ◽  
Scholarly Publications ◽  
Comprehensive Exploitation ◽  
Data Citation ◽  
Persistent Data ◽  
Scholarly Data

Reproducibility and reusability of research results is an important concern in scientific communication and science policy. A foundational element of reproducibility and reusability is the open and persistently available presentation of research data. However, many common approaches for primary data publication in use today do not achieve sufficient long-term robustness, openness, accessibility or uniformity. Nor do they permit comprehensive exploitation by modern Web technologies. This has led to several authoritative studies recommending uniform direct citation of data archived in persistent repositories. Data are to be considered as first-class scholarly objects, and treated similarly in many ways to cited and archived scientific and scholarly literature. Here we briefly review the most current and widely agreed set of principle-based recommendations for scholarly data citation, the Joint Declaration of Data Citation Principles (JDDCP). We then present a framework for operationalizing the JDDCP; and a set of initial recommendations on identifier schemes, identifier resolution behavior, required metadata elements, and best practices for realizing programmatic machine actionability of cited data. The main target audience for the common implementation guidelines in this article consists of publishers, scholarly organizations, and persistent data repositories, including technical staff members in these organizations. But ordinary researchers can also benefit from these recommendations. The guidance provided here is intended to help achieve widespread, uniform human and machine accessibility of deposited data, in support of significantly improved verification, validation, reproducibility and re-use of scholarly/scientific data.

scholarly journals Problems of forming the library stock in the context of axiological philosophy

Bibliosphere ◽  
2017 ◽  
pp. 12-16
Author(s):  
G. M. Vikhreva ◽  
O. P. Fedotova
Keyword(s):  
Science Policy ◽  
Social Relations ◽  
Technological Progress ◽  
Social Consciousness ◽  
Library Service ◽  
Creative Development ◽  
Technological Processes ◽  
Criterion System ◽  
Starting Point ◽  
Library Transformation

The paper considers mechanisms of extrapolating the axiological function on the library stock formation and creating its concept of values. The author show the latter influence upon the criterion system of primary and secondary selection, on correlation of the hybrid stock elements. Regularities of the library transformation in the electronic epoch - how the information-technological progress predetermines changes in the library paradigm of values - are exposed. This new library philosophy is being created on the cross-road of a series of sciences. Its aim is reflexive comprehension of the library role in economic, cultural and technological progress of the community, in socialization and creative development of a person, harmonizing social relations. The empiric base and starting point of generalized notions about the sphere of librarianship activities is the whole complex of all forms of social consciousness: science, policy, law, economy, moral, art and so on. Library axiology, which is a perspective direction of librarianship, is being developed successfully in the new philosophy frames. As this axiological function is inherent to the library essence mainly, it's revealed in each of so called «inner», system forming functions, such as: information-analytical, memorial, etc. Interacting with technological processes of library service and collections formation the axiological function also favors the development of various applied functions - educational, cognitive, enlightening ones and others.

scholarly journals Argumentation schemes: From genetics to international relations to environmental science policy to AI ethics

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-20
Author(s):  
Nancy L. Green
Keyword(s):  
International Relations ◽  
Science Policy ◽  
Computational Models ◽  
Environmental Science ◽  
Building Blocks ◽  
Computer Applications ◽  
Argumentation Schemes ◽  
Argument Schemes ◽  
Starting Point ◽  
Ai Ethics

Argumentation schemes have played a key role in our research projects on computational models of natural argument over the last decade. The catalogue of schemes in Walton, Reed and Macagno’s 2008 book, Argumentation Schemes, served as our starting point for analysis of the naturally occurring arguments in written text, i.e., text in different genres having different types of author, audience, and subject domain (genetics, international relations, environmental science policy, AI ethics), for different argument goals, and for different possible future applications. We would often first attempt to analyze the arguments in our corpora in terms of those schemes, then adapt schemes as needed for the goals of the project, and in some cases implement them for use in computational models. Among computational researchers, the main interest in argumentation schemes has been for use in argument mining by applying machine learning methods to existing argument corpora. In contrast, a primary goal of our research has been to learn more about written arguments themselves in various contemporary fields. Our approach has been to manually analyze semantics, discourse structure, argumentation, and rhetoric in texts. Another goal has been to create sharable digital corpora containing the results of our studies. Our approach has been to define argument schemes for use by human corpus annotators or for use in logic programs for argument mining. The third goal is to design useful computer applications based upon our studies, such as argument diagramming systems that provide argument schemes as building blocks. This paper describes each of the various projects: the methods, the argument schemes that were identified, and how they were used. Then a synthesis of the results is given with a discussion of open issues.

scholarly journals Achieving human and machine accessibility of cited data in scholarly publications

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joan Starr ◽  
Eleni Castro ◽  
Mercè Crosas ◽  
Michel Dumontier ◽  
Robert R. Downs ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Short Article ◽  
Joint Declaration ◽  
Cross Domain ◽  
Widespread Adoption ◽  
Scholarly Publications ◽  
Data Citation ◽  
Scholarly Data ◽  
Operational Guidance

This short article provides operational guidance on implementing scholarly data citation and data deposition, in conformance with the Joint Declaration of Data Citation Principles (JDDCP, http://force11.org/datacitation) to help achieve widespread, uniform human and machine accessibility of deposited data. The JDDCP is the outcome of a cross-domain effort to establish core principles around cited data in scholarly publications. It deals with important issues in identification, deposition, description, accessibility, persistence, and evidential status of cited data. Eighty-five scholarly, governmental, and funding institutions have now endorsed the JDDCP. The purpose of this article is to provide the necessary guidance for JDDCP-endorsing organizations to implement these principles and to achieve their widespread adoption.

scholarly journals Principles of open, transparent and reproducible science in author guidelines of sleep research and chronobiology journals

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 172
Author(s):  
Manuel Spitschan ◽  
Marlene H. Schmidt ◽  
Christine Blume
Keyword(s):  
Open Science ◽  
Scientific Process ◽  
Sleep Research ◽  
Citation Data ◽  
Science Practices ◽  
The Past ◽  
Data Citation ◽  
Recent Developments ◽  
Data Transparency ◽  
Different Levels

Background: "Open science" is an umbrella term describing various aspects of transparent and open science practices. The adoption of practices at different levels of the scientific process (e.g., individual researchers, laboratories, institutions) has been rapidly changing the scientific research landscape in the past years, but their uptake differs from discipline to discipline. Here, we asked to what extent journals in the field of sleep research and chronobiology encourage or even require following transparent and open science principles in their author guidelines. Methods: We scored the author guidelines of a comprehensive set of 27 sleep and chronobiology journals, including the major outlets in the field, using the standardised Transparency and Openness (TOP) Factor. The TOP Factor is a quantitative summary of the extent to which journals encourage or require following various aspects of open science, including data citation, data transparency, analysis code transparency, materials transparency, design and analysis guidelines, study pre-registration, analysis plan pre-registration, replication, registered reports, and the use of open science badges. Results: Across the 27 journals, we find low values on the TOP Factor (median [25 th, 75 th percentile] 3 [1, 3], min. 0, max. 9, out of a total possible score of 29) in sleep research and chronobiology journals. Conclusions: Our findings suggest an opportunity for sleep research and chronobiology journals to further support recent developments in transparent and open science by implementing transparency and openness principles in their author guidelines.

scholarly journals Reformasi dan keesaan gereja: Makna peristiwa 31 Oktober bagi Gereja Protestan dan Katolik masa kini

Kurios ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Agustinus M.L Batlajery
Keyword(s):  
Sixteenth Century ◽  
Martin Luther ◽  
Historical Event ◽  
Joint Declaration ◽  
Starting Point ◽  
The Future ◽  
To Come ◽  
Common Understanding ◽  
The Church ◽  
The Way

It has been well known that sixteenth century reformation of the church begun on Otober 31th 1517 when Martin Luther puted 95 theses at the gate of Wittenburg church. That is the beginning of reformation but also starting point of church separation and split. While on October 31th 1999 the Lutheran representative and the Catholic leader signed what is called Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification in which the Protestant and the Catholics show their common understanding on doctrine of justification. This event could be seen as an indication that unity among two churches is a possibility. So the first October 31th refers to reformation and separation but the second October 31th refers to unity. This article want to analize the meaning of these two events for the Protestants and Catholics in nowadays. Both churches can learn much from these important events for their present and future relationship. By analizing the meaning of the valuable historical event we can say that the way to come close to each other and to become one church in the future is open.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document