scholarly journals The domesticated brain: genetics of brain mass and brain structure in an avian species

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Henriksen ◽  
M. Johnsson ◽  
L. Andersson ◽  
P. Jensen ◽  
D. Wright
Keyword(s):  
Body Size ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
Brain Size ◽  
Large Body ◽  
Brain Regions ◽  
Population Variation ◽  
Wild Progenitor ◽  
Brain Mass ◽  
Evolutionary Studies ◽  
Selection For

ABSTRACTAs brain size usually increases with body size it has been assumed that the two are tightly constrained and evolutionary studies have therefore often been based on relative brain size (i.e. brain size proportional to body size) instead of absolute brain size. The process of domestication offers an excellent opportunity to disentangle the linkage between body and brain mass due to the extreme selection for increased body mass that has occurred. By breeding an intercross between domestic chicken and their wild progenitor, we address this relationship by simultaneously mapping the genes that control inter-population variation in brain mass and body mass. Loci controlling variation in brain mass and body mass have separate genetic architectures and are therefore not directly constrained. Genetic mapping of brain regions in the intercross indicates that domestication has led to a larger body mass and to a lesser extent a larger absolute brain mass in chickens, mainly due to enlargement of the cerebellum. Domestication has traditionally been linked to brain mass regression, based on measurements of relative brain mass, which confounds the large body mass augmentation due to domestication. Our results refute this concept in chicken and confirm recent studies that show that different genetic architectures underlie these traits.

scholarly journals Do Different Methods Yield Equivalent Estimations of Brain Size in Birds?

2020 ◽  
Vol 95 (2) ◽  
pp. 113-122
Author(s):  
Diego Ocampo ◽  
César Sánchez ◽  
Gilbert Barrantes
Keyword(s):  
Body Size ◽  
Brain Size ◽  
Brain Mass ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Evolutionary Studies ◽  
Relative Brain Size ◽  
Using Data ◽  
Endocranial Volume ◽  
The Brain ◽  
Size Estimates

The ratio of brain size to body size (relative brain size) is often used as a measure of relative investment in the brain in ecological and evolutionary studies on a wide range of animal groups. In birds, a variety of methods have been used to measure the brain size part of this ratio, including endocranial volume, fixed brain mass, and fresh brain mass. It is still unclear, however, whether these methods yield the same results. Using data obtained from fresh corpses and from published sources, this study shows that endocranial volume, mass of fixed brain tissue, and fresh mass provide equivalent estimations of brain size for 48 bird families, in 19 orders. We found, however, that the various methods yield significantly different brain size estimates for hummingbirds (Trochilidae). For hummingbirds, fixed brain mass tends to underestimate brain size due to reduced tissue density, whereas endocranial volume overestimates brain size because it includes a larger volume than that occupied by the brain.

scholarly journals Selection for reduced fear in red junglefowl changes brain composition and affects fear memory

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (8) ◽  
pp. 200628
Author(s):  
Rebecca Katajamaa ◽  
Per Jensen
Keyword(s):  
Body Size ◽  
Brain Size ◽  
Prior Experience ◽  
Fear Memory ◽  
Brain Regions ◽  
Preference Learning ◽  
Response To Selection ◽  
Red Junglefowl ◽  
Selection For ◽  
Region Size

Brain size reduction is a common trait in domesticated species when compared to wild conspecifics. This reduction can happen through changes in individual brain regions as a response to selection on specific behaviours. We selected red junglefowl for 10 generations for diverging levels of fear towards humans and measured brain size and composition as well as habituation learning and conditioned place preference learning in young chicks. Brain size relative to body size as well as brainstem region size relative to whole brain size were significantly smaller in chicks selected for low fear of humans compared to chicks selected for high fear of humans. However, when including allometric effects in the model, these differences disappear but a tendency towards larger cerebra in low-fear chickens remains. Low-fear line chicks habituated more effectively to a fearful stimulus with prior experience of that same stimulus, whereas high-fear line chicks with previous experience of the stimulus had a response similar to naive chicks. The phenotypical changes are in line with previously described effects of domestication.

scholarly journals Comparison of Dolphins' Body and Brain Measurements with Four Other Groups of Cetaceans Reveals Great Diversity

2016 ◽  
Vol 88 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 235-257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sam H. Ridgway ◽  
Kevin P. Carlin ◽  
Kaitlin R. Van Alstyne ◽  
Alicia C. Hanson ◽  
Raymond J. Tarpley
Keyword(s):  
Body Size ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
Body Length ◽  
Brain Volume ◽  
Brain Size ◽  
The Other ◽  
Vascular Networks ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Brain Mass ◽  
Endocranial Volume

We compared mature dolphins with 4 other groupings of mature cetaceans. With a large data set, we found great brain diversity among 5 different taxonomic groupings. The dolphins in our data set ranged in body mass from about 40 to 6,750 kg and in brain mass from 0.4 to 9.3 kg. Dolphin body length ranged from 1.3 to 7.6 m. In our combined data set from the 4 other groups of cetaceans, body mass ranged from about 20 to 120,000 kg and brain mass from about 0.2 to 9.2 kg, while body length varied from 1.21 to 26.8 m. Not all cetaceans have large brains relative to their body size. A few dolphins near human body size have human-sized brains. On the other hand, the absolute brain mass of some other cetaceans is only one-sixth as large. We found that brain volume relative to body mass decreases from Delphinidae to a group of Phocoenidae and Monodontidae, to a group of other odontocetes, to Balaenopteroidea, and finally to Balaenidae. We also found the same general trend when we compared brain volume relative to body length, except that the Delphinidae and Phocoenidae-Monodontidae groups do not differ significantly. The Balaenidae have the smallest relative brain mass and the lowest cerebral cortex surface area. Brain parts also vary. Relative to body mass and to body length, dolphins also have the largest cerebellums. Cortex surface area is isometric with brain size when we exclude the Balaenidae. Our data show that the brains of Balaenidae are less convoluted than those of the other cetaceans measured. Large vascular networks inside the cranial vault may help to maintain brain temperature, and these nonbrain tissues increase in volume with body mass and with body length ranging from 8 to 65% of the endocranial volume. Because endocranial vascular networks and other adnexa, such as the tentorium cerebelli, vary so much in different species, brain size measures from endocasts of some extinct cetaceans may be overestimates. Our regression of body length on endocranial adnexa might be used for better estimates of brain volume from endocasts or from endocranial volume of living species or extinct cetaceans.

scholarly journals Effect of Phenotype Selection on Genome Size Variation in Two Species of Diptera

Genes ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 218
Author(s):  
Carl E. Hjelmen ◽  
Jonathan J. Parrott ◽  
Satyam P. Srivastav ◽  
Alexander S. McGuane ◽  
Lisa L. Ellis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Body Size ◽  
Cell Count ◽  
Genome Size ◽  
Large Body ◽  
Population Variation ◽  
Phenotypic Traits ◽  
Stabilizing Selection ◽  
Large Body Size ◽  
Slow Development ◽  
Selection For

Genome size varies widely across organisms yet has not been found to be related to organismal complexity in eukaryotes. While there is no evidence for a relationship with complexity, there is evidence to suggest that other phenotypic characteristics, such as nucleus size and cell-cycle time, are associated with genome size, body size, and development rate. However, what is unknown is how the selection for divergent phenotypic traits may indirectly affect genome size. Drosophila melanogaster were selected for small and large body size for up to 220 generations, while Cochliomyia macellaria were selected for 32 generations for fast and slow development. Size in D. melanogaster significantly changed in terms of both cell-count and genome size in isolines, but only the cell-count changed in lines which were maintained at larger effective population sizes. Larger genome sizes only occurred in a subset of D. melanogaster isolines originated from flies selected for their large body size. Selection for development time did not change average genome size yet decreased the within-population variation in genome size with increasing generations of selection. This decrease in variation and convergence on a similar mean genome size was not in correspondence with phenotypic variation and suggests stabilizing selection on genome size in laboratory conditions.

scholarly journals Atmospheric Hypoxia Limits Selection for Large Body Size in Insects

PLoS ONE ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. e3876 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Jaco Klok ◽  
Jon F. Harrison
Keyword(s):  
Body Size ◽  
Large Body ◽  
Large Body Size ◽  
Selection For

scholarly journals Quantitative genetic analysis of brain size variation in sticklebacks: support for the mosaic model of brain evolution

2015 ◽  
Vol 282 (1810) ◽  
pp. 20151008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristina Noreikiene ◽  
Gábor Herczeg ◽  
Abigél Gonda ◽  
Gergely Balázs ◽  
Arild Husby ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Body Size ◽  
Brain Size ◽  
Additive Genetic Variance ◽  
Genetic Correlations ◽  
Relative Size ◽  
Strong Support ◽  
Brain Evolution ◽  
Brain Regions ◽  
Independent Evolution ◽  
Mosaic Model

The mosaic model of brain evolution postulates that different brain regions are relatively free to evolve independently from each other. Such independent evolution is possible only if genetic correlations among the different brain regions are less than unity. We estimated heritabilities, evolvabilities and genetic correlations of relative size of the brain, and its different regions in the three-spined stickleback ( Gasterosteus aculeatus ). We found that heritabilities were low (average h 2 = 0.24), suggesting a large plastic component to brain architecture. However, evolvabilities of different brain parts were moderate, suggesting the presence of additive genetic variance to sustain a response to selection in the long term. Genetic correlations among different brain regions were low (average r G = 0.40) and significantly less than unity. These results, along with those from analyses of phenotypic and genetic integration, indicate a high degree of independence between different brain regions, suggesting that responses to selection are unlikely to be severely constrained by genetic and phenotypic correlations. Hence, the results give strong support for the mosaic model of brain evolution. However, the genetic correlation between brain and body size was high ( r G = 0.89), suggesting a constraint for independent evolution of brain and body size in sticklebacks.

scholarly journals Brain size predicts problem-solving ability in mammalian carnivores

2016 ◽  
Vol 113 (9) ◽  
pp. 2532-2537 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Benson-Amram ◽  
Ben Dantzer ◽  
Gregory Stricker ◽  
Eli M. Swanson ◽  
Kay E. Holekamp
Keyword(s):  
Body Mass ◽  
Cognitive Abilities ◽  
Brain Size ◽  
Technical Problem ◽  
Behavioral Flexibility ◽  
Empirical Support ◽  
Brain Regions ◽  
Self Control ◽  
Invasion Success ◽  
The Relationship

Despite considerable interest in the forces shaping the relationship between brain size and cognitive abilities, it remains controversial whether larger-brained animals are, indeed, better problem-solvers. Recently, several comparative studies have revealed correlations between brain size and traits thought to require advanced cognitive abilities, such as innovation, behavioral flexibility, invasion success, and self-control. However, the general assumption that animals with larger brains have superior cognitive abilities has been heavily criticized, primarily because of the lack of experimental support for it. Here, we designed an experiment to inquire whether specific neuroanatomical or socioecological measures predict success at solving a novel technical problem among species in the mammalian order Carnivora. We presented puzzle boxes, baited with food and scaled to accommodate body size, to members of 39 carnivore species from nine families housed in multiple North American zoos. We found that species with larger brains relative to their body mass were more successful at opening the boxes. In a subset of species, we also used virtual brain endocasts to measure volumes of four gross brain regions and show that some of these regions improve model prediction of success at opening the boxes when included with total brain size and body mass. Socioecological variables, including measures of social complexity and manual dexterity, failed to predict success at opening the boxes. Our results, thus, fail to support the social brain hypothesis but provide important empirical support for the relationship between relative brain size and the ability to solve this novel technical problem.

scholarly journals Using relative brain size to better understand trophic interactions and phenotypic plasticity of invasive lionfish (Pterois volitans)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
McKenna Becker
Keyword(s):  
Body Mass ◽  
Brain Size ◽  
Predation Pressure ◽  
Mass Ratio ◽  
Pterois Volitans ◽  
Predator Prey ◽  
Brain Mass ◽  
Body Mass Ratio ◽  
Relative Brain Size ◽  
The Brain

AbstractPredator-prey dynamics provide critical insight into overall coral reef health. It has been shown that predator-prey relationships link the relative brain size of predators to their prey. Predation pressure forces prey to use decision-making skills that require higher cognition by inspecting and identifying predators and then adjusting their behavior to achieve the highest chance for survival. However, the predation pressure that prey face outweighs the pressure predators face to find prey, resulting in prey having larger relative brain sizes than their predators. There is little data on the relative brain size of fishes with few natural predators such as Pterois volitans. This study compared the brain mass to body mass ratio of Pterois volitans, which have very few natural predators and thus very little predation pressure, to the brain mass to body mass ratio of their prey, possible predators, competitors, and taxonomically similar fish. Lionfish had a significantly smaller relative brain size than their predators, prey, and competitors, but was not significantly smaller than taxonomically similar fish. These results demonstrate that the morphological anti-predator adaptation of venomous spines causes little predation pressure. Thus, lionfish do not use the same cognitive skills as other prey or predators and, in turn, have smaller relative brain sizes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document