scholarly journals Assembly of Long Error-Prone Reads Using de Bruijn Graphs

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu Lin ◽  
Jeffrey Yuan ◽  
Mikhail Kolmogorov ◽  
Max W. Shen ◽  
Pavel A. Pevzner
Keyword(s):  
Real Time ◽  
Single Molecule ◽  
Genome Assembly ◽  
State Of The Art ◽  
De Bruijn Graph ◽  
Consensus Approach ◽  
De Bruijn Graphs ◽  
De Bruijn

AbstractThe recent breakthroughs in assembling long error-prone reads (such as reads generated by Single Molecule Real Time technology) were based on the overlap-layout-consensus approach and did not utilize the strengths of the alternative de Bruijn graph approach to genome assembly. Moreover, these studies often assume that applications of the de Bruijn graph approach are limited to short and accurate reads and that the overlap-layout-consensus approach is the only practical paradigm for assembling long error-prone reads. Below we show how to generalize de Bruijn graphs to assemble long error-prone reads and describe the ABruijn assembler, which results in more accurate genome reconstructions than the existing state-of-the-art algorithms.

scholarly journals cloudSPAdes: assembly of synthetic long reads using de Bruijn graphs

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (14) ◽  
pp. i61-i70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ivan Tolstoganov ◽  
Anton Bankevich ◽  
Zhoutao Chen ◽  
Pavel A Pevzner
Keyword(s):  
Narrow Range ◽  
State Of The Art ◽  
Supplementary Information ◽  
De Bruijn Graph ◽  
Hybrid Assembly ◽  
De Bruijn Graphs ◽  
Long Reads ◽  
Long Read ◽  
De Bruijn ◽  
New Applications

Abstract Motivation The recently developed barcoding-based synthetic long read (SLR) technologies have already found many applications in genome assembly and analysis. However, although some new barcoding protocols are emerging and the range of SLR applications is being expanded, the existing SLR assemblers are optimized for a narrow range of parameters and are not easily extendable to new barcoding technologies and new applications such as metagenomics or hybrid assembly. Results We describe the algorithmic challenge of the SLR assembly and present a cloudSPAdes algorithm for SLR assembly that is based on analyzing the de Bruijn graph of SLRs. We benchmarked cloudSPAdes across various barcoding technologies/applications and demonstrated that it improves on the state-of-the-art SLR assemblers in accuracy and speed. Availability and implementation Source code and installation manual for cloudSPAdes are available at https://github.com/ablab/spades/releases/tag/cloudspades-paper. Supplementary Information Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

scholarly journals Assembly of Long Error-Prone Reads Using Repeat Graphs

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mikhail Kolmogorov ◽  
Jeffrey Yuan ◽  
Yu Lin ◽  
Pavel. A. Pevzner
Keyword(s):  
Single Molecule ◽  
State Of The Art ◽  
De Bruijn Graph ◽  
Single Molecule Sequencing ◽  
Short Read ◽  
Initial Stage ◽  
A Genome ◽  
De Bruijn ◽  
Initial Assembly

ABSTRACTThe problem of genome assembly is ultimately linked to the problem of the characterization of all repeat families in a genome as a repeat graph. The key reason the de Bruijn graph emerged as a popular short read assembly approach is because it offered an elegant representation of all repeats in a genome that reveals their mosaic structure. However, most algorithms for assembling long error-prone reads use an alternative overlap-layout-consensus (OLC) approach that does not provide a repeat characterization. We present the Flye algorithm for constructing the A-Bruijn (assembly) graph from long error-prone reads, that, in contrast to the k-mer-based de Bruijn graph, assembles genomes using an alignment-based A-Bruijn graph. In difference from existing assemblers, Flye does not attempt to construct accurate contigs (at least at the initial assembly stage) but instead simply generates arbitrary paths in the (unknown) assembly graph and further constructs an assembly graph from these paths. Counter-intuitively, this fast but seemingly reckless approach results in the same graph as the assembly graph constructed from accurate contigs. Flye constructs (overlapping) contigs with possible assembly errors at the initial stage, combines them into an accurate assembly graph, resolves repeats in the assembly graph using small variations between various repeat instances that were left unresolved during the initial assembly stage, constructs a new, less tangled assembly graph based on resolved repeats, and finally outputs accurate contigs as paths in this graph. We benchmark Flye against several state-of-the-art Single Molecule Sequencing assemblers and demonstrate that it generates better or comparable assemblies for all analyzed datasets.

scholarly journals Aligning optical maps to de Bruijn graphs

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (18) ◽  
pp. 3250-3256 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kingshuk Mukherjee ◽  
Bahar Alipanahi ◽  
Tamer Kahveci ◽  
Leena Salmela ◽  
Christina Boucher
Keyword(s):  
Single Molecule ◽  
Genome Assembly ◽  
Sequence Data ◽  
Supplementary Information ◽  
De Bruijn Graph ◽  
Structural Variations ◽  
Regular Feature ◽  
A Genome ◽  
De Bruijn ◽  
Optical Maps

Abstract Motivation Optical maps are high-resolution restriction maps (Rmaps) that give a unique numeric representation to a genome. Used in concert with sequence reads, they provide a useful tool for genome assembly and for discovering structural variations and rearrangements. Although they have been a regular feature of modern genome assembly projects, optical maps have been mainly used in post-processing step and not in the genome assembly process itself. Several methods have been proposed for pairwise alignment of single molecule optical maps—called Rmaps, or for aligning optical maps to assembled reads. However, the problem of aligning an Rmap to a graph representing the sequence data of the same genome has not been studied before. Such an alignment provides a mapping between two sets of data: optical maps and sequence data which will facilitate the usage of optical maps in the sequence assembly step itself. Results We define the problem of aligning an Rmap to a de Bruijn graph and present the first algorithm for solving this problem which is based on a seed-and-extend approach. We demonstrate that our method is capable of aligning 73% of Rmaps generated from the Escherichia coli genome to the de Bruijn graph constructed from short reads generated from the same genome. We validate the alignments and show that our method achieves an accuracy of 99.6%. We also show that our method scales to larger genomes. In particular, we show that 76% of Rmaps can be aligned to the de Bruijn graph in the case of human data. Availability and implementation The software for aligning optical maps to de Bruijn graph, omGraph is written in C++ and is publicly available under GNU General Public License at https://github.com/kingufl/omGraph. Supplementary information Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

scholarly journals Assembly of long error-prone reads using de Bruijn graphs

2016 ◽  
Vol 113 (52) ◽  
pp. E8396-E8405 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu Lin ◽  
Jeffrey Yuan ◽  
Mikhail Kolmogorov ◽  
Max W. Shen ◽  
Mark Chaisson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Genome Assembly ◽  
De Bruijn Graph ◽  
De Bruijn Graphs ◽  
De Bruijn

The recent breakthroughs in assembling long error-prone reads were based on the overlap-layout-consensus (OLC) approach and did not utilize the strengths of the alternative de Bruijn graph approach to genome assembly. Moreover, these studies often assume that applications of the de Bruijn graph approach are limited to short and accurate reads and that the OLC approach is the only practical paradigm for assembling long error-prone reads. We show how to generalize de Bruijn graphs for assembling long error-prone reads and describe the ABruijn assembler, which combines the de Bruijn graph and the OLC approaches and results in accurate genome reconstructions.

scholarly journals Fast and efficient Rmap assembly using the Bi-labelled de Bruijn graph

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kingshuk Mukherjee ◽  
Massimiliano Rossi ◽  
Leena Salmela ◽  
Christina Boucher
Keyword(s):  
Single Molecule ◽  
De Bruijn Graph ◽  
Anabas Testudineus ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Genome Wide ◽  
A Genome ◽  
De Bruijn ◽  
Optical Maps ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Numeric Representation

AbstractGenome wide optical maps are high resolution restriction maps that give a unique numeric representation to a genome. They are produced by assembling hundreds of thousands of single molecule optical maps, which are called Rmaps. Unfortunately, there are very few choices for assembling Rmap data. There exists only one publicly-available non-proprietary method for assembly and one proprietary software that is available via an executable. Furthermore, the publicly-available method, by Valouev et al. (Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103(43):15770–15775, 2006), follows the overlap-layout-consensus (OLC) paradigm, and therefore, is unable to scale for relatively large genomes. The algorithm behind the proprietary method, Bionano Genomics’ Solve, is largely unknown. In this paper, we extend the definition of bi-labels in the paired de Bruijn graph to the context of optical mapping data, and present the first de Bruijn graph based method for Rmap assembly. We implement our approach, which we refer to as rmapper, and compare its performance against the assembler of Valouev et al. (Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103(43):15770–15775, 2006) and Solve by Bionano Genomics on data from three genomes: E. coli, human, and climbing perch fish (Anabas Testudineus). Our method was able to successfully run on all three genomes. The method of Valouev et al. (Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103(43):15770–15775, 2006) only successfully ran on E. coli. Moreover, on the human genome rmapper was at least 130 times faster than Bionano Solve, used five times less memory and produced the highest genome fraction with zero mis-assemblies. Our software, rmapper is written in C++ and is publicly available under GNU General Public License at https://github.com/kingufl/Rmapper.

Improved Parallel Processing of Massive De Bruijn Graph for Genome Assembly

2013 ◽  
pp. 96-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Li Zeng ◽  
Jiefeng Cheng ◽  
Jintao Meng ◽  
Bingqiang Wang ◽  
Shengzhong Feng
Keyword(s):  
Parallel Processing ◽  
Genome Assembly ◽  
De Bruijn Graph ◽  
De Bruijn

scholarly journals Scalable Genome Assembly through Parallel de Bruijn Graph Construction for Multiple k-mers

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kanak Mahadik ◽  
Christopher Wright ◽  
Milind Kulkarni ◽  
Saurabh Bagchi ◽  
Somali Chaterji
Keyword(s):  
De Novo ◽  
De Bruijn Graph ◽  
High Quality ◽  
De Bruijn Graphs ◽  
Sequencing Technologies ◽  
De Bruijn ◽  
Similar Accuracy ◽  
Valued Graph ◽  
Assembly Algorithms ◽  
Level Parallelism

Abstract Remarkable advancements in high-throughput gene sequencing technologies have led to an exponential growth in the number of sequenced genomes. However, unavailability of highly parallel and scalable de novo assembly algorithms have hindered biologists attempting to swiftly assemble high-quality complex genomes. Popular de Bruijn graph assemblers, such as IDBA-UD, generate high-quality assemblies by iterating over a set of k-values used in the construction of de Bruijn graphs (DBG). However, this process of sequentially iterating from small to large k-values slows down the process of assembly. In this paper, we propose ScalaDBG, which metamorphoses this sequential process, building DBGs for each distinct k-value in parallel. We develop an innovative mechanism to “patch” a higher k-valued graph with contigs generated from a lower k-valued graph. Moreover, ScalaDBG leverages multi-level parallelism, by both scaling up on all cores of a node, and scaling out to multiple nodes simultaneously. We demonstrate that ScalaDBG completes assembling the genome faster than IDBA-UD, but with similar accuracy on a variety of datasets (6.8X faster for one of the most complex genome in our dataset).

scholarly journals Accurate determination of node and arc multiplicities in de bruijn graphs using conditional random fields

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Aranka Steyaert ◽  
Pieter Audenaert ◽  
Jan Fostier
Keyword(s):  
Genomic Sequence ◽  
Conditional Random Field ◽  
Accurate Determination ◽  
Next Generation Sequencing Data ◽  
De Bruijn Graph ◽  
Sequencing Data ◽  
De Bruijn Graphs ◽  
Sequencing Errors ◽  
Expectation Maximisation ◽  
De Bruijn

Abstract Background De Bruijn graphs are key data structures for the analysis of next-generation sequencing data. They efficiently represent the overlap between reads and hence, also the underlying genome sequence. However, sequencing errors and repeated subsequences render the identification of the true underlying sequence difficult. A key step in this process is the inference of the multiplicities of nodes and arcs in the graph. These multiplicities correspond to the number of times each k-mer (resp. k+1-mer) implied by a node (resp. arc) is present in the genomic sequence. Determining multiplicities thus reveals the repeat structure and presence of sequencing errors. Multiplicities of nodes/arcs in the de Bruijn graph are reflected in their coverage, however, coverage variability and coverage biases render their determination ambiguous. Current methods to determine node/arc multiplicities base their decisions solely on the information in nodes and arcs individually, under-utilising the information present in the sequencing data. Results To improve the accuracy with which node and arc multiplicities in a de Bruijn graph are inferred, we developed a conditional random field (CRF) model to efficiently combine the coverage information within each node/arc individually with the information of surrounding nodes and arcs. Multiplicities are thus collectively assigned in a more consistent manner. Conclusions We demonstrate that the CRF model yields significant improvements in accuracy and a more robust expectation-maximisation parameter estimation. True k-mers can be distinguished from erroneous k-mers with a higher F1 score than existing methods. A C++11 implementation is available at https://github.com/biointec/detoxunder the GNU AGPL v3.0 license.

scholarly journals How to apply de Bruijn graphs to genome assembly

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (11) ◽  
pp. 987-991 ◽  
Author(s):  
Phillip E C Compeau ◽  
Pavel A Pevzner ◽  
Glenn Tesler
Keyword(s):  
Genome Assembly ◽  
De Bruijn Graphs ◽  
De Bruijn
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document