A Perspective on Interaction Tests in Genetic Association Studies

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hugues Aschard

The identification of gene-gene and gene-environment interaction in human traits and diseases is an active area of research that generates high expectation, and most often lead to high disappointment. This is partly explained by a misunderstanding of some of the inherent characteristics of interaction effects. Here, I untangle several theoretical aspects of standard regression-based interaction tests in genetic association studies. In particular, I discuss variables coding scheme, interpretation of effect estimate, power, and estimation of variance explained in regard of various hypothetical interaction patterns. I show first that the simplest biological interaction models—in which the magnitude of a genetic effect depends on a common exposure—are among the most difficult to identify. Then, I demonstrate the demerits of the current strategy to evaluate the contribution of interaction effects to the variance of quantitative outcomes and argue for the use of new approaches to overcome these issues. Finally I explore the advantages and limitations of multivariate models when testing for interaction between multiple SNPs and/or multiple exposures, using either a joint test, or a test of interaction based on risk score. Theoretical and simulated examples presented along the manuscript demonstrate that the application of these methods can provide a new perspective on the role of interaction in multifactorial traits.

BMC Genetics ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Qihua Tan ◽  
Lene Christiansen ◽  
Charlotte Brasch-Andersen ◽  
Jing Hua Zhao ◽  
Shuxia Li ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 39 (5) ◽  
pp. 366-375 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Alaine Broadaway ◽  
Richard Duncan ◽  
Karen N. Conneely ◽  
Lynn M. Almli ◽  
Bekh Bradley ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 360 (1460) ◽  
pp. 1609-1616 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Kraft ◽  
David Hunter

Recent advances in human genomics have made it possible to better understand the genetic basis of disease. In addition, genetic association studies can also elucidate the mechanisms by which ‘non-genetic’ exogenous and endogenous exposures influence the risk of disease. This is true both of studies that assess the marginal effect of a single gene and studies that look at the joint effect of genes and environmental exposures. For example, gene variants that are known to alter enzyme function or level can serve as surrogates for long-term biomarker levels that are impractical or impossible to measure on many subjects. Evidence that genetic variants modify the effect of an established risk factor may help specify the risk factor's biologically active components. We illustrate these ideas with several examples and discuss design and analysis challenges, particularly for studies of gene–environment interaction. We argue that to increase the power to detect interaction effects and limit the number of false positive results, large sample sizes will be needed, which are currently only available through planned collaborative efforts. Such collaborations also ensure a common approach to measuring variation at a genetic locus, avoiding a problem that has led to difficulties when comparing results from genetic association studies.


2019 ◽  
Vol 84 (6) ◽  
pp. 256-271 ◽  
Author(s):  
Camille M. Moore ◽  
Sean A. Jacobson ◽  
Tasha E. Fingerlin

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> When analyzing data from large-scale genetic association studies, such as targeted or genome-wide resequencing studies, it is common to assume a single genetic model, such as dominant or additive, for all tests of association between a given genetic variant and the phenotype. However, for many variants, the chosen model will result in poor model fit and may lack statistical power due to model misspecification. <b><i>Objective:</i></b> We develop power and sample size calculations for tests of gene and gene × environment interaction, allowing for misspecification of the true mode of genetic susceptibility. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> The power calculations are based on a likelihood ratio test framework and are implemented in an open-source R package (“genpwr”). <b><i>Results:</i></b> We use these methods to develop an analysis plan for a resequencing study in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and show that using a 2-degree of freedom test can increase power to detect recessive genetic effects while maintaining power to detect dominant and additive effects. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Understanding the impact of model misspecification can aid in study design and developing analysis plans that maximize power to detect a range of true underlying genetic effects. In particular, these calculations help identify when a multiple degree of freedom test or other robust test of association may be advantageous.


2008 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 285-300 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhaogong Zhang ◽  
Shuanglin Zhang ◽  
Man-Yu Wong ◽  
Nicholas J. Wareham ◽  
Qiuying Sha

2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Vicente Gallego ◽  
M. Luz Calle ◽  
Ramon Oller

Abstract The identification of genetic variants that are associated with disease risk is an important goal of genetic association studies. Standard approaches perform univariate analysis where each genetic variant, usually Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs), is tested for association with disease status. Though many genetic variants have been identified and validated so far using this univariate approach, for most complex diseases a large part of their genetic component is still unknown, the so called missing heritability. We propose a Kernel-based measure of variable importance (KVI) that provides the contribution of a SNP, or a group of SNPs, to the joint genetic effect of a set of genetic variants. KVI can be used for ranking genetic markers individually, sets of markers that form blocks of linkage disequilibrium or sets of genetic variants that lie in a gene or a genetic pathway. We prove that, unlike the univariate analysis, KVI captures the relationship with other genetic variants in the analysis, even when measured at the individual level for each genetic variable separately. This is specially relevant and powerful for detecting genetic interactions. We illustrate the results with data from an Alzheimer’s disease study and show through simulations that the rankings based on KVI improve those rankings based on two measures of importance provided by the Random Forest. We also prove with a simulation study that KVI is very powerful for detecting genetic interactions.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin K. Esoh ◽  
Tobias O. Apinjoh ◽  
Steven G. Nyanjom ◽  
Ambroise Wonkam ◽  
Emile R. Chimusa ◽  
...  

AbstractInferences from genetic association studies rely largely on the definition and description of the underlying populations that highlight their genetic similarities and differences. The clustering of human populations into subgroups (population structure) can significantly confound disease associations. This study investigated the fine-scale genetic structure within Cameroon that may underlie disparities observed with Cameroonian ethnicities in malaria genome-wide association studies in sub-Saharan Africa. Genotype data of 1073 individuals from three regions and three ethnic groups in Cameroon were analyzed using measures of genetic proximity to ascertain fine-scale genetic structure. Model-based clustering revealed distinct ancestral proportions among the Bantu, Semi-Bantu and Foulbe ethnic groups, while haplotype-based coancestry estimation revealed possible longstanding and ongoing sympatric differentiation among individuals of the Foulbe ethnic group, and their Bantu and Semi-Bantu counterparts. A genome scan found strong selection signatures in the HLA gene region, confirming longstanding knowledge of natural selection on this genomic region in African populations following immense disease pressure. Signatures of selection were also observed in the HBB gene cluster, a genomic region known to be under strong balancing selection in sub-Saharan Africa due to its co-evolution with malaria. This study further supports the role of evolution in shaping genomes of Cameroonian populations and reveals fine-scale hierarchical structure among and within Cameroonian ethnicities that may impact genetic association studies in the country.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document