scholarly journals Sequence-based model of gap gene regulatory network

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Konstantin N Kozlov ◽  
Vitaly V Gursky ◽  
Ivan V Kulakovskiy ◽  
Maria G Samsonova
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Gene Network ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Gene Expression Patterns ◽  
Model Output ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Gap Gene ◽  
Gene Regulatory

Background: The detailed analysis of transcriptional regulation is crucially important for understanding biological processes. The gap gene network in Drosophila attracts large interest among researches studying mechanisms of transcriptional regulation. It implements the most upstream regulatory layer of the segmentation gene network. The knowledge of molecular mechanisms involved in gap gene regulation is far less complete than that of genetics of the system. Mathematical modeling goes beyond insights gained by genetics and molecular approaches. It allows us to reconstruct wild-type gene expression patterns in silico, infer underlying regulatory mechanism and prove its sufficiency. Results: We developed a new model that provides a dynamical description of gap gene regulatory systems, using detailed DNA-based information, as well as spatial transcription factor concentration data at varying time points. We showed that this model correctly reproduces gap gene expression patterns in wild type embryos and is able to predict gap expression patterns in Kr mutants and four reporter constructs. We used four-fold cross validation test and fitting to random dataset to validate the model and proof its sufficiency in data description. The identifiability analysis showed that most model parameters are well identifiable. We reconstructed the gap gene network topology and studied the impact of individual transcription factor binding sites on the model output. We measured this impact by calculating the site regulatory weight as a normalized difference between the residual sum of squares error for the set of all annotated sites and the set, from which the site of interest was left out. Conclusions: The reconstructed topology of the gap gene network is in agreement with previous modeling results and data from literature. We showed that 1) the regulatory weights of transcription factor binding sites show very weak correlation with their PWM score; 2) sites with low regulatory weight are important for the model output; 3) functional important sites are not exclusively located in cis-regulatory elements, but are rather dispersed through regulatory region. It is of importance that some of the sites with high functional impact in hb, Kr and kni regulatory regions coincide with strong sites annotated and verified in Dnase I footprint assays. Keywords: transcription; thermodynamics; reaction-diffusion; drosophila

Abstract 1086: CTNNB1-mutated desmoid tumors have different gene expression patterns compared to wild-type ones

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chiara Colombo ◽  
Loris De Cecco ◽  
Antonino Belfiore ◽  
Silvana Canevari ◽  
Marco Fiore ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Gene Expression Patterns ◽  
Desmoid Tumors ◽  
Wild Type

scholarly journals A single cell brain atlas in human Alzheimer’s disease

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandra Grubman ◽  
Gabriel Chew ◽  
John F. Ouyang ◽  
Guizhi Sun ◽  
Xin Yi Choo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Single Cell ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Gene Expression Patterns ◽  
Cell Type ◽  
Web Resource ◽  
Cell Type Specific

AbstractAlzheimer’s disease (AD) is a heterogeneous disease that is largely dependent on the complex cellular microenvironment in the brain. This complexity impedes our understanding of how individual cell types contribute to disease progression and outcome. To characterize the molecular and functional cell diversity in the human AD brain we utilized single nuclei RNA- seq in AD and control patient brains in order to map the landscape of cellular heterogeneity in AD. We detail gene expression changes at the level of cells and cell subclusters, highlighting specific cellular contributions to global gene expression patterns between control and Alzheimer’s patient brains. We observed distinct cellular regulation of APOE which was repressed in oligodendrocyte progenitor cells (OPCs) and astrocyte AD subclusters, and highly enriched in a microglial AD subcluster. In addition, oligodendrocyte and microglia AD subclusters show discordant expression of APOE. Integration of transcription factor regulatory modules with downstream GWAS gene targets revealed subcluster-specific control of AD cell fate transitions. For example, this analysis uncovered that astrocyte diversity in AD was under the control of transcription factor EB (TFEB), a master regulator of lysosomal function and which initiated a regulatory cascade containing multiple AD GWAS genes. These results establish functional links between specific cellular sub-populations in AD, and provide new insights into the coordinated control of AD GWAS genes and their cell-type specific contribution to disease susceptibility. Finally, we created an interactive reference web resource which will facilitate brain and AD researchers to explore the molecular architecture of subtype and AD-specific cell identity, molecular and functional diversity at the single cell level.HighlightsWe generated the first human single cell transcriptome in AD patient brainsOur study unveiled 9 clusters of cell-type specific and common gene expression patterns between control and AD brains, including clusters of genes that present properties of different cell types (i.e. astrocytes and oligodendrocytes)Our analyses also uncovered functionally specialized sub-cellular clusters: 5 microglial clusters, 8 astrocyte clusters, 6 neuronal clusters, 6 oligodendrocyte clusters, 4 OPC and 2 endothelial clusters, each enriched for specific ontological gene categoriesOur analyses found manifold AD GWAS genes specifically associated with one cell-type, and sets of AD GWAS genes co-ordinately and differentially regulated between different brain cell-types in AD sub-cellular clustersWe mapped the regulatory landscape driving transcriptional changes in AD brain, and identified transcription factor networks which we predict to control cell fate transitions between control and AD sub-cellular clustersFinally, we provide an interactive web-resource that allows the user to further visualise and interrogate our dataset.Data resource web interface:http://adsn.ddnetbio.com

scholarly journals Refining interaction search through signed iterative Random Forests

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karl Kumbier ◽  
Sumanta Basu ◽  
James B. Brown ◽  
Susan Celniker ◽  
Bin Yu
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Random Forests ◽  
Predictive Accuracy ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
High Order ◽  
Gene Expression Patterns ◽  
Enhancer Activity ◽  
Gap Gene ◽  
Strength Of Interaction ◽  
Interacting Features

AbstractAdvances in supervised learning have enabled accurate prediction in biological systems governed by complex interactions among biomolecules. However, state-of-the-art predictive algorithms are typically “black-boxes,” learning statistical interactions that are difficult to translate into testable hypotheses. The iterative Random Forest (iRF) algorithm took a step towards bridging this gap by providing a computationally tractable procedure to identify the stable, high-order feature interactions that drive the predictive accuracy of Random Forests (RF). Here we refine the interactions identified by iRF to explicitly map responses as a function of interacting features. Our method, signed iRF (s-iRF), describes “subsets” of rules that frequently occur on RF decision paths. We refer to these “rule subsets” as signed interactions. Signed interactions share not only the same set of interacting features but also exhibit similar thresholding behavior, and thus describe a consistent functional relationship between interacting features and responses. We describe stable and predictive importance metrics (SPIMs) to rank signed interactions in terms of their stability, predictive accuracy, and strength of interaction. For each SPIM, we define null importance metrics that characterize its expected behavior under known structure. We evaluate our proposed approach in biologically inspired simulations and two case studies: predicting enhancer activity and spatial gene expression patterns. In the case of enhancer activity, s-iRF recovers one of the few experimentally validated high-order interactions and suggests novel enhancer elements where this interaction may be active. In the case of spatial gene expression patterns, s-iRF recovers all 11 reported links in the gap gene network. By refining the process of interaction recovery, our approach has the potential to guide mechanistic inquiry into systems whose scale and complexity is beyond human comprehension.

scholarly journals Identification of key tissue-specific, biological processes by integrating enhancer information in maize gene regulatory networks

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maud Fagny ◽  
Marieke Lydia Kuijjer ◽  
Maike Stam ◽  
Johann Joets ◽  
Olivier Turc ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Regulatory Network ◽  
Tissue Specificity ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Tissue Specific ◽  
Genome Wide ◽  
Gene Regulatory

AbstractEnhancers are important regulators of gene expression during numerous crucial processes including tissue differentiation across development. In plants, their recent molecular characterization revealed their capacity to activate the expression of several target genes through the binding of transcription factors. Nevertheless, identifying these target genes at a genome-wide level remains a challenge, in particular in species with large genomes, where enhancers and target genes can be hundreds of kilobases away. Therefore, the contribution of enhancers to regulatory network is still poorly understood in plants. In this study, we investigate the enhancer-driven regulatory network of two maize tissues at different stages: leaves at seedling stage and husks (bracts) at flowering. Using a systems biology approach, we integrate genomic, epigenomic and transcriptomic data to model the regulatory relationship between transcription factors and their potential target genes. We identify regulatory modules specific to husk and V2-IST, and show that they are involved in distinct functions related to the biology of each tissue. We evidence enhancers exhibiting binding sites for two distinct transcription factor families (DOF and AP2/ERF) that drive the tissue-specificity of gene expression in seedling immature leaf and husk. Analysis of the corresponding enhancer sequences reveals that two different transposable element families (TIR transposon Mutator and MITE Pif/Harbinger) have shaped the regulatory network in each tissue, and that MITEs have provided new transcription factor binding sites that are involved in husk tissue-specificity.SignificanceEnhancers play a major role in regulating tissue-specific gene expression in higher eukaryotes, including angiosperms. While molecular characterization of enhancers has improved over the past years, identifying their target genes at the genome-wide scale remains challenging. Here, we integrate genomic, epigenomic and transcriptomic data to decipher the tissue-specific gene regulatory network controlled by enhancers at two different stages of maize leaf development. Using a systems biology approach, we identify transcription factor families regulating gene tissue-specific expression in husk and seedling leaves, and characterize the enhancers likely to be involved. We show that a large part of maize enhancers is derived from transposable elements, which can provide novel transcription factor binding sites crucial to the regulation of tissue-specific biological functions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document