scholarly journals Robotic-Assisted Surgery for Benign Urological Conditions

2006 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 2573-2580 ◽  
Author(s):  
Declan G. Murphy ◽  
Ben J. Challacombe ◽  
Lail-U-Mah Zaheer ◽  
M. Shamim Khan ◽  
Prokar Dasgupta
Keyword(s):  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Da Vinci ◽  
Robotic Assistance ◽  
Robotic Technology ◽  
Robotic Assisted ◽  
The Past ◽  
Robotic Assisted Surgery ◽  
Urological Procedures ◽  
Robotic Assisted Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Surgical System

Robotic technology for use in surgery has advanced considerably in the past 10 years. This has become particularly apparent in urology where robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy using the da VinciTMsurgical system (Intuitive Surgical, CA) has become very popular. The use of robotic assistance for benign urological procedures is less well documented. This article considers the current robotic technology and reviews the situation with regard to robotic surgery for benign urological conditions.

228 Console-integrated stereoscopic OsiriX 3D volume-rendered images for da Vinci S robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy

2013 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. e228-e229
Author(s):  
Y. Shiga ◽  
M. Sugimoto ◽  
S. Minagawa ◽  
H. Morikawa ◽  
S. Okada ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Da Vinci ◽  
Robotic Assisted ◽  
Robotic Assisted Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
3D Volume

Robotic-Assisted Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy (RAMIE) with a Standardized Intrathoracic Circular End-to-side Stapled Anastomosis and a Team of Two (Surgeon and Assistant Only)

2017 ◽  
Vol 66 (05) ◽  
pp. 404-406 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edin Hadzijusufovic ◽  
Hauke Lang ◽  
Peter Grimminger
Keyword(s):  
Da Vinci ◽  
Minimal Invasive ◽  
Operation Technique ◽  
Da Vinci Xi ◽  
Ivor Lewis ◽  
Robotic Assisted ◽  
Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy ◽  
The Past ◽  
Robotic Assisted Surgery

AbstractRobotic-assisted surgery is rapidly increasing, especially in general surgery. It has been shown for years that the minimal invasive esophagectomy (MIE) is possible using a robotic system, for example, da Vinci Xi, Intuitive Surgical. In the past, most robotic esophageal resections have been performed thoracoscopically, and the anastomosis was mostly sutured at the neck. Due to the increase of usable instruments and technical progress, it is possible to perform the total abdominothoracic esophagectomy with an intrathoracic sutured anastomosis robotically. In this article, we would like to present the standardized operation technique and tricks for the robotic-assisted (da Vinci Xi) Ivor Lewis MIE (RAMIE), especially the robotic technique in combination with a standardized intrathoracic circular end-to-side stapled esophagogastric anastomosis.

scholarly journals P105 Robosurgeons vs. robosceptics’: can we afford robotic technology or can we afford not to?

BJS Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jasmesh Sandhu ◽  
Jasmesh Sandhu
Keyword(s):  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
High Volume ◽  
Robotic Prostatectomy ◽  
Robotic Technology ◽  
Robotic Training ◽  
Robotic Assisted ◽  
Open Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Robotic Assisted Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
The Cost

Abstract Aim To investigate the cost-effectiveness of robotic technology in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy in comparison with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open radical prostatectomy. Methods The British Association of Urology Surgeons database (2014–2016) and Cancer Research UK (2012–2014) were accessed in conjunction with media; keywords included: ‘Da Vinci’, ‘first robotic prostatectomy’, ‘hospital’ to estimate the cost-effectiveness of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy in the National Health Service. Results Approximately 12/43 (27.9%) centres achieved 150 robotic-assisted radical prostatectomies per year while 26/43 (60.4%) centres have managed to meet 100 robotic-assisted radical prostatectomies per year in 2014–2016. A national mean of 120–130 robotic-assisted radical prostatectomies per year for 2014–2016 was estimated. Conclusion The cost of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy is adequately justified if a high volume of surgeries (>150) are performed in high volume centres by high volume experienced surgeons per year. This can be achieved by subsidising the cost of robotic technology, centralisation and establishing robotic training centres.

Single‐port versus multiport robotic‐assisted radical prostatectomy: A systematic review and meta‐analysis on the da Vinci SP platform

The Prostate ◽  
2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Eugenio Hinojosa‐Gonzalez ◽  
Andres Roblesgil‐Medrano ◽  
Mauricio Torres‐Martinez ◽  
Cordelia Alanis‐Garza ◽  
Ricardo J. Estrada‐Mendizabal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Da Vinci ◽  
Single Port ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Robotic Assisted ◽  
Robotic Assisted Radical Prostatectomy

scholarly journals Robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: a different treatment for prostate cancer?

2010 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 381-382
Author(s):  
Alexandre Den Julio ◽  
Thomas Edward Ahlering ◽  
Fernando Korkes ◽  
Antonio Correa Lopes Neto ◽  
Marcos Tobias-Machado ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Scientific Evidence ◽  
Daily Practice ◽  
Public Healthcare ◽  
Robotic Technology ◽  
Robotic Assisted ◽  
Public Investments ◽  
Robotic Assisted Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Over Time

ABSTRACT Considering the Health Care System in Brazil, a developing country, and public healthcare policies, robotic surgery is a reality to very few citizens. Therefore, robotic assisted radical prostatectomy is far removed from the daily practice of the vast majority of Brazilian urologists. Scientific evidence of the superiority of robotic assisted radical prostatectomy does not presently justify public investments for widespread development of robotic centers. Maybe over time and with reductions in costs, robotic technology will become a more established practice, as observed in other countries, and more feasible for the Brazilian urological community.

Trends in the adoption of robotic technology in the surgical management of prostate cancer: A population-based analysis.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (5_suppl) ◽  
pp. 258-258
Author(s):  
Steven Lee Chang ◽  
Wei Jiang ◽  
Benjamin I. Chung
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Robotic Surgery ◽  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Surgical Management ◽  
Da Vinci ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Da Vinci Surgical System ◽  
Robotic Technology ◽  
Vinci Surgical System ◽  
Surgical System

258 Background: The adoption of the da Vinci Surgical System (Intuitive Surgical, Inc) for robotic surgery requires a substantial financial investment by hospitals, acquisition of new surgical skills by surgeons, and demand from patients. Although the benefits of this technology have been previously described, the prevalence and adoption rate for the treatment of prostate cancer is not currently known. We performed a population-based analysis to determine how the introduction of robotic technology has altered the surgical management of prostate cancer. Methods: We analyzed patient-level data from the Prospective Rx Comparative Database (Premier, Inc., Charlotte, NC), which collects data from over 600 non-federal hospitals throughout the United States. We captured all men who underwent a radical prostatectomy between January 1, 2003, and December 31, 2010, based on the International Classification of Disease, 9th edition. Radical prostatectomies utilizing the da Vinci Surgical System were identified by a detailed review of the hospital charge data. Descriptive analysis with univariate and multivariate statistical analyses were performed. Results: Prior to 2006, <10% of radical prostatectomies were performed with robotic surgery. Beginning in 2006 there was a rapid rise in adoption reaching 56% utilization in 2009 and leveling off in 2010 to 54%. Adjusted analysis demonstrated that the odds of adopting robotic surgery were higher in teaching hospital (odds ratio [OR] 1.45, p<0.001) and hospitals in the Northeast (vs Midwest [OR 2.99, p<0.001]). Smaller hospitals (<200 beds) had a lower likelihood of adopting robotic surgery (OR 0.4, p<0.001). Patient age had no impact on the odds of undergoing robotic radical prostatectomy. Conclusions: Over past 5 years, there has been widespread adoption of robotic surgery in the management of prostate cancer now with just over half of procedures performed with the da Vinci Surgical System. Our analysis suggests that the adoption of robotic surgery has been determined primarily by the acquisition of this technology by hospitals, which was more common in teaching institutions, larger hospitals, and hospitals in the Northeast.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document