scholarly journals Transcriptional regulation of the Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans ygiW–qseBC operon by QseB and integration host factor proteins

Microbiology ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 160 (12) ◽  
pp. 2583-2594 ◽  
Author(s):  
María Dolores Juárez-Rodríguez ◽  
Ascención Torres-Escobar ◽  
Donald R. Demuth
Keyword(s):  
Response Regulator ◽  
Direct Repeat ◽  
Aggregatibacter Actinomycetemcomitans ◽  
Single Copy ◽  
Repeat Sequence ◽  
Integration Host Factor ◽  
Host Factor ◽  
Negative Regulator ◽  
Mobility Shift ◽  
Biofilm Growth

The QseBC two-component system plays a pivotal role in regulating virulence and biofilm growth of the oral pathogen Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans. We previously showed that QseBC autoregulates the ygiW–qseBC operon. In this study, we characterized the promoter that drives ygiW–qseBC expression. Using lacZ transcriptional fusion constructs and 5′-rapid amplification of cDNA ends, we showed that ygiW–qseBC expression is driven by a promoter that initiates transcription 53 bases upstream of ygiW and identified putative cis-acting promoter elements, whose function was confirmed using site-specific mutagenesis. Using electrophoretic mobility shift assays, two trans-acting proteins were shown to interact with the ygiW–qseBC promoter. The QseB response regulator bound to probes containing the direct repeat sequence CTTAA-N6-CTTAA, where the CTTAA repeats flank the −35 element of the promoter. The ygiW–qseBC expression could not be detected in A. actinomycetemcomitans ΔqseB or ΔqseBC strains, but was restored to WT levels in the ΔqseBC mutant when complemented by single copy chromosomal insertion of qseBC. Interestingly, qseB partially complemented the ΔqseBC strain, suggesting that QseB could be activated in the absence of QseC. QseB activation required its phosphorylation since complementation did not occur using qseB pho−, encoding a protein with the active site aspartate substituted with alanine. These results suggest that QseB is a strong positive regulator of ygiW–qseBC expression. In addition, integration host factor (IHF) bound to two sites in the promoter region and an additional site near the 5′ end of the ygiW ORF. The expression of ygiW–qseBC was increased by twofold in ΔihfA and ΔihfB strains of A. actinomycetemcomitans, suggesting that IHF is a negative regulator of the ygiW–qseBC operon.

scholarly journals The Escherichia coli K-12 NarL and NarP Proteins Insulate the nrf Promoter from the Effects of Integration Host Factor

2006 ◽  
Vol 188 (21) ◽  
pp. 7449-7456 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas F. Browning ◽  
David J. Lee ◽  
Alan J. Wolfe ◽  
Jeffrey A. Cole ◽  
Stephen J. W. Busby
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Response Regulator ◽  
Regulatory Region ◽  
Enteric Bacteria ◽  
Integration Host Factor ◽  
Host Factor ◽  
Receptor Protein ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Serovar Typhimurium ◽  
K 12

ABSTRACT The Escherichia coli K-12 nrf operon promoter can be activated fully by the FNR protein (regulator of fumarate and nitrate reduction) binding to a site centered at position −41.5. FNR-dependent transcription is suppressed by integration host factor (IHF) binding at position −54, and this suppression is counteracted by binding of the NarL or NarP response regulator at position −74.5. The E. coli acs gene is transcribed from a divergent promoter upstream from the nrf operon promoter. Transcription from the major acsP2 promoter is dependent on the cyclic AMP receptor protein and is modulated by IHF and Fis binding at multiple sites. We show that IHF binding to one of these sites, located at position −127 with respect to the nrf promoter, has a positive effect on nrf promoter activity. This activation is dependent on the face of the DNA helix, independent of IHF binding at other locations, and found only when NarL/NarP are not bound at position −74.5. Binding of NarL/NarP appears to insulate the nrf promoter from the effects of IHF. The acs-nrf regulatory region is conserved in other pathogenic E. coli strains and related enteric bacteria but differs in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium.

scholarly journals Integration Host Factor Positively Regulates Virulence Gene Expression in Vibrio cholerae

2008 ◽  
Vol 190 (13) ◽  
pp. 4736-4748 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily Stonehouse ◽  
Gabriela Kovacikova ◽  
Ronald K. Taylor ◽  
Karen Skorupski
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Vibrio Cholerae ◽  
Virulence Gene ◽  
Toxin Production ◽  
Dnase I ◽  
Integration Host Factor ◽  
Host Factor ◽  
Mobility Shift ◽  
Virulence Gene Expression ◽  
Dnase I Footprinting

ABSTRACT Virulence gene expression in Vibrio cholerae is dependent upon a complex transcriptional cascade that is influenced by both specific and global regulators in response to environmental stimuli. Here, we report that the global regulator integration host factor (IHF) positively affects virulence gene expression in V. cholerae. Inactivation of ihfA and ihfB, the genes encoding the IHF subunits, decreased the expression levels of the two main virulence factors tcpA and ctx and prevented toxin-coregulated pilus and cholera toxin production. IHF was found to directly bind to and bend the tcpA promoter region at an IHF consensus site centered at position −162 by using gel mobility shift assays and DNase I footprinting experiments. Deletion or mutation of the tcpA IHF consensus site resulted in the loss of IHF binding and additionally disrupted the binding of the repressor H-NS. DNase I footprinting revealed that H-NS protection overlaps with both the IHF and the ToxT binding sites at the tcpA promoter. In addition, disruption of ihfA in an hns or toxT mutant background had no effect on tcpA expression. These results suggest that IHF may function at the tcpA promoter to alleviate H-NS repression.

scholarly journals Control of Enzyme IIscr and Sucrose-6-Phosphate Hydrolase Activities in Streptococcus mutans by Transcriptional Repressor ScrR Binding to the cis-Active Determinants of the scr Regulon

2003 ◽  
Vol 185 (19) ◽  
pp. 5791-5799 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bing Wang ◽  
Howard K. Kuramitsu
Keyword(s):  
Streptococcus Mutans ◽  
Transcriptional Repressor ◽  
Direct Repeat ◽  
Dnase I ◽  
Repeat Sequence ◽  
Promoter Regions ◽  
Mobility Shift ◽  
Promoter Sequences ◽  
In The Wild ◽  
Dna Binding Properties

ABSTRACT In Streptococcus mutans, enzyme IIscr and sucrose-6-phosphate hydrolase are two important enzymes in the transport and metabolism of dietary sucrose. The scr regulon of S. mutans is composed of three genes, scrA and scrB, which code for enzyme IIscr and sucrose-6-phosphate hydrolase, respectively, and scrR, which codes for a GalR-LacI-type transcription regulator. It was previously shown that expression of both scrA and scrB is similarly induced by sucrose. Mutation in the scrR gene resulted in increased expression of scrB relative to that in the wild-type strain. In this study, we employed DNA mobility shift and DNase I protection assays with a purified ScrR-histidine tag fusion protein to examine the DNA binding properties of ScrR to the promoter regions of the scrA and scrB genes. The results showed that ScrR bound specifically to the promoter regions of both scrA and scrB. Two regions with high affinity for ScrR in the promoter sequences of the scrA and scrB genes were identified by DNase I protection assays. One, O C, which includes a 20-bp imperfect inverted-repeat sequence, is located between the two promoters, and the other, O B, is located within the scrB promoter region containing a 37-bp imperfect direct-repeat sequence. Mutations of O B and O C resulted in constitutive transcription and expression of both the scrA and scrB genes. Our results indicated that S. mutans coordinates the activities of enzyme IIscr and sucrose-6-phosphate hydrolase by transcriptional repressor ScrR binding to the promoter regions of the scr regulon.

scholarly journals A Dual Binding Site for Integration Host Factor and the Response Regulator CtrA inside the Caulobacter crescentus Replication Origin

2003 ◽  
Vol 185 (18) ◽  
pp. 5563-5572 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rania Siam ◽  
Ann Karen C. Brassinga ◽  
Gregory T. Marczynski
Keyword(s):  
Binding Site ◽  
Replication Origin ◽  
Protein Concentration ◽  
Caulobacter Crescentus ◽  
Response Regulator ◽  
Chromosome Replication ◽  
Integration Host Factor ◽  
Host Factor ◽  
Dna Mutations ◽  
Ihf Protein

ABSTRACT The response regulator CtrA controls chromosome replication by binding to five sites, a, b, c, d, and e, inside the Caulobacter crescentus replication origin (Cori). In this study, we demonstrate that integration host factor (IHF) binds Cori over the central CtrA binding site c. Surprisingly, IHF and CtrA share DNA recognition sequences. Rather than promoting cooperative binding, IHF binding hinders CtrA binding to site c and nearby site d. Unlike other CtrA binding sites, DNA mutations in the CtrA c/IHF site uniquely impair autonomous Cori plasmid replication. These mutations also alter transcription from distant promoters more than 100 bp away. When the CtrA c/IHF site was deleted from the chromosome, these cells grew slowly and became selectively intolerant to a CtrA phosphor-mimic allele (D51E). Since CtrA protein concentration decreases during the cell cycle as IHF protein concentration increases, we propose a model in which IHF displaces CtrA in order to bend Cori and promote efficient chromosome replication.

scholarly journals In the Staphylococcus aureus Two-Component System sae, the Response Regulator SaeR Binds to a Direct Repeat Sequence and DNA Binding Requires Phosphorylation by the Sensor Kinase SaeS

2010 ◽  
Vol 192 (8) ◽  
pp. 2111-2127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fei Sun ◽  
Chunling Li ◽  
Dowon Jeong ◽  
Changmo Sohn ◽  
Chuan He ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Response Regulator ◽  
Direct Repeat ◽  
Repeat Sequence ◽  
Sensor Kinase ◽  
Two Component System ◽  
Component System ◽  
Direct Repeat Sequence ◽  
Two Component

ABSTRACT Staphylococcus aureus uses the SaeRS two-component system to control the expression of many virulence factors such as alpha-hemolysin and coagulase; however, the molecular mechanism of this signaling has not yet been elucidated. Here, using the P1 promoter of the sae operon as a model target DNA, we demonstrated that the unphosphorylated response regulator SaeR does not bind to the P1 promoter DNA, while its C-terminal DNA binding domain alone does. The DNA binding activity of full-length SaeR could be restored by sensor kinase SaeS-induced phosphorylation. Phosphorylated SaeR is more resistant to digestion by trypsin, suggesting conformational changes. DNase I footprinting assays revealed that the SaeR protection region in the P1 promoter contains a direct repeat sequence (GTTAAN6GTTAA [where N is any nucleotide]). This sequence is critical to the binding of phosphorylated SaeR. Mutational changes in the repeat sequence greatly reduced both the in vitro binding of SaeR and the in vivo function of the P1 promoter. From these results, we concluded that SaeR recognizes the direct repeat sequence as a binding site and that binding requires phosphorylation by SaeS.

scholarly journals SpdR, a Response Regulator Required for Stationary-Phase Induction of Caulobacter crescentus cspD

2010 ◽  
Vol 192 (22) ◽  
pp. 5991-6000 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carolina A. P. T. da Silva ◽  
Heloise Balhesteros ◽  
Ricardo R. Mazzon ◽  
Marilis V. Marques
Keyword(s):  
Stationary Phase ◽  
Cold Shock ◽  
Caulobacter Crescentus ◽  
Response Regulator ◽  
Phosphorylation Site ◽  
Regulatory Region ◽  
Repeat Sequence ◽  
Medium Composition ◽  
Cold Shock Protein ◽  
Mobility Shift

ABSTRACT The cold shock protein (CSP) family includes small polypeptides that are induced upon temperature downshift and stationary phase. The genome of the alphaproteobacterium Caulobacter crescentus encodes four CSPs, with two being induced by cold shock and two at the onset of stationary phase. In order to identify the environmental signals and cell factors that are involved in cspD expression at stationary phase, we have analyzed cspD transcription during growth under several nutrient conditions. The results showed that expression of cspD was affected by the medium composition and was inversely proportional to the growth rate. The maximum levels of expression were decreased in a spoT mutant, indicating that ppGpp may be involved in the signalization for carbon starvation induction of cspD. A Tn5 mutant library was screened for mutants with reduced cspD expression, and 10 clones that showed at least a 50% reduction in expression were identified. Among these, a strain with a transposon insertion into a response regulator of a two-component system showed no induction of cspD at stationary phase. This protein (SpdR) was able to acquire a phosphate group from its cognate histidine kinase, and gel mobility shift assay and DNase I footprinting experiments showed that it binds to an inverted repeat sequence of the cspD regulatory region. A mutated SpdR with a substitution of the conserved aspartyl residue that is the probable phosphorylation site is unable to bind to the cspD regulatory region and to complement the spdR mutant phenotype.

Transcriptional regulation of the uptake [NiFe]hydrogenase genes in Rhodobacter capsulatus

2005 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
P.M. Vignais ◽  
S. Elsen ◽  
A. Colbeau
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Rhodobacter Capsulatus ◽  
Response Regulator ◽  
Regulatory System ◽  
Integration Host Factor ◽  
Host Factor ◽  
Promoter Recognition ◽  
The Stability ◽  
A Site

Transcription of the hupSL genes, which encode the uptake [NiFe]hydrogenase of Rhodobacter capsulatus, is specifically activated by H2. Three proteins are involved, namely the H2-sensor HupUV, the histidine kinase HupT and the transcriptional activator HupR. hupT and hupUV mutants have the same phenotype, i.e. an increased level of hupSL expression (assayed by phupS::lacZ fusion) in the absence of H2; they negatively control hupSL gene expression. HupT can autophosphorylate its conserved His217, and in vitro phosphotransfer to Asp54 of its cognate response regulator, HupR, was demonstrated. The non-phosphorylated form of HupR binds to an enhancer site (5′-TTG-N5-CAA) of phupS localized at −162/−152 nt and requires integration host factor to activate fully hupSL transcription. HupUV is an O2-insensitive [NiFe]hydrogenase, which interacts with HupT to regulate the phosphorylation state of HupT in response to H2 availability. The N-terminal domain of HupT, encompassing the PAS domain, is required for interaction with HupUV. This interaction with HupT, leading to the formation of a (HupT)2–(HupUV)2 complex, is weakened in the presence of H2, but incubation of HupUV with H2 has no effect on the stability of the heterodimer/tetramer, HupUV–(HupUV)2, equilibrium. HupSL biosynthesis is also under the control of the global two-component regulatory system RegB/RegA, which controls gene expression in response to redox. RegA binds to a site close to the −35 promoter recognition site and to a site overlapping the integration host factor DNA-binding site (5′-TCACACACCATTG, centred at −87 nt) and acts as a repressor.

scholarly journals Activation from a Distance: Roles of Lrp and Integration Host Factor in Transcriptional Activation ofgltBDF

2001 ◽  
Vol 183 (13) ◽  
pp. 3910-3918 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ligi Paul ◽  
Robert M. Blumenthal ◽  
Rowena G. Matthews
Keyword(s):  
Binding Site ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Core Promoter ◽  
Regulatory Protein ◽  
Glutamate Synthase ◽  
Promoter Sequence ◽  
Integration Host Factor ◽  
Host Factor ◽  
Upstream Region ◽  
Mobility Shift

ABSTRACT The leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp) binds to three sites centered 252, 216, and 152 bp upstream of the transcription start site of the Escherichia coli glutamate synthase operon (gltBDF) and activates transcription. Activators of ς70-dependent promoters usually bind closer to the −35 hexamer of the core promoter sequence. To study the mechanism by which Lrp-dependent activation occurs over this relatively large distance, the gltBDF upstream region was sequentially replaced with corresponding portions from the well-characterized ς70-dependent promoter lacZYAp. Theglt-lac promoter hybrids were placed upstream oflacZ, allowing transcriptional activity to be monitored via β-galactosidase assays. Even replacing all gltBDFsequences downstream of and including the −35 hexamer did not eliminate Lrp-dependent activation of transcription. When a 91-bp region between the −35 hexamer and the proximal Lrp binding site (−48 to −128) was replaced with heterologous DNA of the same length, transcription was reduced nearly 40-fold. Based on the presence of a consensus binding sequence, this region seemed likely to be a binding site for integration host factor (IHF). Experiments to study the effects of a himD mutant on expression of agltB::lacZ transcriptional fusion, gel mobility shift analyses, and DNA footprinting assays were used to confirm the direct participation of IHF in gltBDF promoter regulation. Based on these results, we suggest that IHF plays a crucial architectural role, bringing the distant Lrp complex in close proximity to the promoter-bound RNA polymerase.

scholarly journals Integration Host Factor Is Required for RpoN-Dependent hrpL Gene Expression and Controls Motility by Positively Regulating rsmB sRNA in Erwinia amylovora

2016 ◽  
Vol 106 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jae Hoon Lee ◽  
Youfu Zhao
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Type Iii Secretion ◽  
Erwinia Amylovora ◽  
Integration Host Factor ◽  
Host Factor ◽  
Mobility Shift ◽  
Electrophoresis Mobility Shift Assay ◽  
Mobility Shift Assay ◽  
Nucleoid Structure

Erwinia amylovora requires an hrp-type III secretion system (T3SS) to cause disease. It has been reported that HrpL, the master regulator of T3SS, is transcriptionally regulated by sigma factor 54 (RpoN), YhbH, and HrpS. In this study, the role of integration host factor (IHF) in regulating hrpL and T3SS gene expression was investigated. IHF is a nucleoid-associated protein that regulates gene expression by influencing nucleoid structure and DNA bending. Our results showed that both ihfA and ihfB mutants of E. amylovora did not induce necrotic lesions on pear fruits. Growth of both mutants was greatly reduced, and expression of the hrpL and T3SS genes was significantly down-regulated as compared with those of the wild type. In addition, expression of the ihfA, but not the ihfB gene, was under auto-suppression by IHF. Furthermore, both ihfA and ihfB mutants were hypermotile, due to significantly reduced expression of small RNA (sRNA) rsmB. Electrophoresis mobility shift assay further confirmed that IHF binds to the promoters of the hrpL and ihfA genes, as well as the rsmB sRNA gene. These results indicate that IHF is required for RpoN-dependent hrpL gene expression and virulence, and controls motility by positively regulating the rsmB sRNA in E. amylovora.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document