scholarly journals The status of the Notes in the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes: proposal to emend General Consideration 6

2016 ◽  
Vol 66 (9) ◽  
pp. 3305-3306
Author(s):  
Aharon Oren ◽  
George M. Garrity
Keyword(s):  
General Consideration ◽  
International Code ◽  
Code Of Nomenclature ◽  
The Status ◽  
International Code Of Nomenclature

scholarly journals Emendation of General Consideration 5 and Rules 18a, 24a and 30 of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes to resolve the status of the Cyanobacteria in the prokaryotic nomenclature

2021 ◽  
Vol 71 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Aharon Oren ◽  
David R. Arahal ◽  
Ramon Rosselló-Móra ◽  
Iain C. Sutcliffe ◽  
Edward R. B. Moore
Keyword(s):  
International Committee ◽  
General Consideration ◽  
International Code ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Link Type ◽  
Code Of Nomenclature ◽  
The Status ◽  
International Code Of Nomenclature

Following the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes electronic discussion and vote on proposals to resolve the status of the Cyanobacteria in the prokaryotic nomenclature, we announce here the results of the ballot. We also present the emended versions of General Consideration 5 and Rules 18a, 24a and 30, based on the outcome of the ballot, to be included in the new revision of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes.

Proposal to change General Consideration 5 and Principle 2 of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes

2014 ◽  
Vol 64 (Pt_1) ◽  
pp. 309-310 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aharon Oren ◽  
George M. Garrity
Keyword(s):  
General Consideration ◽  
Zoological Nomenclature ◽  
Botanical Nomenclature ◽  
International Code ◽  
Link Type ◽  
Code Of Nomenclature ◽  
International Code Of Nomenclature

A proposal is submitted to the ICSP to change the wording of General Consideration 5 of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes (ICNP), deleting the words Schizophycetes, Cyanophyceae and Cyanobacteria from the groups of organisms whose nomenclature is covered by the Code. It is further proposed to change the terms Zoological Code and International Code of Botanical Nomenclature in General Consideration 5 and in Principle 2 to International Code of Zoological Nomenclature and International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi and plants, respectively.

scholarly journals Unification of Abyssicoccus albus Jiang et al. 2016 and Auricoccus indicus Prakash et al. 2017 and the status of the genus Auricoccus Prakash et al. 2017

2020 ◽  
Vol 70 (11) ◽  
pp. 5969-5971 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anatoly P. Dobritsa ◽  
Mansour Samadpour
Keyword(s):  
Type Species ◽  
International Code ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Phylogenetic Relatedness ◽  
Link Type ◽  
Code Of Nomenclature ◽  
The Status ◽  
International Code Of Nomenclature

Based on the high phylogenetic relatedness of Auricoccus indicus Prakash et al. 2017 and Abyssicoccus albus Jiang et al. 2016, it is proposed to unite them with retaining the latter name as having nomenclatural priority. As the result of the species unification, the genus Auricoccus name is proposed to consider as illegitimate in the boundaries determined by Rule 51a of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes.

scholarly journals Proposal to consistently apply the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes (ICNP) to names of the oxygenic photosynthetic bacteria (cyanobacteria), including those validly published under the International Code of Botanical Nomenclature (ICBN)/International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi and plants (ICN), and proposal to change Principle 2 of the ICNP

2015 ◽  
Vol 65 (Pt_3) ◽  
pp. 1070-1074 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander V. Pinevich
Keyword(s):  
Photosynthetic Bacteria ◽  
General Consideration ◽  
Botanical Nomenclature ◽  
International Code ◽  
Recent Proposal ◽  
Taxonomic Note ◽  
Code Of Nomenclature ◽  
International Code Of Nomenclature

This taxonomic note was motivated by the recent proposal [Oren & Garrity (2014) Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 64, 309–310] to exclude the oxygenic photosynthetic bacteria (cyanobacteria) from the wording of General Consideration 5 of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes (ICNP), which entails unilateral coverage of these prokaryotes by the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (ICN; formerly the International Code of Botanical Nomenclature, ICBN). On the basis of key viewpoints, approaches and rules in the systematics, taxonomy and nomenclature of prokaryotes it is reciprocally proposed to apply the ICNP to names of cyanobacteria including those validly published under the ICBN/ICN. For this purpose, a change to Principle 2 of the ICNP is proposed to enable validation of cyanobacterial names published under the ICBN/ICN rules.

scholarly journals Three alternative proposals to emend the Rules of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes to resolve the status of the Cyanobacteria in the prokaryotic nomenclature

2020 ◽  
Vol 70 (7) ◽  
pp. 4406-4408 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aharon Oren
Keyword(s):  
International Committee ◽  
International Code ◽  
Content Type ◽  
The Third ◽  
Link Type ◽  
Code Of Nomenclature ◽  
The Status ◽  
International Code Of Nomenclature

Three alternative proposals to emend the Rules of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes are presented to resolve the status of the Cyanobacteria in the prokaryotic nomenclature. Two were earlier published (Oren and Garrity, Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014;64 : 309–310; Pinevich, Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2015;65 : 1070–1074). The third proposal is based on reciprocation of Article 45.1 of the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants. According to Article 13b of the Statutes of the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes, a decision on these proposals must be reached within 11 months from the date of this publication.

scholarly journals International Mycological Congress: Guiding Vote on nomenclature proposals to amend Chapter F of the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants

IMA Fungus ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. xv-xxi ◽  
Author(s):  
Tom W. May ◽  
Andrew N. Miller
Keyword(s):  
Dna Sequences ◽  
International Code ◽  
Code Of Nomenclature ◽  
International Mycological Congress ◽  
International Code Of Nomenclature

Abstract Results are provided for the Guiding Vote on the seven formal proposals to amend the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants to be decided by the Fungal Nomenclature Session (FNS) of the XI International Mycological Congress in July 2018. Te ballot for the Guiding Vote was provided online. Tere were 520 valid ballots, submitted by mycologists from 42 countries, belonging to 23 eligible groups and societies, along with authors of proposals. Tw o proposals F-005 and F-006, both concerning DNA sequences as types, exceeded the 75 % No vote that is the threshold above which proposals are considered rejected by the FNS unless formally re-introduced. Two options for amendments to future procedures for the Guiding Vote are proposed: adding eligibility via publication of a nomenclatural novelty among fungi and removing eligibility via membership of IMA MMOs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document