scholarly journals Optimization of light harvesting and photoprotection: molecular mechanisms and physiological consequences

2012 ◽  
Vol 367 (1608) ◽  
pp. 3455-3465 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Horton
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Thylakoid Membrane ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Light Harvesting ◽  
Protein Complexes ◽  
Efficient Energy Transfer ◽  
Light Harvesting Complexes ◽  
Functional Flexibility ◽  
Jan Anderson ◽  
Repulsive Forces

The distinctive lateral organization of the protein complexes in the thylakoid membrane investigated by Jan Anderson and co-workers is dependent on the balance of various attractive and repulsive forces. Modulation of these forces allows critical physiological regulation of photosynthesis that provides efficient light-harvesting in limiting light but dissipation of excess potentially damaging radiation in saturating light. The light-harvesting complexes (LHCII) are central to this regulation, which is achieved by phosphorylation of stromal residues, protonation on the lumen surface and de-epoxidation of bound violaxanthin. The functional flexibility of LHCII derives from a remarkable pigment composition and configuration that not only allow efficient absorption of light and efficient energy transfer either to photosystem II or photosystem I core complexes, but through subtle configurational changes can also exhibit highly efficient dissipative reactions involving chlorophyll–xanthophyll and/or chlorophyll–chlorophyll interactions. These changes in function are determined at a macroscopic level by alterations in protein–protein interactions in the thylakoid membrane. The capacity and dynamics of this regulation are tuned to different physiological scenarios by the exact protein and pigment content of the light-harvesting system. Here, the molecular mechanisms involved will be reviewed, and the optimization of the light-harvesting system in different environmental conditions described.

scholarly journals Fast Diffusion of the Unassembled PetC1-GFP Protein in the Cyanobacterial Thylakoid Membrane

Life ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 15
Author(s):  
Radek Kaňa ◽  
Gábor Steinbach ◽  
Roman Sobotka ◽  
György Vámosi ◽  
Josef Komenda
Keyword(s):  
Membrane Proteins ◽  
Single Molecule ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Thylakoid Membrane ◽  
Protein Complexes ◽  
Correlation Spectroscopy ◽  
Membrane Microdomains ◽  
Fast Diffusion ◽  
Light Harvesting Complexes ◽  
Term Survival

Biological membranes were originally described as a fluid mosaic with uniform distribution of proteins and lipids. Later, heterogeneous membrane areas were found in many membrane systems including cyanobacterial thylakoids. In fact, cyanobacterial pigment–protein complexes (photosystems, phycobilisomes) form a heterogeneous mosaic of thylakoid membrane microdomains (MDs) restricting protein mobility. The trafficking of membrane proteins is one of the key factors for long-term survival under stress conditions, for instance during exposure to photoinhibitory light conditions. However, the mobility of unbound ‘free’ proteins in thylakoid membrane is poorly characterized. In this work, we assessed the maximal diffusional ability of a small, unbound thylakoid membrane protein by semi-single molecule FCS (fluorescence correlation spectroscopy) method in the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC6803. We utilized a GFP-tagged variant of the cytochrome b6f subunit PetC1 (PetC1-GFP), which was not assembled in the b6f complex due to the presence of the tag. Subsequent FCS measurements have identified a very fast diffusion of the PetC1-GFP protein in the thylakoid membrane (D = 0.14 − 2.95 µm2s−1). This means that the mobility of PetC1-GFP was comparable with that of free lipids and was 50–500 times higher in comparison to the mobility of proteins (e.g., IsiA, LHCII—light-harvesting complexes of PSII) naturally associated with larger thylakoid membrane complexes like photosystems. Our results thus demonstrate the ability of free thylakoid-membrane proteins to move very fast, revealing the crucial role of protein–protein interactions in the mobility restrictions for large thylakoid protein complexes.

scholarly journals From isolated light-harvesting complexes to the thylakoid membrane: a single-molecule perspective

Nanophotonics ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 81-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Michael Gruber ◽  
Pavel Malý ◽  
Tjaart P.J. Krüger ◽  
Rienk van Grondelle
Keyword(s):  
Single Molecule ◽  
Thylakoid Membrane ◽  
Light Harvesting ◽  
Protein Complexes ◽  
Conformational Dynamics ◽  
Physical Models ◽  
Photochemical Quenching ◽  
Light Harvesting Complexes ◽  
Fluorescence Measurements

AbstractThe conversion of solar radiation to chemical energy in plants and green algae takes place in the thylakoid membrane. This amphiphilic environment hosts a complex arrangement of light-harvesting pigment-protein complexes that absorb light and transfer the excitation energy to photochemically active reaction centers. This efficient light-harvesting capacity is moreover tightly regulated by a photoprotective mechanism called non-photochemical quenching to avoid the stress-induced destruction of the catalytic reaction center. In this review we provide an overview of single-molecule fluorescence measurements on plant light-harvesting complexes (LHCs) of varying sizes with the aim of bridging the gap between the smallest isolated complexes, which have been well-characterized, and the native photosystem. The smallest complexes contain only a small number (10–20) of interacting chlorophylls, while the native photosystem contains dozens of protein subunits and many hundreds of connected pigments. We discuss the functional significance of conformational dynamics, the lipid environment, and the structural arrangement of this fascinating nano-machinery. The described experimental results can be utilized to build mathematical-physical models in a bottom-up approach, which can then be tested on larger in vivo systems. The results also clearly showcase the general property of biological systems to utilize the same system properties for different purposes. In this case it is the regulated conformational flexibility that allows LHCs to switch between efficient light-harvesting and a photoprotective function.

scholarly journals Macrocycle ring deformation as the secondary design principle for light-harvesting complexes

2018 ◽  
Vol 115 (39) ◽  
pp. E9051-E9057 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luca De Vico ◽  
André Anda ◽  
Vladimir Al. Osipov ◽  
Anders Ø. Madsen ◽  
Thorsten Hansen
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Design Principle ◽  
Light Harvesting ◽  
Protein Complexes ◽  
Critical Factor ◽  
Structural Factors ◽  
Modeling Tools ◽  
Light Harvesting Complexes ◽  
Pigment Protein Complexes ◽  
Rhodoblastus Acidophilus

Natural light-harvesting is performed by pigment–protein complexes, which collect and funnel the solar energy at the start of photosynthesis. The identity and arrangement of pigments largely define the absorption spectrum of the antenna complex, which is further regulated by a palette of structural factors. Small alterations are induced by pigment–protein interactions. In light-harvesting systems 2 and 3 from Rhodoblastus acidophilus, the pigments are arranged identically, yet the former has an absorption peak at 850 nm that is blue-shifted to 820 nm in the latter. While the shift has previously been attributed to the removal of hydrogen bonds, which brings changes in the acetyl moiety of the bacteriochlorophyll, recent work has shown that other mechanisms are also present. Using computational and modeling tools on the corresponding crystal structures, we reach a different conclusion: The most critical factor for the shift is the curvature of the macrocycle ring. The bending of the planar part of the pigment is identified as the second-most important design principle for the function of pigment–protein complexes—a finding that can inspire the design of novel artificial systems.

scholarly journals The molecular mechanisms of light adaption in light-harvesting complexes of purple bacteria revealed by a multiscale modeling

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (42) ◽  
pp. 9650-9662 ◽  
Author(s):  
Felipe Cardoso Ramos ◽  
Michele Nottoli ◽  
Lorenzo Cupellini ◽  
Benedetta Mennucci
Keyword(s):  
Multiscale Modeling ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Light Harvesting ◽  
Purple Bacteria ◽  
Spectral Tuning ◽  
Light Harvesting Complexes

The spectral tuning of LH2 antenna complexes arises from H-bonding, acetyl torsion, and inter-chromophore couplings.

scholarly journals Structure of the stress-related LHCSR1 complex determined by an integrated computational strategy

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ingrid Guarnetti Prandi ◽  
Vladislav Sláma ◽  
Cristina Pecorilla ◽  
Lorenzo Cupellini ◽  
Benedetta Mennucci
Keyword(s):  
Structural Model ◽  
Light Harvesting ◽  
Structural Information ◽  
Protein Complexes ◽  
Complex Stress ◽  
Main Function ◽  
Light Harvesting Complexes ◽  
Light Harvesting Complex ◽  
Pigment Protein Complexes ◽  
Computational Strategy

Light-harvesting complexes (LHCs) are pigment-protein complexes whose main function is to capture sunlight and transfer the energy to reaction centers of photosystems. In response to varying light conditions, LH complexes also play photoregulation and photoprotection roles. In algae and mosses, a sub-family of LHCs, Light-Harvesting complex stress related (LHCSR), is responsible for photoprotective quenching. Despite their functional and evolutionary importance, no direct structural information on LHCSRs is available that can explain their unique properties. In this work we propose a structural model of LHCSR1 from the moss P. Patens, obtained through an integrated computational strategy that combines homology modeling, molecular dynamics, and multiscale quantum chemical calculations. The model is validated by reproducing the spectral properties of LHCSR1. Our model reveals the structural specificity of LHCSR1, as compared with the CP29 LH complex, and poses the basis for understanding photoprotective quenching in mosses.

scholarly journals A photosynthetic antenna complex foregoes unity carotenoid-to-bacteriochlorophyll energy transfer efficiency to ensure photoprotection

2020 ◽  
Vol 117 (12) ◽  
pp. 6502-6508 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dariusz M. Niedzwiedzki ◽  
David J. K. Swainsbury ◽  
Daniel P. Canniffe ◽  
C. Neil Hunter ◽  
Andrew Hitchcock
Keyword(s):  
Energy Transfer ◽  
Transient Absorption ◽  
Light Harvesting ◽  
Protein Complexes ◽  
Fluorescence Emission ◽  
Energy Transfer Efficiency ◽  
Transfer Efficiency ◽  
Light Harvesting Complexes ◽  
Antenna Complex ◽  
Pigment Protein Complexes

Carotenoids play a number of important roles in photosynthesis, primarily providing light-harvesting and photoprotective energy dissipation functions within pigment–protein complexes. The carbon–carbon double bond (C=C) conjugation length of carotenoids (N), generally between 9 and 15, determines the carotenoid-to-(bacterio)chlorophyll [(B)Chl] energy transfer efficiency. Here we purified and spectroscopically characterized light-harvesting complex 2 (LH2) fromRhodobacter sphaeroidescontaining theN= 7 carotenoid zeta (ζ)-carotene, not previously incorporated within a natural antenna complex. Transient absorption and time-resolved fluorescence show that, relative to the lifetime of the S1state of ζ-carotene in solvent, the lifetime decreases ∼250-fold when ζ-carotene is incorporated within LH2, due to transfer of excitation energy to the B800 and B850 BChlsa. These measurements show that energy transfer proceeds with an efficiency of ∼100%, primarily via the S1→ Qxroute because the S1→ S0fluorescence emission of ζ-carotene overlaps almost perfectly with the Qxabsorption band of the BChls. However, transient absorption measurements performed on microsecond timescales reveal that, unlike the nativeN≥ 9 carotenoids normally utilized in light-harvesting complexes, ζ-carotene does not quench excited triplet states of BChla, likely due to elevation of the ζ-carotene triplet energy state above that of BChla. These findings provide insights into the coevolution of photosynthetic pigments and pigment–protein complexes. We propose that theN≥ 9 carotenoids found in light-harvesting antenna complexes represent a vital compromise that retains an acceptable level of energy transfer from carotenoids to (B)Chls while allowing acquisition of a new, essential function, namely, photoprotective quenching of harmful (B)Chl triplets.

Isolation and characterization of three membranebound chlorophyll-protein complexes from four dinoflagellate species

1993 ◽  
Vol 340 (1294) ◽  
pp. 381-392 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Energy Transfer ◽  
Photosystem I ◽  
Light Harvesting ◽  
Protein Complexes ◽  
Gradient Centrifugation ◽  
Water Soluble ◽  
Molar Ratio ◽  
Light Harvesting Complexes ◽  
Light Harvesting Complex ◽  
Isolation And Characterization

Employing discontinuous sucrose density gradient centrifugation of n -dodecyl β-d-maltoside-solubilized thylakoid membranes, three chlorophyll (Chl)-protein complexes containing Chl a , Chl c 2 and peridinin in different proportions, were isolated from the dinoflagellates Symbiodinium microadriaticum, S. kawagutii, S. pilosum and Heterocapsa pygmaea . In S. microadriaticum , the first complex, containing 13% of the total cellular Chl a , and minor quantities of Chl c 2 and peridinin, is associated with polypeptides with apparent molecular mass ( M r ) of 8-9 kDa, and demonstrated inefficient energy transfer from the accessory pigments to Chl a . The second complex contains Chl a , Chl c 2 and peridinin in a molar ratio of 1:1:2, associated with two apoproteins of M r 19-20 kDa, and comprises 45%, 75% and 70%, respectively, of the cellular Chl a , Chl c 2 and peridinin. The efficient energy transfer from Chl c 2 and peridinin to Chl a in this complex is supportive of a light-harvesting function. This Chl a - c 2 - peridin-protein complex represents the major light-harvesting complex in dinoflagellates. The third complex obtained contains 12% of the cellular Chl a , and appears to be the core of photosystem I, associated with a light-harvesting complex. This complex is spectroscopically similar to analogous preparations from different taxonomic groups, but demonstrates a unique apoprotein composition. Antibodies against the water-soluble peridinin-Chl a -protein (sPCP) light-harvesting complexes failed to cross-react with any of the thylakoid-associated complexes, as did antibodies against Chl a - c -fucoxanthin apoprotein (from diatoms). Antibodies against the P 700 apoprotein of plants did not cross-react with the photosystem I complex. Similar results were observed in the other dinoflagellates.

Control of genome stability by Slx protein complexes

2009 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 495-510 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Rouse
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Cellular Response ◽  
Genome Stability ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Excision Repair ◽  
Protein Complexes ◽  
Alkylating Agents ◽  
Strand Break

The six Saccharomyces cerevisiae SLX genes were identified in a screen for factors required for the viability of cells lacking Sgs1, a member of the RecQ helicase family involved in processing stalled replisomes and in the maintenance of genome stability. The six SLX gene products form three distinct heterodimeric complexes, and all three have catalytic activity. Slx3–Slx2 (also known as Mus81–Mms4) and Slx1–Slx4 are both heterodimeric endonucleases with a marked specificity for branched replication fork-like DNA species, whereas Slx5–Slx8 is a SUMO (small ubiquitin-related modifier)-targeted E3 ubiquitin ligase. All three complexes play important, but distinct, roles in different aspects of the cellular response to DNA damage and perturbed DNA replication. Slx4 interacts physically not only with Slx1, but also with Rad1–Rad10 [XPF (xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group F)–ERCC1 (excision repair cross-complementing 1) in humans], another structure-specific endonuclease that participates in the repair of UV-induced DNA damage and in a subpathway of recombinational DNA DSB (double-strand break) repair. Curiously, Slx4 is essential for repair of DSBs by Rad1–Rad10, but is not required for repair of UV damage. Slx4 also promotes cellular resistance to DNA-alkylating agents that block the progression of replisomes during DNA replication, by facilitating the error-free mode of lesion bypass. This does not require Slx1 or Rad1–Rad10, and so Slx4 has several distinct roles in protecting genome stability. In the present article, I provide an overview of our current understanding of the cellular roles of the Slx proteins, paying particular attention to the advances that have been made in understanding the cellular roles of Slx4. In particular, protein–protein interactions and underlying molecular mechanisms are discussed and I draw attention to the many questions that have yet to be answered.

scholarly journals Regulatory factors for the assembly of thylakoid membrane protein complexes

2012 ◽  
Vol 367 (1608) ◽  
pp. 3420-3429 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei Chi ◽  
Jinfang Ma ◽  
Lixin Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Membrane Protein ◽  
Thylakoid Membrane ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Protein Complexes ◽  
Thylakoid Membranes ◽  
Regulatory Factors ◽  
Photosynthetic Organisms ◽  
Photosynthetic Complexes ◽  
Membrane Protein Complexes

Major multi-protein photosynthetic complexes, located in thylakoid membranes, are responsible for the capture of light and its conversion into chemical energy in oxygenic photosynthetic organisms. Although the structures and functions of these photosynthetic complexes have been explored, the molecular mechanisms underlying their assembly remain elusive. In this review, we summarize current knowledge of the regulatory components involved in the assembly of thylakoid membrane protein complexes in photosynthetic organisms. Many of the known regulatory factors are conserved between prokaryotes and eukaryotes, whereas others appear to be newly evolved or to have expanded predominantly in eukaryotes. Their specific features and fundamental differences in cyanobacteria, green algae and land plants are discussed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document