scholarly journals Sex allocation and investment into pre- and post-copulatory traits in simultaneous hermaphrodites: the role of polyandry and local sperm competition

2013 ◽  
Vol 368 (1613) ◽  
pp. 20120052 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lukas Schärer ◽  
Ido Pen
Keyword(s):  
Sexual Selection ◽  
Sperm Competition ◽  
Sex Allocation ◽  
Optimal Allocation ◽  
Recent Theory ◽  
Detailed Knowledge ◽  
Female Reproduction ◽  
Sexually Selected Traits ◽  
Simultaneous Hermaphrodites

Sex allocation theory predicts the optimal allocation to male and female reproduction in sexual organisms. In animals, most work on sex allocation has focused on species with separate sexes and our understanding of simultaneous hermaphrodites is patchier. Recent theory predicts that sex allocation in simultaneous hermaphrodites should strongly be affected by post-copulatory sexual selection, while the role of pre-copulatory sexual selection is much less clear. Here, we review sex allocation and sexual selection theory for simultaneous hermaphrodites, and identify several strong and potentially unwarranted assumptions. We then present a model that treats allocation to sexually selected traits as components of sex allocation and explore patterns of allocation when some of these assumptions are relaxed. For example, when investment into a male sexually selected trait leads to skews in sperm competition, causing local sperm competition, this is expected to lead to a reduced allocation to sperm production. We conclude that understanding the evolution of sex allocation in simultaneous hermaphrodites requires detailed knowledge of the different sexual selection processes and their relative importance. However, little is currently known quantitatively about sexual selection in simultaneous hermaphrodites, about what the underlying traits are, and about what drives and constrains their evolution. Future work should therefore aim at quantifying sexual selection and identifying the underlying traits along the pre- to post-copulatory axis.

scholarly journals Conceptual developments in sperm competition: a very brief synopsis

2020 ◽  
Vol 375 (1813) ◽  
pp. 20200061 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geoff A. Parker
Keyword(s):  
Sexual Selection ◽  
Sperm Competition ◽  
Seminal Fluid ◽  
Female Reproduction ◽  
Internal Fertilization ◽  
Seminal Fluid Proteins ◽  
Competition Theory ◽  
Past Half Century ◽  
Mate Acquisition ◽  
Gamete Competition

The past half century has seen the development of the field of post-ejaculatory sexual selection, the sequel to sexual selection for mate-acquisition (pre-ejaculatory) described by Darwin. In richness and diversity of adaptations, post-ejaculatory selection rivals that of pre-ejaculatory sexual selection. Anisogamy—and hence two sexes—likely arose by primeval gamete competition, and sperm competition remains a major force maintaining high sperm numbers. The post-ejaculatory equivalent of male–male competition for matings, sperm competition was an intense ancestral form of sexual selection, typically weakening as mobility and internal fertilization developed in many taxa, when some expenditure became diverted into pre-ejaculatory competition. Sperm competition theory has been relatively successful in explaining variation in relative testes size and sperm numbers per ejaculate and is becoming more successful in explaining variation in sperm phenotype. Sperm competition has generated many other male adaptations such as seminal fluid proteins that variously modify female reproduction towards male interests, and copulatory plugs, prolonged copulations and post-ejaculatory guarding behaviour that reduce female remating probability, many of which result in sexual conflict. This short survey of conceptual developments is intended as a broad overview, mainly as a primer for new researchers. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Fifty years of sperm competition'.

scholarly journals Beyond sex allocation: the role of mating systems in sexual selection in parasitoid wasps

2014 ◽  
Vol 90 (2) ◽  
pp. 599-627 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca A. Boulton ◽  
Laura A. Collins ◽  
David M. Shuker
Keyword(s):  
Sexual Selection ◽  
Sex Allocation ◽  
Mating Systems ◽  
Parasitoid Wasps

scholarly journals Selection on sperm morphology under relaxed sperm competition in a wild passerine bird

2008 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 58-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Calhim ◽  
Helene M Lampe ◽  
Tore Slagsvold ◽  
Tim R Birkhead
Keyword(s):  
Sexual Selection ◽  
Sperm Competition ◽  
Sperm Morphology ◽  
Reproductive Traits ◽  
Female Preference ◽  
Passerine Bird ◽  
High Heritability ◽  
Individual Consistency ◽  
Sperm Size

Theories regarding the role of sexual selection on the evolution of sperm traits are based on an association between pre-copulatory (e.g. female preference) and post-copulatory (e.g. ejaculate quality) male reproductive traits. In tests of these hypotheses, sperm morphology has rarely been used, despite its high heritability and intra-individual consistency. We found evidence of selection for longer sperm through positive phenotypic associations between sperm size and the two major female preference traits in the pied flycatcher, Ficedula hypoleuca . Our results support the sexually selected sperm hypothesis in a species under low sperm competition and demonstrate that natural and pre-copulatory sexual selection forces should not be overlooked in studies of intraspecific sperm morphology evolution.

No effect of group size on sex allocation in a protandric-simultaneous hermaphroditic shrimp

2007 ◽  
Vol 87 (5) ◽  
pp. 1169-1174 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Antonio Baeza
Keyword(s):  
Sperm Competition ◽  
Group Size ◽  
Sex Allocation ◽  
Male Gender ◽  
Male Mating ◽  
Gender Preferences ◽  
Female Role ◽  
First Clutch ◽  
Lysmata Wurdemanni ◽  
Simultaneous Hermaphrodites

Lysmata wurdemanni is a protandric-simultaneous hermaphroditic shrimp. Individuals reproduce as males first and late in life as simultaneous hermaphrodites. I examined whether sex allocation (resources devoted to ova vs sperm) varies with group size in shrimps that have just matured as hermaphrodites. Focal males were reared with different numbers of hermaphrodites (1, 2, 5 or 10). Sperm stored in the ejaculatory ducts and eggs brooded underneath the abdomen were retrieved and weighted immediately after focal shrimps matured as hermaphrodites. Hermaphrodites should invest more into sperm with increasing group size to cope with more intense sperm competition. The proportion of focal shrimps that lost their first clutch of eggs after maturing as hermaphrodites increased with group size. This suggests male gender preferences by hermaphrodites experiencing large group sizes. No differences in sex allocation among group sizes were recorded for shrimps that did not lose their first clutch of eggs. Thus, group size does not affect sex allocation in terms of ova and sperm mass. This lack of phenotypic plasticity might be explained if sperm competition is not important in L. wurdemanni. It should not pay in terms of fitness for shrimps to produce and inseminate female-role hermaphrodites with large amounts of sperm when full paternity is assured in the absence of multi-male mating. In agreement with this idea, a second experiment demonstrated that female-role hermaphrodites invariably mated only once with a single other shrimp.

Interspecific variation in relative brain size is not correlated with intensity of sexual selection in waterfowl (Anseriformes)

2008 ◽  
Vol 56 (5) ◽  
pp. 311 ◽  
Author(s):  
P.-J. Guay ◽  
A. N. Iwaniuk
Keyword(s):  
Sexual Selection ◽  
Sexual Dimorphism ◽  
Sperm Competition ◽  
Brain Size ◽  
Interspecific Variation ◽  
Morphological Characters ◽  
Comparative Approach ◽  
Pair Bonds ◽  
Relative Brain Size

The role of sexual selection in shaping the brain is poorly understood. Although numerous studies have investigated the role of natural selection, relatively few have focussed on the role of sexual selection. Two important factors influencing the intensity of sexual selection are sperm competition and pair bonding and three different hypotheses have been proposed to explain how they could influence relative brain size. (1) The ‘extra-pair mating’ hypothesis predicts that sexual dimorphism in brain size will increase with sperm competition intensity. (2) The ‘Machiavellian intelligence’ hypothesis predicts that brain size will be larger in species with intense sperm competition. (3) The ‘relationship intelligence’ hypothesis predicts that species forming long-term pair bonds will have larger brains. We investigated sexual dimorphism in brain size and tested these three hypotheses in waterfowl by studying correlations between relative brain volume and three measures of sperm competition (testicular mass, phallus length and mating strategy) and pair-bond duration using the modern phylogenetic comparative approach. We found no evidence of sexual dimorphism in brain size in waterfowl after controlling for body mass and found no support for any of the three hypotheses. This suggests that brain size may not be sexually selected in waterfowl, despite evidence of sexual selection pressures on other morphological characters.

scholarly journals Sex allocation and sexual conflict in simultaneously hermaphroditic animals

2009 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. 705-708 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lukas Schärer ◽  
Tim Janicke
Keyword(s):  
Sexual Selection ◽  
Theoretical Prediction ◽  
Experimental Test ◽  
Sexual Conflict ◽  
Sex Allocation ◽  
Theoretical Work ◽  
Theoretical Research ◽  
Sperm Donor ◽  
Simultaneous Hermaphrodites

Links between sex allocation (SA) and sexual conflict in simultaneous hermaphrodites have been evident since Charnov's landmark paper published 30 years ago. We discuss two links, namely the potential for sexual conflict over SA between sperm donor and recipient, and the importance of post-copulatory sexual selection and the resulting sexual conflict for the evolution of SA. We cover the little empirical and theoretical work exploring these links, and present an experimental test of one theoretical prediction. The link between SA and sexual conflict is an interesting field for future empirical and theoretical research.

scholarly journals Intraspecific sperm competition genes enforce post-mating species barriers in Drosophila

2014 ◽  
Vol 281 (1797) ◽  
pp. 20142050 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dean M. Castillo ◽  
Leonie C. Moyle
Keyword(s):  
Sexual Selection ◽  
Reproductive Isolation ◽  
Sperm Competition ◽  
Competitive Ability ◽  
Sexual Isolation ◽  
Theoretical Models ◽  
Sexually Selected Traits ◽  
Genetic Mechanisms ◽  
Selected Traits ◽  
Additional Role

Sexual selection and sexual conflict are considered important drivers of speciation, based on both theoretical models and empirical correlations between sexually selected traits and diversification. However, whether reproductive isolation between species evolves directly as a consequence of intrapopulation sexual dynamics remains empirically unresolved, in part because knowledge of the genetic mechanisms (if any) connecting these processes is limited. Here, we provide evidence of a direct mechanistic link between intraspecies sexual selection and reproductive isolation. We examined genes with known roles in intraspecific sperm competition (ISC) in D. melanogaster and assayed their impact on conspecific sperm precedence (CSP). We found that two such genes ( Acp36DE and CG9997 ) contribute to both offensive sperm competition and CSP; null/knockdown lines both had lower competitive ability against D. melanogaster conspecifics and were no longer able to displace heterospecific D. simulans sperm in competitive matings. In comparison, Sex Peptide ( Acp70A )—another locus essential for ISC—does not contribute to CSP. These data indicate that two loci important for sperm competitive interactions have an additional role in similar interactions that enforce post-mating reproductive isolation between species, and show that sexual selection and sexual isolation can act on the same molecular targets in a gene-specific manner.

scholarly journals Sexual selection and natural selection in bird speciation

1998 ◽  
Vol 353 (1366) ◽  
pp. 251-260 ◽  
Author(s):  
Trevor Price
Keyword(s):  
Sexual Selection ◽  
Adaptive Radiation ◽  
Species Recognition ◽  
Correlated Response ◽  
Premating Isolation ◽  
Sexual Imprinting ◽  
Sexually Selected Traits ◽  
Isolating Mechanisms ◽  
Selected Traits

The role of sexual selection in speciation is investigated, addressing two main issues. First, how do sexually selected traits become species recognition traits? Theory and empirical evidence suggest that female preferences often do not evolve as a correlated response to evolution of male traits. This implies that, contrary to runaway (Fisherian) models of sexual selection, premating isolation will not arise as an automatic side effect of divergence between populations in sexually selected traits. I evaluate premating isolating mechanisms in one group, the birds. In this group premating isolation is often a consequence of sexual imprinting, whereby young birds learn features of their parents and use these features in mate choice. Song, morphology and plumage are known recognition cues. I conclude that perhaps the main role for sexual selection in speciation is in generating differences between populations in traits. Sexual imprinting then leads to these traits being used as species recognition mechanisms. The second issue addressed in this paper is the role of sexual selection in adaptive radiation, again concentrating on birds. Ecological differences between species include large differences in size, which may in themselves be sufficient for species recognition, and differences in habitat, which seem to evolve frequently and at all stages of an adaptive radiation. Differences in habitat often cause song and plumage patterns to evolve as a result of sexual selection for efficient communication. Therefore sexual selection is likely to have an important role in generating premating isolating mechanisms throughout an adaptive radiation. It is also possible that sexual selection, by creating more allopatric species, creates more opportunity for ecological divergence to occur. The limited available evidence does not support this idea. A role for sexual selection in accelerating ecological diversification has yet to be demonstrated.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document