scholarly journals General mathematical formulation of scattering processes in atom–diatomic collisions in the RmatReact methodology

Author(s):  
Laura K. McKemmish ◽  
Jonathan Tennyson

Accurately modelling cold and ultracold reactive collisions occurring over deep potential wells, such as D + + H 2 → H + + HD , requires the development of new theoretical and computational methodologies. One potentially useful framework is the R -matrix method adopted widely for electron–molecule collisions which has more recently been applied to non-reactive heavy-particle collisions such as Ar–Ar. The existing treatment of non-reactive elastic and inelastic scattering needs to be substantially extended to enable modelling of reactive collisions: this is the subject of this paper. Herein, we develop the general mathematical formulation for non-reactive elastic and inelastic scattering, photoassociation, photodissociation, charge exchange and reactive scattering using the R -matrix method. Of particular note is that the inner region, of central importance to calculable R -matrix methodologies, must be finite in all scattering coordinates rather than a single scattering coordinate as for non-reactive scattering. This article is part of a discussion meeting issue ‘Advances in hydrogen molecular ions: H 3 + , H 5 + and beyond’.

Author(s):  
S. Golladay

The theory of multiple scattering has been worked out by Groves and comparisons have been made between predicted and observed signals for thick specimens observed in a STEM under conditions where phase contrast effects are unimportant. Independent measurements of the collection efficiencies of the two STEM detectors, calculations of the ratio σe/σi = R, where σe, σi are the total cross sections for elastic and inelastic scattering respectively, and a model of the unknown mass distribution are needed for these comparisons. In this paper an extension of this work will be described which allows the determination of the required efficiencies, R, and the unknown mass distribution from the data without additional measurements or models. Essential to the analysis is the fact that in a STEM two or more signal measurements can be made simultaneously at each image point.


1981 ◽  
Vol 102 (4) ◽  
pp. 242-246 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Buenerd ◽  
J. Pinston ◽  
J. Cole ◽  
C. Guet ◽  
D. Lebrun ◽  
...  

1966 ◽  
Vol 79 (1) ◽  
pp. 188-192 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Boca ◽  
M. Borşaru ◽  
M. Cenja ◽  
C. Haţegan ◽  
E. Iliescu ◽  
...  

1988 ◽  
Vol 489 (2) ◽  
pp. 329-346 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Ott ◽  
R. Butsch ◽  
H.J. Jänsch ◽  
K.-H. Möbius ◽  
P. Paul ◽  
...  

1993 ◽  
Vol 553 ◽  
pp. 585-588 ◽  
Author(s):  
W.J. Briscoe ◽  
D.B. Barlow ◽  
B.L. Berman ◽  
R.W. Caress ◽  
K.S. Dhuga ◽  
...  

1969 ◽  
Vol 125 (3) ◽  
pp. 641-653 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kineo Tsukada ◽  
Shigeya Tanaka ◽  
Yoshiaki Tomita ◽  
Michio Maruyama

1976 ◽  
Vol 61 (4) ◽  
pp. 521-533 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. W. Glasgow ◽  
F. O. Purser ◽  
H. Hogue ◽  
J. C. Clement ◽  
K. Stelzer ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 69 ◽  
pp. 00008 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Capote ◽  
A. Trkov ◽  
M. Sin ◽  
M.W. Herman ◽  
E.Sh. Soukhovitskiĩ

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document