scholarly journals The inconstancy of the transient climate response parameter under increasing CO 2

2015 ◽  
Vol 373 (2054) ◽  
pp. 20140417 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. M. Gregory ◽  
T. Andrews ◽  
P. Good
Keyword(s):  
Radiative Forcing ◽  
Coupled Model ◽  
Surface Air Temperature ◽  
Deep Ocean ◽  
Climate Feedback ◽  
Climate Response ◽  
Ocean Heat Uptake ◽  
Transient Climate Response ◽  
Feedback Parameter ◽  
Response Parameter

In the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5), the model-mean increase in global mean surface air temperature T under the 1pctCO2 scenario (atmospheric CO 2 increasing at 1% yr −1 ) during the second doubling of CO 2 is 40% larger than the transient climate response (TCR), i.e. the increase in T during the first doubling. We identify four possible contributory effects. First, the surface climate system loses heat less readily into the ocean beneath as the latter warms. The model spread in the thermal coupling between the upper and deep ocean largely explains the model spread in ocean heat uptake efficiency. Second, CO 2 radiative forcing may rise more rapidly than logarithmically with CO 2 concentration. Third, the climate feedback parameter may decline as the CO 2 concentration rises. With CMIP5 data, we cannot distinguish the second and third possibilities. Fourth, the climate feedback parameter declines as time passes or T rises; in 1pctCO2, this effect is less important than the others. We find that T projected for the end of the twenty-first century correlates more highly with T at the time of quadrupled CO 2 in 1pctCO2 than with the TCR, and we suggest that the TCR may be underestimated from observed climate change.

Large ensemble assessment of how the global surface warming response to cumulative carbon differs for negative and positive carbon emissions  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Negar Vakilifard ◽  
Katherine Turner ◽  
Ric Williams ◽  
Philip Holden ◽  
Neil Edwards ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carbon Emissions ◽  
Radiative Forcing ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Climate Feedback ◽  
Climate Response ◽  
Ocean Heat Uptake ◽  
Transient Climate Response ◽  
Surface Warming ◽  
Radiative Processes ◽  
Negative Emission

<p>The controls of the effective transient climate response (TCRE), defined in terms of the dependence of surface warming since the pre-industrial to the cumulative carbon emission, is explained in terms of climate model experiments for a scenario including positive emissions and then negative emission over a period of 400 years. We employ a pre-calibrated ensemble of GENIE, grid-enabled integrated Earth system model, consisting of 86 members to determine the process of controlling TCRE in both CO<sub>2</sub> emissions and drawdown phases. Our results are based on the GENIE simulations with historical forcing from AD 850 including land use change, and the future forcing defined by CO<sub>2</sub> emissions and a non-CO<sub>2</sub> radiative forcing timeseries. We present the results for the point-source carbon capture and storage (CCS) scenario as a negative emission scenario, following the medium representative concentration pathway (RCP4.5), assuming that the rate of emission drawdown is 2 PgC/yr CO<sub>2</sub> for the duration of 100 years. The climate response differs between the periods of positive and negative carbon emissions with a greater ensemble spread during the negative carbon emissions. The controls of the spread in ensemble responses are explained in terms of a combination of thermal processes (involving ocean heat uptake and physical climate feedback), radiative processes (saturation in radiative forcing from CO<sub>2</sub> and non-CO<sub>2</sub> contributions) and carbon dependences (involving terrestrial and ocean carbon uptake).  </p>

scholarly journals Bayesian estimation of Earth's climate sensitivity and transient climate response from observational warming and heat content datasets

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 709-723
Author(s):  
Philip Goodwin ◽  
B. B. Cael
Keyword(s):  
Climate Sensitivity ◽  
Future Climate ◽  
Climate Feedback ◽  
Future Climate Change ◽  
Climate Projections ◽  
Climate Response ◽  
Ocean Heat Uptake ◽  
Transient Climate Response ◽  
Posterior Probability Distribution ◽  
The Impact

Abstract. Future climate change projections, impacts, and mitigation targets are directly affected by how sensitive Earth's global mean surface temperature is to anthropogenic forcing, expressed via the climate sensitivity (S) and transient climate response (TCR). However, the S and TCR are poorly constrained, in part because historic observations and future climate projections consider the climate system under different response timescales with potentially different climate feedback strengths. Here, we evaluate S and TCR by using historic observations of surface warming, available since the mid-19th century, and ocean heat uptake, available since the mid-20th century, to constrain a model with independent climate feedback components acting over multiple response timescales. Adopting a Bayesian approach, our prior uses a constrained distribution for the instantaneous Planck feedback combined with wide-ranging uniform distributions of the strengths of the fast feedbacks (acting over several days) and multi-decadal feedbacks. We extract posterior distributions by applying likelihood functions derived from different combinations of observational datasets. The resulting TCR distributions when using two preferred combinations of historic datasets both find a TCR of 1.5 (1.3 to 1.8 at 5–95 % range) ∘C. We find the posterior probability distribution for S for our preferred dataset combination evolves from S of 2.0 (1.6 to 2.5) ∘C on a 20-year response timescale to S of 2.3 (1.4 to 6.4) ∘C on a 140-year response timescale, due to the impact of multi-decadal feedbacks. Our results demonstrate how multi-decadal feedbacks allow a significantly higher upper bound on S than historic observations are otherwise consistent with.

scholarly journals Plant Physiology Increases the Magnitude and Spread of the Transient Climate Response to CO2 in CMIP6 Earth System Models

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (19) ◽  
pp. 8561-8578
Author(s):  
Claire M. Zarakas ◽  
Abigail L. S. Swann ◽  
Marysa M. Laguë ◽  
Kyle C. Armour ◽  
James T. Randerson
Keyword(s):  
Plant Physiology ◽  
Coupled Model ◽  
Surface Air Temperature ◽  
Physiological Effect ◽  
Climate Response ◽  
Earth System ◽  
Transient Climate Response ◽  
Near Surface ◽  
System Models ◽  
Earth System Models

AbstractIncreasing concentrations of CO2 in the atmosphere influence climate both through CO2’s role as a greenhouse gas and through its impact on plants. Plants respond to atmospheric CO2 concentrations in several ways that can alter surface energy and water fluxes and thus surface climate, including changes in stomatal conductance, water use, and canopy leaf area. These plant physiological responses are already embedded in most Earth system models, and a robust literature demonstrates that they can affect global-scale temperature. However, the physiological contribution to transient warming has yet to be assessed systematically in Earth system models. Here this gap is addressed using carbon cycle simulations from phases 5 and 6 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP) to isolate the radiative and physiological contributions to the transient climate response (TCR), which is defined as the change in globally averaged near-surface air temperature during the 20-yr window centered on the time of CO2 doubling relative to preindustrial CO2 concentrations. In CMIP6 models, the physiological effect contributes 0.12°C (σ: 0.09°C; range: 0.02°–0.29°C) of warming to the TCR, corresponding to 6.1% of the full TCR (σ: 3.8%; range: 1.4%–13.9%). Moreover, variation in the physiological contribution to the TCR across models contributes disproportionately more to the intermodel spread of TCR estimates than it does to the mean. The largest contribution of plant physiology to CO2-forced warming—and the intermodel spread in warming—occurs over land, especially in forested regions.

Tropospheric Adjustment Induces a Cloud Component in CO2 Forcing

2008 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 58-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Gregory ◽  
Mark Webb
Keyword(s):  
Radiative Forcing ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Surface Air Temperature ◽  
Co2 Concentration ◽  
Climate Feedback ◽  
Climate Projections ◽  
Feedback Parameter ◽  
Tropospheric Adjustment ◽  
Effective Radiative Forcing ◽  
Global Mean

Abstract The radiative forcing of CO2 and the climate feedback parameter are evaluated in several climate models with slab oceans by regressing the annual-mean global-mean top-of-atmosphere radiative flux against the annual-mean global-mean surface air temperature change ΔT following a doubling of atmospheric CO2 concentration. The method indicates that in many models there is a significant rapid tropospheric adjustment to CO2 leading to changes in cloud, and reducing the effective radiative forcing, in a way analogous to the indirect and semidirect effects of aerosol. By contrast, in most models the cloud feedback is small, defined as the part of the change that evolves with ΔT. Comparison with forcing evaluated by fixing sea surface conditions gives qualitatively similar results for the cloud components of forcing, both globally and locally. Tropospheric adjustment to CO2 may be responsible for some of the model spread in equilibrium climate sensitivity and could affect time-dependent climate projections.

scholarly journals Estimating the Permafrost-Carbon Climate Response in the CMIP5 Climate Models Using a Simplified Approach

2013 ◽  
Vol 26 (14) ◽  
pp. 4897-4909 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eleanor J. Burke ◽  
Chris D. Jones ◽  
Charles D. Koven
Keyword(s):  
Climate Change ◽  
Radiative Forcing ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Coupled Model ◽  
Climate Feedback ◽  
Cmip5 Models ◽  
Future Climate Change ◽  
Permafrost Region ◽  
Climate Response ◽  
Simplified Approach

Abstract Under climate change, thawing permafrost may cause a release of carbon, which has a positive feedback on the climate. The permafrost-carbon climate response (γPF) is the additional permafrost-carbon made vulnerable to decomposition per degree of global temperature increase. A simple framework was adopted to estimate γPF using the database for phase 5 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5). The projected changes in the annual maximum active layer thicknesses (ALTmax) over the twenty-first century were quantified using CMIP5 soil temperatures. These changes were combined with the observed distribution of soil organic carbon and its potential decomposability to give γPF. This estimate of γPF is dependent on the biases in the simulated present-day permafrost. This dependency was reduced by combining a reference estimate of the present-day ALTmax with an estimate of the sensitivity of ALTmax to temperature from the CMIP5 models. In this case, γPF was from −6 to −66 PgC K−1(5th–95th percentile) with a radiative forcing of 0.03–0.29 W m−2 K−1. This range is mainly caused by uncertainties in the amount of soil carbon deeper in the soil profile and whether it thaws over the time scales under consideration. These results suggest that including permafrost-carbon within climate models will lead to an increase in the positive global carbon climate feedback. Under future climate change the northern high-latitude permafrost region is expected to be a small sink of carbon. Adding the permafrost-carbon response is likely to change this region to a source of carbon.

scholarly journals Bayesian estimation of Earth’s climate sensitivity and transient climate response from observational warming and heat content datasets

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip Goodwin ◽  
B. B. Cael
Keyword(s):  
Climate Sensitivity ◽  
Heat Content ◽  
Future Climate ◽  
Climate Feedback ◽  
Future Climate Change ◽  
Climate Response ◽  
Ocean Heat Uptake ◽  
Transient Climate Response ◽  
Posterior Probability Distribution ◽  
Future Global Warming

Abstract. Future climate change projections, impacts and mitigation targets are directly affected by how sensitive Earth’s global mean surface temperature is to anthropogenic forcing, expressed via the effective climate sensitivity (ECS) and transient climate response (TCR). However, the ECS and TCR are poorly constrained, in part because historic observations and future climate projections consider the climate system under different response timescales with potentially different climate feedback strengths. Here, we evaluate ECS and TCR by using historic observations of surface warming, since the mid-19th century, and ocean heat uptake, since the mid 20th century, to constrain a model with independent climate feedback components acting over multiple response timescales. Adopting a Bayesian approach, our prior uses a constrained distribution for the instantaneous Planck feedback combined with wide-ranging uniform distributions of the strengths of the fast feedbacks (acting over several days) and slow feedbacks (acting over decades). We extract posterior distributions by applying likelihood functions derived from different combinations of observational datasets. The resulting TCR distributions are similar when using different historic datasets: from a TCR of 1.5 (1.3 to 1.7 at 5–95 % range) °C, up to 1.7 (1.4 to 2.0) °C. However, the posterior probability distribution for ECS on a 100-year response timescale varies depending on which combinations of temperature and heat content anomaly datasets are used: from ECS of 2.2 (1.5 to 4.5) °C, for datasets with less historic warming, up to 2.8 (1.8 to 6.1) °C, for datasets with more historic warming. Our results demonstrate how differences between historic climate reconstructions imply significant differences in expected future global warming.

scholarly journals An energy budget framework to understand mechanisms of land–ocean warming contrast induced by increasing greenhouse gases Part I: Near-equilibrium state

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-63
Author(s):  
Masaki Toda ◽  
Masahiro Watanabe ◽  
Masakazu Yoshimori
Keyword(s):  
Heat Capacity ◽  
Equilibrium State ◽  
Radiative Forcing ◽  
Energy Transport ◽  
Coupled Model ◽  
Surface Air Temperature ◽  
Ocean Warming ◽  
Climate Feedback ◽  
Energy Budgets ◽  
Effective Radiative Forcing

AbstractModeling studies have shown that surface air temperature (SAT) increase in response to an increase in the atmospheric CO2 concentration is larger over land than over ocean. This so-called land–ocean warming contrast, φ, defined as the land–mean SAT change divided by the ocean-mean SAT change, is a striking feature of global warming. Small heat capacity over land is unlikely the sole cause because the land-ocean warming contrast is found in the equilibrium state of CO2 doubling experiments.Several different mechanisms have been proposed to explain the land–ocean warming contrast, but the comprehensive understanding has not yet been obtained. In Part I of this study, we propose a framework to diagnose φ based on energy budgets at the top of atmosphere and for the atmosphere, which enables the decomposition of contributions from effective radiative forcing (ERF), climate feedback, heat capacity, and atmospheric energy transport anomaly to φ. Using this framework, we analyzed the SAT response to an abrupt CO2 quadrupling using 15 Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) Earth system models. In the near-equilibrium state (years 121-150), φ is 1.49 ± 0.11, which is primarily induced by the land–ocean difference in ERF and heat capacity. We found that contributions from ERF, feedback, and energy transport anomaly tend to cancel each other, leading to a small inter-model spread of φ compared to the large spread of individual components. In the equilibrium state without heat capacity contribution, ERF and energy transport anomaly are the major contributors to φ, which shows a weak negative correlation with the equilibrium climate sensitivity.

Controls of the Transient Climate Response to Emissions: effects of physical feedbacks, heat uptake and saturation of radiative forcing

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ric Williams ◽  
Paulo Ceppi ◽  
Anna Katavouta
Keyword(s):  
Carbon Emissions ◽  
Radiative Forcing ◽  
Carbon Emission ◽  
Atmospheric Co2 ◽  
Climate Response ◽  
Climate Feedbacks ◽  
Ocean Heat Uptake ◽  
Transient Climate Response ◽  
Surface Warming ◽  
Heat Uptake

<p>The surface warming response to carbon emissions, defines a climate metric, the Transient Climate Response to cumulative carbon Emissions (TCRE), which is important in estimating how much carbon may be emitted to avoid dangerous climate. The TCRE is diagnosed from a suite of 9 CMIP6 Earth system models following an annual 1% rise in atmospheric CO2 over 140 years.   The TCRE   is nearly constant in time during emissions for these climate models, but its value   differs between individual models. The near constancy of this climate metric is due to a strengthening in the surface warming per unit radiative forcing, involving a weakening in both the climate feedback parameter and   fraction of radiative forcing warming the ocean interior, which are compensated by a weakening in the radiative forcing per unit carbon emission from the radiative forcing saturating with increasing atmospheric CO2. Inter-model differences in the TCRE are mainly controlled by the   surface warming response to radiative forcing with large inter-model differences in physical climate feedbacks dominating over smaller, partly compensating differences in ocean heat uptake. Inter-model differences in the radiative forcing per unit carbon emission   provide smaller inter-model differences in the TCRE, which are mainly due to differences in the ratio of the radiative forcing and change in atmospheric CO2 rather than from differences in the airborne fraction.     Hence, providing tighter constraints in the climate projections for the TCRE during emissions requires improving estimates of the physical climate feedbacks,   the rate of ocean   heat uptake, and how the radiative forcing saturates with atmospheric CO2.</p>

scholarly journals Effects of Ocean Slow Response under Low Warming Targets

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 477-496 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shang-Min Long ◽  
Shang-Ping Xie ◽  
Yan Du ◽  
Qinyu Liu ◽  
Xiao-Tong Zheng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiative Forcing ◽  
Coupled Model ◽  
Deep Ocean ◽  
Ocean Warming ◽  
Meridional Overturning Circulation ◽  
Slow Response ◽  
Intercomparison Project ◽  
Meridional Overturning ◽  
Near Future

AbstractThe 2015 Paris Agreement proposed targets to limit global-mean surface temperature (GMST) rise well below 2°C relative to preindustrial level by 2100, requiring a cease in the radiative forcing (RF) increase in the near future. In response to changing RF, the deep ocean responds slowly (ocean slow response), in contrast to the fast ocean mixed layer adjustment. The role of the ocean slow response under low warming targets is investigated using representative concentration pathway (RCP) 2.6 simulations from phase 5 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project. In RCP2.6, the deep ocean continues to warm while RF decreases after reaching a peak. The deep ocean warming helps to shape the trajectories of GMST and fuels persistent thermosteric sea level rise. A diagnostic method is used to decompose further changes after the RF peak into a slow warming component under constant peak RF and a cooling component due to the decreasing RF. Specifically, the slow warming component amounts to 0.2°C (0.6°C) by 2100 (2300), raising the hurdle for achieving the low warming targets. When RF declines, the deep ocean warming takes place in all basins but is the most pronounced in the Southern Ocean and Atlantic Ocean where surface heat uptake is the largest. The climatology and change of meridional overturning circulation are both important for the deep ocean warming. To keep the GMST rise at a low level, substantial decrease in RF is required to offset the warming effect from the ocean slow response.

scholarly journals Description and basic evaluation of simulated mean state, internal variability, and climate sensitivity in MIROC6

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. 2727-2765 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroaki Tatebe ◽  
Tomoo Ogura ◽  
Tomoko Nitta ◽  
Yoshiki Komuro ◽  
Koji Ogochi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Climate Variability ◽  
Climate Sensitivity ◽  
Radiative Forcing ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Coupled Model ◽  
Climate Feedback ◽  
Climate Projections ◽  
Internal Climate Variability ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Mean Climate

Abstract. The sixth version of the Model for Interdisciplinary Research on Climate (MIROC), called MIROC6, was cooperatively developed by a Japanese modeling community. In the present paper, simulated mean climate, internal climate variability, and climate sensitivity in MIROC6 are evaluated and briefly summarized in comparison with the previous version of our climate model (MIROC5) and observations. The results show that the overall reproducibility of mean climate and internal climate variability in MIROC6 is better than that in MIROC5. The tropical climate systems (e.g., summertime precipitation in the western Pacific and the eastward-propagating Madden–Julian oscillation) and the midlatitude atmospheric circulation (e.g., the westerlies, the polar night jet, and troposphere–stratosphere interactions) are significantly improved in MIROC6. These improvements can be attributed to the newly implemented parameterization for shallow convective processes and to the inclusion of the stratosphere. While there are significant differences in climates and variabilities between the two models, the effective climate sensitivity of 2.6 K remains the same because the differences in radiative forcing and climate feedback tend to offset each other. With an aim towards contributing to the sixth phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project, designated simulations tackling a wide range of climate science issues, as well as seasonal to decadal climate predictions and future climate projections, are currently ongoing using MIROC6.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document