scholarly journals Generation of families of spectra in PT -symmetric quantum mechanics and scalar bosonic field theory

Author(s):  
Steffen Schmidt ◽  
S. P. Klevansky

This paper explains the systematics of the generation of families of spectra for the -symmetric quantum-mechanical Hamiltonians H = p 2 + x 2 (i x ) ϵ , H = p 2 +( x 2 ) δ and H = p 2 −( x 2 ) μ . In addition, it contrasts the results obtained with those found for a bosonic scalar field theory, in particular in one dimension, highlighting the similarities to and differences from the quantum-mechanical case. It is shown that the number of families of spectra can be deduced from the number of non-contiguous pairs of Stokes wedges that display symmetry. To do so, simple arguments that use the Wentzel–Kramers–Brillouin approximation are used, and these imply that the eigenvalues are real. However, definitive results are in most cases presently only obtainable numerically, and not all eigenvalues in each family may be real. Within the approximations used, it is illustrated that the difference between the quantum-mechanical and the field-theoretical cases lies in the number of accessible regions in which the eigenfunctions decay exponentially. This paper reviews and implements well-known techniques in complex analysis and -symmetric quantum theory.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sehban Kartal ◽  
Taha Koohrokhi ◽  
Ali Mohammadi

Abstract A quantum mechanical system with unbroken super-and parity-time (PT)-symmetry is derived and analyzed. Here, we propose a new formalism to construct the complex PT-symmetric superpartners by extending the additive shape invariant potentials to the complex domain. The probabilistic interpretation of a PT-symmetric quantum theory is correlated with the calculation of a new linear operator called the C operator, instead of complex conjugation in conventional quantum mechanics. At the present work, we introduce an anti-PT (A PT) conjugation to redefine a new version of the inner product without any additional considerations. This PT-supersymmetric quantum mechanics, satisfies essential requirements such as completeness, orthonormality as well as probabilistic interpretation.


2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (29) ◽  
pp. 1950177
Author(s):  
Won Sang Chung ◽  
Hassan Hassanabadi

In this paper, we extend the theory of the [Formula: see text]-deformed quantum mechanics in one dimension[Formula: see text] into three-dimensional case. We relate the [Formula: see text]-deformed quantum theory to the quantum theory in a curved space. We discuss the diagonal metric based on [Formula: see text]-addition in the Cartesian coordinate system and core radius of neutron star. We also discuss the diagonal metric based on [Formula: see text]-addition in the spherical coordinate system and [Formula: see text]-deformed Heisenberg atom model.


2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (12) ◽  
pp. 1750073 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Bazeia ◽  
F. S. Bemfica

In this work, we report a new result that appears when one investigates the route that starts from a scalar field theory and ends on a supersymmetric quantum mechanics. The subject has been studied before in several distinct ways and here, we unveil an interesting novelty, showing that the same scalar field model may describe distinct quantum mechanical problems.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Aaron C.H. Davey

The father of quantum mechanics, Erwin Schrodinger, was one of the most important figures in the development of quantum theory. He is perhaps best known for his contribution of the wave equation, which would later result in his winning of the Nobel Prize for Physics in 1933. The Schrodinger wave equation describes the quantum mechanical behaviour of particles and explores how the Schrodinger wave functions of a system change over time. This project is concerned about exploring the one-dimensional case of the Schrodinger wave equation in a harmonic oscillator system. We will give the solutions, called eigenfunctions, of the equation that satisfy certain conditions. Furthermore, we will show that this happens only for particular values called eigenvalues.


2010 ◽  
Vol 19 (14) ◽  
pp. 2379-2384 ◽  
Author(s):  
SUDARSHAN ANANTH

Three of the four forces of Nature are described by quantum Yang–Mills theories with remarkable precision. The fourth force, gravity, is described classically by the Einstein–Hilbert theory. There appears to be an inherent incompatibility between quantum mechanics and the Einstein–Hilbert theory which prevents us from developing a consistent quantum theory of gravity. The Einstein–Hilbert theory is therefore believed to differ greatly from Yang–Mills theory (which does have a sensible quantum mechanical description). It is therefore very surprising that these two theories actually share close perturbative ties. This essay focuses on these ties between Yang–Mills theory and the Einstein–Hilbert theory. We discuss the origin of these ties and their implications for a quantum theory of gravity.


Author(s):  
John Skilling ◽  
Kevin Knuth

The theories of quantum mechanics and relativity dramatically altered our understanding of the universe ushering in the era of modern physics. Quantum theory deals with objects probabilistically at small scales, whereas relativity deals classically with motion in space and time. We show here that the mathematical structures of quantum theory and of relativity follow together from pure thought, defined and uniquely constrained by the same elementary ``combining and sequencing'' symmetries that underlie standard arithmetic and probability. The key is uncertainty, which inevitably accompanies observation of quantity and imposes the use of pairs of numbers. The symmetries then lead directly to the use of complex \sqrt{-1} arithmetic, the standard calculus of quantum mechanics, and the Lorentz transformations of relativistic spacetime. One dimension of time and three dimensions of space are thus derived as the profound and inevitable framework of physics.


The development of the electron theory of metals from Drude’s free electron picture to Bloch’s quantum mechanical treatment of electrons in crystal lattices reflects in structure the evolution of quantum mechanics itself. As in that development, the steps leading to the quantum theory of metals may be divided into three periods: classical, 1900-26; semi-classical, 1926-8; and modern, late 1928 onwards. The classical period was dominated by the model of Drude and Lorentz in which a metal contained an ideal gas of conduction electrons governed by kinetic theory. Although the failures and contradictions of the model were strikingly apparent by World War I, few useful new concepts were added until Pauli’s crucial application in 1926 of Fermi-Dirac statistics to metals opened up the semi-classical period. In the following two years Sommerfeld, and others in his circle, by further application of the new statistics within the framework of the classical Drude-Lorentz theory, were able to resolve most of that theory’s outstanding difficulties. But it was not until Bloch’s paper in August 1928 that the full machinery of quantum mechanics, developed in 1925-6, was brought to bear on solids, thereby spearheading the creation between 1928 and 1933, by the first generation of theoretical solid-state physicists including Peierls, Wilson, Mott and others, of the modern quantum theory of solids.


Scientific realism has traditionally maintained that our best scientific theories can be regarded as more or less true and as representing the world as it is (more or less). However, one of our very best current theories—quantum mechanics—has famously resisted such a realist construal, threatening to undermine the realist stance altogether. The chapters in this volume carefully examine this tension and the reasons behind it, including the underdetermination generated by the multiplicity of formulations and interpretations of quantum physics, each presenting a different way the world could be. Authors in this volume offer a range of alternative ways forward: some suggest new articulations of realism, limiting our commitments in one way or another; others attempt to articulate a ‘third way’ between traditional forms of realism and antirealism, or are critical of such attempts. Still others argue that quantum theory itself should be reconceptualised, or at least alternative formulations should be considered in the hope of evading the problems faced by realism. And some examine the nature of these issues when moving beyond quantum mechanics to quantum field theory. Taken together they offer an exciting new set of perspectives on one of the most fundamental questions in the philosophy of modern physics: how can one be a realist about quantum theory, and what does this realism amount to?


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document